Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Modernizing Plastic Recycling: The Key to Unleashing American Manufacturing

Opinion

Modernizing Plastic Recycling: The Key to Unleashing American Manufacturing
blue labeled plastic bottles
Photo by tanvi sharma on Unsplash

Strengthening American manufacturing is a goal that Americans support across political persuasions and demographic groups, from the public to policymakers.

But, as with other topics, partisan and other interests propagate a stale, limited understanding of what is possible. “Either/or” thinking clouds the ability to weigh policy options that impact industries and derail debates. Witness what many present as a clash between a critical industry, such as plastic production, and the worthy goal of environmental protection.


Contrary to some perceptions, American manufacturing’s role in the economy has been an ongoing strength, at least in terms of output. The National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) notes that manufacturing alone employs more than 13 million Americans and generates more than $3 trillion annually for the domestic economy.

The innovations and resilience of modern manufacturers have enabled our country’s dominance on the global stage. Unfortunately, President Trump’s tariff regime has caused some setbacks—including the loss of American jobs every month since the proclaimed ‘liberation day’ announcements

The elimination of overly burdensome regulatory restrictions has been one benefit for American businesses overall, including manufacturers.

Yet to fully reap the benefits, America needs more of one critical manufacturing input: plastic. This may surprise many, given that plastic is typically perceived as a manufacturing byproduct, and because of increasing grievances from some circles aimed at plastic’s very existence. Categorically demonizing plastic has undoubtedly been on the rise.

Thanks to its versatility, affordability, durability, and lightweight nature, plastic has established itself as the anchor of domestic manufacturing. According to industry estimates, more than a quarter of American manufacturing output comes from sectors in which plastic accounts for more than 5 percent of material inputs.

And plastic is integral not just to manufacturing as an industry itself but to all the industries that utilize products made with it: healthcare, biotechnology, aerospace engineering, food storage, and transportation are but a few. Downstream industries support almost five million onshore jobs, paying out nearly $400 billion in wages annually. With plastic so interwoven across sectors, demand will continue to rise.

Of course, there are challenges and important questions about the proper and responsible use of plastics. Americans largely want to be responsible environmental stewards. A constructive, forward-thinking approach would be for Congress to make policy changes that meet the growing demand in a sustainable way.

Thankfully, there are a couple of common-sense reforms that policymakers can take to increase domestic plastic production and fully unleash American manufacturing innovation.

First, lawmakers should modernize outdated recycling regulations. They should acknowledge new and innovative forms of recycling that past rules could not anticipate, provide greater regulatory certainty, and yield better results. This is one of the stated goals of the recently introduced Recycling Technology Innovation Act.

Advanced recycling is a modern technology that chemically breaks down hard-to-recycle plastics at the molecular level, enabling them to be continually reused. The process transforms used plastics into high-quality food- and pharmaceutical-grade plastics, rather than generating waste—a process that is much closer to manufacturing regulations than to waste disposal.

This process would sound like science fiction not long ago. Harnessing the technology at a commercial scale stands to yield tremendous benefits: more material being reused and recycled, which is better for the environment, and moving us toward a more circular economy.

Second, Congress should pass prudent federal legislation that would establish national standards for plastic recycling. For far too long, American recyclers have worked under a patchwork of often contradictory sets of state rules that have created confusion and made it difficult for manufacturers to properly source recycled plastic for reuse.

Having national standards would clarify definitions of what constitutes recycling and recycled content, and expand recycling infrastructure in American communities.

A recent analysis from the American Chemistry Council and America’s Plastics Makers found that if just 50% of plastics in the municipal solid waste stream were redirected from landfills to recycling facilities, the U.S. could gain an estimated 173,200 jobs, $12.8 billion in annual payroll, and $48.7 billion in additional annual economic output.

The role of plastic in domestic manufacturing and the economy is nearly impossible to unravel. But if policymakers tackle the challenges in a considered way, streamlining and modernizing the regulations surrounding plastic recycling, there is tremendous upside.

