Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Modernizing Plastic Recycling: The Key to Unleashing American Manufacturing

Opinion

Modernizing Plastic Recycling: The Key to Unleashing American Manufacturing
blue labeled plastic bottles
Photo by tanvi sharma on Unsplash

Strengthening American manufacturing is a goal that Americans support across political persuasions and demographic groups, from the public to policymakers.

But, as with other topics, partisan and other interests propagate a stale, limited understanding of what is possible. “Either/or” thinking clouds the ability to weigh policy options that impact industries and derail debates. Witness what many present as a clash between a critical industry, such as plastic production, and the worthy goal of environmental protection.


Contrary to some perceptions, American manufacturing’s role in the economy has been an ongoing strength, at least in terms of output. The National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) notes that manufacturing alone employs more than 13 million Americans and generates more than $3 trillion annually for the domestic economy.

The innovations and resilience of modern manufacturers have enabled our country’s dominance on the global stage. Unfortunately, President Trump’s tariff regime has caused some setbacks—including the loss of American jobs every month since the proclaimed ‘liberation day’ announcements

The elimination of overly burdensome regulatory restrictions has been one benefit for American businesses overall, including manufacturers.

Yet to fully reap the benefits, America needs more of one critical manufacturing input: plastic. This may surprise many, given that plastic is typically perceived as a manufacturing byproduct, and because of increasing grievances from some circles aimed at plastic’s very existence. Categorically demonizing plastic has undoubtedly been on the rise.

Thanks to its versatility, affordability, durability, and lightweight nature, plastic has established itself as the anchor of domestic manufacturing. According to industry estimates, more than a quarter of American manufacturing output comes from sectors in which plastic accounts for more than 5 percent of material inputs.

And plastic is integral not just to manufacturing as an industry itself but to all the industries that utilize products made with it: healthcare, biotechnology, aerospace engineering, food storage, and transportation are but a few. Downstream industries support almost five million onshore jobs, paying out nearly $400 billion in wages annually. With plastic so interwoven across sectors, demand will continue to rise.

Of course, there are challenges and important questions about the proper and responsible use of plastics. Americans largely want to be responsible environmental stewards. A constructive, forward-thinking approach would be for Congress to make policy changes that meet the growing demand in a sustainable way.

Thankfully, there are a couple of common-sense reforms that policymakers can take to increase domestic plastic production and fully unleash American manufacturing innovation.

First, lawmakers should modernize outdated recycling regulations. They should acknowledge new and innovative forms of recycling that past rules could not anticipate, provide greater regulatory certainty, and yield better results. This is one of the stated goals of the recently introduced Recycling Technology Innovation Act.

Advanced recycling is a modern technology that chemically breaks down hard-to-recycle plastics at the molecular level, enabling them to be continually reused. The process transforms used plastics into high-quality food- and pharmaceutical-grade plastics, rather than generating waste—a process that is much closer to manufacturing regulations than to waste disposal.

This process would sound like science fiction not long ago. Harnessing the technology at a commercial scale stands to yield tremendous benefits: more material being reused and recycled, which is better for the environment, and moving us toward a more circular economy.

Second, Congress should pass prudent federal legislation that would establish national standards for plastic recycling. For far too long, American recyclers have worked under a patchwork of often contradictory sets of state rules that have created confusion and made it difficult for manufacturers to properly source recycled plastic for reuse.

Having national standards would clarify definitions of what constitutes recycling and recycled content, and expand recycling infrastructure in American communities.

A recent analysis from the American Chemistry Council and America’s Plastics Makers found that if just 50% of plastics in the municipal solid waste stream were redirected from landfills to recycling facilities, the U.S. could gain an estimated 173,200 jobs, $12.8 billion in annual payroll, and $48.7 billion in additional annual economic output.

The role of plastic in domestic manufacturing and the economy is nearly impossible to unravel. But if policymakers tackle the challenges in a considered way, streamlining and modernizing the regulations surrounding plastic recycling, there is tremendous upside.

A framework that allows American manufacturing and recycling to thrive together and can help continue American manufacturing strength while also advancing a more circular and sustainable economy.

Mario H. Lopez is the President of the Hispanic Leadership Fund, a public policy advocacy organization that promotes liberty, opportunity, and prosperity for all.


