Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Neighbors Turn to Each Other As ICE Raids Shake Los Angeles’ Immigrant Communities

News

Neighbors Turn to Each Other As ICE Raids Shake Los Angeles’ Immigrant Communities

Vendors sell merchandise in the Santee Alley area of the Fashion District on June 19, 2025 in Los Angeles, California. Fear of ICE raids and the recent violent protests occurring nearby have hurt business, keeping shoppers away from from the area known for its cut-rate electronics, inexpensive clothing and large selections of quinceañera dresses.

Getty Images, Scott Olson

When federal immigration enforcement operations swept through Los Angeles earlier this summer, the effects rippled far beyond the undocumented community. Entire neighborhoods saw the slowdown of businesses as the sense of fear began to settle in. Yet, the absence of safety nets has encouraged residents to rely on one another.

Across the city, mutual aid networks, some long-standing and others entirely new, have mobilized to meet urgent needs. From advocacy nonprofits to autonomous street-defense teams to the vendors themselves, the response reveals a pattern: in times of crisis, communities turn inward, pooling resources, skills, and trust to keep each other afloat.


Walking through the Fashion District’s Santee Alley, known locally as Los Callejones, the economic fallout is visible. Foot traffic is thin. Vendors lean against their stalls, scanning the street.

Erick, who helps run his family’s hat and embroidery shop, says the raids have cut business in half. “Since the ICE raids started, I’ve lost more than 50% of my revenue,” he said. “There’s a lot less people, and families are afraid of just walking around and shopping. It’s supposed to be a safe space, but now customers wonder if they’ll even make it home without being stopped.”

Even weekends, which used to be the busiest days, feel eerily slow. A group chat among vendors now acts as a warning system, allowing them to alert each other of possible ICE sightings.

Rodrigo Alvarado, who works at a cellphone accessories stand, has been in the Callejones for over a year. He says the decline in sales is steep and happened immediately after rumors of enforcement circulate. “More than anything, I feel like it is the bad promotion [misinformation] that has been circulating about Santee Alley. ICE has not been on the premises, and my bosses have told me if they were to show up, it would be trespassing,” he said.

At the end of the alley is a stand stacked with zines, flyers, and small plastic bags, each one containing what volunteers call a “Know Your Rights kit.” The station belongs to the Downtown LA Community Defense Center, an entirely autonomous, volunteer-run network that exists mostly through group chats and word of mouth.

“I can’t give my name,” one masked volunteer said, “but I’m a born-and-raised Angeleno. This effort is just a bunch of people who care about protecting the community. We don’t know each other personally, we organize anonymously, but we come together to get vendors the information and tools they need.”

The tools include legal guides distinguishing real judicial warrants from fake Department of Homeland Security warrants, private property signs to deter ICE from entering shops, and bright plastic whistles. Vendors are trained to use specific whistle calls to warn each other if ICE is nearby or if someone is detained.

The Defense Center also works on getting the community ready if a raid occurs. The organization has no official board and relies on rotating volunteers to step in when others are unable. Many of the printed materials come from other Angelenos who design, fund, and contribute to the cause.

On the other hand, InnerCity Struggle is a non-profit that has worked on education, housing, and economic justice in East Los Angeles for over 30 years. When ICE raids hit, they prioritize direct mutual aid efforts, raising $52,800 toward a $100,000 goal, to help immigrant families who lost income or faced deportation-related expenses through a $500 rental assistance or free grocery program.

Similarly, HIIT Factory LA, a local gym, launched a mutual aid drive providing groceries, gift cards, and bill assistance to impacted families, turning workout classes into fundraisers.

From nonprofit offices to gym floors to neighborhood groups in the Callejones, the common thread is taking initiative to help those that are directly affected, not only by spreading information but through resource and monetary help. These networks are rooted in the communities they serve; therefore, they know the specific needs of people and the best way to mend their hardship.

Still, the limits are clear. Funding runs out. Volunteers face burnout. And the risk of future raids remains constant.

These networks of resilience show that when the government turns against its people, neighbors can coordinate rapidly to preserve not just livelihoods but dignity.

Lluvia Chavez, a Mexican-American bilingual journalist dedicated to amplifying the stories of underrepresented communities, and a cohort member with the Fulcrum Fellowship

Please help the Fulcrum in its mission of nurturing the next generation of journalists by donating HERE!


Read More

Are State Courts More Protective of Transgender People than Federal Courts?

