Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

America’s ‘Do Nothing Congress’ Investigation Failures Under Trump 2.0

With mounting legal concerns and unchecked authority, Congress’s silence threatens to normalize presidential overreach.

Congress at sunset
Sunlight Foundation, a transparency trailblazer, closes after 15 years
Bill Clark/Getty Images

The month of August is widely recognized as the ideal time for relaxation and rejuvenation. America’s 535 delegates to the U.S. Capitol started their annual summer recess on Aug. 4 and will not return to D.C. until Sept. 1.

This four-week respite should give our elected delegates time to reflect on their achievements since President Donald Trump started his 2.0 administration on Jan. 20. And, hopefully, the four-week break will give our legislators time to consider how they’ve come up short in representing their 340 million constituents and honoring the principles of the U.S. Constitution, which they took an oath to uphold and defend.


Congress’s job description

The 535 members of Congress’s job is to make laws, represent the people (versus their party), oversee the executive branch, and conduct investigations. Every legislator takes a pledge to bear allegiance to the Constitution as the supreme law and act without personal or political evasion.

Salary, fringe benefits, and employment sidebar

Let’s reflect on a couple work-related matters that have occurred in the past 29 weeks since Trump 2.0’s administration started. During this time period, the average adult has labored for 145 days with an average annual salary of $66,622 and a 31 percent fringe benefit package. Meanwhile, our 100 Senators and 435 Representatives have shown up to the Capitol 109 and 97 days, respectively, with an annual salary of $174,000, plus 61.9 percent fringe benefits.

Quite the disparity exists between our legislators and the working class.

119th Congress accomplishments

Multiple research-oriented searches revealed the most prominent accomplishments by our lawmakers since Jan. 20 are GOP dominated and defined in two areas: 1) the Republican Party has secured power of the Senate and House deliberations—which permits them to make laws, oversee the executive branch, and control the nation’s purse strings—and 2) passage of the “Big Beautiful Bill” will have a significant effect on federal taxes, credit, and deductions but is projected to increase federal deficits by $3.4 trillion over the next 10 years.

119th Congress shortcomings

Several legal experts and non-partisan public interest groups have raised serious concerns regarding potential overreach, violation of the law, and abuses of power by President Trump that suggest congressional investigations. They include:

  • Trump signed multiple Executive Orders (EO) directing agencies to pause or redirect funds that were explicitly appropriated by Congress. Such actions potentially violate the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act, which prohibits the president from unilaterally withholding congressionally allocated funds. Courts will make the final determination, but Congressional response to date can be summarized as: nothing.
  • Trump fired 17 Inspector Generals in the first week of 2.0 without providing the required 30-day notice and case-specific reasons to Congress, as mandated by law. Congressional response: silence.
  • Trump issued a series of EOs asserting powers that contradict or bypass federal statutes, such as border enforcement, birthright citizenship, and instructing the Department of Justice not to enforce TikTok’s ownership. Congressional response: sound of crickets.
  • Trump signed EOs to place independent agencies—such as the Securities and Exchange Commission, Federal Communications Commission, and Federal Trade Commission—under his control and shut down USAID, bypassing congressional intent and defunding programs authorized by law. Congressional response: nada, nil, and naught.
  • In March, President Trump issued an EO that many think undermines the independence of the electoral process, intervening where only Congress and the 50 states have constitutional authority. Courts will make the final determination, but to date, Congressional response has been: diddly-squat.
  • Trump’s personal business entanglements and refusal to place assets in a blind trust violate the Emoluments Clauses of the Constitution, which our Congressional delegates have taken an oath to uphold. The final determination will be made by the courts, but to date, Congressional response has been: zip.

Congress’s failure to act is alarming

To date, a multitude of recommendations have been made by constitutional experts, independent think tanks, and freelance guest columnists urging Congress to take legislative oversight and accountability reforms during the Trump 2.0 administration.

Back in February, Gallup noted that only 29 percent of Americans approved of Congress. Not surprisingly, today, only 23 percent of Americans approve of the way Congress is handling its job (news.gallup.com).

