Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Trump Has Betrayed the Troops Again

Opinion

A stethoscope on top of the uniform a U.S. military solider.

New VA rules could reduce disability compensation for millions of veterans while staffing cuts hit healthcare services, sparking warnings from lawmakers and veterans groups.

Getty Images, Cunaplus_M.Faba

It is old news that President Trump neglects and disrespects veterans, but now, as he engages in a new war, he is maliciously targeting them. Veterans compose 30% of the federal workforce; by this time last year, the draft dodger who referred to fallen American soldiers as ‘losers’ and ‘suckers’ had fired nearly 6,000 veterans. Now, Trump is coming after their disability ratings, putting millions of prior service members at risk of losing benefits. According to VoteVets, an organization advocating for troops, veterans, and their families, “The Trump administration…see[s] our newest veterans as a piggy bank. They are prepared to gut their veteran benefits to pay for all their giveaways to the wealthiest Americans and corporations.” Trump’s regime made the change behind closed doors, which is nonstandard, and now VA Secretary Collins claims this change “will have no impact on any Veteran’s current disability rating.” He’s lying. If you didn’t think Trump could possibly stoop so low as to rob veterans, think again.

In January, Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee Ranking Member Richard Blumenthal sounded the alarm: “The Trump administration is literally destroying the Veterans Administrationhe Trump administration is literally destroying the Veterans Administration.” This followed the release of a report on the damage Trump’s policies and budget cuts have had on veterans (e.g., in only a year, 40,000 employees were fired from the VA, 80% of them in health care). More and more, veterans have been speaking out about the unconstitutional actions of this government, and now they’re having their benefits slashed. What happened to “Thank you for your service”?


The playbook comes right out of Project 2025. Trump wants to privatize veterans’ healthcare, make it easier to replace dissenters on staff, and make it harder to remove loyalists. The Senate’s report states plainly in its introduction: “the chaos and corruption of the Trump Administration is deliberate and purposeful…[V]eterans are increasingly paying the price for this Administration’s self-sabotage… hard-working, talented VA employees are demoralized and exhausted by the malice and incompetence of their leadership.” As a new veteran, I feel disappointed and betrayed. As an American, I feel disgusted and ashamed.

Again, Trump’s VA just amended a rule that provides the basis for evaluating veterans’ disabilities in a way that is likely to slash compensation for millions of former service members. The new rule directs the VA to evaluate the severity of a disability claim after medication, which will do nothing but reduce the compensation veterans are owed for the injuries and ailments they suffer from due to their military service. Worse still, it could scare veterans into avoiding life-improving medication, which presents a brand new and imminent risk to veterans’ physical and mental health. Meanwhile, this past year, Palantir brought in $1.5 billion and paid literally nothing in federal income tax. They should have paid $330 million. Trump is giving billionaires a tax break on the backs of American heroes.

Serving in the military is physically, mentally, and emotionally demanding. Patriotism alone is often not enough to compel a young person to sign up for that kind of lifestyle—but financial necessity can be. In fact, according to Jorge Mariscol, the term “poverty draft” refers to the belief that the enlisted ranks have been largely filled by young people with limited economic opportunities. William Ayers wrote in 2005: “The nation’s high schools have thus become battlefields for the hearts and minds of young people…recruiters dangle gifts and promises of future benefits before teenagers in an effort to fill the ranks of an all-volunteer military.” Now, those future benefits are in jeopardy.

How dare this government shirk its responsibility to take care of veterans. Already, 71% of the Department of Defense’s budget is spent on government contracts (over $430 billion) while only 27% is spent on personnel salaries; Lockheed Martin alone got over $61 billion in Defense contracts in FY23, while around 25% of active-duty service members are experiencing food insecurity. Once they get out of the military, it gets worse: nearly 13% of unhoused adults are veterans, 51% of them have disabilities, 50% have serious mental illness, 70% have substance abuse problems, and the suicide rate for veterans is 1.5 times higher than that of the general population. Among women, the rate is 2.5 times.

