Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Story Behind the Hantavirus Outbreak and Why It Matters

News

​Passengers are evacuated by small boat.

Passengers are evacuated by small boat from the MV Hondius in the Granadilla Port on May 10, 2026 in Tenerife, part of the Canary Islands, Spain.

Getty Images, Chris McGrath

No, the hantavirus is not like COVID-19, and it will not trigger another pandemic, said Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, World Health Organization (WHO) Director General, in a recent CBS News interview. And yes, it is understandable that many people around the world panicked and began ordering face masks online. In many ways, we are still reeling from the trauma of the COVID-19 pandemic, not to mention the flood of disinformation unleashed then that continues to polarize us now.

The good news is that, based on what we know, this hantavirus strain is not highly transmissible because it requires prolonged exposure and does not spread through air.


Exactly one month after the first hantavirus death was registered aboard the MV Hondius cruise ship on April 11, seventeen American passengers and one British national residing in the U.S. who had been exposed to the virus arrived in the United States. Sixteen are now quarantined at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha, while two passengers were transferred to Emory University Hospital in Atlanta. So far, only one has tested positive and is not yet showing symptoms. Common symptoms resemble those of other respiratory infections. They include fever, headache, muscle aches, nausea, and fatigue.

What is important to understand is that there are more than 50 known hantaviruses, most of which are carried by rodents. Transmission to humans generally occurs through contact with the infected urine, feces, and saliva or contaminated surfaces. The only hantavirus known to spread from human to human is the Andes hantavirus, the strain found aboard the MV Hondius. This strain is extremely rare and is endemic to South America. While there are no vaccines for the Andes hantavirus, health officials continue to reassure the public that this outbreak is contained and is fundamentally different from COVID-19.

Still, as of May 12, there have been 11 reported cases linked to the cruise ship, nine of them confirmed as Andes hantavirus cases. Three people have died. Because the virus has a long incubation period, anywhere between one to eight weeks after exposure, former passengers will require long-term monitoring and isolation. Contact tracing for anyone exposed to infected passengers is also standard protocol.

The outbreak does, however, give us the opportunity to reflect on what the world has learned from COVID-19 and whether we are better prepared to prevent another pandemic.

There are mixed views about the emergency response so far, but one thing is certain: containing disease outbreaks requires countries to collaborate and exchange information quickly and transparently for the global good. The transactional approach to global health adopted by the second Trump administration is not an ideal framework for averting future health threats. Reciprocal trust among nations remains at the core of effective pandemic prevention.

In written comments to The Fulcrum, Dr. Caitlin Rivers—Senior Scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and author of Crisis Averted, The Hidden Science of Fighting Outbreaks—said she was generally satisfied with the international response, noting that more than two dozen countries coordinated the repatriation of the passengers.

“The hantavirus situation is a reminder that outbreaks emerge periodically. It is in our best interest to maintain strong defences,” Rivers said. “Although, to my knowledge the U.S. has been able to coordinate with the WHO despite the fact we ended our membership last year, this outbreak illustrates the importance of maintaining those ties.”

Others are less forgiving, arguing that the United States was not at the forefront of this latest public health response and that this sets a dangerous precedent. In an interview with NPR, Lawrence Gostin, Professor of Health Law at Georgetown University and Advisor to the World Health Organization on the global Pandemic Treaty, expressed concern for the poorly planned and uncoordinated response.

“It took weeks to figure out what was causing the illnesses. Initial coordination was poor, and U.S. public health officials were missing in action for a long time,” Gostin said. “It's shown that the U.S. and the world are not ready for the next pandemic.”

In the past, the United States often led global coordination efforts during infectious disease outbreaks. During the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) deployed roughly 1900 staff to the region to help identify and isolate cases, contain transmission, and support overwhelmed health systems. The CDC coordinated daily with Ministries of Health, international partners, and global health institutions.

This time, the emergency response was led by the WHO, the agency President Trump formally withdrew the United States from in an executive order signed on January 20, 2025.

In an interview with CNN, Acting CDC Director Jay Bhattacharya has defended the agency’s response, saying, “They didn’t see what the agency has been doing… we don’t want to treat it like Covid. We don’t want to cause a public panic over this. We want to treat it with the hantavirus protocols that were successful in containing outbreaks in the past.”

Avoiding unnecessary panic is reasonable. But the statement comes from a public official in an administration that has repeatedly declined to respond to media inquiries and regularly disregarded congressional oversight. Furthermore, since January last year, the CDC has lost roughly a quarter of its workforce through layoffs and voluntary buyouts, a move many outside experts say has accelerated the loss of expertise and weakened the Agency’s capacity to swiftly respond to public health crises."

