Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Neighbors Turn to Each Other As ICE Raids Shake Los Angeles’ Immigrant Communities

News

Neighbors Turn to Each Other As ICE Raids Shake Los Angeles’ Immigrant Communities

Vendors sell merchandise in the Santee Alley area of the Fashion District on June 19, 2025 in Los Angeles, California. Fear of ICE raids and the recent violent protests occurring nearby have hurt business, keeping shoppers away from from the area known for its cut-rate electronics, inexpensive clothing and large selections of quinceañera dresses.

Getty Images, Scott Olson

When federal immigration enforcement operations swept through Los Angeles earlier this summer, the effects rippled far beyond the undocumented community. Entire neighborhoods saw the slowdown of businesses as the sense of fear began to settle in. Yet, the absence of safety nets has encouraged residents to rely on one another.

Across the city, mutual aid networks, some long-standing and others entirely new, have mobilized to meet urgent needs. From advocacy nonprofits to autonomous street-defense teams to the vendors themselves, the response reveals a pattern: in times of crisis, communities turn inward, pooling resources, skills, and trust to keep each other afloat.


Walking through the Fashion District’s Santee Alley, known locally as Los Callejones, the economic fallout is visible. Foot traffic is thin. Vendors lean against their stalls, scanning the street.

Erick, who helps run his family’s hat and embroidery shop, says the raids have cut business in half. “Since the ICE raids started, I’ve lost more than 50% of my revenue,” he said. “There’s a lot less people, and families are afraid of just walking around and shopping. It’s supposed to be a safe space, but now customers wonder if they’ll even make it home without being stopped.”

Even weekends, which used to be the busiest days, feel eerily slow. A group chat among vendors now acts as a warning system, allowing them to alert each other of possible ICE sightings.

Rodrigo Alvarado, who works at a cellphone accessories stand, has been in the Callejones for over a year. He says the decline in sales is steep and happened immediately after rumors of enforcement circulate. “More than anything, I feel like it is the bad promotion [misinformation] that has been circulating about Santee Alley. ICE has not been on the premises, and my bosses have told me if they were to show up, it would be trespassing,” he said.

At the end of the alley is a stand stacked with zines, flyers, and small plastic bags, each one containing what volunteers call a “Know Your Rights kit.” The station belongs to the Downtown LA Community Defense Center, an entirely autonomous, volunteer-run network that exists mostly through group chats and word of mouth.

“I can’t give my name,” one masked volunteer said, “but I’m a born-and-raised Angeleno. This effort is just a bunch of people who care about protecting the community. We don’t know each other personally, we organize anonymously, but we come together to get vendors the information and tools they need.”

The tools include legal guides distinguishing real judicial warrants from fake Department of Homeland Security warrants, private property signs to deter ICE from entering shops, and bright plastic whistles. Vendors are trained to use specific whistle calls to warn each other if ICE is nearby or if someone is detained.

The Defense Center also works on getting the community ready if a raid occurs. The organization has no official board and relies on rotating volunteers to step in when others are unable. Many of the printed materials come from other Angelenos who design, fund, and contribute to the cause.

On the other hand, InnerCity Struggle is a non-profit that has worked on education, housing, and economic justice in East Los Angeles for over 30 years. When ICE raids hit, they prioritize direct mutual aid efforts, raising $52,800 toward a $100,000 goal, to help immigrant families who lost income or faced deportation-related expenses through a $500 rental assistance or free grocery program.

Similarly, HIIT Factory LA, a local gym, launched a mutual aid drive providing groceries, gift cards, and bill assistance to impacted families, turning workout classes into fundraisers.

From nonprofit offices to gym floors to neighborhood groups in the Callejones, the common thread is taking initiative to help those that are directly affected, not only by spreading information but through resource and monetary help. These networks are rooted in the communities they serve; therefore, they know the specific needs of people and the best way to mend their hardship.

Still, the limits are clear. Funding runs out. Volunteers face burnout. And the risk of future raids remains constant.

These networks of resilience show that when the government turns against its people, neighbors can coordinate rapidly to preserve not just livelihoods but dignity.

Lluvia Chavez, a Mexican-American bilingual journalist dedicated to amplifying the stories of underrepresented communities, and a cohort member with the Fulcrum Fellowship

Please help the Fulcrum in its mission of nurturing the next generation of journalists by donating HERE!

