Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

America at 250: Will We Learn from Our Past?

Opinion

A document representing the Declaration of Independence.

As trust in institutions declines, America’s 250th anniversary offers a chance to rediscover the civic lessons, leadership principles, and democratic values that sustain a republic.

Getty Images

We call it the American Experiment. Yet too often we celebrate it without studying it, invoke it without interrogating it, and inherit it without improving it. A republic designed to learn from experience cannot afford to ignore its own lessons from history.

As the United States approaches the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, the country faces a deeper question than how to celebrate its founding. Do we still know how to learn from it?


The anniversary arrives at a moment of deep uncertainty. Trust in institutions is low. Civic knowledge is thin. Our politics often reward immediacy over reflection. And yet the challenges we face concerning division, leadership, and self-government are not entirely new. They are the recurring tests of a diverse, democratic republic.

But if we have faced these tests before, why don’t we seem to remember how we met them?

A choice is before us. This can be a moment of nostalgia or a moment of learning and renewal. It can be a celebration of what was, or a serious effort to recover the habits of mind that sustain a republic.

At Monticellothe home of Thomas Jefferson and a place where ideals were both declared and testedan alliance of 44 Presidential Centers and civic organizations gathered in 2024 with a single purpose: to ensure that this anniversary accomplished something more than commemoration. 2026 must challenge us as citizens to analyze our past to inform the future. From that meeting, the In Pursuit initiative was born as a solution to the problem.

It became clear that the place to begin was the presidency—not focusing on politics or partisanship, but as a long-standing case study in democratic leadership under pressure. Presidents and first ladies have confronted issues of war and peace, expansion and fracture, moral crisis and disunion. Collectively, their experiences offer a rare perspective over time.

What distinguishes their most enduring contributions is not the offices they held, but the character they demonstrated: patience in uncertainty, discipline in crisis, the modesty to listen, and the resilience to endure. These are not abstract principles or virtues. They are the pragmatic foundations for democratic leadership, relevant to all of us, no matter our station in life.

That is why In Pursuit gathered leading historians, journalists, and public figures to distill lessons from these historically recognizable figures. The lessons they have identified are meant not for unquestioned admiration, but for application.

George W. Bush reminds us, through the example of George Washington, that leadership’s greatest strength is not bravado but humility. Joseph Ellis points to Abigail Adams as proof that enduring change requires both courage and patience, often in unequal measure. Jack Rakove draws from James Madison the enduring wisdom that process, not perfection, sustains legitimacy in a republic.

Each week of the project, a new lesson emerges—not as a relic of the past, but as a guide for the present. History is not a set of perfect models. It provides us with examples of wisdom, failure, and consequence. The most instructive moments are not always the triumphs. The tension between principle versus pragmatism or restraint versus action is where we can learn from our past leaders.

The stories being told aren’t meant to remain on the page. They are being carried into classrooms, libraries, civic forums, podcasts, and communities across the nation. Through teachers and scholars, through historians and citizens, these lessons are reaching millions, inviting citizens to engage with our past, not as passive spectators but as participants in an ongoing American experiment.

When Jefferson wrote about the “pursuit of Happiness” in the Declaration, he did not describe a solitary quest. He described a shared endeavor—a recognition that individual flourishing is inseparable from the well-being of others. Happiness, in the American sense, is not only a right; it is a responsibility. Ultimately, happiness is a cooperative enterprise we help each other achieve. That requires learning and thoughtful engagement.

That idea lies at the heart of this effort. Like so many defining movements in our history, it began not in the halls of power, but among private citizens—men and women without title but in possession of a conviction to renew our attachment to founding principles and to apply them to modern challenges. As such, this project emerged from a voluntary group of leaders—in a spirit of continuous improvement.

The American Experiment does not run on autopilot. It requires attention, reflection, and, above all, participation.

As we approach this historic anniversary, the question is not whether we will celebrate. It is whether we will learn. Not whether we will look back, but whether we will move forward, guided by the successes and failures that have carried us this far.

The past isn’t finished with us. The only question is whether we are willing to learn from it.


John Bridgeland is Founder & CEO of More Perfect, an alliance of 44 Presidential Centers and more than 100 partners working to renew democracy, and former Director of the White House Domestic Policy Council.

Colleen Shogan is CEO of More Perfect’s In Pursuit, Senior Advisor to Stand Together, and the former 11th Archivist of the United States. Both are Senior Practitioner Fellows at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center.


Read More

The exterior of a home.

While en route to surrender his Army of Northern Virginia to General Ulysses S. Grant on April 9, 1865, General Robert E. Lee rode past Appomattox Courthouse in rural Virginia.

visionsofmaine / Getty Images

The Civil War Never Really Ended, But an American Union Could Finally Help America Truly Heal

In previous essays, I argued that the United States should seriously consider a new governing structure — an “American Union” — in which red and blue America peacefully separate into two sovereign nations while preserving a common military alliance, shared currency, and freedom of movement, with each new nation having its own constitution reflecting its own political consensus.

Simply put, the United States is too politically, culturally, and geographically divided to function effectively under the existing highly centralized, winner-take-all system in which every election determines how more than 330 million people must live.

Keep ReadingShow less
 Constitution of the United States

A look at America's growing crisis of trust, rising inequality, technology's impact, and how founding principles can help renew democracy.

Tetra Images / Getty Images

People Are Hurting: The U.S. Needs to Return to Our Founding Principles

There are many ways in which our country is currently struggling, both from a government perspective and from the people's perspective. There is no shortage of articles or studies detailing the ways in which the country and its leaders are failing us.

A recent article by Nicholas Kristof in The New York Times discussed the report of the State of the Nation Project—written by a bipartisan group of experts—that assessed the state of our country on 31 measures. Bottom line, it found that too many people do not feel good about their lives, about other people, or our institutions. This is a nationwide phenomenon; the worst performers may be red states in the South, but liberal states in the North and West have the same problems. And it's not a function of prosperous versus less-prosperous states.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democrats Don’t Get Why They’ve Lost Most Working Class Voters

Graham Platner, Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate, speaks at an event hosted by U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders in Orono, Maine, on May 24, 2026.

Democrats Don’t Get Why They’ve Lost Most Working Class Voters

Since 2016, when Donald Trump shattered the Democrats’ blue wall by winning working-class voters across the Midwest, a cottage industry has sprung up on the left dedicated to answering a single question: How can Democrats win back the working class?

The answers come in different forms. Sometimes it is veteran Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders – barnstorming red districts, railing against oligarchy and corporate greed.

Keep ReadingShow less
​The Edmund Pettus Bridge, in Selma, Alabama, was the scene of violent clashes as Martin Luther King led a march from Selma to Montgomery.

Following the Supreme Court's Louisiana v. Callais ruling, MBA students explore Selma's civil rights history and the urgent lessons of democratic leadership.

Getty Images, Kirkikis

What We Owe Democracy

The day before we flew to Alabama to lead a civil rights and leadership trek with 30 MBA students, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Louisiana v. Callais, a case we were watching closely in light of our upcoming trip. Writing for the majority, Justice Alito substantially narrowed Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, ruling that states may draw congressional district lines on partisan grounds even when the practical effect, and many argue the intention, is to dilute Black voting power. Justice Kagan, in dissent, called it the completion of the majority’s “demolition” of the Act.

It was with this backdrop that our students stood with us on the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama—the very place that birthed the Voting Rights Act, where the courageous actions of a small group of people helped, as Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. so famously put it, “bend the arc of the moral universe towards justice.”

Keep ReadingShow less