Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Trump's Perversion of U.S. History

Opinion

A display entitled 'The Dirty Business of Slavery' at the President's House on August 9, 2025 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Tourists inspect a display entitled 'The Dirty Business of Slavery' at the President's House on August 9, 2025 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Getty Images, Matthew Hatcher

One more example of Trump's broadcasting fake news and lies is his confrontation with American history.

In his Executive Order, "Restore Truth and Sanity to American History," Trump stated that there has been "a concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history, replacing objective facts with a distorted narrative driven by ideology rather than truth." He has, among other things, instructed the National Park Service and a variety of museums and other sites to remove all information that "inappropriately disparage Americans, past or living." This includes information about slavery, the treatment of Native Americans, and a host of other subjects.


While it may make some people uncomfortable or angry to have these subjects raised officially in public, they do just state the facts. The purpose of history is not to make people comfortable; it is to learn from the past. As usual, it is instead Trump who is "replacing objective facts with a distorted narrative driven by ideology rather than truth."

This is not, as he says, "a revisionist history," it is rather, "calling a spade a spade." It is only revisionist in the sense that, in the past, neither the government nor many institutions were interested in telling the truth of our history to the American public; what they provided was a whitewashed version of history.

That attitude ended decades ago, and the truth has been out ever since. Slavery was a horrific experience. Many Founding Fathers, including Washington and Jefferson, were slave holders. A host of inhumane actions were taken against the Native American inhabitants of our country. And the list goes on.

As usual, Trump clothes his lies with the aura of fighting for truth, when, in fact, he is perverting the truth through outright lies or misinformation by providing information only on what made America great and omitting information about troublesome aspects of American history.

What is, however, almost as troubling as Trump's playing up to his white supremacist supporters, is that Black leadership organizations, organizations with moral authority (i.e., churches), and people themselves have not raised their voices, not just in objection or condemnation but in massive displays of disapproval through public non-violent demonstrations. Yes, there have been ongoing demonstrations about the actions of ICE, but they have been disappointingly small; e.g., thousands marched in Manhattan, but there should have been hundreds of thousands.

Has Trump effectively put the fear of his wrath in so many people and organizations that few will stick their neck out to speak out against him and his MAGA allies? Have people come to feel that Trump will get away with anything he wants to do (the Supreme Court has consistently allowed him to continue his actions while cases are proceeding slowly through the courts), so that they feel there is no reason to make the effort to oppose him?

How would Martin Luther King Jr. have reacted to recent events? Would he have stood at the sidelines and just voiced his despair? It's great that the American bishops of the Catholic Church and several American cardinals came out with forceful statements rebuking Trump's efforts, but those statements contained no call to action by anyone, whether politicians or the people.

Demonstrations would unlikely change Trump's direction, but they would provide evidence both to America's silent majority as well as the world that Trump is acting in ways that are decidedly un-American and that are only supported by his base. And by so doing, it would increase the likelihood that at last some Republican legislators will speak their mind, if only to ensure that they are re-elected this November.

As citizens of this republic, it is ultimately our responsibility—not the politicians'—to insure that our democracy and our history remain intact.


Ronald L. Hirsch is a teacher, legal aid lawyer, survey researcher, nonprofit executive, consultant, composer, author, and volunteer. He is a graduate of Brown University and the University of Chicago Law School and the author of We Still Hold These Truths. Read more of his writing at www.PreservingAmericanValues.com


Read More

Allies United Holds Cross‑Community Meetings to Protect Civil Rights Across Chicagoland

Fight For Today For A Better Tomorrow sign

Canva

Allies United Holds Cross‑Community Meetings to Protect Civil Rights Across Chicagoland

En español

Operation Midway Blitz outraged much of the Chicagoland community last September when U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents raided neighborhoods, arrested thousands of individuals, and fatally shot Mexican immigrant Silverio Villegas González.

Witnessing these injustices across the country and in Chicago, two local coalitions came together last year to form Allies United, a Chicago-based coalition initially focused on responding to immigration raids, and now prioritizing protecting civil rights and building long-term cross‑community solidarity.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Republic at 250: What History Teaches — and What Americans Must Choose
white red and blue textile

A Republic at 250: What History Teaches — and What Americans Must Choose

As the United States approaches both a consequential election cycle and the 250th anniversary of its founding, Americans stand at a crossroads the framers anticipated but hoped we would never reach: a moment when citizens must decide whether to allow the Republic to erode or restore it through vigilance. This is not about left or right. It is about whether we still share a common vision of the country we want to be — and whether we still believe in the same Republic.

The Founders never imagined “the land of the free” as a place dependent on benevolent leaders. They built a system in which the people — not the government — were the safeguards against overreach. James Madison warned that “the accumulation of all powers…in the same hands…may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny,” a reminder that freedom depends on restraint, not trust in any single individual. George Washington pledged that the Constitution would remain “the guide which I will never abandon,” signaling that loyalty to the Republic must always outweigh loyalty to any leader. These were not ceremonial lines. They were instructions — a blueprint for preventing institutional strain, polarization, and distrust we see today.

Keep ReadingShow less
Person holding a sign in front of the U.S. capitol that reads, "We The People."

The nation has reached a divide in the road—a moment when Americans must decide whether to accept a slow weakening of the Republic or insist on the principles that have held it together for more than two centuries

Getty Images

A Republic Under Strain—And a Choice Ahead

Americans feel something shifting beneath their feet — quieter than crisis but unmistakably a strain. Many live with a steady sense of uncertainty, conflict, and the emotional weight of issues that seem impossible to escape. They feel unheard, unsafe, or unsure whether the Republic they trust is fading. Friends, relatives, and former colleagues say they’ve tried to look away just to cope, hoping the turmoil will pass. And they ask the same thing: if the framers made the people the primary control on government, how will they help set the Republic back on a steadier path?

Understanding the strain Americans are experiencing is essential, but so is recognizing the choice we still have. Madison’s warning offers the answer the framers left us: when trust erodes and power concentrates, the Constitution turns back to the people—not as a slogan, but as a structural reality.

Keep ReadingShow less
Latest Attack Threatening President Trump Reflects Rising Political Violence in US

President Donald Trump speaks at the White House on April 25, 2026, after the cancellation of the annual White House Correspondents Association Dinner.

Latest Attack Threatening President Trump Reflects Rising Political Violence in US

For the third time in three years, Donald Trump has come under threat by an attacker. Many facts remain unclear after a gunman stormed the Washington Hilton on April 25, 2026, during the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner.

As the investigation into the shooting continues, Alfonso Serrano, The Conversation’s politics and society editor, spoke with James Piazza, a political violence scholar at Penn State, about what is driving the rise of political violence in the U.S. and what can be done about it.

Keep ReadingShow less