If any employee ignored work-site legal issues, abused the authority of their job, and received a 23 percent approval rating, they wouldn’t remain on the payroll very long.

But, Congress’s do-nothing behavior—since Jan. 20—is more alarming as their inaction risks normalizing executive overreach, enables unchecked presidential power, ignores laws, weakens democracy, and, most assuredly, reveals that an autocratic dictatorship is not coming to America, it is here!

Research is replete: Members of Congress have failed their oath of office to uphold the nation’s legal foundation, oversee the executive branch, and conduct investigations.

Congress: when you go back to work on Sept. 1, re-read your oath of office and do your job!


Steve Corbin is a professor emeritus of marketing at the University of Northern Iowa, and a non-paid freelance opinion editor and guest columnist contributor to 246 news agencies and 48 social media platforms in 45 states.

Read More

How Texas’ Mid-Decade Redistricting Could Affect Voters in One Houston Community

Then-U.S. Rep. Sylvester Turner addresses a crowd at Houston City Hall in October 2024. Turner died in March, and his 18th District congressional seat has been vacant since then, with a special election set for Nov. 4. The district is one of five Republicans have targeted in a mid-decade redistricting effort aimed at gaining an advantage in Congress.

Douglas Sweet Jr. for The Texas Tribune

How Texas’ Mid-Decade Redistricting Could Affect Voters in One Houston Community

Adrian Izaguirre grew up in Houston’s South Park neighborhood, a historically low-income community tucked between Interstates 610 and 45, south of downtown. He still calls that place home.

For years, he has seen his neighbors struggle to find affordable housing and access to quality education. On any given day, Izaguirre and other residents in the predominantly Latino and Black neighborhood would have a hard time quickly accessing a local hospital. There are few nearby.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Hidden Cause (and Higher Stakes) of the Gerrymandering Crisis

California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks about the “Election Rigging Response Act” at a press conference at the Democracy Center, Japanese American National Museum on August 14, 2025 in Los Angeles, California. Newsom spoke about a possible California referendum on redistricting to counter the legislative effort to add five Republican House seats in the state of Texas.

Getty Images, Mario Tama

The Hidden Cause (and Higher Stakes) of the Gerrymandering Crisis

The first shots in the gerrymandering wars have now been fired. Texas Republicans rammed a new gerrymandered map through the legislature, forcing police escorts on Democratic lawmakers until the power grab was complete. California Governor Gavin Newsom has fired back with his “Election Rigging Response Act”— a response that will, sadly, also involve rigging elections. The Act would sideline California’s Citizens Redistricting Commission until 2031 so Democrats can oust five Republicans from California’s congressional delegation as payback.

To be clear, the actions taken by Texas and California are not equal—one’s a brazen power grab, the other a response to that power grab. But it’s still deeply concerning that California could become the first state to backtrack from independent redistricting, just when increasing polarization makes these and other independent institutions even more essential.

Keep ReadingShow less
Meet the Faces of Democracy: Dave Bjerke

Dave Bjerke spends much of his (limited) free time with his family, as a combination swim team-soccer-marching band dad.

Issue One

Meet the Faces of Democracy: Dave Bjerke

More than 10,000 officials across the country run U.S. elections. This interview is part of a series highlighting the election heroes who are the faces of democracy.

Dave Bjerke, the nonpartisan Director of Elections and General Registrar of Voters in the City of Falls Church, VA, has been working in elections in Northern Virginia, just miles from the nation’s capital, for nearly 20 years.

Keep ReadingShow less
Gerrymandering, California, and a Fight the Democrats Can Only Lose

California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks about the “Election Rigging Response Act” at a press conference at the Democracy Center, Japanese American National Museum on August 14, 2025 in Los Angeles, California.

Getty Images, Mario Tama

Gerrymandering, California, and a Fight the Democrats Can Only Lose

California Democrats are getting ready for a fight they can’t win. And taxpayers will foot the bill for the privilege.

Governor Gavin Newsom, backed by national party operatives, appears poised to put a statewide gerrymander on the ballot under the banner of “fighting Trump.” The plan? Overturn California’s Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission, redraw congressional maps, and lock in party control well into the next decade.

Keep ReadingShow less