Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

American Democracy Has Been Caught in the Partisan Crossfire

Opinion

American Democracy Has Been Caught in the Partisan Crossfire

Red and blue strings knotted up.

Getty Images, MirageC

As democracy advocates and concerned citizens resist the erosion of norms and institutions during a second Trump administration, we must remember that our democracy is already in a state of crisis! This crisis has seen our Freedom House rating drop more than 10 points in the last decade. According to this measure of political rights and civil liberties, our peers were once countries like France and Germany, but now we find ourselves ranked just below Argentina and Mongolia.

Mass Partisanship and Elite Power-Seeking: A Dangerous Combination


America’s crisis is borne of a dangerous interaction between mass-level partisan hyperpolarization, the cynical exploitation of it by some elites for personal or political advantage, and craven silence from many co-partisan leaders. Unlike previous divisions on civil rights, gender equity, and the Vietnam War, which split us along cleavages not consistently demarcated by party lines, today’s partisan polarization places our democracy directly in the path of political crossfire. This environment incentivizes party elites and stalwarts in the body politic to circumvent democracy—doing things like refusing to accept fair election results or even justifying political violence—when it serves their side’s pursuit of power.

In a UMass Amherst Poll, conducted in partnership with the League of Women Voters right before the 2024 election, just 26% of Republicans told us they were “very confident” that their vote would be counted accurately, and 72% expressed concern about fraud and abuse associated with the counting of ballots. This is deeply troubling given that our elections are the most secure they have ever been and levels of fraud and error are negligible. Trump’s lies about the 2020 election and his efforts to stay in power despite losing a free and fair election, including the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol, have resulted in a deep-seated doubt of our country’s electoral process.

“When leaders in the Republican Party, elected officials now for four years, have refused to accept the 2020 election results, that then bleeds into your rank-and-file Republicans,” said Bill Gates, a Republican member of the board of supervisors in Arizona’s Maricopa County, in an interview with CNN. Both Democrats and Republicans take cues from their party’s leaders. Partisan voters may be inclined toward incredulity when their preferred candidate loses, but that doubt usually remains latent unless unleashed by political elites. Speculation about 2024 election fraud has been largely limited to the fringes because Democratic leaders have not reinforced them, thus depriving the inevitable conspiracy theories of the oxygen they need to spread. Leaders who do spread disinformation, or even tacitly endorse it through silence, are abrogating an important responsibility. They are failing us.

The Specter of Political Violence

Election lies and equivocation have also fostered a political climate over which the specter of threats and violence looms. Heading into 2024’s election day, 71% of Americans, including both Democrats and Republicans, expressed concern about election violence when responding to the UMass Amherst Poll. And these fears are warranted. The US Justice Department’s Election Threats Task Force, which was created in 2021 to address a rash of threats and intimidation against election officials, has received thousands of reports. The devoted public servants and citizens who administer our elections, from secretaries of state to workers at polling places, once did their vital work in relative obscurity. Now, they sign up with the knowledge that they and their families may face threats and intimidation.

Threats of violence impact public servants well beyond those involved in elections. In collaboration with the US Association of Former Members of Congress, the UMass Amherst Poll conducted a survey of nearly 300 former members of Congress. About half indicated they or their family received threats during their time in office, and the rates are higher for those who served most recently and considerably higher for women and people of color.

Even when we don’t see violence, the fact that threats have become such a regular feature of American politics shapes the behavior of everyone, from our elected officials to the people working at the polls. Republican Congressman Mike Gallagher, a staunch conservative who did not fully support Trump’s border policy or Trump’s claims that the 2020 election was stolen, cited threats and a swatting incident his family endured when he retired from Congress at the age 40. “I signed up for the death threats and the late-night swatting, but they did not,” Gallagher said.

Reinforcing Democratic Norms

Remarks from Kettering Senior Fellow and former FBI director James Comey at the foundation’s January 2024 Conversations with Democracy Innovators are especially chilling as we head into a second Trump administration and the promised pardon of those who attacked our Capitol four years ago:

We have always had a radioactive stew in the basement of America. . . . There is violence there in America’s basement. It’s just part of who we are, but we control it in two different ways. We control it by building a building of law around it that says, “you come out of these doors, we’re gonna lock your butt up.” But we also put control rods that are cultural down into the radioactive stew. And what’s been happening in this country over the last seven or eight years is the control rods are being withdrawn by people like Donald Trump and his enablers and radiation is banging around inside the building. The building of laws has done a real good job of containing it and sending a message. But it’s not enough. . . . We have to push the control rods back down in. It’s not OK to talk about violence. It’s not OK for one of our two parties, the Republicans, to be embracing the idea that January 6th was a heroic event. It’s not OK. They’re trying to pull the control rods out. We must push it deeper and deeper into the stew.

