Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

America’s $5.6 Trillion Healthcare Gorilla: Why We’re Blind to the Real Crisis

From Washington to the workplace to rural America, skyrocketing healthcare spending threatens coverage, jobs, and communities unless we confront the real cost crisis.

Opinion

A stethoscope, calculator, pills, and cash.

America’s healthcare debate misses the real crisis: soaring care costs. Discover how inattentional blindness hides the $5.6T gorilla reshaping policy, work, and rural communities.

Getty Images, athima tongloom

In the late 1990s, two Harvard psychologists ran a now-famous experiment. In it, students watched a short video of six people passing basketballs. They were told to count the number of passes made by the three players in white shirts.

Halfway through the film, a person in a gorilla suit walks into the frame, beats its chest, and exits. Amazingly, half of viewers — both then and in later versions of the study — never notice the gorilla. They’re so focused on counting passes that they miss the obvious event happening right in front of them.


The authors call this “inattentional blindness.” And its impact isn’t limited to research labs. You can see it everywhere in American healthcare.

Today, policymakers and business leaders are focusing on healthcare metrics like subsidies, premiums, and enrollment numbers. Understanding these details matters, but not nearly as much as confronting medicine’s “invisible gorilla”: the $5.6 trillion our nation spends on healthcare each year. For perspective, that expenditure exceeds the total economic output of every nation except China.

As a country, we need to stop counting passes long enough to see how the gorilla is impacting life everywhere.

1. The gorilla in Washington, D.C.

U.S. lawmakers spent 43 days debating how to reopen the federal government. The fight centered on whether to continue funding the premium tax credits that help 20 million Americans afford coverage through the online health exchanges.

Democrats said ending those payments in 2026 would cause premiums to spike and make coverage unaffordable. Republicans warned that continuing them would add nearly $400 billion to the federal deficit. Both were right. If the underlying cost of medical care isn’t reduced, neither the federal government nor the average family will be able to afford it.

The United States spends $14,885 per person each year on medical care. Switzerland, the second most medically expensive nation, spends $9,963. If the U.S. could close half that spending gap, we’d save $700 billion annually.

But the gorilla’s impact in Washington extends far beyond Affordable Care Act subsidies. Between federal funding changes and eligibility tightening, analysts warn that millions of Americans enrolled in Medicaid will become uninsured starting in 2026. Meanwhile, because Medicare payment growth is capped at the inflation rate, hospitals make up the difference by charging private insurers far more (already about 250% of Medicare prices).

Ultimately, unless we control the cost of care delivery, all Americans will pay the price.

2. The gorilla in the workplace

Employers and workers are counting passes of their own. They focus on premiums, deductibles, and network size while failing to tackle the root problem: the rising costs of care itself.

Without structural reform, no insurance plan will remain affordable. The average cost of family health coverage will reach nearly $30,000 next year, with employers covering about $24,000 and workers responsible for the rest. A projected 9% premium increase means employers and employees together will spend roughly $2,500 more per worker.

For many companies, rising medical costs make labor increasingly unaffordable. As a result, businesses are turning to automation and generative AI to replace jobs. More than 1 million positions have already disappeared in 2025, with more expected in 2026.

When workers lose employer-based coverage, they don’t stop getting sick. They turn to Medicaid or subsidized exchange plans, further straining state budgets and prompting insurers to raise commercial premiums even higher.

3. The gorilla in rural America

The cost crisis is felt acutely in rural communities. Over the past two decades, 150 rural hospitals have closed or stopped inpatient services, and another 700 facilities (nearly one-third of those remaining) are at risk.

Small patient populations and high fixed expenses have made the cost of inpatient care unsustainable in many rural communities. Local leaders focus on added revenue through federal grants or stopgap funding, but those efforts don’t address the underlying cost crisis driving today’s problems.

Addressing the gorilla everywhere

The United States can dramatically reduce healthcare spending while improving quality. But doing so will require a structural overhaul, not incremental tweaks. Three major opportunities already exist.

1. Shrink our hospital footprint

America maintains far more hospitals than it needs, with many offering duplicate services at high fixed costs. A more sustainable system would:

  • Consolidate low-volume hospitals.
  • Build regional centers of excellence that achieve better outcomes at far lower cost.
  • Eliminate overlapping specialty programs in crowded markets.

