Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

American Democracy Has Been Caught in the Partisan Crossfire

American Democracy Has Been Caught in the Partisan Crossfire

Red and blue strings knotted up.

Getty Images, MirageC

As democracy advocates and concerned citizens resist the erosion of norms and institutions during a second Trump administration, we must remember that our democracy is already in a state of crisis! This crisis has seen our Freedom House rating drop more than 10 points in the last decade. According to this measure of political rights and civil liberties, our peers were once countries like France and Germany, but now we find ourselves ranked just below Argentina and Mongolia.

Mass Partisanship and Elite Power-Seeking: A Dangerous Combination


America’s crisis is borne of a dangerous interaction between mass-level partisan hyperpolarization, the cynical exploitation of it by some elites for personal or political advantage, and craven silence from many co-partisan leaders. Unlike previous divisions on civil rights, gender equity, and the Vietnam War, which split us along cleavages not consistently demarcated by party lines, today’s partisan polarization places our democracy directly in the path of political crossfire. This environment incentivizes party elites and stalwarts in the body politic to circumvent democracy—doing things like refusing to accept fair election results or even justifying political violence—when it serves their side’s pursuit of power.

In a UMass Amherst Poll, conducted in partnership with the League of Women Voters right before the 2024 election, just 26% of Republicans told us they were “very confident” that their vote would be counted accurately, and 72% expressed concern about fraud and abuse associated with the counting of ballots. This is deeply troubling given that our elections are the most secure they have ever been and levels of fraud and error are negligible. Trump’s lies about the 2020 election and his efforts to stay in power despite losing a free and fair election, including the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol, have resulted in a deep-seated doubt of our country’s electoral process.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

“When leaders in the Republican Party, elected officials now for four years, have refused to accept the 2020 election results, that then bleeds into your rank-and-file Republicans,” said Bill Gates, a Republican member of the board of supervisors in Arizona’s Maricopa County, in an interview with CNN. Both Democrats and Republicans take cues from their party’s leaders. Partisan voters may be inclined toward incredulity when their preferred candidate loses, but that doubt usually remains latent unless unleashed by political elites. Speculation about 2024 election fraud has been largely limited to the fringes because Democratic leaders have not reinforced them, thus depriving the inevitable conspiracy theories of the oxygen they need to spread. Leaders who do spread disinformation, or even tacitly endorse it through silence, are abrogating an important responsibility. They are failing us.

The Specter of Political Violence

Election lies and equivocation have also fostered a political climate over which the specter of threats and violence looms. Heading into 2024’s election day, 71% of Americans, including both Democrats and Republicans, expressed concern about election violence when responding to the UMass Amherst Poll. And these fears are warranted. The US Justice Department’s Election Threats Task Force, which was created in 2021 to address a rash of threats and intimidation against election officials, has received thousands of reports. The devoted public servants and citizens who administer our elections, from secretaries of state to workers at polling places, once did their vital work in relative obscurity. Now, they sign up with the knowledge that they and their families may face threats and intimidation.

Threats of violence impact public servants well beyond those involved in elections. In collaboration with the US Association of Former Members of Congress, the UMass Amherst Poll conducted a survey of nearly 300 former members of Congress. About half indicated they or their family received threats during their time in office, and the rates are higher for those who served most recently and considerably higher for women and people of color.

Even when we don’t see violence, the fact that threats have become such a regular feature of American politics shapes the behavior of everyone, from our elected officials to the people working at the polls. Republican Congressman Mike Gallagher, a staunch conservative who did not fully support Trump’s border policy or Trump’s claims that the 2020 election was stolen, cited threats and a swatting incident his family endured when he retired from Congress at the age 40. “I signed up for the death threats and the late-night swatting, but they did not,” Gallagher said.

Reinforcing Democratic Norms

Remarks from Kettering Senior Fellow and former FBI director James Comey at the foundation’s January 2024 Conversations with Democracy Innovators are especially chilling as we head into a second Trump administration and the promised pardon of those who attacked our Capitol four years ago:

We have always had a radioactive stew in the basement of America. . . . There is violence there in America’s basement. It’s just part of who we are, but we control it in two different ways. We control it by building a building of law around it that says, “you come out of these doors, we’re gonna lock your butt up.” But we also put control rods that are cultural down into the radioactive stew. And what’s been happening in this country over the last seven or eight years is the control rods are being withdrawn by people like Donald Trump and his enablers and radiation is banging around inside the building. The building of laws has done a real good job of containing it and sending a message. But it’s not enough. . . . We have to push the control rods back down in. It’s not OK to talk about violence. It’s not OK for one of our two parties, the Republicans, to be embracing the idea that January 6th was a heroic event. It’s not OK. They’re trying to pull the control rods out. We must push it deeper and deeper into the stew.

Trump’s reelection reminds us that this “building of laws” is not truly independent of the pro-democratic, anti-political-violence norms Comey calls cultural “control rods.” Those control rods, it turns out, are load bearing. And they have been weakened. As many Americans are led to believe that refusing to accept the results of an election and stoking partisan violence are either justified or not such a big deal, the entire structure’s integrity is compromised.

