Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

America’s $5.6 Trillion Healthcare Gorilla: Why We’re Blind to the Real Crisis

From Washington to the workplace to rural America, skyrocketing healthcare spending threatens coverage, jobs, and communities unless we confront the real cost crisis.

Opinion

A stethoscope, calculator, pills, and cash.

America’s healthcare debate misses the real crisis: soaring care costs. Discover how inattentional blindness hides the $5.6T gorilla reshaping policy, work, and rural communities.

Getty Images, athima tongloom

In the late 1990s, two Harvard psychologists ran a now-famous experiment. In it, students watched a short video of six people passing basketballs. They were told to count the number of passes made by the three players in white shirts.

Halfway through the film, a person in a gorilla suit walks into the frame, beats its chest, and exits. Amazingly, half of viewers — both then and in later versions of the study — never notice the gorilla. They’re so focused on counting passes that they miss the obvious event happening right in front of them.


The authors call this “inattentional blindness.” And its impact isn’t limited to research labs. You can see it everywhere in American healthcare.

Today, policymakers and business leaders are focusing on healthcare metrics like subsidies, premiums, and enrollment numbers. Understanding these details matters, but not nearly as much as confronting medicine’s “invisible gorilla”: the $5.6 trillion our nation spends on healthcare each year. For perspective, that expenditure exceeds the total economic output of every nation except China.

As a country, we need to stop counting passes long enough to see how the gorilla is impacting life everywhere.

1. The gorilla in Washington, D.C.

U.S. lawmakers spent 43 days debating how to reopen the federal government. The fight centered on whether to continue funding the premium tax credits that help 20 million Americans afford coverage through the online health exchanges.

Democrats said ending those payments in 2026 would cause premiums to spike and make coverage unaffordable. Republicans warned that continuing them would add nearly $400 billion to the federal deficit. Both were right. If the underlying cost of medical care isn’t reduced, neither the federal government nor the average family will be able to afford it.

The United States spends $14,885 per person each year on medical care. Switzerland, the second most medically expensive nation, spends $9,963. If the U.S. could close half that spending gap, we’d save $700 billion annually.

But the gorilla’s impact in Washington extends far beyond Affordable Care Act subsidies. Between federal funding changes and eligibility tightening, analysts warn that millions of Americans enrolled in Medicaid will become uninsured starting in 2026. Meanwhile, because Medicare payment growth is capped at the inflation rate, hospitals make up the difference by charging private insurers far more (already about 250% of Medicare prices).

Ultimately, unless we control the cost of care delivery, all Americans will pay the price.

2. The gorilla in the workplace

Employers and workers are counting passes of their own. They focus on premiums, deductibles, and network size while failing to tackle the root problem: the rising costs of care itself.

Without structural reform, no insurance plan will remain affordable. The average cost of family health coverage will reach nearly $30,000 next year, with employers covering about $24,000 and workers responsible for the rest. A projected 9% premium increase means employers and employees together will spend roughly $2,500 more per worker.

For many companies, rising medical costs make labor increasingly unaffordable. As a result, businesses are turning to automation and generative AI to replace jobs. More than 1 million positions have already disappeared in 2025, with more expected in 2026.

When workers lose employer-based coverage, they don’t stop getting sick. They turn to Medicaid or subsidized exchange plans, further straining state budgets and prompting insurers to raise commercial premiums even higher.

3. The gorilla in rural America

The cost crisis is felt acutely in rural communities. Over the past two decades, 150 rural hospitals have closed or stopped inpatient services, and another 700 facilities (nearly one-third of those remaining) are at risk.

Small patient populations and high fixed expenses have made the cost of inpatient care unsustainable in many rural communities. Local leaders focus on added revenue through federal grants or stopgap funding, but those efforts don’t address the underlying cost crisis driving today’s problems.

Addressing the gorilla everywhere

The United States can dramatically reduce healthcare spending while improving quality. But doing so will require a structural overhaul, not incremental tweaks. Three major opportunities already exist.

1. Shrink our hospital footprint

America maintains far more hospitals than it needs, with many offering duplicate services at high fixed costs. A more sustainable system would:

  • Consolidate low-volume hospitals.
  • Build regional centers of excellence that achieve better outcomes at far lower cost.
  • Eliminate overlapping specialty programs in crowded markets.

Small rural hospitals could transition into 24-hour emergency and urgent-care hubs supported by telemedicine and reliable, low-cost transportation to larger facilities.

