Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Ku Klux Klan Returns to Power

Opinion

Silver sign of Department of Justice on a classical concrete wall with plants as foreground.
Silver sign of Department of Justice on a classical concrete wall with plants as foreground.
Getty Images, Dragon Claws

Last month, the Department of Justice initiated a baseless lawsuit against the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). This retributive action, like the previous frivolous actions brought against other individuals and organizations who defend the rule of law and judicial administration, is not only meritless, but is primarily intended to harass, intimidate, and render dysfunctional an organization that is interfering with the administration’s goal of fomenting hate and perpetuating its ethnic cleansing agenda of America.

Letitia James, James Comey, Mark Kelly, Jerome Powell, Minnesota Democrats, protesters at Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota, former military intelligence community lawmakers, John Bolton, Adam Schiff, John Brennan, Congressional Representative Lamonica McIver, Newark, New Jersey Mayor Ras Baraka, and fifteen law firms have been previous targets of such fabricated claims. The Department of Justice (DOJ), which has posted the worst success rate in the country's history, has been plagued by significant corruption and politicization, undermining its independence and integrity. It has shut down departments previously focused on enforcing the civil rights laws, national security, corruption, ethics, money laundering, and terrorism in order to focus on deportations of non-criminals, dismantling civil rights, and harassing the administration’s enemies. There have been forced resignations of prosecutors who resisted political pressure, indicating a shift towards loyalty over legal judgment. Disciplinary actions against judges and prosecutors who criticize the executive have become commonplace. Attacks on judges, even those appointed by the president, who follow the law rather than the president’s illegal policies, are routine. The DOJ's internal oversight and ethics capacity have been weakened, raising concerns about the rule of law and the Department’s abuse of justice.


In addition, the administration has declared war on people of color, having invaded urban areas of Los Angeles, Portland, Chicago, and Minneapolis-St. Paul. ICE has systematically, illegally, and violently detained and deported people whom they determined were immigrants and not entitled to stay in the United States. ICE’s efforts were so inept that they detained and deported citizens, legal residents, Native Americans, and others based on amateurish racial profiling, regardless of whether someone had tattoos and/or accents alone. ICE and DHS intentionally did this without regard to the individual rights guaranteed under the US Constitution, which explicitly states that all persons are entitled to counsel and due process. In addition, the president pardoned 1600 January 6 rioters, including members of the Proud Boys and other avowed white supremacists, who then brought a $100M lawsuit against the United States Government with support from the administration.

It is clear that the administration’s concept of justice has no relationship to Justice for All as articulated in the Pledge of Allegiance. The administration is pursuing an agenda of white supremacy at the expense of all others.

One of the bulwarks against this vile hatred and supremacist agenda has been the Southern Poverty Law Center. It is an organization based in Montgomery, Alabama, which has steadfastly focused on strengthening democracy and voting rights, which this administration persistently seeks to undermine. The people of the SPLC, also at significant risk to their lives and livelihoods, monitor white supremacist organizations and related activities, exposing hate, extremism, and countering disinformation and conspiracy theories with grounded research and intimate community knowledge. Their other projects include addressing unjust imprisonment and eliminating poverty and economic inequality.

The SPLC agenda is antithetical to the administration’s agenda, which announced its intention to spend $38.3 billion to turn warehouses into 21st-century versions of WWII Japanese detainment camps to hold nearly 100,000 people and is committed to deporting one million people a year, without regard to the merits of their right to live in America. Since, the Administration is unable to justify their expulsions under law, they have sought to destroy the system by firing immigration judges who follow the law, separating children from their families in an effort to make their lives so miserable that the families self deport; repealing naturalized citizenship status, despite the fact that such status was legally obtained and they have even tried, without merit, to unlawfully repeal the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution by executive order. Their approach is so outlandish that when asked directly, the Solicitor General could not confirm the right of Native Americans to live in the United States under the new executive order.

So why would the DOJ bring an action when it knows that it cannot obtain a conviction? Because initiating an indictment permits the Department to subpoena all the records of an organization that it despises. The DOJ can intimidate SPLC’s employees and witnesses. The investigation permits the DOJ (which has long ago abandoned confidentiality protocols) to force the organization to expend its precious 501(c)(3) funds to defend itself rather than fulfilling its mission. It also gives the DOJ the opportunity to expose the SPLC's methodologies and discredit informants within various organizations. In essence, the indictment permits the DOJ to comprehensively deconstruct the operations of the SPLC, rendering it incapable of fulfilling its mission of shining a light into the dark underworld of violent, racist, xenophobic hate groups, which the administration supports.

