Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Rethinking the Church’s Calling in a Time of Crisis

Opinion

Rethinking the Church’s Calling in a Time of Crisis
person's hand
Photo by Billy Pasco on Unsplash

There is a significant distinction between charity and justice. Charity responds to visible wounds in the community and rushes to bandage them as necessary. Justice, rooted in biblical conviction and prophetic courage, goes further. It questions the sources of suffering: Why are people bleeding in the first place? This tension between crisis response and deeper transformation is at the core of a courageous step recently taken by Atlanta's New Birth Missionary Baptist Church.

As the nation grapples with democratic strain and institutional fatigue, New Birth's decision to suspend the collection of tithes and offerings during a government shutdown and amid the threatened rollback of social supports is a daring example of moral clarity. It is more than an act of relief; it is a refusal to proceed with business as usual when the most economically vulnerable are again being asked to bear the highest costs. The pause is not merely financial; I believe it is prophetic. An assertion that the church's highest duty is to its people, not its ledger.


"The church still needs to keep the lights on," some will argue, or, "Is this responsible stewardship?" But such questions miss the larger point. The real test is not procedural continuity; it is moral imagination. This kind of decision does not break from Christian scripture; it embodies it. The prophets and Jesus himself call the faithful to solidarity with those most at risk. Holiness, in this tradition, is measured not by institutional preservation but by proximity to the vulnerable.

What does it mean, then, for Pastor Jamal Bryant to halt all giving, even temporarily? It is more than symbolism; it is pastoral realism. The pews are filled with people trying to stretch every dollar, wondering whether aid will vanish, people for whom Sunday should be a sanctuary of hope, not a reminder of scarcity. If church ritual compounds rather than heals the pain of poverty, something vital in the Gospel has gone missing.

The Witness

This kind of act centers the church on its true mission: caring for people above maintaining machinery. It is not a call to disorder, but a reframing of stewardship itself. To steward faithfully is to care for what God entrusts to us, beginning with the lives of those most in need.

If the decision feels disruptive, it should. Prophetic witness rarely aligns with comfort. It stands in a long moral lineage, from the churches that sustained the Montgomery bus boycotts to the sanctuary movements that sheltered the displaced to the countless communities that have risked their reputations for compassion. The history of the church at its best is a history of faithful interruption. Sometimes faith looks reckless: a wild generosity that trusts divine abundance beyond what reason permits. Such gestures challenge routines that, left unchecked, can crush the very people they were meant to serve. Like those who marched for voting rights or stood against apartheid, this action declares, Not here. Not now. Not on our watch.

Halting the offering does not make salaries or bills disappear. Yet both scripture and experience teach that provision often follows risk, not safety. Faith in action requires courage—the willingness to embody the beloved community through shared sacrifice and creative compassion. The challenge to clerics and faith leaders is clear: our calling is not merely to preserve but to incarnate. The measure of the church is not whether it maintains old habits, but whether it becomes a living witness to renewal. True faith demands risk. The church must risk its routines to serve the people entrusted to its care.

The Work Ahead

In an age anxious about reputation, obsessed with budgets, and haunted by decline, moral integrity requires holding those very structures to account. The church does not exist to reinforce the world as it is, but to model the world as it could be—one shaped by love, equity, and shared flourishing. This vision is not a departure from the church's mission, but a fulfillment of it. The church's role in social justice is not just to provide charity, but to advocate for systemic change that aligns with the Gospel's call for justice.

This vision begins with self-examination. Communities of conscience must audit how their resources—money, staff time, and facilities—are distributed. Are they sustaining bureaucracy, or serving those most likely to be overlooked? Budgets must follow the needs of the people, not the comfort of the institution.

Communities of faith can adopt pause-and-redirect practices: during moments of public crisis, temporarily halting standard giving or programming to channel funds and energy toward the most urgent needs. This could mean redirecting resources to support local food banks during a pandemic, or suspending regular services to participate in a protest against systemic racism. Such habits cultivate adaptability and ensure that generosity serves solidarity rather than self-preservation.

Finally, churches must move beyond charity toward a justice ethic—linking arms with advocacy coalitions, neighborhood alliances, and policy reformers who address root causes rather than symptoms. Feeding the hungry is holy work, but transforming the systems that perpetuate hunger fulfills the deeper call of justice.

Threaded through all of this is a theological truth: charity reflects divine love, but justice demands that the structures that cause pain change. Prophetic faith, a core tenet of my tradition’s belief system, demands transformation, not mere relief. It is a faith that speaks truth to power, that challenges the status quo, and that insists on a world where all can flourish. Authentic discipleship is public as well as private; solidarity is not a luxury of belief but its beating heart.

