Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Modernizing Plastic Recycling: The Key to Unleashing American Manufacturing

Opinion

Modernizing Plastic Recycling: The Key to Unleashing American Manufacturing
blue labeled plastic bottles
Photo by tanvi sharma on Unsplash

Strengthening American manufacturing is a goal that Americans support across political persuasions and demographic groups, from the public to policymakers.

But, as with other topics, partisan and other interests propagate a stale, limited understanding of what is possible. “Either/or” thinking clouds the ability to weigh policy options that impact industries and derail debates. Witness what many present as a clash between a critical industry, such as plastic production, and the worthy goal of environmental protection.


Contrary to some perceptions, American manufacturing’s role in the economy has been an ongoing strength, at least in terms of output. The National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) notes that manufacturing alone employs more than 13 million Americans and generates more than $3 trillion annually for the domestic economy.

The innovations and resilience of modern manufacturers have enabled our country’s dominance on the global stage. Unfortunately, President Trump’s tariff regime has caused some setbacks—including the loss of American jobs every month since the proclaimed ‘liberation day’ announcements

The elimination of overly burdensome regulatory restrictions has been one benefit for American businesses overall, including manufacturers.

Yet to fully reap the benefits, America needs more of one critical manufacturing input: plastic. This may surprise many, given that plastic is typically perceived as a manufacturing byproduct, and because of increasing grievances from some circles aimed at plastic’s very existence. Categorically demonizing plastic has undoubtedly been on the rise.

Thanks to its versatility, affordability, durability, and lightweight nature, plastic has established itself as the anchor of domestic manufacturing. According to industry estimates, more than a quarter of American manufacturing output comes from sectors in which plastic accounts for more than 5 percent of material inputs.

And plastic is integral not just to manufacturing as an industry itself but to all the industries that utilize products made with it: healthcare, biotechnology, aerospace engineering, food storage, and transportation are but a few. Downstream industries support almost five million onshore jobs, paying out nearly $400 billion in wages annually. With plastic so interwoven across sectors, demand will continue to rise.

Of course, there are challenges and important questions about the proper and responsible use of plastics. Americans largely want to be responsible environmental stewards. A constructive, forward-thinking approach would be for Congress to make policy changes that meet the growing demand in a sustainable way.

Thankfully, there are a couple of common-sense reforms that policymakers can take to increase domestic plastic production and fully unleash American manufacturing innovation.

First, lawmakers should modernize outdated recycling regulations. They should acknowledge new and innovative forms of recycling that past rules could not anticipate, provide greater regulatory certainty, and yield better results. This is one of the stated goals of the recently introduced Recycling Technology Innovation Act.

Advanced recycling is a modern technology that chemically breaks down hard-to-recycle plastics at the molecular level, enabling them to be continually reused. The process transforms used plastics into high-quality food- and pharmaceutical-grade plastics, rather than generating waste—a process that is much closer to manufacturing regulations than to waste disposal.

This process would sound like science fiction not long ago. Harnessing the technology at a commercial scale stands to yield tremendous benefits: more material being reused and recycled, which is better for the environment, and moving us toward a more circular economy.

Second, Congress should pass prudent federal legislation that would establish national standards for plastic recycling. For far too long, American recyclers have worked under a patchwork of often contradictory sets of state rules that have created confusion and made it difficult for manufacturers to properly source recycled plastic for reuse.

Having national standards would clarify definitions of what constitutes recycling and recycled content, and expand recycling infrastructure in American communities.

A recent analysis from the American Chemistry Council and America’s Plastics Makers found that if just 50% of plastics in the municipal solid waste stream were redirected from landfills to recycling facilities, the U.S. could gain an estimated 173,200 jobs, $12.8 billion in annual payroll, and $48.7 billion in additional annual economic output.

The role of plastic in domestic manufacturing and the economy is nearly impossible to unravel. But if policymakers tackle the challenges in a considered way, streamlining and modernizing the regulations surrounding plastic recycling, there is tremendous upside.

A framework that allows American manufacturing and recycling to thrive together and can help continue American manufacturing strength while also advancing a more circular and sustainable economy.

Mario H. Lopez is the President of the Hispanic Leadership Fund, a public policy advocacy organization that promotes liberty, opportunity, and prosperity for all.


Read More

Supreme Court weighs pipeline deadline fight with stakes far beyond the Straits of Mackinac

Supreme Court of the United States

Cayla Labgold-Carroll

Supreme Court weighs pipeline deadline fight with stakes far beyond the Straits of Mackinac

WASHINGTON – A dispute over a missed court filing deadline landed before the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 24, but legal scholars warned the decision could reshape whether federal or state courts get to decide the fate of major energy projects, and whether states retain meaningful power to enforce their own environmental laws.

The case, Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel, asks whether federal courts have the authority to waive a 30-day deadline for removing a case from state to federal court. While the case is procedural, the flexibility Enbridge requested could allow companies to pick the court they prefer.

Keep Reading Show less
Plastic Is Flowing Into the Great Lakes—and Into Us

Rainbow Beach cleanup effort.

Loyd DeGrane

Plastic Is Flowing Into the Great Lakes—and Into Us

Plastic pollution, so evident along Great Lakes shorelines – is increasingly found in the water and fish. Peer-reviewed studies have detected microplastics—tiny fragments shed from consumer products, industrial waste, and synthetic clothing—in Lake Michigan and the other Great Lakes.

The findings raise urgent questions about what everyday plastic use is sending into the lake and the millions of people who rely on it.

Keep Reading Show less
East Wing's Demolition Highlights U.S. Construction Waste Problem

An excavator works to clear rubble after the East Wing of the White House was demolished on October 23, 2025 in Washington, DC. The demolition is part of U.S. President Donald Trump's plan to build a multimillion-dollar ballroom on the eastern side of the White House.

Getty Images, Eric Lee

East Wing's Demolition Highlights U.S. Construction Waste Problem

Last December, the National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration for demolishing the East Wing of the White House for Trump’s $300 million ballroom. While the destruction alarmed historians and preservationists, angered political opponents, and may prove illegal, it’s also emblematic of a key issue with modern construction: the waste problem.

We don’t know how much waste was produced by the East Wing’s demolition, but there are suspicions that debris may have been dumped in Maryland while the dirt is being piled up in a local golf course. There is also substantial concern that it may contain asbestos, potentially endangering workers and the public.

Keep Reading Show less
Trump’s EPA Decides Climate Change Doesn’t Endanger Public Health – the Evidence Says Otherwise

Rising global temperatures are increasing the risk of heat stroke on hot days, among many other human harms.

Trump’s EPA Decides Climate Change Doesn’t Endanger Public Health – the Evidence Says Otherwise

The Trump administration took a major step in its efforts to unravel America’s climate policies on Feb. 12, 2026, when it moved to rescind the 2009 endangerment finding – a formal determination that six greenhouse gases that drive climate change, including carbon dioxide and methane from burning fossil fuels, endanger public health and welfare.

But the administration’s arguments in dismissing the health risks of climate change are not only factually wrong, they’re deeply dangerous to Americans’ health and safety.

Keep Reading Show less