Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Religious choice vs. Christian nationalism

Perston holding a sign that reads "Project 2025 is Christian nationalism"
Opponents of Project 2025 hold a rally at Times Square on July 27.
Selcuk Acar/Anadolu via Getty Images

American voters were under a lot of stress leading up to the Nov. 5 presidential election. That stress has continued given the uncertainty as to whether many of President-elect Donald Trump’s pronouncements are just negotiating techniques or serious proposals that he will implement through executive orders upon taking office.

Angst over our Constitution also prevails. Republicans have proposed concepts that would severely impact the separation of church and state concept that’s enshrined in America’s First Amendment, wanting to make Christianity the exclusive religion in our nation. Christian nationalism has also been supported by 91 state bills and is found in the right-wing Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, a 922-page blueprint for Trump to follow in his first 180 days of office.


Many of Trump’s allies support the concept of Christian nationalism, whereby they believe America was founded as a Christian nation and only Christians have the power to infuse their theology within our laws. However, the separation of church and state does at least three things: It frees us from the possible oppression of an established church, it permits everyone to believe as they choose and it protects secular public education.

Andra Watkins, a best selling author who was raised in a Christian nationalist family, feels Speaker Mike Johnson (R- La.), Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito are a sample of Christian nationalists who “ have infiltrated our legislative and judicial branches.”

It’s sad these right-wing entities weren’t good students of American history. As a quick review, America’s 13 original colonies belonged to the British empire and were subservient to an imperial church. The British monarchy formally lost control over its American subjects during the Revolutionary War. On July 4, 1776, and every Fourth of July since then, patriotic citizens celebrate religious freedom as well as political independence.

As Americans listen to the rhetoric proclaiming that the United States is a Christian nation, they should consider how the lack of religious freedom permeates more than 50 monarchies and authoritarian countries like China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Hungary, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Burma, Afghanistan and Syria.

It’s interesting the United States is one of the most diverse religious nations in the world yet we know almost nothing about others’ beliefs. Christian nationalism prioritizes an ethno-cultural, ethno-religious and ethno-nationalist framing around fear of "the other," and represents a serious danger to the 372 distinct faith groups in America

As stated by the Rev. Barry Howard, of the Church at Wieuca in Atlanta, “The principle of separation of church and state is not an attack on religion but a protection of religious freedom and individual rights. By maintaining this distinction, we uphold the values of democracy and equality.”

We all ought to reflect on and be thankful for America’s fundamental principle of separation of church and state given the uncertainties of what lies ahead.

The universal prayer “Dawning of the Spiritual Sun” by Sharron Stroud should be an important reminder to us all of the importance of honoring and respecting all religions in our nation:

Right now somewhere in the world
A Jew is saying his prayers,
A Hindu is chanting a mantra and a
Buddhist is kneeling at her sacred shrine.

Right now at this very moment someone is
Lighting a candle in a Cathedral,
Someone is making their haj toward Mecca
For it is the will of Allah.

And someone else lights a fire in a jungle,
Repeating an ancient mystical drama.
Many, many pathways up the mountaintop
And the view is always the same from the summit!

In the Dawning of the Spiritual Sun
For a moment all faiths became as One.
The Christian, Buddhist, Muslim, Jew . . .
Became as One and somehow knew.

That Mystic Voice that calls to me
“O yonder, yonder person, I Am Thee!”

Corbin is professor emeritus of marketing at the University of Northern Iowa.

Read More

White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

The rise of book bans and erasure of Black history from classrooms emotionally and systematically harms Black children. It's critical that we urge educators to represent Black experiences and stories in class.

Getty Images, Klaus Vedfelt

White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

When my son, Jonathan, was born, one of the first children’s books I bought was "So Much" by Trish Cooke. I was captivated by its joyful depiction of a Black family loving their baby boy. I read it to him often, wanting him to know that he was deeply loved, seen, and valued. In an era when politicians are banning books, sanitizing curricula, and policing the teaching of Black history, the idea of affirming Black children’s identities is miscast as divisive and wrong. Forty-two states have proposed or passed legislation restricting how race and history can be taught, including Black history. PEN America reported that nearly 16,000 books (many featuring Black stories) were banned from schools within the last three years across 43 states. These prohibitive policies and bans are presented as protecting the ‘feelings’ of White children, while at the same time ignoring and invalidating the feelings of Black children who live daily with the pain of erasure, distortion, and disregard in schools.

When I hear and see the ongoing devaluation of Black children in schools and public life, I, and other Black parents, recognize this pain firsthand. For instance, recently, my teenage granddaughter, Jaliyah, texted me, asking to visit the National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C., because she had heard that the President planned to close it. For what felt like the millionth time, my heart broke with the understanding that too many people fail to rally on behalf of Black children. Jaliyah’s question revealed what so many Black children intuitively understand—that their histories, their feelings, and their futures are often treated as expendable.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

equity, inclusion, diversity

AI generated

Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

Even before Trump’s actions against DEI, many in the academic community and elsewhere felt for some time that DEI had taken an unintended turn.

What was meant to provide support—in jobs, education, grants, and other ways—to those groups who historically and currently have suffered from discrimination became for others a sign of exclusion because all attention was placed on how these groups were faring, with little attention to others. Those left out were assumed not to need any help, but that was mistaken. They did need help and are angry.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two people in business attire walking into an office.

Dr. Valentina Greco reflects on how accent bias, internalized gatekeeping, and hidden prejudices shape academia—and how true change begins by confronting our own discomfort.

Getty Images, Marco VDM

How Do We Become the Gatekeepers?

“Do you have a moment?”

I turned and saw my senior colleague, Paul (not his real name), a mentor and sponsor, at my office door.

Keep ReadingShow less
So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

Conceptual image of multiple human face shapes in a variety of colors illustrating different races

Getty Images

So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

It is no secret that diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs are under attack in our country. They have been blamed for undermining free speech, meritocracy, and America itself. The University of Virginia is the latest to settle with the government and walk away from its DEI initiatives rather than defend its programs or find a new solution.

Those who decry DEI say they do so in the name of meritocracy. They argue that those who benefit from DEI programs do so at the expense of other, more qualified individuals, and that these programs are weakening professions such as our military, science, education, and healthcare. But these arguments have it exactly backwards. DEI programs were never designed to give privilege to underrepresented people. They were put in place to chip away at discrimination and nepotism, both concepts that are antithetical to meritocracy.

Keep ReadingShow less