A framework that allows American manufacturing and recycling to thrive together and can help continue American manufacturing strength while also advancing a more circular and sustainable economy.

Mario H. Lopez is the President of the Hispanic Leadership Fund, a public policy advocacy organization that promotes liberty, opportunity, and prosperity for all.


Read More

Students sitting at a table listening to a speaker.

Tucson youth members of the Arizona Youth Climate Coalition listen as Rep. Adelita Grijalva talks about the importance of youth voices on the issue of climate change and extreme heat. More than a dozen Arizona youth met with Representative Adelita Grijalva and Ward 5 council member Selina Barajas on Tuesday, at El Pueblo Activity Center in Tucson, to share some of their concerns about climate change, as well as some of the work they are already doing to address these issues.

Credit: Stephanie Casanova

Arizona Youth Tell Lawmakers: Climate Change Can’t Wait

When Carmen De Backer was a toddler, she would sit on the couch staring at photos of wildlife in the worn pages of National Geographic magazines her mom bought at the thrift store. She couldn’t read the articles so she would ask her older sisters to tell her about the wildlife in the photos.

That’s where her love for and curiosity about nature started.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Utah’s H.B. 222 Set the Stage for State-level Climate Liability Shields
A factory with smoke coming out of it
Photo by Anthony Maw on Unsplash

How Utah’s H.B. 222 Set the Stage for State-level Climate Liability Shields

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Background

Keep ReadingShow less
Latino Voters Raise Alarms Over AI Data Centers’ Water, Energy, and Pollution Impacts

environmental justice

AI generated

Latino Voters Raise Alarms Over AI Data Centers’ Water, Energy, and Pollution Impacts

A new national poll finds Latino voters increasingly concerned about the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) data centers — especially when those facilities are built near their communities. The survey, conducted by Blue Rose Research for Climate Power En Acción, shows strong opposition to data‑center development tied to rising utility costs, water shortages, and pollution.

According to the poll, 58% of Latino voters oppose building AI data centers near residential areas when the question is framed around higher electricity bills, compared to just 18% who support it. Concerns remain high even when the focus shifts to water usage: 56% oppose construction if it risks reducing local water supplies.

Keep ReadingShow less
Red rock formations in the "Valley of the Gods."

Red rock formations in the "Valley of the Gods" on April 22, 2026 in Bears Ears National Monument, Utah. Bears Ears has been a controversial Monument since it's creation in December of 2016.

George Frey / Getty Images

When Public Lands Become Real Estate

Last week, in his latest attempted liquidation of our shared heritage, President Trump signed two executive orders eviscerating protections for close to three million acres of our national monuments: Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante. From the Oval Office, a president who has never even seen these sacred sites reduced them by roughly 90%, dwarfing his 2017 attempt at a similar land grab by about a million acres, leaving only 300,000 acres of protected land. These cuts will directly threaten critical wildlife habitats, put nearly 100,000 irreplaceable archaeological sites at risk of destruction, and fracture an interconnected indigenous homeland that has been stewarded by Native tribes since time immemorial. To Trump, it’s just another real estate deal.

The Trump regime has tried to portray this set-up to sell off as an effort to restore public access. During the Oval Office photo op where the president signed the proclamations, he said of the monuments: “You can’t go hunting. You can’t go fishing. You can’t do anything. You can virtually not even walk on it.” That is, to put it mildly, a malicious lie. All your favorite forms of outdoor recreation—from hiking and camping to fishing and hunting—are allowed there, which Trump might know if he had ever visited the land he decided is not worth preserving. In fact, the Antiquities Act doesn’t limit ordinary public use but rather the extent to which an area can be subject to mining and drilling. So much for the land of the free. Trump wants to make it a whole lot easier for extractive industries and private development interests to privatize and pillage these sacred lands for financial gain. Home of the brave? Not an ounce of courage to refuse the fuel lobby when it comes to our public lands. At least the law is on our side. As the President of the National Parks Conservation Association put it, this is both “a betrayal to the American people and illegal.”

Keep ReadingShow less