Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

America at 250: Will We Learn from Our Past?

Opinion

A document representing the Declaration of Independence.

As trust in institutions declines, America’s 250th anniversary offers a chance to rediscover the civic lessons, leadership principles, and democratic values that sustain a republic.

Getty Images

We call it the American Experiment. Yet too often we celebrate it without studying it, invoke it without interrogating it, and inherit it without improving it. A republic designed to learn from experience cannot afford to ignore its own lessons from history.

As the United States approaches the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, the country faces a deeper question than how to celebrate its founding. Do we still know how to learn from it?


The anniversary arrives at a moment of deep uncertainty. Trust in institutions is low. Civic knowledge is thin. Our politics often reward immediacy over reflection. And yet the challenges we face concerning division, leadership, and self-government are not entirely new. They are the recurring tests of a diverse, democratic republic.

But if we have faced these tests before, why don’t we seem to remember how we met them?

A choice is before us. This can be a moment of nostalgia or a moment of learning and renewal. It can be a celebration of what was, or a serious effort to recover the habits of mind that sustain a republic.

At Monticellothe home of Thomas Jefferson and a place where ideals were both declared and testedan alliance of 44 Presidential Centers and civic organizations gathered in 2024 with a single purpose: to ensure that this anniversary accomplished something more than commemoration. 2026 must challenge us as citizens to analyze our past to inform the future. From that meeting, the In Pursuit initiative was born as a solution to the problem.

It became clear that the place to begin was the presidency—not focusing on politics or partisanship, but as a long-standing case study in democratic leadership under pressure. Presidents and first ladies have confronted issues of war and peace, expansion and fracture, moral crisis and disunion. Collectively, their experiences offer a rare perspective over time.

What distinguishes their most enduring contributions is not the offices they held, but the character they demonstrated: patience in uncertainty, discipline in crisis, the modesty to listen, and the resilience to endure. These are not abstract principles or virtues. They are the pragmatic foundations for democratic leadership, relevant to all of us, no matter our station in life.

That is why In Pursuit gathered leading historians, journalists, and public figures to distill lessons from these historically recognizable figures. The lessons they have identified are meant not for unquestioned admiration, but for application.

George W. Bush reminds us, through the example of George Washington, that leadership’s greatest strength is not bravado but humility. Joseph Ellis points to Abigail Adams as proof that enduring change requires both courage and patience, often in unequal measure. Jack Rakove draws from James Madison the enduring wisdom that process, not perfection, sustains legitimacy in a republic.

Each week of the project, a new lesson emerges—not as a relic of the past, but as a guide for the present. History is not a set of perfect models. It provides us with examples of wisdom, failure, and consequence. The most instructive moments are not always the triumphs. The tension between principle versus pragmatism or restraint versus action is where we can learn from our past leaders.

The stories being told aren’t meant to remain on the page. They are being carried into classrooms, libraries, civic forums, podcasts, and communities across the nation. Through teachers and scholars, through historians and citizens, these lessons are reaching millions, inviting citizens to engage with our past, not as passive spectators but as participants in an ongoing American experiment.

When Jefferson wrote about the “pursuit of Happiness” in the Declaration, he did not describe a solitary quest. He described a shared endeavor—a recognition that individual flourishing is inseparable from the well-being of others. Happiness, in the American sense, is not only a right; it is a responsibility. Ultimately, happiness is a cooperative enterprise we help each other achieve. That requires learning and thoughtful engagement.

That idea lies at the heart of this effort. Like so many defining movements in our history, it began not in the halls of power, but among private citizens—men and women without title but in possession of a conviction to renew our attachment to founding principles and to apply them to modern challenges. As such, this project emerged from a voluntary group of leaders—in a spirit of continuous improvement.

The American Experiment does not run on autopilot. It requires attention, reflection, and, above all, participation.

As we approach this historic anniversary, the question is not whether we will celebrate. It is whether we will learn. Not whether we will look back, but whether we will move forward, guided by the successes and failures that have carried us this far.

