Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

America’s ‘Do Nothing Congress’ Investigation Failures Under Trump 2.0

With mounting legal concerns and unchecked authority, Congress’s silence threatens to normalize presidential overreach.

Opinion

Congress at sunset
Sunlight Foundation, a transparency trailblazer, closes after 15 years
Bill Clark/Getty Images

The month of August is widely recognized as the ideal time for relaxation and rejuvenation. America’s 535 delegates to the U.S. Capitol started their annual summer recess on Aug. 4 and will not return to D.C. until Sept. 1.

This four-week respite should give our elected delegates time to reflect on their achievements since President Donald Trump started his 2.0 administration on Jan. 20. And, hopefully, the four-week break will give our legislators time to consider how they’ve come up short in representing their 340 million constituents and honoring the principles of the U.S. Constitution, which they took an oath to uphold and defend.


Congress’s job description

The 535 members of Congress’s job is to make laws, represent the people (versus their party), oversee the executive branch, and conduct investigations. Every legislator takes a pledge to bear allegiance to the Constitution as the supreme law and act without personal or political evasion.

Salary, fringe benefits, and employment sidebar

Let’s reflect on a couple work-related matters that have occurred in the past 29 weeks since Trump 2.0’s administration started. During this time period, the average adult has labored for 145 days with an average annual salary of $66,622 and a 31 percent fringe benefit package. Meanwhile, our 100 Senators and 435 Representatives have shown up to the Capitol 109 and 97 days, respectively, with an annual salary of $174,000, plus 61.9 percent fringe benefits.

Quite the disparity exists between our legislators and the working class.

119th Congress accomplishments

Multiple research-oriented searches revealed the most prominent accomplishments by our lawmakers since Jan. 20 are GOP dominated and defined in two areas: 1) the Republican Party has secured power of the Senate and House deliberations—which permits them to make laws, oversee the executive branch, and control the nation’s purse strings—and 2) passage of the “Big Beautiful Bill” will have a significant effect on federal taxes, credit, and deductions but is projected to increase federal deficits by $3.4 trillion over the next 10 years.

119th Congress shortcomings

Several legal experts and non-partisan public interest groups have raised serious concerns regarding potential overreach, violation of the law, and abuses of power by President Trump that suggest congressional investigations. They include:

  • Trump signed multiple Executive Orders (EO) directing agencies to pause or redirect funds that were explicitly appropriated by Congress. Such actions potentially violate the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act, which prohibits the president from unilaterally withholding congressionally allocated funds. Courts will make the final determination, but Congressional response to date can be summarized as: nothing.
  • Trump fired 17 Inspector Generals in the first week of 2.0 without providing the required 30-day notice and case-specific reasons to Congress, as mandated by law. Congressional response: silence.
  • Trump issued a series of EOs asserting powers that contradict or bypass federal statutes, such as border enforcement, birthright citizenship, and instructing the Department of Justice not to enforce TikTok’s ownership. Congressional response: sound of crickets.
  • Trump signed EOs to place independent agencies—such as the Securities and Exchange Commission, Federal Communications Commission, and Federal Trade Commission—under his control and shut down USAID, bypassing congressional intent and defunding programs authorized by law. Congressional response: nada, nil, and naught.
  • In March, President Trump issued an EO that many think undermines the independence of the electoral process, intervening where only Congress and the 50 states have constitutional authority. Courts will make the final determination, but to date, Congressional response has been: diddly-squat.
  • Trump’s personal business entanglements and refusal to place assets in a blind trust violate the Emoluments Clauses of the Constitution, which our Congressional delegates have taken an oath to uphold. The final determination will be made by the courts, but to date, Congressional response has been: zip.

Congress’s failure to act is alarming

To date, a multitude of recommendations have been made by constitutional experts, independent think tanks, and freelance guest columnists urging Congress to take legislative oversight and accountability reforms during the Trump 2.0 administration.

Back in February, Gallup noted that only 29 percent of Americans approved of Congress. Not surprisingly, today, only 23 percent of Americans approve of the way Congress is handling its job (news.gallup.com).

If any employee ignored work-site legal issues, abused the authority of their job, and received a 23 percent approval rating, they wouldn’t remain on the payroll very long.

But, Congress’s do-nothing behavior—since Jan. 20—is more alarming as their inaction risks normalizing executive overreach, enables unchecked presidential power, ignores laws, weakens democracy, and, most assuredly, reveals that an autocratic dictatorship is not coming to America, it is here!

