Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

In Every Banana Republic You Need Enablers

Opinion

Protest ​Demonstrators holding up signs.

Demonstrators listen to speeches with other protesters during the "No Kings" protest on Oct. 18, 2025, in Portland, Oregon.

Mathieu Lewis-Rolland/Getty Images/TNS

In any so-called banana republic you need enablers. President Donald Trump has Mike Johnson, Speaker of the House, and Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito leading the charge. Johnson is pulling Congress along with the justices who are the most ferocious defenders of Trump on the Supreme Court. It just takes a handful of enablers to allow a king to assume his crown – or to have a banana republic. And these guys are exceptionally good at what they do.

And as jaywalking is only a crime if enforced, Trump is allowed to continue on doing whatever he wants without guardrails or fear of getting a ticket – just like most Americans feel about jaywalking: It’s against the law, but who really cares?


The “No Kings Day” march that took place over the past weekend fell around the same date, as fate would have it, as the anti-Vietnam War march in Washington, D.C. (October 21, 1967). At that time, over 100,000 people marched to show then-President Lyndon Johnson their objection to the war. It eventually contributed to Johnson deciding to not seek re-election in 1968. It became clear to Johnson that he was losing not just the war but the faith of the American people. Last weekend, over seven million Americans marched across the nation in more than 3,000 venues to express their lack of faith in Trump.

Johnson responded to the 1967 march by aggressively engaging in a propaganda campaign to allow him to push his false narrative about the conditions in Vietnam. Trump has countered with a Looney Tune-like AI cartoon posted on his social media page in which he is depicted as a king flying a jet over a crowd of No Kings protesters and dumping load after load of what presumably is human feces on their heads. Not funny. Well, I am sure dictators like Russian leader Vladimir Putin, Chinese President Xi Jinping, Iran’s leader and North Korea’s leader all found it hilarious.

If any other U.S. president did the same, congressional leaders would not be smiling and condoning it with their silence.

The No Kings march should be followed with a “no confidence” vote by state legislatures (state representatives and state senators). Such a follow-up act to the No Kings march would be a first, and it would be bad for Trump’s legacy, and it could act as strong pushback to his abuse of power. “We the People” do not have to wait until the 2026 mid-term elections to have our voices heard.

So, in order to be a king or an authoritarian you need enablers. Step up to the front, Justice Thomas and Speaker Johnson.

Thomas, the Black justice on the Supreme court, has earned deep disdain among the Black community. Some refer to him as an “Uncle Tom,” a term depicting a Black person who personally benefits from helping white people but hurts his own people. Thomas has boasted about not necessarily feeling bound to existing laws and precedence. According to Thomas, that translates to: “I will change the law (precedence) so others will not be breaking the law into the future.” It must be nice.

We have numerous key questions before the court – American citizenship, voting rights, civil rights, threatening private institutions to conform to Trump’s wishes or risk losing federal funds via the use of very questionable non-traditional tactics, potentially imposing unfunded mandates on states, withholding federal funds for previously approved appropriations, tariffs (the soybean crisis caused by Trump’s tariffs could result in a $20 billion bailout to U.S. farmers), use of the U.S. military on citizens often with little to no proof of emergencies.

So, who would truly want to change the laws so they are not truly breaking the law? My guess is that we should first look at the folks that have “invested” and ingratiated themselves with, or have financially helped, justices like Thomas.

While as a member of the court, Thomas has reportedly accepted $2-4 million in gifts while Alito has accepted nearly $200,000 in gifts from a handful of right-wing activists.

No other members of the court have received such generous monetary “assistance.”

Then we have the other enabler, Speaker Johnson.

The federal government is closed, and Johnson has refused to call Congress back in session to help work towards reopening the government. During the summer he closed Congress abruptly to prevent a vote on the release of the Epstein files. He has done everything in his power to stop the full release of these files in an effort which seems designed to protect Trump.

Johnson has also been silent on Trump using federal funds to buy shares in American companies, much like how China has part ownership of Chinese companies. Johnson does nothing as Trump plans to spend $20 billion to bail out Argentina (even though the power of the purse lies with Congress). Johnson has also refused to swear in a member of Congress who was elected in September. The speaker shows little curiosity when it comes to the U.S. attacks against small Venezuelan boats in the Caribbean, which have killed a number of people.

Trump pushed and Johnson allowed young kids to review the most sensitive areas of our government under Elon Musk’s DOGE initiative, usurping the powers of Congress and its already established oversight committees. DOGE’s results do not match the administration’s hyperbole of savings that it had originally claimed. And now its head, Musk, is gone.

