Skip to content
Project 2025
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories
U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN)

Trump’s Plan to Strip Rep. Omar of Her Citizenship Is Unconstitutional and a Threat to All of Us

JD Vance

JD Vance Tells Republicans Who America’s Real Birthright Citizens Are

Group of voters stand in line

Six Key Voting Blocs Hold the Balance of Power on Nov. 3

Five men sitting on one side of a table, as a panel at an event.

Congressional Inaction Raises Constitutional Change Alternative

Man holding American flag

This Is What Makes America Great

Congress Bill Spotlight: Easter Monday Act, Federal Holiday

News

A child holding a basket full of colorfully painted eggs.

A proposed bill in Congress could make Easter Monday a U.S. federal holiday. Here’s what the Easter Monday Act would do, why supporters back it, and critics’ concerns.

Getty Images, Evgeniia Siiankovskaia
Jesse Rifkin
By Jesse RifkinMar 13, 2026
Jesse Rifkin
Jesse Rifkin is a contributor for The Fulcrum, a nonpartisan publication dedicated to strengthening democracy by fostering informed civic engagement and elevating diverse perspectives.
See More Writings by author

Easter traditions: chocolate bunnies, egg rolling contests out on the lawn… and the day off?

What the legislation does

The Easter Monday Act would officially make “Easter Monday” a federal holiday. In the next three years, that would mean: April 6 in 2026, March 29 in 2027, and April 17 in 2028.

Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO) introduced the Senate version last April 10. Rep. Riley Moore (R-WV2) introduced the House version one week later: last April 17. That was mere days before Easter actually occurred last year: April 20.

If enacted, it would become the 12th annual federal holiday, alongside the other 11: New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King Day, Presidents' Day, Memorial Day, Juneteenth, Independence Day (July 4), Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving, and Christmas.

Context: Easter

In Christianity, Easter celebrates the resurrection of Jesus on the third day after his burial, which is commemorated on Good Friday.

However, unlike Christmas, which celebrates the birth of Jesus and is always on December 25, Easter’s date fluctuates. Specifically, it’s always celebrated on the first Sunday after an astronomical phenomenon called the Paschal Full Moon. Because that phenomenon can occur across a range of weeks, Easter can take place anywhere from March 22 to April 25.

(This year, it’s April 5.)

What supporters say

Supporters argue that one of the biggest days on the calendar should have the day off.

“81% of Americans celebrate Easter. But our current holiday schedule makes it way too difficult for families to celebrate together,” Sen. Schmitt posted on X, formerly Twitter. “Easter falls on the longest unbroken work stretch of the calendar. March and April are the only back-to-back months without a federal holiday.”

(Indeed: Presidents' Day is in February, then Memorial Day is in May. The 81% stat came from a 2024 survey by the National Retail Federation. The organization’s 2025 survey found a slightly-smaller but still overwhelming 79% celebrate Easter.)

“Nor is this some boutique left-wing micro-holiday, commemorating ‘Trans Visibility’ or ‘Indigenous Mourning,’” Sen. Schmitt continued. “This is not partisan. It's not a ‘Republican’ or ‘Democrat’ holiday. It's an American holiday, allowing a fuller celebration of the defining moment of the faith that shaped our nation and civilization.”

What opponents say

Opponents may counter that the legislation would violate the separation of church and state or the First Amendment’s “establishment of religion” clause.

However, there is some precedent for this, since Christmas has been a federal holiday since 1870. Few people argue against this: that’s just the federal government acknowledging the reality that few people in a majority-Christian nation would go to work or school that day, not that the government is declaring Christianity to be the “official religion,” per se.

Even just on a practical level, though, some may argue against this legislation on more nitpicking grounds: Easter Monday isn’t that important in the Christian tradition. Easter Sunday is really the holiday, not so much Easter Monday.

What happens now?

The House bill has attracted one Republican cosponsor, Rep. Addison McDowell (R-NC6), and was referred to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

The Senate bill has not yet attracted any cosponsors and was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

As of this writing, this year’s Easter is imminent – but who knows, perhaps this legislation could still be enacted shortly before then? After all, look at how the last new federal holiday was added: Juneteenth in 2021.