This is the summons before us—to make belief visible. Justice must leap from sermon scripts to situations in the streets, especially when human dignity is being commodified and inalienable rights are under siege. Some acts will resemble a suspension of offerings; others will look like direct aid, radical hospitality, or sanctuary for the unhoused. The form matters less than the fidelity that inspires it.

Prophetic witness always carries a cost. Consensus rarely precedes conviction. Absolute abundance is discovered in mutual sacrifice, not accumulation. "We are each other's harvest; we are each other's business; we are each other's magnitude and bond." In that spirit, the present crisis invites communities of faith to embody love with courage and imagination.

If we listen to those in pain and to the whisper of the Spirit, we might yet become the kind of church this age of cynicism and inequality so desperately needs: a church unafraid to pause, to risk, to hope, and to live the sermon it proclaims.

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, scholar-practioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.

Read More

We Are Not Going Back to the Sidelines!

Participants of the seventh LGBTIQ+ Political Leaders Conference of the Americas and the Caribbean.

Photograph courtesy of Siara Horna. © liderazgoslgbt.com/Siara

We Are Not Going Back to the Sidelines!

"A Peruvian, a Spaniard, a Mexican, a Colombian, and a Brazilian meet in Lima." This is not a cliché nor the beginning of a joke, but rather the powerful image of four congresswomen and a councilwoman who openly, militantly, and courageously embrace their diversity. At the National Congress building in Peru, the officeholders mentioned above—Susel Paredes, Carla Antonelli, Celeste Ascencio, Carolina Giraldo, and Juhlia Santos—presided over the closing session of the seventh LGBTIQ+ Political Leaders Conference of the Americas and the Caribbean.

The September 2025 event was convened by a coalition of six organizations defending the rights of LGBTQ+ people in the region and brought together almost 200 delegates from 18 countries—mostly political party leaders, as well as NGO and elected officials. Ten years after its first gathering, the conference returned to the Peruvian capital to produce the "Lima Agenda," a 10-year roadmap with actions in six areas to advance toward full inclusion in political participation, guaranteeing the right of LGBTQ+ people to be candidates—elected, visible, and protected in the public sphere, with dignity and without discrimination. The agenda's focus areas include: constitutional protections, full and diverse citizenship, egalitarian democracy, politics without hate, education and collective memory, and comprehensive justice and reparation.

Keep Reading Show less
Has Trump already lost the Latino vote?

A man holds up a "Latinos for Trump" sign at a protest after Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election in Austin, Texas on Nov. 7, 2020.

(Sergio Flores/AFP via Getty Images/TNS)

Has Trump already lost the Latino vote?

For generations, foreign policy eggheads debated the question, “Who lost China?” I’m wondering if election analysts might soon ask, “Who lost the Latinos?”

Almost exactly one year ago, President Trump won an impressive election victory. It wasn’t the landslide his boosters claim, but it was decisive. And Trump’s record-breaking success with Latino voters played a crucial part.

Keep Reading Show less
Have Males Always been the Problem?

Mad scream. Angry man. Conflict person. Aggression neurosis.

Getty Images

Have Males Always been the Problem?

Have you ever wondered why there have been so many bad happenings in human history? Why are there so many bad actors? Sadly, I came to realize that it was largely caused by the male sex. That's not to say that women can't act badly, but the statistics are clearly weighted toward males as the cause of most of the bad events throughout all of history.

United States FBI statistics of 2012 document that 73.5% of criminal behavior is male-caused versus 26.2% by women of the 10 million criminal acts across all categories. Noted psychologist Steven Pinker argues in his book The Better Angels of Our Nature (2011) that historically high levels of male violence can be explained by psychological mechanisms that he calls "inner demons," such as predation, dominance, and revenge. Males commit more crimes than females, particularly violent ones, a trend supported by arrest and victimization data globally. This disparity is attributed to a combination of factors, including socialization into roles that may emphasize aggression, evolutionary differences, and potential biological factors. As of February 2017, 93.3 percent of federal inmates were men, according to the Federal Bureau of Prisons.

Keep Reading Show less
‘Ain’t I a woman?’ Why policing the gender binary hurts all women
a couple of yellow people standing next to each other
Photo by Marc Stress on Unsplash

‘Ain’t I a woman?’ Why policing the gender binary hurts all women

As Caster Semenya recently ended her seven-year legal battle to compete as the woman she has always been, I was reminded of being in the Santiago, Chile airport in pre-COVID 2020, on my way to a weeklong trek across Patagonia National Park. Walking into a women’s restroom, I was accosted by a group of women shouting, “¡Es para mujeres!” This is for women!

I am a 5’10” cisgender woman. My hair was short at the time, and I was wearing baggy sweatpants and a sweatshirt. I am also Black. This was not the first time I had been mistaken for a man. Summoning the remnants of my high school Spanish, I shouted back, “¡Yo soy mujer!” I am a woman.

Keep Reading Show less