Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Story Behind the Hantavirus Outbreak and Why It Matters

News

​Passengers are evacuated by small boat.

Passengers are evacuated by small boat from the MV Hondius in the Granadilla Port on May 10, 2026 in Tenerife, part of the Canary Islands, Spain.

Getty Images, Chris McGrath

No, the hantavirus is not like COVID-19, and it will not trigger another pandemic, said Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, World Health Organization (WHO) Director General, in a recent CBS News interview. And yes, it is understandable that many people around the world panicked and began ordering face masks online. In many ways, we are still reeling from the trauma of the COVID-19 pandemic, not to mention the flood of disinformation unleashed then that continues to polarize us now.

The good news is that, based on what we know, this hantavirus strain is not highly transmissible because it requires prolonged exposure and does not spread through air.


Exactly one month after the first hantavirus death was registered aboard the MV Hondius cruise ship on April 11, seventeen American passengers and one British national residing in the U.S. who had been exposed to the virus arrived in the United States. Sixteen are now quarantined at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha, while two passengers were transferred to Emory University Hospital in Atlanta. So far, only one has tested positive and is not yet showing symptoms. Common symptoms resemble those of other respiratory infections. They include fever, headache, muscle aches, nausea, and fatigue.

What is important to understand is that there are more than 50 known hantaviruses, most of which are carried by rodents. Transmission to humans generally occurs through contact with the infected urine, feces, and saliva or contaminated surfaces. The only hantavirus known to spread from human to human is the Andes hantavirus, the strain found aboard the MV Hondius. This strain is extremely rare and is endemic to South America. While there are no vaccines for the Andes hantavirus, health officials continue to reassure the public that this outbreak is contained and is fundamentally different from COVID-19.

Still, as of May 12, there have been 11 reported cases linked to the cruise ship, nine of them confirmed as Andes hantavirus cases. Three people have died. Because the virus has a long incubation period, anywhere between one to eight weeks after exposure, former passengers will require long-term monitoring and isolation. Contact tracing for anyone exposed to infected passengers is also standard protocol.

The outbreak does, however, give us the opportunity to reflect on what the world has learned from COVID-19 and whether we are better prepared to prevent another pandemic.

There are mixed views about the emergency response so far, but one thing is certain: containing disease outbreaks requires countries to collaborate and exchange information quickly and transparently for the global good. The transactional approach to global health adopted by the second Trump administration is not an ideal framework for averting future health threats. Reciprocal trust among nations remains at the core of effective pandemic prevention.

In written comments to The Fulcrum, Dr. Caitlin Rivers—Senior Scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and author of Crisis Averted, The Hidden Science of Fighting Outbreaks—said she was generally satisfied with the international response, noting that more than two dozen countries coordinated the repatriation of the passengers.

“The hantavirus situation is a reminder that outbreaks emerge periodically. It is in our best interest to maintain strong defences,” Rivers said. “Although, to my knowledge the U.S. has been able to coordinate with the WHO despite the fact we ended our membership last year, this outbreak illustrates the importance of maintaining those ties.”

Others are less forgiving, arguing that the United States was not at the forefront of this latest public health response and that this sets a dangerous precedent. In an interview with NPR, Lawrence Gostin, Professor of Health Law at Georgetown University and Advisor to the World Health Organization on the global Pandemic Treaty, expressed concern for the poorly planned and uncoordinated response.

“It took weeks to figure out what was causing the illnesses. Initial coordination was poor, and U.S. public health officials were missing in action for a long time,” Gostin said. “It's shown that the U.S. and the world are not ready for the next pandemic.”

In the past, the United States often led global coordination efforts during infectious disease outbreaks. During the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) deployed roughly 1900 staff to the region to help identify and isolate cases, contain transmission, and support overwhelmed health systems. The CDC coordinated daily with Ministries of Health, international partners, and global health institutions.

This time, the emergency response was led by the WHO, the agency President Trump formally withdrew the United States from in an executive order signed on January 20, 2025.

