Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

America’s ‘Do Nothing Congress’ Investigation Failures Under Trump 2.0

With mounting legal concerns and unchecked authority, Congress’s silence threatens to normalize presidential overreach.

Opinion

Congress at sunset
Sunlight Foundation, a transparency trailblazer, closes after 15 years
Bill Clark/Getty Images

The month of August is widely recognized as the ideal time for relaxation and rejuvenation. America’s 535 delegates to the U.S. Capitol started their annual summer recess on Aug. 4 and will not return to D.C. until Sept. 1.

This four-week respite should give our elected delegates time to reflect on their achievements since President Donald Trump started his 2.0 administration on Jan. 20. And, hopefully, the four-week break will give our legislators time to consider how they’ve come up short in representing their 340 million constituents and honoring the principles of the U.S. Constitution, which they took an oath to uphold and defend.


Congress’s job description

The 535 members of Congress’s job is to make laws, represent the people (versus their party), oversee the executive branch, and conduct investigations. Every legislator takes a pledge to bear allegiance to the Constitution as the supreme law and act without personal or political evasion.

Salary, fringe benefits, and employment sidebar

Let’s reflect on a couple work-related matters that have occurred in the past 29 weeks since Trump 2.0’s administration started. During this time period, the average adult has labored for 145 days with an average annual salary of $66,622 and a 31 percent fringe benefit package. Meanwhile, our 100 Senators and 435 Representatives have shown up to the Capitol 109 and 97 days, respectively, with an annual salary of $174,000, plus 61.9 percent fringe benefits.

Quite the disparity exists between our legislators and the working class.

119th Congress accomplishments

Multiple research-oriented searches revealed the most prominent accomplishments by our lawmakers since Jan. 20 are GOP dominated and defined in two areas: 1) the Republican Party has secured power of the Senate and House deliberations—which permits them to make laws, oversee the executive branch, and control the nation’s purse strings—and 2) passage of the “Big Beautiful Bill” will have a significant effect on federal taxes, credit, and deductions but is projected to increase federal deficits by $3.4 trillion over the next 10 years.

119th Congress shortcomings

Several legal experts and non-partisan public interest groups have raised serious concerns regarding potential overreach, violation of the law, and abuses of power by President Trump that suggest congressional investigations. They include:

  • Trump signed multiple Executive Orders (EO) directing agencies to pause or redirect funds that were explicitly appropriated by Congress. Such actions potentially violate the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act, which prohibits the president from unilaterally withholding congressionally allocated funds. Courts will make the final determination, but Congressional response to date can be summarized as: nothing.
  • Trump fired 17 Inspector Generals in the first week of 2.0 without providing the required 30-day notice and case-specific reasons to Congress, as mandated by law. Congressional response: silence.
  • Trump issued a series of EOs asserting powers that contradict or bypass federal statutes, such as border enforcement, birthright citizenship, and instructing the Department of Justice not to enforce TikTok’s ownership. Congressional response: sound of crickets.
  • Trump signed EOs to place independent agencies—such as the Securities and Exchange Commission, Federal Communications Commission, and Federal Trade Commission—under his control and shut down USAID, bypassing congressional intent and defunding programs authorized by law. Congressional response: nada, nil, and naught.
  • In March, President Trump issued an EO that many think undermines the independence of the electoral process, intervening where only Congress and the 50 states have constitutional authority. Courts will make the final determination, but to date, Congressional response has been: diddly-squat.
  • Trump’s personal business entanglements and refusal to place assets in a blind trust violate the Emoluments Clauses of the Constitution, which our Congressional delegates have taken an oath to uphold. The final determination will be made by the courts, but to date, Congressional response has been: zip.

Congress’s failure to act is alarming

To date, a multitude of recommendations have been made by constitutional experts, independent think tanks, and freelance guest columnists urging Congress to take legislative oversight and accountability reforms during the Trump 2.0 administration.

Back in February, Gallup noted that only 29 percent of Americans approved of Congress. Not surprisingly, today, only 23 percent of Americans approve of the way Congress is handling its job (news.gallup.com).

If any employee ignored work-site legal issues, abused the authority of their job, and received a 23 percent approval rating, they wouldn’t remain on the payroll very long.