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that state laws prohibiting trans women and girls from participating on female sports teams do not violate the Equal Protection Clause — the seventh Supreme Court ruling curbing the rights of trans people in just the past 14 months. Since May 2025, the Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to ban trans people from serving in the military, upheld a Tennessee law banning gender-affirming care for trans minors, given anti-LGBTQ+ parents a veto over LGBTQ+-inclusive content in their children’s classrooms, endorsed Trump’s policy requiring trans people to list their sex assigned at birth on their passports, reinstated an injunction against policies barring schools from outing trans students to their parents against students’ wishes, and determined that Colorado’s ban on anti-LGBTQ+ conversion therapy must be subjected to strict scrutiny, a form of judicial review that almost no law survives.

However, there may be some cause for optimism. In an article published in The Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, I conducted a comprehensive survey of state court cases that impacted the rights and lives of trans people between 2022 and 2024. The survey showed state courts have an essential role to play in protecting trans people in an increasingly hostile political environment. Amongst some ominous signs for trans rights, there were important signals of hope in the survey.

Keep ReadingShow less
A gavel.

The rule of law, American democracy, constitutional rights, and judicial independence.

Getty Images, David Talukdar

In Texas, People Don’t Kill People, Guns Kill People

It has been said that a good prosecutor can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich. Apparently, that’s not the case in very red Collin County, Texas, where a self-described recovering alcoholic fatally shot his daughter in the chest, only to be let off the hook by a sympathetic grand jury. As a retired justice of the New York State Supreme Court, the case intrigued me and I tried to understand why the prosecutor, upon failing to obtain an indictment, did not try again.

In January 2025, the victim and her boyfriend traveled from England to visit her father at his home in Collin County where the shooting occurred. Although evidence presented to a grand jury cannot be disclosed, it is reasonably assumed that the grand jury was provided with the statement made by the father to the police at the scene immediately following the shooting. In that statement, the father related how he had taken his daughter, at her request, to see his gun, and that when he brought her to his bedroom and removed the gun from a cabinet in which he kept it, “it went off.” He could not recall if his finger had been on the trigger.

Keep ReadingShow less
Citizens in Name Only: What the Supreme Court Can’t Fix
beige concrete building under blue sky during daytime

Citizens in Name Only: What the Supreme Court Can’t Fix

This month, the Supreme Court will rule on Trump v. Barbara, the case that could upend birthright citizenship as we have known it for over a century.

But the current debate over birthright citizenship overlooks the fact that legal citizenship — by birthright or naturalization — has never fully protected marginalized Americans. People of color, women, LGBTQ, and lower-income Americans have long been CINOs: Citizens in Name Only. Throughout our 250-year history, they have lacked full social citizenship - access to social/welfare entitlements, political citizenship – access to voting rights, and cultural citizenship – recognition as members of the American family. So, while a court ruling can determine who gets a U.S. birth certificate, it cannot guarantee societal inclusion.

Keep ReadingShow less
How State Courts Can Help Deflect the Supreme Court’s Latest Blow to Multiracial Democracy

Black and white illustration of voters

State Court Report

How State Courts Can Help Deflect the Supreme Court’s Latest Blow to Multiracial Democracy

With its April ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, the Supreme Court delivered yet another blow to the Voting Rights Act, specifically Section 2, which governs race in redistricting. The decision was sad and utterly predictable, but still nothing short of astonishing. Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the Court’s conservative supermajority, stealthily setting aside 40 years of legal precedent under Section 2 largely on the belief that racism is a thing of the past and extreme partisan gerrymandering is, in effect, a fundamental right of state lawmakers. Callais had a tortured path to the Court, a feature of the case that has undoubtedly been eclipsed by the lawless nature of the ruling itself, all of which reveals that the Supreme Court represents the gravest threat to multiracial democracy in the United States. (I argued as much in a law review article, predicting the outcome and analyzing the ways a Court gone rogue might get to that ruling.)

What’s more? In recent years, the Court has played fast and loose with a “principle” purportedly meant to limit chaos around elections, known as Purcell. But instead of limiting chaos, the Court’s Purcell jurisprudence will hasten and aggrandize the already-problematic impact of the Callais ruling. As the nation’s redistricting wars inevitably continue — in this election season, the 2028 presidential campaign, and even the next decade — state courts can help stave off democratic erosion by resisting the urge to invoke Purcell.

Keep ReadingShow less