Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

In Every Banana Republic You Need Enablers

Opinion

Protest ​Demonstrators holding up signs.

Demonstrators listen to speeches with other protesters during the "No Kings" protest on Oct. 18, 2025, in Portland, Oregon.

Mathieu Lewis-Rolland/Getty Images/TNS

In any so-called banana republic you need enablers. President Donald Trump has Mike Johnson, Speaker of the House, and Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito leading the charge. Johnson is pulling Congress along with the justices who are the most ferocious defenders of Trump on the Supreme Court. It just takes a handful of enablers to allow a king to assume his crown – or to have a banana republic. And these guys are exceptionally good at what they do.

And as jaywalking is only a crime if enforced, Trump is allowed to continue on doing whatever he wants without guardrails or fear of getting a ticket – just like most Americans feel about jaywalking: It’s against the law, but who really cares?


The “No Kings Day” march that took place over the past weekend fell around the same date, as fate would have it, as the anti-Vietnam War march in Washington, D.C. (October 21, 1967). At that time, over 100,000 people marched to show then-President Lyndon Johnson their objection to the war. It eventually contributed to Johnson deciding to not seek re-election in 1968. It became clear to Johnson that he was losing not just the war but the faith of the American people. Last weekend, over seven million Americans marched across the nation in more than 3,000 venues to express their lack of faith in Trump.

Johnson responded to the 1967 march by aggressively engaging in a propaganda campaign to allow him to push his false narrative about the conditions in Vietnam. Trump has countered with a Looney Tune-like AI cartoon posted on his social media page in which he is depicted as a king flying a jet over a crowd of No Kings protesters and dumping load after load of what presumably is human feces on their heads. Not funny. Well, I am sure dictators like Russian leader Vladimir Putin, Chinese President Xi Jinping, Iran’s leader and North Korea’s leader all found it hilarious.

If any other U.S. president did the same, congressional leaders would not be smiling and condoning it with their silence.

The No Kings march should be followed with a “no confidence” vote by state legislatures (state representatives and state senators). Such a follow-up act to the No Kings march would be a first, and it would be bad for Trump’s legacy, and it could act as strong pushback to his abuse of power. “We the People” do not have to wait until the 2026 mid-term elections to have our voices heard.

So, in order to be a king or an authoritarian you need enablers. Step up to the front, Justice Thomas and Speaker Johnson.

Thomas, the Black justice on the Supreme court, has earned deep disdain among the Black community. Some refer to him as an “Uncle Tom,” a term depicting a Black person who personally benefits from helping white people but hurts his own people. Thomas has boasted about not necessarily feeling bound to existing laws and precedence. According to Thomas, that translates to: “I will change the law (precedence) so others will not be breaking the law into the future.” It must be nice.

We have numerous key questions before the court – American citizenship, voting rights, civil rights, threatening private institutions to conform to Trump’s wishes or risk losing federal funds via the use of very questionable non-traditional tactics, potentially imposing unfunded mandates on states, withholding federal funds for previously approved appropriations, tariffs (the soybean crisis caused by Trump’s tariffs could result in a $20 billion bailout to U.S. farmers), use of the U.S. military on citizens often with little to no proof of emergencies.

So, who would truly want to change the laws so they are not truly breaking the law? My guess is that we should first look at the folks that have “invested” and ingratiated themselves with, or have financially helped, justices like Thomas.

While as a member of the court, Thomas has reportedly accepted $2-4 million in gifts while Alito has accepted nearly $200,000 in gifts from a handful of right-wing activists.

No other members of the court have received such generous monetary “assistance.”

Then we have the other enabler, Speaker Johnson.

The federal government is closed, and Johnson has refused to call Congress back in session to help work towards reopening the government. During the summer he closed Congress abruptly to prevent a vote on the release of the Epstein files. He has done everything in his power to stop the full release of these files in an effort which seems designed to protect Trump.

Johnson has also been silent on Trump using federal funds to buy shares in American companies, much like how China has part ownership of Chinese companies. Johnson does nothing as Trump plans to spend $20 billion to bail out Argentina (even though the power of the purse lies with Congress). Johnson has also refused to swear in a member of Congress who was elected in September. The speaker shows little curiosity when it comes to the U.S. attacks against small Venezuelan boats in the Caribbean, which have killed a number of people.