Trump’s reelection reminds us that this “building of laws” is not truly independent of the pro-democratic, anti-political-violence norms Comey calls cultural “control rods.” Those control rods, it turns out, are load bearing. And they have been weakened. As many Americans are led to believe that refusing to accept the results of an election and stoking partisan violence are either justified or not such a big deal, the entire structure’s integrity is compromised.

Trump and his enablers have opened a Pandora’s Box, unleashing upon American democracy a set of ills such as diminished confidence in our elections and the menace of partisan violence. But we must remember that the last thing left in Pandora’s Box was hope. Our hope must rest in a redoubling of efforts by regular citizens, honorable leaders from both political parties, and democracy-focused organizations like the Kettering Foundation to resist the erosion of democratic institutions and norms.

American Democracy Has Been Caught in the Partisan Crossfire was originally published by the Charles F. Kettering Foundation. Alexander Theodoridis is an associate professor of political science at the University of Massachusetts Amherst and codirector of the UMass Poll.


Read More

Voter receives a pen from poll worker at polling station.

A civic petition calling for constitutional restraint, civil discourse, bipartisan cooperation, and equal justice to strengthen American democracy and national unity.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

A Contemporary Olive Branch Petition

To the President of the United States, the Leaders of the Congress, and Our Fellow Americans Entrusted with the Powers of Government:

When, in the ordinary course of a free republic, disagreements arise among citizens concerning the proper exercise of power, it is neither unusual nor dishonorable that earnest convictions should differ. Such diversity has long been the strength of our nation, for liberty has never depended upon unanimity of opinion, but upon mutual respect under a common Constitution.

Keep ReadingShow less
Close-up shot of a Black woman's hands receiving a mail-in ballot to vote in a USA Presidential, Senatorial, Congressional, or local election

Federal investigators spent eight months reviewing the Allied Pilots Association election, examining ballot secrecy, observer rights, election records and transparency before allowing the results to stand.

Jeremy Poland/Getty Images

What a Federal Investigation of a Union Election Can Teach Us About Democratic Trust

For eight months, federal investigators examined allegations involving ballot secrecy, observer rights, election records and reporting procedures in a contested union election before allowing the result to stand.

Following a disputed election within the Allied Pilots Association (APA), complaints led to a formal review by the U.S. Department of Labor's Office of Labor-Management Standards. Investigators spent months going through election records, audit logs, witness testimony and technical documentation before reaching their conclusion.

Keep ReadingShow less
50501 Movement – Thomas Paine’s Political Philosophy in the 21st Century

circa 1770: The English-born American revolutionary philosopher Thomas Paine, (1737 - 1809), who wrote and published 'The Rights of Man', (1791 - 1792), in England. In it he expressed his support for the French Revolution and called for the overthrow of the British monarchy.

(Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

50501 Movement – Thomas Paine’s Political Philosophy in the 21st Century

The 50501 Movement can be viewed as a 21st-century manifestation of the anti-authoritarian, pro-egalitarian framework that Thomas Paine championed in Common Sense. Both movements share a core belief in challenging entrenched power and mobilizing the collective voice of everyday people to defend democracy. By utilizing decentralized, nationwide grassroots mobilization to challenge executive overreach and billionaire consolidation, the 50501 movement directly echoes Paine’s anti-authoritarianism, his belief in collective civic power, and his demand that power remains in the hands of the people.

The 50501 Movement mirrors the spirit of Paine’s Common Sense through three primary parallels:

Keep ReadingShow less
  Creative Images & Video Creative Images & Video Images Creative Editorial Video Creative Editorial  Search by image or video I Voted Today paper sticker on mans finger on rustic wooden table

How class, identity, and political recognition shaped the Democratic Party's relationship with rural white working-class voters over two decades.

BackyardProduction/Getty Images

The Thousand Injuries: The Not-Qwhite Voter and the Politics of Recognition

In the fall of 2003, Howard Dean said he wanted to be the candidate for guys with Confederate flags in the back windows of their pickup trucks. It was clumsy but not dishonest. He meant that his party had written off a whole category of American voter and wanted to change that. He was attacked at once, mostly by his own side, and walked it back within forty-eight hours. The lesson his party drew was not that the outreach had been badly phrased; It was that the outreach itself was impermissible, that to pursue the rural white working class voter was to be complicit with everything he was presumed to represent. Dean was the last major Democrat to try, and the consequences have accumulated in the shape of the electoral map.

Edgar Allan Poe understood something the party still does not. "The Cask of Amontillado" opens with a line that ought to hang in every campaign office: the thousand injuries of Fortunato the narrator had borne as best he could, but when Fortunato ventured upon insult, he vowed revenge. Injuries can be borne as long as the injured man believes his tormentors still regard his suffering as real. The insult is different. It reframes the injuries as deserved, telling the sufferer he is the kind of person who deserves to suffer. Poe's narrator does not recalculate his interests; he takes his revenge at great cost to himself. That is not irrational but human, and it is the most precise framework we have for what has happened to rural white working-class voters over the last twenty years.

Keep ReadingShow less