This is an utter disservice to the country and those who were ready to die for it. Even years ago, when President Biden was working on relieving student debt, multiple members of Congress came out and said the quiet part out loud: “The armed services have often used educational benefits as a top incentive in the recruitment process, and now that is gone,” “[cutting the legs] out from underneath them,” “weaken[ing] our most powerful recruiting tool at the precise moment we are experiencing a crisis in military recruiting.” For ages, the grand plan for recruitment into our armed forces has offered little more than, “we’ll take care of you, and we’re the only ones who will.” Now the VA is experiencing the largest decline in staffing in the agent’s history, and many wonder if it can survive another three years with Trump.

Obviously, dismantling the VA is a slap in the face to everyone who has already served. To do it while war with Iran loomed, in anticipation of a potential influx of new veterans with serious needs, should be criminal. Gutting the department means significantly longer wait times, fewer appointments, and less access to healthcare and other services. And threatening disability benefits feels cruel and unusual–even if it ends up just being a threat. Everyone in this country deserves care. But when working-class Americans have been risking their lives for a foot in the door to a better life in a rigged system, they better be taken care of on the outside. We must pay attention. We must care. We can’t let Trump get away with turning his back on those who served. Call your reps and stand up for the vets. They’ve earned it.

Julie Roland was a Naval Officer for ten years, deploying to both the South China Sea and the Persian Gulf as a helicopter pilot before separating in June 2025 as a Lieutenant Commander. She has a law degree from the University of San Diego, a Master of Laws from Columbia University, and is a member of the Truman National Security Project.


Read More

Historical documents representing founding principles of United States on flag backdrop

As the US Constitution turns 250, one expert argues it was designed as an antidote to tyranny — and warns that antidote is now at risk.

photovs/Getty Images

Why the Constitution Remains Our Defense Against Tyranny

There are many analogies for constitutions, for example, a social contract, a blueprint, a roadmap. But as we mark the 250th birthday of the United States of America, I propose another: constitution as antidote.

Constitutions are always intentionally and carefully designed, more often than not as antidotes to heal and ward off ills that a country wishes - or existentially needs - to avoid. This is, and has historically been, true all around the world, although the study of how constitutions and constitutional change can address root causes of conflict and instability has evolved greatly, allowing us to harness their healing power more effectively.

Keep ReadingShow less
A rose stands on the 9/11 Memorial for the North Tower in front of 3 and 4 World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

A rose stands on the 9/11 Memorial for the North Tower in front of 3 and 4 World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

Gary Hershorn/Getty Images

The 9/11 Town Hall That Helped Rebuild Ground Zero—and Democracy

As the nation and the world pause this week to honor and reflect on the 25th Anniversary of the terrorist attack that brought down the twin towers of the World Trade Center and killed more than 3,000 people, I am moved to share a very personal reflection.

After serving as Chief of Staff to Governor Celeste of Ohio and in the Clinton-Gore Administration, where I experienced firsthand how the major institutions in our country interact to favor the powerful over we the people, I became deeply concerned about the health of our democracy. It was clear to me that, beyond voting and national polling, the American people were not at the table to influence the decisions that most affect their lives.

Keep ReadingShow less
People casting their ballots.

Voters cast their ballots at the Buckhead Library for the primary runoff election on June 16, 2026 in Atlanta, Georgia.

Jessica McGowan/Getty Images

Bridgers in the House Face Disproportionate Headwinds in the Midterms

Congressional collaboration on Capitol Hill has become a lost art.

At Bridge Grades, we compile non-partisan 3rd party data to rank members of Congress on how collaboratively (or divisively) they govern. Our thesis is that a more collaborative and bipartisan Congress benefits Americans through a healthier Legislative Branch, stronger checks-and-balances, and more win-win legislation in our common interests.

Keep ReadingShow less
Women walks by voting booths.

People vote in New York's primary elections at an armory and YMCA in Brooklyn on June 23, 2026, in New York City.

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Surging Socialists: A Warning for Democrats

Something is happening in the Democratic Party that is making party leaders and media pundits take notice. It became impossible to ignore with Zohran Mamdani’s 2025 election as mayor of New York City. Now comes Angie Nixon’s stunning victory in Florida’s Democratic Senate primary, where she defeated an establishment opponent who outspent her by more than ten to one.

Candidates challenging capitalism are finding a receptive audience, especially among younger Democrats. They are no longer easily dismissed as isolated insurgents in liberal enclaves, though their victories do not mean socialists are taking over the party.

Keep ReadingShow less