Read More

A drone view of dry land with trees around and a lake near the center.

After the Central Oregon Irrigation District delivered water to landowners near Redmond, Oregon, in July 2025, what’s left pooled in a silty pond where it eventually drained away or evaporated. The district said it has 24 ponds that catch water at the ends of its system.

Brandon Swanson/OPB

An Oregon Law Lets One Wealthy Region Turn the Desert Green. When Drought Hits, Farmers Pay the Price.

Chris Casad awakens each day before dawn on the Central Oregon property he bought nine years ago, the farm where he once grew tons of potatoes before water shortages forced him to fallow fields and take a job feeding someone else’s cattle on someone else’s land.

At 38, he’s got tractors older than he is. His two kids are under 5. His wife, Cate, has two jobs. They’re staring down a pile of debt from their 85 acres and its unending supply of things in the process of breaking.

Keep ReadingShow less
Latino Workers Need Stronger OSHA Protections

healthcare worker

Latino Workers Need Stronger OSHA Protections

Across California and the U.S., thousands of employees working in sterilization facilities, medical device distribution centers, and other industrial environments are exposed to a chemical that poses significant long-term health risks. Ethylene oxide (EtO) is used to sterilize nearly half of the medical devices in healthcare, making it indispensable. Yet the mounting evidence of its danger to those who handle it can no longer be dismissed.

What makes this especially alarming is that the risk does not stop at the facility fence. In California, emissions from EtO sterilization plants drift into surrounding neighborhoods, reaching schools, childcare centers, and homes. Many of these facilities are located near lower-income communities and communities of color, and as a result, Latino workers and families are often among those most heavily exposed. For these communities, this is not an abstract policy debate. It is a matter of environmental justice, public health, and the basic right to a safe workplace and a safe neighborhood.

Keep ReadingShow less
Plumes of smoke rise over the oil depot tanks hit by joint Israel-U.S.

Plumes of smoke rise over the oil depot tanks hit by joint Israel-U.S. over night in a station north west of the capital on March 8, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. The United States and Israel continued their joint attack on Iran that began on February 28.

Kaveh Kazemi / Getty Images

Russia is Winning the War in Iran. Earth is Losing

As the United States falls behind in the great power competition, climate change is providing economic and military advantages to our geopolitical rivals and destabilizing the world. We are outgunned and outmanned, and global warming will only exacerbate the issue. The war in Iran is now accelerating climate change to a level that will have devastating consequences on the human race and our planet, while ultimately benefiting our adversaries. As President Trump puts off making a deal with Iran, Russia, especially, is in a position to reap the benefits and gain a tactical edge. The Department of Defense (DOD) used to talk a bit about these environmental threats, but most Americans do not understand how dire the situation is. We should be yelling.

The increasing volatility of climate change pushes our world more rapidly towards global conflict every day. Heat domes, massive fires, and lethal floods all over the world signal “mayday.” The DOD used to call climate change a national security priority, “integrating climate considerations into policies, strategies and partner engagements.” Former Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin used to say that “no nation can find lasting security without addressing the climate crisis,” one of the only threats that “truly deserve[s] to be called existential.” Natural resources have been a frequent source of armed conflicts for millennia; future conflict will only intensify as these resources are reduced at a rapidly increasing rate.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Best Utility Is a Public Utility
black and white electric meter
Photo by Jon Moore on Unsplash

The Best Utility Is a Public Utility

Utilities are boring until the power goes out. US Census data shows that one in three households struggles to pay their energy bills, resulting in millions of electricity shut-offs each year. Poor management by electric companies leads to more outages and wildfires. At the same time, many of us feel that we have little say in energy decisions that affect us. In Utah, the recent approval of a data center twice the size of Manhattan has left residents struggling with the real cost of growing electricity demand—on the environment and on our wallets.

Often overlooked in the conversation about cost is the fact that most of our utility sector is run for profit. There is a better way. I’m a public power organizer in New York’s Hudson Valley, and people like me from St. Petersburg, Florida, to Ann Arbor, Michigan, are fighting to take control of our investor-owned utilities and turn them public. Making electricity not-for-profit and community-owned means lower bills for customers and more say in our shared resources.

Keep ReadingShow less