2. Prevent diseases before they happen

According to the CDC, more effective control of chronic diseases would reduce medical costs up to $1.8 trillion by preventing as many as half of all heart attacks, strokes, cancers, and kidney failures. Three pragmatic opportunities include:

Every complication avoided is a hospital admission, ICU stay, or surgery that never happens and is never billed.

Pay for value, not volume

Healthcare’s fee-for-service payment system rewards doing more, not doing better. Capitation — fixed monthly payments to physician groups and hospitals — flips the incentive structure, rewarding improved health, not just disease treatment.

Under capitation, prevention becomes financially rewarded, chronic diseases are managed earlier and more effectively, and care shifts to high-quality, cost-efficient settings, including outpatient facilities and virtual platforms.

The result is a virtuous cycle: healthier patients, fewer complications, and significantly lower costs.

No single group — government, employers, patients, or clinicians — can solve this crisis alone. Success will require all stakeholders to overcome their inattentional blindness and confront the gorilla together. The only question is how much worse things must become before we do.


Robert Pearl, the author of “ChatGPT, MD,” teaches at both the Stanford University School of Medicine and the Stanford Graduate School of Business. He is a former CEO of The Permanente Medical Group.


Read More

Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs
person sitting while using laptop computer and green stethoscope near

Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs

Healthcare and social assistance professions added 693,000 jobs in 2025. Without those gains, the U.S. economy would have lost roughly 570,000 jobs.

At first glance, these numbers suggest that healthcare is a growth engine in an otherwise slowing labor market. But a closer look reveals something more troubling for patients and healthcare professionals.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Cost of Fear: What Immigration Enforcement Is Doing to Our Clinics

Hands holding a heart

Picture provided by Latino News Network

The Cost of Fear: What Immigration Enforcement Is Doing to Our Clinics

He was supposed to come in three months ago. When he finally returned to the clinic, it was not for routine follow-up. Instead, it was because he could no longer feel his feet, and his vision had begun to blur. He told us he had missed his appointments out of fear. Immigration enforcement activity in his neighborhood and rumors of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) near clinics made him afraid to be seen entering a healthcare space. So he stayed home. He rationed his insulin until it ran out. Now he sat before us with uncontrolled diabetes, worsening nerve damage, and worsening vision concerning diabetic retinopathy.

Stories like this are becoming increasingly common. In Minneapolis, recent ICE raids have sent shockwaves through immigrant communities, with reports of enforcement agents present in or near healthcare settings, including exam rooms. Families describe being too afraid to leave their homes, even to see a doctor, or choosing the most ill child to bring to urgent care because bringing multiple children would be too risky. Clinics meant to serve as places of healing are being transformed into sites of fear.

Keep ReadingShow less
A person grabbing a gallon of milk from an aisle.

New U.S. dietary guidelines from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Brooke Rollins promote more milk in schools—but widespread Lactose Intolerance raises questions about equity and nutrition policy.

Getty Images, Theerawit Jirattawevut

Lactose Intolerant? You’re Not Alone

Last month, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Brooke Rollins announced new dietary guidelines for Americans that were a major reset of federal nutrition policy. Among the new recommendations: drink more milk, eat more yogurt and cheese. While nutritionists continue to debate the scientific basis of the recommendations, changes in federal meal programs, including school meals, are already in the works.

Any school that participates in federal meal programs must offer milk with every meal, and new guidelines support whole milk in addition to 2% and skim milk already available in schools. While there is debate about the level of saturated fats in whole milk, there’s a deeper problem with the dairy recommendation for school lunches: the widespread prevalence of lactose intolerance. The vast majority of people on this planet, approximately 70%, are lactose intolerant. While it is estimated that only about 35% of the US population is lactose intolerant, that number is much higher depending on your ancestral history: 75% of African Americans; 90% of Asian Americans; 50% of Latinos; 50% of Ashkenazi Jews; and 70-90% of Native Americans are lactose intolerant. For school districts with large populations of descendant groups, the recommendation to just drink more milk doesn’t work for millions of kids.

Keep ReadingShow less
I Watched the State of the Union Address: Everyone is “Winning” Except Child Care

U.S. President Donald Trump delivers the State of the Union address during a joint session of Congress in the House Chamber at the Capitol on February 24, 2026 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Kenny Holston-Pool/Getty Images)

I Watched the State of the Union Address: Everyone is “Winning” Except Child Care

During Tuesday night’s State of the Union address, we heard repeatedly that America is “winning.” The message was clear and consistent. But when it came to child care, there was only a single mention, briefly noted during a guest recognition for a woman in the audience who balances work and family responsibilities.

That was it.

Keep ReadingShow less