Trump pushed and Johnson allowed young kids to review the most sensitive areas of our government under Elon Musk’s DOGE initiative, usurping the powers of Congress and its already established oversight committees. DOGE’s results do not match the administration’s hyperbole of savings that it had originally claimed. And now its head, Musk, is gone.

When, in reality there is “no Congress,” that also puts you on the road toward a banana republic. They allow Trump to be a king.

Johnson is not doing his job, and he is proud of his failures. He has allowed Congress to be the most impotent and useless motley group of elected officials ever. Correction: Maybe he is doing “his job” if that job is being the enabler of an authoritarian leader.

And the remaining justices on the court, especially those who feel beholden to Trump because he appointed them, should beware of the twisted logic from the enablers on the bench. America can only truly become a banana republic if the high court allows it to be and if the states refuse to exercise their power – their states’ rights.

The current Congress is hopeless, due to a lack of courage of its Republican members and a lack of good and creative leadership among its Democratic members. It is all a reminder that we need to consider and financially support viable third-party candidates.


In Every Banana Republic You Need Enablers was originally published by The Tribune Content Agency and is republished with permission.

Gary Franks served three terms as a congressman from Connecticut’s 5th District. He was the first Black conservative elected to Congress and first Black Republican elected to the House in nearly 60 years. Host: Podcast "We Speak Frankly" www.garyfranksphilanthropy.org


Read More

People waving US flags

People waving US flags

LeoPatrizi/Getty Images

Democracy Fellowship Spotlight: Joel Gurin on Trustworthy Data

Earlier this year, the Bridge Alliance and the National Academy of Public Administration launched the Fellows for Democracy and Public Service Initiative to strengthen the country's civic foundations. This fellowship unites the Academy’s distinguished experts with the Bridge Alliance’s cross‑sector ecosystem to elevate distributed leadership throughout the democracy reform landscape. Instead of relying on traditional, top‑down models, the program builds leadership ecosystems: spaces where people share expertise, prioritize collaboration, and use public‑facing storytelling to renew trust in democratic institutions. Each fellow grounds their work in one of six core sectors essential to a thriving democratic republic.

Recently, I interviewed Joel Gurin, who founded and now leads the Center for Open Data Enterprise (CODE) and wrote Open Data Now. Before launching CODE in 2015, he chaired the White House Task Force on Smart Disclosure, which studied how open government data can improve consumer markets. He also led as Chief of the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at the Federal Communications Commission and spent over a decade at Consumer Reports.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

People clear rubble in a house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. The United States and Israel continued their joint attack on Iran that began on February 28. Iran retaliated by firing waves of missiles and drones at Israel, and targeting U.S. allies in the region.

Getty Images, Majid Saeedi

Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

Most of what we have heard from the administration as it pertains to the Iran War is swagger and bro-talk. A few days into the war, the White House released a social media video that combined footage of the bombardment with clips from video games. Not long after, it released a second video, titled “Justice the American Way,” that mixed images of the U.S. military with scenes from movies like Gladiator and Top Gun Maverick.

Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon, War Secretary Pete Hegseth boasted of “death and destruction from the sky all day long.” “They are toast, and they know it,” he said. “This was never meant to be a fair fight... we are punching them while they’re down.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Bomb First, Debate Later: The Hidden Cost of How America Makes War Now

A general view of Tehran with smoke visible in the distance after explosions were reported in the city, on March 02, 2026 in Tehran, Iran.

Getty Images, Contributor

Bomb First, Debate Later: The Hidden Cost of How America Makes War Now

For those old enough to remember the first Gulf War, the scenes feel painfully familiar: smoke rising over Tehran. Babies carried out of a bombed-out hospital in incubators. Missiles striking cities across the Middle East. Oil markets in turmoil as Iran threatens to close the Strait of Hormuz. The war of choice that began with Israeli and American strikes on Iran is widening by the hour, pulling in multiple countries, including NATO allies, and producing casualties that mount by the day.

Much of the early discussion has focused on obvious questions. How far will the conflict spread? How many people will die? What will it cost the United States in money, lives, and global stability?

Keep ReadingShow less