Small rural hospitals could transition into 24-hour emergency and urgent-care hubs supported by telemedicine and reliable, low-cost transportation to larger facilities.

2. Prevent diseases before they happen

According to the CDC, more effective control of chronic diseases would reduce medical costs up to $1.8 trillion by preventing as many as half of all heart attacks, strokes, cancers, and kidney failures. Three pragmatic opportunities include:

Every complication avoided is a hospital admission, ICU stay, or surgery that never happens and is never billed.

Pay for value, not volume

Healthcare’s fee-for-service payment system rewards doing more, not doing better. Capitation — fixed monthly payments to physician groups and hospitals — flips the incentive structure, rewarding improved health, not just disease treatment.

Under capitation, prevention becomes financially rewarded, chronic diseases are managed earlier and more effectively, and care shifts to high-quality, cost-efficient settings, including outpatient facilities and virtual platforms.

The result is a virtuous cycle: healthier patients, fewer complications, and significantly lower costs.

No single group — government, employers, patients, or clinicians — can solve this crisis alone. Success will require all stakeholders to overcome their inattentional blindness and confront the gorilla together. The only question is how much worse things must become before we do.


Robert Pearl, the author of “ChatGPT, MD,” teaches at both the Stanford University School of Medicine and the Stanford Graduate School of Business. He is a former CEO of The Permanente Medical Group.


Read More

Ultrasound scanning

Ultrasound scanning of intestines, abdominal cavity, right lobe, liver, bile ducts, gallbladder

Getty Images

Men4Choice Encourages Men to Fight for Reproductive Freedom

Not knowing who to invite to his community conversations, Michael Facey sent an invite link to his fraternity brothers for his virtual meeting without telling them what the conversation was about.

Facey later told this story during one of the virtual meetings, as the programs director, during the summer fellowship of Men4Choice. He inspired the fellows to use an unconventional approach to get other men to join their community conversation, though he added a disclaimer: don't drop an invite link without explaining what it is.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Country That Vaccinated the World Is Unlearning How
a hand in a blue glove holding a syquet
Photo by Elen Sher on Unsplash

The Country That Vaccinated the World Is Unlearning How

On August 10, in the Oval Office, Donald Trump signed an executive order telling American parents to break the measles, mumps, and rubella shot into three separate injections and to space childhood vaccines across many more trips to the doctor. He said the change would "align the United States with other advanced and developed nations." That line is the whole argument, and it is false. No advanced country gives measles, mumps, and rubella as three single-disease shots. The vaccines do not exist in that form anywhere. A parent who wanted to follow the new American recommendation could not, because there is nothing to buy.

This is not a small drafting slip. It sits at the center of the case the White House is making, and it falls apart the moment you look past America's borders.

Keep ReadingShow less
man in yellow and black crew neck shirt raising his right hand
man in yellow and black crew neck shirt raising his right hand

Building a Heat-Safe South Florida for Cancer Survivors and Patients

Temperatures in South Florida have been rising, leading to extreme heat and alarming heat advisories. On Aug. 13, 2026, the state experienced dangerous heat, with heat index values potentially climbing above 110 degrees.

Most Floridians take caution and stay inside if they can to escape the heat. For cancer patients and survivors, getting to that air-conditioned space can be another challenge.

Keep ReadingShow less
Senators Criticize Trump Administration’s Demands to Access Health Data as a Condition for Lifesaving Aid
Roberto “Bear” Guerra/ProPublica. Source image: Getty Images

Senators Criticize Trump Administration’s Demands to Access Health Data as a Condition for Lifesaving Aid

What Happened: Citing reporting by ProPublica, eight Democratic U.S. senators have criticized the Trump administration’s demands to access the health data of millions of people as a condition of giving lifesaving aid to other countries. In a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the senators, including minority leader Chuck Schumer, said the U.S. demands were “unprecedented and at odds with U.S. policy concerning the data of American citizens.”

The inquiry into the administration’s approach to foreign health data referred to a ProPublica story published in June about agreements the U.S. struck with African countries — and the risks they posed to people there. Experts told ProPublica that the deals are vague and lack language used in most data-sharing agreements to adequately limit what information is collected and how it can be used. As a result, they said, there is an increased risk that individuals’ personal data could be exposed, misused or commercialized without their consent.

Keep ReadingShow less