Tom Frieden, president and CEO of Resolve to Save Lives and former CDC Director, wrote on Substack that collaboration with the WHO and goodwill among countries remain essential to managing disease outbreaks and preventing future catastrophes. This hantavirus is no exception.

“The current administration's disengagement from WHO makes Americans less safe,” Frieden wrote. “Only WHO can coordinate the early warnings, genome sequencing, case definitions, and multi-country contact tracing that protect Americans. The outbreak is, at present, a small one. The next one may not be.”


Beatrice Spadacini is a freelance journalist for the Fulcrum. Spadacini writes about social justice and public health.


Read More

Medicaid Cuts Could Threaten Key Student Services at IL Schools

Monique McClure is a single parent to four children, two of whom rely on Medicaid-funded school services.

Photo courtesy of Monique McClure

Medicaid Cuts Could Threaten Key Student Services at IL Schools

Medicaid-funded school services are a lifeline and financial necessity for Monique McClure, a single mother of four, and her two children with learning disabilities.

Trent and Trenity, McClure’s 9-year-old twins, participate in a range of Medicaid-funded programs at their respective schools in Belleville, including speech, occupational, and developmental therapies.

Keep ReadingShow less
Focused athlete performing lateral raises with dumbbells, building shoulder muscles in a modern fitness center

This Mental Health Awareness Month essay explores Black masculinity, emotional wellness, HYROX training, therapy, and healing through movement.

zamrznutitonovi / Getty Images

Mental Strength Is More Than Toughness

May is Mental Health Awareness Month, but awareness alone cannot save us. Men of color are already painfully aware that something is wrong. We feel it in our sleeplessness. In our blood pressure. In the marriages that strain under emotional distance. In the fathers who never learned how to say “I’m not okay.” In the sons trying to inherit manhood from men who never permitted tenderness.

The crisis is not merely psychological. It is cultural, historical, spiritual, and physiological all at once. African Americans, particularly men, occupy one of the most paradoxical spaces in American life. We are hyper-visible in sports and entertainment. We are present in politics and public discourse. Yet we are emotionally invisible in matters of vulnerability, grief, anxiety, and depression. We are celebrated for resilience, but denied rest. Our toughness is admirable, while we are punished for transparency.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pregnant woman holding her belly during a prenatal exam.

Americans are questioning whether they have enough resources and support to raise a family in the nation's current political landscape. Julie Roland examines the contradictions of "pro-family" politics in America today and the kind of care mothers are owed to safely and successfully raise children.

Getty Images, Drs Producoes

The Trump Administration Has a Mommy Problem

My mother, who died of breast cancer when I was 18, had me when she was 32. This past Sunday, I turned 33, childless. As I officially fall behind her timeline, with no plans to have kids anytime soon, I look at the landscape of 2026 America and have to ask: Who can blame me?

The decision to start a family is a difficult one. J.D. Vance said on his first day as Vice President that he wants “more babies in America,” but many Americans simply can’t afford to have kids anymore. Perhaps that’s one reason why this administration is offering $5,000 “baby bonuses” just to incentivize birth, while also banning abortion in every way they can. But becoming a mother should be a choice. I was the result of an unplanned pregnancy–and I’m lucky my mom decided to have me and that she turned out to be the best mom ever–but as Miriam Rabkin, MD, MPH, put it: “if you want mom to be happy and healthy, she needs access to contraception so she can choose if and when to get pregnant!” Instead, this administration seems to think that if women won’t elect to have children, they should try paying them, and if that doesn’t work, then they should just force them.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Women Will Die’: How the Mifepristone Ban Will Affect Women across the Country

In this photo illustration, packages of Mifepristone tablets are displayed at a family planning clinic.

(Photo illustration by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

‘Women Will Die’: How the Mifepristone Ban Will Affect Women across the Country

WASHINGTON–Maternal health advocates and a Virginia state legislator warned that women’s health would suffer even in states that allow abortions if the Supreme Court fails to block a ban on mail deliveries of mifepristone, a drug used in abortions.

Jennifer McClellan, a representative for the state of Virginia and long-time advocate for reproductive rights, experienced a high-risk pregnancy and an emergency C-section 9 weeks before her due date. She said that she worried about the risks to individuals if they lose easy access to Mifepristone for abortions, miscarriages, or other reasons.

Keep ReadingShow less