Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Investigations Committee Releases COVID Vaccine Adverse Effects Report, Research Debated across Party Lines

News

Osha Vaccination
OSHA Vaccine Mandate: Osha releases long-awaited vaccination/testing standard
Photo by Daniel Schludi on Unsplash

WASHINGTON–The Homeland Security subcommittee on investigations released a report alleging that the FDA, under President Joe Biden, hid information about potential adverse effects of COVID vaccines.

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis, the committee’s majority chairman, and his team investigated whether the federal government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System had failed to accurately report data on negative side effects from mRNA COVID vaccinations, and in turn, misinformed the public.


“The bottom line is all about hindsight that you need to expose what happens so it never happens again,” Sen. Johnson said in an interview with Medill News Services. “We have to be honest with the American public, and we haven’t been.”

The report, released in conjunction with a subcommittee hearing, included allegations that Food and Drug Administration officials failed to adequately gather and analyze data on vaccine adverse effects.

“The timeline will also show how FDA officials reacted to Dr. [Ana] Szarfman’s findings, their growing concern about her access to the safety data, and their failure to adjust the FDA’s data mining analysis to account for the significant flaws in their methodology that masked dozens of statistically significant adverse events for the COVID-19 vaccines,” the report states, referring to a FDA senior medical officer and safety data mining developer Dr. Szarfman.

Sen. Johnson stated that the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System grossly underreported the number of adverse events after individuals received the COVID vaccination, and that a significant number of COVID vaccinated individuals experienced life-altering side effects.

The committee’s report mentioned several potential adverse effects, including Bell’s Palsy, pulmonary infarctions, and myocarditis. The research, however, shows otherwise. Myocarditis, which was emphasized in the report as a side effect of the vaccine Biden health officials ignored, often makes partial-to-full recoveries.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn, the committee's top Democrat, defended the vaccines, stressing that their benefits outweighed the risks.

“Instead of talking about success and remembering the ones we lost, vaccine opponents turned one of the greatest scientific breakthroughs in our country's history into fodder for political attack,” Sen. Blumenthal said. “Today's hearing purports to discuss a cover up of side effects of the vaccine, as if serious flaws in vaccines were purposely ignored. Let me be clear, they were not ignored, they were not disregarded, they were not covered up.”

Additionally, Sen. Blumenthal stated that the report does not change anything about the safety of the vaccine, and that there is no evidence to support the alleged “cover up”.

“Scientists who were actively looking for ways to detect side effects support a predetermined and flawed thesis that COVID-19 vaccines have done more harm than good,” Sen. Blumenthal said. “That’s not the scientific method to have a preconceived notion, then frame the evidence to fit the outcome.”

Dr. Karl Jablonowski claimed that problems with the government’s management of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System lacked guidance from outside scientists and the lack of research on the vaccine’s negative effects.

“The then secretary of HHS [Health and Human Services] could have then changed history with one word,” Jablonowski, director of science and research at Children’s Health Defense, said. “He could have summoned the greatest army of statisticians, mathematicians, and data scientists ever assembled under one word. That one word was help.”

Children’s Health Defense is a non-profit organization that primarily advocates against vaccines and eliminating childhood chronic illness. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. founded the organization and was chairman of the board from 2015 until 2023.

Maria Young, a severe COVID-19 survivor and advocate who works alongside nonprofit organizations specializing in vaccine education testified to the importance of the COVID vaccine. Young stated that despite sharing her testimony, she wishes she could have attested more to the importance of victims having a say in the overall conversation about the COVID vaccine.

“I just wish I would have been able to speak more or respond to what some of the other people said because what we’re losing here is the victims,” Young said in an interview with Medill News Services. “I think that's what we need to remember, what COVID left us with afterwards.”

Jaylyn Preslicka is a reporter for Medill News Services.


Read More

 Medical Vial Vaccine on Shelf Table

Peptides like BPC-157, MOTS-c and Semax are surging in popularity despite limited human evidence. Here’s why FDA regulation, research and safety matter.

skaman306/Getty Images

Millions Using Unapproved Peptides as FDA Debates Regulation

Peptides, the short chains of amino acids that help regulate biological functions, have become the latest obsession in health, fitness, and longevity.

Online clinics and wellness influencers promote them as ways to heal injuries, reduce inflammation, improve metabolism, sharpen thinking, and slow aging.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of the U.S. flag on the shape of the U.S. with blue and red figures of people across it.

Every state has its own constitution.

How State Constitutions Became the Battleground for American Rights and Liberties – on Both the Left and Right

Beyond picking governors, state legislators, local officials and representatives to serve in Congress, voters in almost every state this year will have the opportunity to amend the language of their state constitution. In one state, they could potentially rewrite the constitution altogether.

Though the U.S. Constitution is rarely amended, voters frequently amend their state constitutions. In every election cycle, voters are asked to ratify constitutional amendments.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's annual policy conference at the Washington Convention Center March 6, 2018 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC

After AIPAC failed to defeat El-Sayed in the Michigan Democratic Senate primary—after spending $32 million—it said that it remains committed to defeating El-Sayed and his "radical, anti-Israel" agenda in the general election. Which means it is poised to sink tens of millions of dollars in supporting Republican Mike Rogers. It also said that Haley Stevens, his opponent, had presented "an authentic Democratic agenda." Meaning that El-Sayed did not? And they think that Mike Rogers, a MAGA Trump supporter, does compared with El-Sayed?

How can AIPAC say that El-Sayed does not present an authentic Democratic agenda when his socialist stance is much more in line with the principles stated in the Declaration of Independence than most centrist Democrats'? And making it sound like AIPAC cares about an authentic Democratic agenda is deceitful, when in the same breath they make clear that they will support Mike Rogers, a Trump lackey, in the general election.

Keep ReadingShow less
Scientists Warn of Deepening Federal Attacks on Research
silhouette of person using microscope

Scientists Warn of Deepening Federal Attacks on Research

Scientists and the federal government have been close partners since World War II. A landmark report by President Truman’s chief science advisor laid out a vision for government research that shaped eight decades of federally funded science. That vision is now at risk. In principle, the Trump administration has supported scientific research with its own vision for a new “golden age of science.” But in practice, the administration has upended the relationship between the government, researchers, and their institutions. The changes have alarmed working scientists and their allies, who have protested in record numbers.

In July, I moderated a webinar on “Rewriting the Rules: What’s happening to public science?” (read the transcript here). The webinar was co-sponsored by NAPA, CODE, and the Bridge Alliance, with Dr. Aaron Carroll of AcademyHealth, Dr. Chris Marcum of the Federation of American Scientists, Dr. Gretchen Goldman of the Union of Concerned Scientists, and Dr. Maryam Zaringhalam of the Center for Open Science. I also interviewed Cole Donovan of the Stand Up for Science Foundation by email.

Keep ReadingShow less