The past isn’t finished with us. The only question is whether we are willing to learn from it.


John Bridgeland is Founder & CEO of More Perfect, an alliance of 44 Presidential Centers and more than 100 partners working to renew democracy, and former Director of the White House Domestic Policy Council.

Colleen Shogan is CEO of More Perfect’s In Pursuit, Senior Advisor to Stand Together, and the former 11th Archivist of the United States. Both are Senior Practitioner Fellows at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center.


Read More

Person holding a sign in front of the U.S. capitol that reads, "We The People."

The nation has reached a divide in the road—a moment when Americans must decide whether to accept a slow weakening of the Republic or insist on the principles that have held it together for more than two centuries

Getty Images

A Republic Under Strain—And a Choice Ahead

Americans feel something shifting beneath their feet — quieter than crisis but unmistakably a strain. Many live with a steady sense of uncertainty, conflict, and the emotional weight of issues that seem impossible to escape. They feel unheard, unsafe, or unsure whether the Republic they trust is fading. Friends, relatives, and former colleagues say they’ve tried to look away just to cope, hoping the turmoil will pass. And they ask the same thing: if the framers made the people the primary control on government, how will they help set the Republic back on a steadier path?

Understanding the strain Americans are experiencing is essential, but so is recognizing the choice we still have. Madison’s warning offers the answer the framers left us: when trust erodes and power concentrates, the Constitution turns back to the people—not as a slogan, but as a structural reality.

Keep Reading Show less
Latest Attack Threatening President Trump Reflects Rising Political Violence in US

President Donald Trump speaks at the White House on April 25, 2026, after the cancellation of the annual White House Correspondents Association Dinner.

Latest Attack Threatening President Trump Reflects Rising Political Violence in US

For the third time in three years, Donald Trump has come under threat by an attacker. Many facts remain unclear after a gunman stormed the Washington Hilton on April 25, 2026, during the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner.

As the investigation into the shooting continues, Alfonso Serrano, The Conversation’s politics and society editor, spoke with James Piazza, a political violence scholar at Penn State, about what is driving the rise of political violence in the U.S. and what can be done about it.

Keep Reading Show less
Democracy Requires Losing. Americans Are Forgetting That.
an american flag hanging from a pole in front of a building
Photo by Calysia Ramos on Unsplash

Democracy Requires Losing. Americans Are Forgetting That.

Americans believe in democracy. What they don’t believe in is losing.

That distinction matters. Democracy depends on its participants’ willingness to accept loss. Without that, elections stop resolving conflict and start producing it.

Keep Reading Show less
Capitol Building.

An in-depth examination of the erosion of checks and balances in the United States, exploring Project 2025, executive overreach, and the growing strain on constitutional democracy—and the critical role of citizens in preserving it.

Getty Images, Rudy Sulgan

The Mirror Has Cracked: How the Three Branches Failed America

James Madison warned that the government would always mirror human nature — its virtues and its flaws. “What is government itself,” he asked, “but the greatest of all reflections on human nature?” The United States was built on a radical promise: a participatory government “of the people, by the people, for the people.” Today, that mirror is cracking in real time. What once reflected a nation striving toward freedom and equality now reflects something far more chaotic — a government drifting from its constitutional purpose and reshaped by loyalty tests, political revenge, and a blueprint designed to consolidate power.

In 2026, that reflection is unmistakable: a government shaped not by three independent branches, but by a president’s loyalists and a coordinated plan to remake American democracy from the inside out. The framers built guardrails — separation of powers, checks and balances, and independent institutions — to prevent the rise of authoritarian rule. Yet the country now faces a blueprint, Project 2025, that overrides those protections by placing independent agencies under presidential control, replacing civil servants with loyalists, and weaponizing the Department of Justice. This is not drift. It is design. And it has left the nation with a government that no longer reflects the people but instead reflects the ambitions of those who seek power without accountability.

Keep Reading Show less