When, in reality there is “no Congress,” that also puts you on the road toward a banana republic. They allow Trump to be a king.

Johnson is not doing his job, and he is proud of his failures. He has allowed Congress to be the most impotent and useless motley group of elected officials ever. Correction: Maybe he is doing “his job” if that job is being the enabler of an authoritarian leader.

And the remaining justices on the court, especially those who feel beholden to Trump because he appointed them, should beware of the twisted logic from the enablers on the bench. America can only truly become a banana republic if the high court allows it to be and if the states refuse to exercise their power – their states’ rights.

The current Congress is hopeless, due to a lack of courage of its Republican members and a lack of good and creative leadership among its Democratic members. It is all a reminder that we need to consider and financially support viable third-party candidates.


In Every Banana Republic You Need Enablers was originally published by The Tribune Content Agency and is republished with permission.

Gary Franks served three terms as a congressman from Connecticut’s 5th District. He was the first Black conservative elected to Congress and first Black Republican elected to the House in nearly 60 years. Host: Podcast "We Speak Frankly" www.garyfranksphilanthropy.org


Read More

Capitol Building.

An in-depth examination of the erosion of checks and balances in the United States, exploring Project 2025, executive overreach, and the growing strain on constitutional democracy—and the critical role of citizens in preserving it.

Getty Images, Rudy Sulgan

The Mirror Has Cracked: How the Three Branches Failed America

James Madison warned that the government would always mirror human nature — its virtues and its flaws. “What is government itself,” he asked, “but the greatest of all reflections on human nature?” The United States was built on a radical promise: a participatory government “of the people, by the people, for the people.” Today, that mirror is cracking in real time. What once reflected a nation striving toward freedom and equality now reflects something far more chaotic — a government drifting from its constitutional purpose and reshaped by loyalty tests, political revenge, and a blueprint designed to consolidate power.

In 2026, that reflection is unmistakable: a government shaped not by three independent branches, but by a president’s loyalists and a coordinated plan to remake American democracy from the inside out. The framers built guardrails — separation of powers, checks and balances, and independent institutions — to prevent the rise of authoritarian rule. Yet the country now faces a blueprint, Project 2025, that overrides those protections by placing independent agencies under presidential control, replacing civil servants with loyalists, and weaponizing the Department of Justice. This is not drift. It is design. And it has left the nation with a government that no longer reflects the people but instead reflects the ambitions of those who seek power without accountability.

Keep ReadingShow less
Independents and Republicans May Hold the Power in Los Angeles – If They Actually Vote
Image: Jamie Phamon Alamy. Image licensed obtained and used by IVN Editor Shawn Griffiths

Independents and Republicans May Hold the Power in Los Angeles – If They Actually Vote

Los Angeles voters are heading into a June 2 primary that may settle far more than who advances to November.

Under the Los Angeles City Charter, any candidate who clears 50% of the primary vote wins outright. No runoff. No November election. That rule turns the June primary into the only election in several of the city's most closely watched contests.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Hidden Infrastructure of Democracy: Professionalizing and Diversifying Election Staff

Dr. Shaniqua Williams, assistant professor of political science

The Hidden Infrastructure of Democracy: Professionalizing and Diversifying Election Staff

Earlier this year, the Bridge Alliance and the National Academy of Public Administration launched the Fellows for Democracy and Public Service Initiative to strengthen the country's civic foundations. This fellowship unites the Academy’s distinguished experts with the Bridge Alliance’s cross‑sector ecosystem to elevate distributed leadership throughout the democracy reform landscape. Instead of relying on traditional, top‑down models, the program builds leadership ecosystems—spaces where people share expertise, prioritize collaboration, and use public‑facing storytelling to renew trust in democratic institutions. Each fellow grounds their work in one of six core sectors essential to a thriving democratic republic.

Below is an interview with Dr. Shaniqua Williams, Assistant Professor at West Virginia University. Her research focuses on state politics, race and ethnicity, Black political behavior, Black women’s descriptive and substantive representation, and election administration. She is also a Research Fellow with the Center for Election Innovation and Research, where her work focuses on election administration, workforce development, infrastructure, and policy.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democracy Isn’t Eroding. It’s Evolving. The Question Is: Toward What?
a group of flags

Democracy Isn’t Eroding. It’s Evolving. The Question Is: Toward What?

I fell in love with democracy before I fully understood it.

In high school civics classes in the 1990s, I learned about a system that was imperfect in its origins but evolving toward something better. I believed in that evolution. I believed that democracy, if nurtured, could become more inclusive than the one it started as.

Keep ReadingShow less