Trump and his enablers have opened a Pandora’s Box, unleashing upon American democracy a set of ills such as diminished confidence in our elections and the menace of partisan violence. But we must remember that the last thing left in Pandora’s Box was hope. Our hope must rest in a redoubling of efforts by regular citizens, honorable leaders from both political parties, and democracy-focused organizations like the Kettering Foundation to resist the erosion of democratic institutions and norms.

American Democracy Has Been Caught in the Partisan Crossfire was originally published by the Charles F. Kettering Foundation. Alexander Theodoridis is an associate professor of political science at the University of Massachusetts Amherst and codirector of the UMass Poll.

Read More

Understanding the 2024 Election: A Call to Action for Inclusive Democracy
Charles F. Kettering Foundation

Understanding the 2024 Election: A Call to Action for Inclusive Democracy

As a Black American woman and an educator, I am compelled to examine the forces that led to Donald Trump’s 2024 victory and its impact on our increasingly multiracial democracy. Democracy—derived from the Greek word demokratia, meaning “rule by the people”—is now under attack. With a deep sense of historical awareness, moral clarity, and an unwavering commitment to justice, I must underscore that democracy, as we have long understood it, is not just a system of governance. Democracy is a promise: a promise that every voice matters, that justice is not reserved for the “few” or the privileged, and that freedom is not a selective right. In this moment, the promise is being rewritten and redefined in ways that exclude rather than include and that silence rather than empower.

Attacks on Diversity and Inclusion

Keep ReadingShow less
Dictionary entry for "democracy"
Paving the path forward to strengthening democracy
Lobro78.Getty Images

A Path Forward for the Pro-Democracy Community

The Fulcrum presents The Path Forward: Defining the Democracy Reform Movement. Scott Warren's weekly interviews engage diverse thought leaders to elevate the conversation about building a thriving and healthy democratic republic that fulfills its potential as a national social and political game-changer. This series is the start of focused collaborations and dialogue led by The Bridge Alliance and The Fulcrum teams to help the movement find a path forward.

In the weeks following President Trump’s inauguration, it is challenging to make sense of the state of our democracy. I am in some conversations where colleagues and friends who assert that Elon Musk is leading a coup. For many, “constitutional crisis” has become the term of the day. I’ve met with conservatives buoyed by a new sense of dynamism and opportunity for re-invention of a stagnant and dysfunctional government and are critical of the left for alarmism. I also know many who have already lost their jobs due to federal cuts, having spent their entire careers fighting for democracy.

Keep ReadingShow less
What Would Patrick Henry Say Today?

An engraving from a painting of Patrick Henry delivering an address before the Virginia Assembly. From the New York Public Library.

Getty Images, Smith Collection/Gado

What Would Patrick Henry Say Today?

In Federalist 10, explaining some of the protections of the new Constitution in 1787, James Madison observed that, “Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm….” The Founders defined tyranny as the legislative, executive, and judicial powers all being combined in the hands of a single individual or small group of people. So, they divided these three powers into separate and independent branches of the government that checked and balanced each other, preventing this accumulation of power. If, however, the people elected an authoritarian president and a legislature of toadies, who allowed this president to install a compliant judiciary, this protection could be lost. Hence, when asked shortly after the Constitutional Convention concluded in 1787 what the delegates had created, Benjamin Franklin responded, “A republic, if you can keep it.”

Echoing Madison, the Supreme Court in 1866, in Ex Parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866), wrote, “Wicked men, ambitious of power, with hatred of liberty and contempt of law, may fill the place once occupied by Washington and Lincoln” as they overturned Lambden Milligan’s conviction before a military commission under martial law in Indiana during the Civil War. Milligan was charged with aiding a secret society that gave material support to the rebellion, conspiring to free Confederate prisoners, and conspiring to raid northern arsenals to come to the aid of the South. The Court’s five-member majority ruled that martial law could not be imposed in states where the civilian courts were open and functioning. Four members of the Court disagreed because state courts could be open and functioning but be in the hands of rebels. Martial law may again be tested, but more fundamental questions are how to prevent the rise of a tyrant in the first place and what remedies are available should the voters elect one.

Keep ReadingShow less
Meet the Faces of Democracy: Derek Bowens

Derek Bowen.

Issue One

Meet the Faces of Democracy: Derek Bowens

Derek Bowens has been a nonpartisan election administrator in North Carolina for over a decade. Since 2012, he served in various capacities, including as the director of elections in New Hanover County, North Carolina. In 2017, he became the director of elections in Durham County. Durham County is home to Duke University and North Carolina Central University, a jurisdiction of nearly a quarter of a million registered voters, the fifth largest in the state.

Bowens has been nationally recognized for his work by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) and the National Association of Counties. In 2020, Durham County won a Clearinghouse Award from the EAC for its innovative app that allowed voters to locate polling places near them, view voting information, and see current polling place wait times.

Keep ReadingShow less