Read More

USA, Washington D.C., Supreme Court building and blurred American flag against blue sky.

Americans increasingly distrust the Supreme Court. The answer may lie not only in Court reforms but in shifting power back to states, communities, and Congress.

Getty Images, TGI /Tetra Images

The Supreme Court Has a Legitimacy Problem—But Washington’s Monopoly on Power Is the Real Crisis

Americans disagree on much, but a new poll shows we agree on this: we don’t trust the Supreme Court. According to the latest Navigator survey, confidence in the Court is at rock bottom, especially among younger voters, women, and independents. Large numbers support term limits and ethical reforms. Even Republicans — the group with the most reason to cheer a conservative Court — are losing confidence in its direction.

The news media and political pundits’ natural tendency is to treat this as a story about partisan appointments or the latest scandal. But the problem goes beyond a single court or a single controversy. It reflects a deeper Constitutional breakdown: too much power has been nationalized, concentrated, and funneled into a handful of institutions that voters no longer see as accountable.

Keep ReadingShow less
A person putting on an "I Voted" sticker.

The Supreme Court’s review of Louisiana v. Callais could narrow Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and limit challenges to racially discriminatory voting maps.

Getty Images, kali9

Louisiana v. Callais: The Supreme Court’s Next Test for Voting Rights

Background and Legal Landscape

Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is one of the most powerful tools for combatting racial discrimination in voting. It prohibits any voting law, district map, or electoral process that results in a denial of the right to vote based on race. Crucially, Section 2 allows for private citizens and civil rights groups to challenge discriminatory electoral systems, a protection that has ensured fairer representation for communities of color. However, the Supreme Court is now considering whether to narrow Section 2’s reach in a high profile court case, Louisiana v. Callais. The case focuses on whether Louisiana’s congressional map—which only contains one majority Black district despite Black residents making up almost one-third of the population—violates Section 2 by diluting Black voting power. The Court’s decision to hear the case marks the latest chapter in the recent trend of judicial decisions around the scope and applications of the Voting Rights Act.

Keep ReadingShow less
Beyond the Protests: How To Support Immigrant Communities Amidst ICE Raids

A small flower wall, with information and signs, sits on the left side of the specified “free speech zone,” or the grassy area outside the Broadview ICE Detention Center, where law enforcement has allowed protestors to gather. The biggest sign, surrounded by flowers, says “THE PEOPLE UNITED WILL NEVER BE DEFEATED.”

Credit: Britton Struthers-Lugo, Oct. 30, 2025

Beyond the Protests: How To Support Immigrant Communities Amidst ICE Raids

The ongoing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids have created widespread panic and confusion across Chicago. Many of the city’s immigrant communities are hurting, and if you’ve found yourself asking “how can I help?”, you’re far from the only one.

“Every single one [U.S. resident] has constitutional rights regardless of their immigration status. And the community needs to know that. And when we allow those rights to be taken away from some, we risk that they're going to take all those rights from everyone. So we all need to feel compelled and concerned when we see that these rights are being stripped away from, right now, a group of people, because it will be just a matter of time for one of us to be the next target,” said Enrique Espinoza, an immigrant attorney at Chicago Kent College of Law.

Keep ReadingShow less
An abstract grid wall of shipping containers, unevenly arranged with some jutting out, all decorated in the colors and patterns of the USA flag. A prominent percentage sign overlays the grid.

The Supreme Court weighs Trump’s IEEPA tariffs, probing executive authority, rising consumer costs, manufacturing strain, and the future of U.S. trade governance.

Getty Images, J Studios

Tariffs on Trial: The Supreme Court’s Hidden Battle for Balance

On November 5, 2025, the Supreme Court convened what may be one of the most important trade cases of this generation. Justices across the ideological spectrum carefully probed whether a president may deploy sweeping import duties under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The outcome will resonate well beyond tariffs. It strikes at the heart of how America governs its commerce, regulates its markets, and wields power abroad.

President Trump’s argument rests on a dramatic claim: that persisting trade deficits, surging imports, and what he called a national security crisis tied to opioids and global supply chains justify tariffs of 10% to 50% on nearly all goods from most of the world. The statute invoked was intended for unusual and extraordinary threats—often adversarial regimes, economic warfare, or sanctions—not for broad-based economic measures against friend and foe alike. The justices registered deep doubts.

Keep ReadingShow less