Research is replete: Members of Congress have failed their oath of office to uphold the nation’s legal foundation, oversee the executive branch, and conduct investigations.

Congress: when you go back to work on Sept. 1, re-read your oath of office and do your job!


Steve Corbin is a professor emeritus of marketing at the University of Northern Iowa, and a non-paid freelance opinion editor and guest columnist contributor to 246 news agencies and 48 social media platforms in 45 states.


Read More

Voter receives a pen from poll worker at polling station.

A civic petition calling for constitutional restraint, civil discourse, bipartisan cooperation, and equal justice to strengthen American democracy and national unity.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

A Contemporary Olive Branch Petition

To the President of the United States, the Leaders of the Congress, and Our Fellow Americans Entrusted with the Powers of Government:

When, in the ordinary course of a free republic, disagreements arise among citizens concerning the proper exercise of power, it is neither unusual nor dishonorable that earnest convictions should differ. Such diversity has long been the strength of our nation, for liberty has never depended upon unanimity of opinion, but upon mutual respect under a common Constitution.

Keep ReadingShow less
Close-up shot of a Black woman's hands receiving a mail-in ballot to vote in a USA Presidential, Senatorial, Congressional, or local election

Federal investigators spent eight months reviewing the Allied Pilots Association election, examining ballot secrecy, observer rights, election records and transparency before allowing the results to stand.

Jeremy Poland/Getty Images

What a Federal Investigation of a Union Election Can Teach Us About Democratic Trust

For eight months, federal investigators examined allegations involving ballot secrecy, observer rights, election records and reporting procedures in a contested union election before allowing the result to stand.

Following a disputed election within the Allied Pilots Association (APA), complaints led to a formal review by the U.S. Department of Labor's Office of Labor-Management Standards. Investigators spent months going through election records, audit logs, witness testimony and technical documentation before reaching their conclusion.

Keep ReadingShow less
50501 Movement – Thomas Paine’s Political Philosophy in the 21st Century

circa 1770: The English-born American revolutionary philosopher Thomas Paine, (1737 - 1809), who wrote and published 'The Rights of Man', (1791 - 1792), in England. In it he expressed his support for the French Revolution and called for the overthrow of the British monarchy.

(Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

50501 Movement – Thomas Paine’s Political Philosophy in the 21st Century

The 50501 Movement can be viewed as a 21st-century manifestation of the anti-authoritarian, pro-egalitarian framework that Thomas Paine championed in Common Sense. Both movements share a core belief in challenging entrenched power and mobilizing the collective voice of everyday people to defend democracy. By utilizing decentralized, nationwide grassroots mobilization to challenge executive overreach and billionaire consolidation, the 50501 movement directly echoes Paine’s anti-authoritarianism, his belief in collective civic power, and his demand that power remains in the hands of the people.

The 50501 Movement mirrors the spirit of Paine’s Common Sense through three primary parallels:

Keep ReadingShow less
  Creative Images & Video Creative Images & Video Images Creative Editorial Video Creative Editorial  Search by image or video I Voted Today paper sticker on mans finger on rustic wooden table

How class, identity, and political recognition shaped the Democratic Party's relationship with rural white working-class voters over two decades.

BackyardProduction/Getty Images

The Thousand Injuries: The Not-Qwhite Voter and the Politics of Recognition

In the fall of 2003, Howard Dean said he wanted to be the candidate for guys with Confederate flags in the back windows of their pickup trucks. It was clumsy but not dishonest. He meant that his party had written off a whole category of American voter and wanted to change that. He was attacked at once, mostly by his own side, and walked it back within forty-eight hours. The lesson his party drew was not that the outreach had been badly phrased; It was that the outreach itself was impermissible, that to pursue the rural white working class voter was to be complicit with everything he was presumed to represent. Dean was the last major Democrat to try, and the consequences have accumulated in the shape of the electoral map.

Edgar Allan Poe understood something the party still does not. "The Cask of Amontillado" opens with a line that ought to hang in every campaign office: the thousand injuries of Fortunato the narrator had borne as best he could, but when Fortunato ventured upon insult, he vowed revenge. Injuries can be borne as long as the injured man believes his tormentors still regard his suffering as real. The insult is different. It reframes the injuries as deserved, telling the sufferer he is the kind of person who deserves to suffer. Poe's narrator does not recalculate his interests; he takes his revenge at great cost to himself. That is not irrational but human, and it is the most precise framework we have for what has happened to rural white working-class voters over the last twenty years.

Keep ReadingShow less