But, Congress’s do-nothing behavior—since Jan. 20—is more alarming as their inaction risks normalizing executive overreach, enables unchecked presidential power, ignores laws, weakens democracy, and, most assuredly, reveals that an autocratic dictatorship is not coming to America, it is here!

Research is replete: Members of Congress have failed their oath of office to uphold the nation’s legal foundation, oversee the executive branch, and conduct investigations.

Congress: when you go back to work on Sept. 1, re-read your oath of office and do your job!


Steve Corbin is a professor emeritus of marketing at the University of Northern Iowa, and a non-paid freelance opinion editor and guest columnist contributor to 246 news agencies and 48 social media platforms in 45 states.


Read More

Allies United Holds Cross‑Community Meetings to Protect Civil Rights Across Chicagoland

Fight For Today For A Better Tomorrow sign

Canva

Allies United Holds Cross‑Community Meetings to Protect Civil Rights Across Chicagoland

En español

Operation Midway Blitz outraged much of the Chicagoland community last September when U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents raided neighborhoods, arrested thousands of individuals, and fatally shot Mexican immigrant Silverio Villegas González.

Witnessing these injustices across the country and in Chicago, two local coalitions came together last year to form Allies United, a Chicago-based coalition initially focused on responding to immigration raids, and now prioritizing protecting civil rights and building long-term cross‑community solidarity.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Republic at 250: What History Teaches — and What Americans Must Choose
white red and blue textile

A Republic at 250: What History Teaches — and What Americans Must Choose

As the United States approaches both a consequential election cycle and the 250th anniversary of its founding, Americans stand at a crossroads the framers anticipated but hoped we would never reach: a moment when citizens must decide whether to allow the Republic to erode or restore it through vigilance. This is not about left or right. It is about whether we still share a common vision of the country we want to be — and whether we still believe in the same Republic.

The Founders never imagined “the land of the free” as a place dependent on benevolent leaders. They built a system in which the people — not the government — were the safeguards against overreach. James Madison warned that “the accumulation of all powers…in the same hands…may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny,” a reminder that freedom depends on restraint, not trust in any single individual. George Washington pledged that the Constitution would remain “the guide which I will never abandon,” signaling that loyalty to the Republic must always outweigh loyalty to any leader. These were not ceremonial lines. They were instructions — a blueprint for preventing institutional strain, polarization, and distrust we see today.

Keep ReadingShow less
Person holding a sign in front of the U.S. capitol that reads, "We The People."

The nation has reached a divide in the road—a moment when Americans must decide whether to accept a slow weakening of the Republic or insist on the principles that have held it together for more than two centuries

Getty Images

A Republic Under Strain—And a Choice Ahead

Americans feel something shifting beneath their feet — quieter than crisis but unmistakably a strain. Many live with a steady sense of uncertainty, conflict, and the emotional weight of issues that seem impossible to escape. They feel unheard, unsafe, or unsure whether the Republic they trust is fading. Friends, relatives, and former colleagues say they’ve tried to look away just to cope, hoping the turmoil will pass. And they ask the same thing: if the framers made the people the primary control on government, how will they help set the Republic back on a steadier path?

Understanding the strain Americans are experiencing is essential, but so is recognizing the choice we still have. Madison’s warning offers the answer the framers left us: when trust erodes and power concentrates, the Constitution turns back to the people—not as a slogan, but as a structural reality.

Keep ReadingShow less
Latest Attack Threatening President Trump Reflects Rising Political Violence in US

President Donald Trump speaks at the White House on April 25, 2026, after the cancellation of the annual White House Correspondents Association Dinner.

Latest Attack Threatening President Trump Reflects Rising Political Violence in US

For the third time in three years, Donald Trump has come under threat by an attacker. Many facts remain unclear after a gunman stormed the Washington Hilton on April 25, 2026, during the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner.

As the investigation into the shooting continues, Alfonso Serrano, The Conversation’s politics and society editor, spoke with James Piazza, a political violence scholar at Penn State, about what is driving the rise of political violence in the U.S. and what can be done about it.

Keep ReadingShow less