Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Investigations Committee Releases COVID Vaccine Adverse Effects Report, Research Debated across Party Lines

News

Osha Vaccination
OSHA Vaccine Mandate: Osha releases long-awaited vaccination/testing standard
Photo by Daniel Schludi on Unsplash

WASHINGTON–The Homeland Security subcommittee on investigations released a report alleging that the FDA, under President Joe Biden, hid information about potential adverse effects of COVID vaccines.

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis, the committee’s majority chairman, and his team investigated whether the federal government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System had failed to accurately report data on negative side effects from mRNA COVID vaccinations, and in turn, misinformed the public.


“The bottom line is all about hindsight that you need to expose what happens so it never happens again,” Sen. Johnson said in an interview with Medill News Services. “We have to be honest with the American public, and we haven’t been.”

The report, released in conjunction with a subcommittee hearing, included allegations that Food and Drug Administration officials failed to adequately gather and analyze data on vaccine adverse effects.

“The timeline will also show how FDA officials reacted to Dr. [Ana] Szarfman’s findings, their growing concern about her access to the safety data, and their failure to adjust the FDA’s data mining analysis to account for the significant flaws in their methodology that masked dozens of statistically significant adverse events for the COVID-19 vaccines,” the report states, referring to a FDA senior medical officer and safety data mining developer Dr. Szarfman.

Sen. Johnson stated that the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System grossly underreported the number of adverse events after individuals received the COVID vaccination, and that a significant number of COVID vaccinated individuals experienced life-altering side effects.

The committee’s report mentioned several potential adverse effects, including Bell’s Palsy, pulmonary infarctions, and myocarditis. The research, however, shows otherwise. Myocarditis, which was emphasized in the report as a side effect of the vaccine Biden health officials ignored, often makes partial-to-full recoveries.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn, the committee's top Democrat, defended the vaccines, stressing that their benefits outweighed the risks.

“Instead of talking about success and remembering the ones we lost, vaccine opponents turned one of the greatest scientific breakthroughs in our country's history into fodder for political attack,” Sen. Blumenthal said. “Today's hearing purports to discuss a cover up of side effects of the vaccine, as if serious flaws in vaccines were purposely ignored. Let me be clear, they were not ignored, they were not disregarded, they were not covered up.”

Additionally, Sen. Blumenthal stated that the report does not change anything about the safety of the vaccine, and that there is no evidence to support the alleged “cover up”.

“Scientists who were actively looking for ways to detect side effects support a predetermined and flawed thesis that COVID-19 vaccines have done more harm than good,” Sen. Blumenthal said. “That’s not the scientific method to have a preconceived notion, then frame the evidence to fit the outcome.”

Dr. Karl Jablonowski claimed that problems with the government’s management of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System lacked guidance from outside scientists and the lack of research on the vaccine’s negative effects.

“The then secretary of HHS [Health and Human Services] could have then changed history with one word,” Jablonowski, director of science and research at Children’s Health Defense, said. “He could have summoned the greatest army of statisticians, mathematicians, and data scientists ever assembled under one word. That one word was help.”

Children’s Health Defense is a non-profit organization that primarily advocates against vaccines and eliminating childhood chronic illness. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. founded the organization and was chairman of the board from 2015 until 2023.

Maria Young, a severe COVID-19 survivor and advocate who works alongside nonprofit organizations specializing in vaccine education testified to the importance of the COVID vaccine. Young stated that despite sharing her testimony, she wishes she could have attested more to the importance of victims having a say in the overall conversation about the COVID vaccine.

“I just wish I would have been able to speak more or respond to what some of the other people said because what we’re losing here is the victims,” Young said in an interview with Medill News Services. “I think that's what we need to remember, what COVID left us with afterwards.”

Jaylyn Preslicka is a reporter for Medill News Services.


Read More

Trump Is Protecting Insurrectionists But Not Your Kids

An analysis of gun violence, political extremism, Islamophobia, and community resilience in America after the San Diego Islamic Center shooting.

GemaIbarra / Getty Images

Trump Is Protecting Insurrectionists But Not Your Kids

Last Monday, two teenage gunmen opened fire outside the Islamic Center of San Diego, murdering three Muslim men. Unfortunately, this is the type of horror Americans have been conditioned to expect. After years of political stagnation on gun safety and ongoing hateful acts of violence, our president has signaled once again to children, to the Muslim community, and to everyone else: he does not care if you get shot.

Gun violence has been on the rise in the United States for too long. Perhaps the most harrowing consequence is that gun violence is now the leading cause of death among children. Whether from school shootings, homicides, suicides, or accidents, the gun-death rate for children is nearly five in every 100,000. In fact, the number of domestic deaths due to gun violence is about as many as U.S. military deaths in every war since World War I combined. More children have been lost to gun violence since 2020 than troops lost since 9/11. Yet even with such a striking death toll—and one affecting children no less—happening on our own soil, Vice President J.D. Vance calls it a “fact of life.

Keep ReadingShow less
The dome of the United States Capitol Building in Washington, D.C., stands tall against a blue sky with the American flag waving proudly

Congress faces growing pressure to pass redistricting reform as lawmakers debate banning gerrymandering, independent commissions, and mid-decade map changes amid renewed national controversy over fair elections.

Getty Images, aire images

Congress's Missed Opportunities on Redistricting Reform

On April 29, Issue One posted an image on Facebook and Instagram: CONGRESS CAN FIX THIS WITH THREE SIMPLE STEPS:

  1. Establish Clear National Criteria for Fair Maps
  2. Require Independent Redistricting Commissions in Every State
  3. Ban Mid-Decade Redistricting.

Issue One added below: “… but it needs 60 Senate votes to do it.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Open Letter to Justice Roberts: Partisan Gerrymandering Is Unconstitutional
beige concrete building under blue sky during daytime

Open Letter to Justice Roberts: Partisan Gerrymandering Is Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court, in holding that partisan gerrymandering is permissible—unless it "goes too far"—stated that the argument made against this practice based on the Court's "one person, one vote" doctrine didn't work because the cases that developed that doctrine were about ensuring that each vote had an equal weight. The Court reasoned that after redistricting, each vote still has equal weight.

I would respectfully disagree. After admittedly partisan redistricting, each vote does not have an equal weight. The purpose of partisan gerrymandering is typically to create a "safe" seat—to group citizens so that the dominant political party has a clear majority of the voters. It's the transformation of a contested seat or even a seat safe for the other party into a safe seat for the party doing the redistricting.

Keep ReadingShow less
Tourists gather at Mather Point on the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, enjoying panoramic views of the iconic natural wonder

National Park Service budget cuts are reshaping America’s public lands through underfunding and neglect. Explore how declining park staffing, deferred maintenance, and political inaction threaten national parks, local economies, and public trust in government.

Getty Images, miroslav_1

They Won’t Close the Parks. They’ll Just Let Them Fail.

This summer, before dawn, the Liu family from Buffalo will load up their SUV, coffee in hand, bound for a long-planned trip out west. The Grand Canyon has been on their list for years, something to do before the kids get too old and schedules get too tight. They expect crowds. They expect long lines at the entrance. That is part of the deal. In recent years, national parks have drawn more than 325 million visits annually, near record highs.

What they do not expect are shuttered visitor centers and closed trails, not because of weather but because there are not enough staff to maintain them. What they do not see is the budget decision in Washington that made those trade-offs, quietly, indirectly, and without much debate.

Keep ReadingShow less