In an interview with CNN, Acting CDC Director Jay Bhattacharya has defended the agency’s response, saying, “They didn’t see what the agency has been doing… we don’t want to treat it like Covid. We don’t want to cause a public panic over this. We want to treat it with the hantavirus protocols that were successful in containing outbreaks in the past.”

Avoiding unnecessary panic is reasonable. But the statement comes from a public official in an administration that has repeatedly declined to respond to media inquiries and regularly disregarded congressional oversight. Furthermore, since January last year, the CDC has lost roughly a quarter of its workforce through layoffs and voluntary buyouts, a move many outside experts say has accelerated the loss of expertise and weakened the Agency’s capacity to swiftly respond to public health crises."

Tom Frieden, president and CEO of Resolve to Save Lives and former CDC Director, wrote on Substack that collaboration with the WHO and goodwill among countries remain essential to managing disease outbreaks and preventing future catastrophes. This hantavirus is no exception.

“The current administration's disengagement from WHO makes Americans less safe,” Frieden wrote. “Only WHO can coordinate the early warnings, genome sequencing, case definitions, and multi-country contact tracing that protect Americans. The outbreak is, at present, a small one. The next one may not be.”


Beatrice Spadacini is a freelance journalist for the Fulcrum. Spadacini writes about social justice and public health.


Read More

How My Benzodiazepine Experience Impacted the Trust I Have in the Healthcare System
a doctor showing a patient something on the tablet
Photo by Nappy on Unsplash

How My Benzodiazepine Experience Impacted the Trust I Have in the Healthcare System

During my junior year of high school, I was prescribed my first benzodiazepine, called lorazepam, at 16 years of age. At the time, my parents and I did not understand the potential consequences of long-term use of benzos. Like so many other patients out there, we trusted that the healthcare system would not only provide treatment and correct guidance to move forward with my prescriptions, but I never realized they would be the force that would ruin my future and so many dreams I had for my young adulthood.

What followed was a years-long struggle with severe medication dependence and withdrawal that fundamentally changed my life for the worse.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Façade of the American Dream: Reimagining the next 250 years
a woman in a green shirt and black gloves vacuuming a gray ottoman

The Façade of the American Dream: Reimagining the next 250 years

Since the birth of the United States, people have been dreaming of the American "Good Life."

This dream accelerated after the Industrial Revolution arrived in the U.S. in the 1800s. Innovative manufacturing practices integrated new technologies, lowering costs and spurring economic growth. As a result, millions of people gained access to affordable consumer goods. These changes improved living standards, making the dream attainable for more people.

Keep ReadingShow less
Food Is Medicine: Historic Concept Needs Expansion
sliced orange fruit and green broccoli
Photo by Nathan Dumlao on Unsplash

Food Is Medicine: Historic Concept Needs Expansion

If the only tool you have is a hammer, then everything looks like a nail.

In the field of healthcare, and specifically regarding food’s influence on wellness, physicians in this country are highly trained and have many tools at their disposal to share with patients. However, they are not immune to the overarching cultural conditions that value convenience and speed over time and quality.

Keep ReadingShow less
Youth Are More Stressed Than Ever:  “Well-Being Infrastructure” Can Help
text
Photo by Matthew Ball on Unsplash

Youth Are More Stressed Than Ever: “Well-Being Infrastructure” Can Help

In May, the JAMA Network released a study showing that doctor visits for children’s anxiety rose by more than 250 percent over 10 years. If we only respond with more clinical visits and prescriptions, we miss the chance to invest in the everyday conditions that help prevent anxiety in the first place—unstructured social time, accessible extracurriculars, walkable neighborhoods, and teen-friendly public spaces—the “wellbeing infrastructure” we should fund in proportion to the benefits it provides.

Good health and well-being–both mental and physical–do not happen by accident. They do not happen only by stepping in when a young person is in a major mental health emergency (although such services are essential). For youth to truly flourish, we need to focus on conditions that lead to thriving mental health and a commitment to building youth wellbeing infrastructure: the physical environments, social systems, and policies that promote long-term physical, mental, and emotional health.

Keep ReadingShow less