Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Trump's Perversion of U.S. History

Opinion

A display entitled 'The Dirty Business of Slavery' at the President's House on August 9, 2025 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Tourists inspect a display entitled 'The Dirty Business of Slavery' at the President's House on August 9, 2025 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Getty Images, Matthew Hatcher

One more example of Trump's broadcasting fake news and lies is his confrontation with American history.

In his Executive Order, "Restore Truth and Sanity to American History," Trump stated that there has been "a concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history, replacing objective facts with a distorted narrative driven by ideology rather than truth." He has, among other things, instructed the National Park Service and a variety of museums and other sites to remove all information that "inappropriately disparage Americans, past or living." This includes information about slavery, the treatment of Native Americans, and a host of other subjects.


While it may make some people uncomfortable or angry to have these subjects raised officially in public, they do just state the facts. The purpose of history is not to make people comfortable; it is to learn from the past. As usual, it is instead Trump who is "replacing objective facts with a distorted narrative driven by ideology rather than truth."

This is not, as he says, "a revisionist history," it is rather, "calling a spade a spade." It is only revisionist in the sense that, in the past, neither the government nor many institutions were interested in telling the truth of our history to the American public; what they provided was a whitewashed version of history.

That attitude ended decades ago, and the truth has been out ever since. Slavery was a horrific experience. Many Founding Fathers, including Washington and Jefferson, were slave holders. A host of inhumane actions were taken against the Native American inhabitants of our country. And the list goes on.

As usual, Trump clothes his lies with the aura of fighting for truth, when, in fact, he is perverting the truth through outright lies or misinformation by providing information only on what made America great and omitting information about troublesome aspects of American history.

What is, however, almost as troubling as Trump's playing up to his white supremacist supporters, is that Black leadership organizations, organizations with moral authority (i.e., churches), and people themselves have not raised their voices, not just in objection or condemnation but in massive displays of disapproval through public non-violent demonstrations. Yes, there have been ongoing demonstrations about the actions of ICE, but they have been disappointingly small; e.g., thousands marched in Manhattan, but there should have been hundreds of thousands.

Has Trump effectively put the fear of his wrath in so many people and organizations that few will stick their neck out to speak out against him and his MAGA allies? Have people come to feel that Trump will get away with anything he wants to do (the Supreme Court has consistently allowed him to continue his actions while cases are proceeding slowly through the courts), so that they feel there is no reason to make the effort to oppose him?

How would Martin Luther King Jr. have reacted to recent events? Would he have stood at the sidelines and just voiced his despair? It's great that the American bishops of the Catholic Church and several American cardinals came out with forceful statements rebuking Trump's efforts, but those statements contained no call to action by anyone, whether politicians or the people.

Demonstrations would unlikely change Trump's direction, but they would provide evidence both to America's silent majority as well as the world that Trump is acting in ways that are decidedly un-American and that are only supported by his base. And by so doing, it would increase the likelihood that at last some Republican legislators will speak their mind, if only to ensure that they are re-elected this November.

As citizens of this republic, it is ultimately our responsibility—not the politicians'—to insure that our democracy and our history remain intact.


Ronald L. Hirsch is a teacher, legal aid lawyer, survey researcher, nonprofit executive, consultant, composer, author, and volunteer. He is a graduate of Brown University and the University of Chicago Law School and the author of We Still Hold These Truths. Read more of his writing at www.PreservingAmericanValues.com


Read More

How an 1876 Massacre of Black Men in South Carolina Turned Racial Terror Into Political Power

This statue on the grounds of the South Carolina State House honors violent segregationist Ben Tillman, who also served as governor and U.S. senator.

How an 1876 Massacre of Black Men in South Carolina Turned Racial Terror Into Political Power

As the U.S. celebrates its 250th anniversary, its citizens commemorate a democracy more diverse, free and inclusive than it’s ever been. The path to this milestone was imperfect and paved in blood and suffering. Still, few of the revelers will likely pay heed to the anniversary of another historic event: the 150th anniversary of the July 1876 Hamburg massacre.

The massacre, which took place in Hamburg, South Carolina, began as a dispute between a local Black militia and two white citizens over whether the latter could cross the group’s centennial Fourth of July parade. The militia leader, Doc Adams, was later charged with blocking a public highway.

Keep ReadingShow less
A crowd of supporters holding signs behind Senate candidate Dr. Abdul El-Sayed as he stands and speaks at a podium outside in front of a crowd.

The crowd cheers as Senate candidate Dr. Abdul El-Sayed speaks during the "People vs. the Powerful" rally in Lansing, Michigan, on July 19, 2026.

Rosem Morton for The 19th

Who Is Electable? Michigan’s Senate Primary Asks a Familiar Question.

DETROIT — Rep. Jim Clyburn of South Carolina, a top Black House Democrat, was making the case for a moderate politician running on boosting jobs and manufacturing. Six years ago, it was to crowds in his home state, arguing that Joe Biden was the best positioned to win in a general election. This time, it was on a stage in Detroit, for a candidate in one of 2026’s most hotly contested Senate primaries.

“I know what it takes to energize Democratic voters. I know she has what it takes to energize Democratic voters, and we need that,” Clyburn said alongside Rep. Haley Stevens, a candidate for U.S. Senate in Michigan, at a Teamsters hall in Detroit on Friday before the two rallied alongside Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.

Keep ReadingShow less
Voter receives a pen from poll worker at polling station.

A civic petition calling for constitutional restraint, civil discourse, bipartisan cooperation, and equal justice to strengthen American democracy and national unity.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

A Contemporary Olive Branch Petition

To the President of the United States, the Leaders of the Congress, and Our Fellow Americans Entrusted with the Powers of Government:

When, in the ordinary course of a free republic, disagreements arise among citizens concerning the proper exercise of power, it is neither unusual nor dishonorable that earnest convictions should differ. Such diversity has long been the strength of our nation, for liberty has never depended upon unanimity of opinion, but upon mutual respect under a common Constitution.

Keep ReadingShow less
Close-up shot of a Black woman's hands receiving a mail-in ballot to vote in a USA Presidential, Senatorial, Congressional, or local election

Federal investigators spent eight months reviewing the Allied Pilots Association election, examining ballot secrecy, observer rights, election records and transparency before allowing the results to stand.

Jeremy Poland/Getty Images

What a Federal Investigation of a Union Election Can Teach Us About Democratic Trust

For eight months, federal investigators examined allegations involving ballot secrecy, observer rights, election records and reporting procedures in a contested union election before allowing the result to stand.

Following a disputed election within the Allied Pilots Association (APA), complaints led to a formal review by the U.S. Department of Labor's Office of Labor-Management Standards. Investigators spent months going through election records, audit logs, witness testimony and technical documentation before reaching their conclusion.

Keep ReadingShow less