The Department of Justice is no longer about truth and justice. It is about destroying enemies of the current administration, and since that administration is populated with white supremacists committed to the development of a nation dominated by white supremacists who use their perverse version of Christianity as a weapon. Their purpose is evil and dangerous and reflects another unconstitutional abuse of the justice system. In the past, supremacists had just violent militias, and local government support. The current administration has officially handed them command of the levers of federal law enforcement. This is MAGA’s vision of Making America Great Again. It is in direct opposition to the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, the UN Declaration of Human Rights, and any sense of decency and equality.

Walter Hiawatha White Jr. - a member of the Board of Directors of Lawyers Defending American Democracy; a founding director and later chair of the American Bar Association Center for Human Rights; past chair of the ABA Section on Civil Rights & Social Justice; a past member of the ABA board of Governors; Past Chair of the Central Asian American Enterprise Fund (appointed by President Clinton). Walter has been admitted to practice in Wisconsin, Washington, D.C., and the Qatar International Court, and has previously been registered as a foreign lawyer in both England and Wales and the Russian Federation.


Read More

Court’s Slaughter Decision Hands Presidents Sweeping New Authority

U.S. President Donald Trump in the Oval Office at the White House on July 24, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Photo by Eric Lee/Getty Images)

Court’s Slaughter Decision Hands Presidents Sweeping New Authority

This series from Lawyers Defending American Democracy connects the words of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution to current events that threaten democracy and the justice system. Each piece highlights the unique responsibility lawyers carry—through their oath, professional obligations, and roles in their communities—to help the public understand what’s at risk and to speak out when democratic principles are under threat. LDAD’s call to action is straightforward: as the Founders once did, we must recognize threats to constitutional values, demand accountability, and act to defend them.

In its recent decision in Trump v. Slaughter, a divided Supreme Court approved an expansive use of presidential power that upsets the Constitutional balance between Congress and the President. The Court approved the President’s summary dismissal of agency leaders (in this case, commissioners of the Federal Trade Commission), notwithstanding a statute signed by a former President and the Court's own precedent specifically forbidding such dismissals. This decision will further politicize and weaponize much of our federal government.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reclassifying Faith?: Inside the Department of War’s Revision to Its List of Religions
man holding his hands on open book
Photo by Patrick Fore on Unsplash

Reclassifying Faith?: Inside the Department of War’s Revision to Its List of Religions

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

How Are Religions Recognized in the U.S. Military?

Keep ReadingShow less
Anti-gerrymandering sign

Anti-gerrymandering sign

Bill Clark/Getty Images

Don't Hold Your Breath Waiting for Politicians or Their Consultants to Fix Gerrymandering

2018, a nonprofit worker in Michigan named Katie Fahey posted a message online asking if anyone else was tired of politicians drawing their own districts. She had no campaign experience and no political base.

Within two years, the ballot initiative she built, called Voters Not Politicians, had written an independent redistricting commission into the Michigan constitution. Hollywood eventually made a documentary about it, Slay the Dragon, which is a fairly accurate description of what she had actually done.

Keep ReadingShow less
Protestors holding signs outside of the Idaho statehouse.

Protesters rally for abortion rights outside of the Idaho Statehouse in downtown Boise, Idaho, on May 14, 2022.

Sarah A. Miller/Idaho Statesman/AP

Idaho Voters Will Weigh In on One of the Strictest Abortion Bans in the Country

Idaho voters will weigh in on their state’s abortion laws this November. The secretary of state’s office certified a ballot measure that could, if passed, overturn one of the strictest bans in the country, the campaign to restore abortion rights in Idaho confirmed on Monday.

The measure would enact a new law establishing a state right to “reproductive freedom,” which it defines as allowing residents to make their own decisions in areas including fertility treatment, contraception and abortion. But it would not amend the state’s constitution, meaning it could still be overturned by the state’s Republican legislature. Currently, Idaho bans abortion in nearly all circumstances, with a narrow exception if staying pregnant threatens someone’s life.

Keep ReadingShow less