The Senate passed it by unanimous consent on June 15, the House passed it by a 415-14 vote the next day on June 16, then President Joe Biden signed it into law the next day on June 17… only two days before the June 19 holiday itself.

Jesse Rifkin is a freelance journalist with The Fulcrum. Don’t miss his report, Congress Bill Spotlight, on The Fulcrum. Rifkin’s writings about politics and Congress have been published in the Washington Post, Politico, Roll Call, Los Angeles Times, CNN Opinion, GovTrack, and USA Today.

SUGGESTIONS:

Congress Bill Spotlight: SERVE Act, To Undo Trump Renamings

Congress Bill Spotlight: MAMDANI Act, Blocking Funds to NYC

Congress Votes With Only One House or Senate Dissenter, 2025

Vice President J.D. Vance’s Tiebreaking Senate Votes, 2025


Latest news

"I Voted" sticker
Elections

New Tool Reveals Which Americans Hold Outsized Voting Power

Man dressed in jaguar costume
Community

Why Language Access Matters for Indigenous New Yorkers

Texas Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico
Elections

Are Independent Voters About to Flip Texas?

Woman sitting and typing on laptop on her lap.
Media & Technology

AI’s Information Crisis: Why Trust Is Harder to Sustain Than Ever

Read More

An empty grocery cart in a market.

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani proposes five city-run grocery stores. See the arguments for and against, from food deserts to bodega concerns and the $70M cost.

Getty Images, Kwangmoozaa

Government-Owned Grocery Stores: Accessible Nutrition or Government Overreach?

Issue Introduction

Over the past few years, affordability has become the most central issue affecting Americans and the quality of life in the United States. The prices of groceries and basic necessities have risen 25-30% since the COVID-19 pandemic and are projected to rise another 3.2% in 2026. At the same time, the exodus of grocery chains from rural and low-income areas has scattered food deserts throughout individual states. Recent mass closures include Grocery Outlet’s shuttering of 36 stores and continued shut-downs of many Albertsons locations. These factors have led politicians to make affordability a major campaign issue.

During his progressive campaign for mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani raised the idea of opening grocery stores owned and operated by the city government to provide New Yorkers with affordable groceries. In his April 2026 public address that marked his first 100 days in office, Mayor Mamdani announced plans for the first of five city-run grocery stores. Mamdani’s proposed initiative will use $70 million in capital funding to build five city-owned municipal stores–one in each borough–and place them under control of the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). NYCEDC will then select third-party operating staff in accordance with city standards for affordability and proper labor practices. Public opinion following the announcement continues to be divided between uproar and support.

Keep ReadingShow less
​U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testifies during a Senate Committee on Appropriations hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on July 21, 2026. Hegseth is crafting a strong and masculine identity for his audience as he reportedly contemplates a presidential run.

(Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

Politicians Can’t Just ’Give the People What They Want’

For reasons that will baffle my many detractors, I am often asked for advice about being an opinion journalist. One of my standard responses is: You have to be willing to disappoint your biggest fans.

What I mean is that if you start to see your job as telling fans what they want to hear, you risk becoming an entertainer rather than a thinker, and eventually you become a caricature. I’ve seen it happen numerous times. Patrick Buchanan was a brilliant columnist and a serious person. But over the course of his career, he listened too much to the people who said, “Go Pat, go!” and too little to friends who said, “I think that’s taking it too far.”

Keep ReadingShow less
White marble exterior of the United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government

Congress approval is at a record-low 10%. Moderation and consensus-building, not partisan theatrics, are how Washington gets problems solved.

Richard Sharrocks / Getty Images

Reclaiming the Politics of the Possible

Washington is stuck in a cycle of performative conflict. The incentives seem to reward outrage, not outcomes that last; purity tests, not problem‑solving. So it’s no surprise that after three shutdowns in less than a year, public approval of Congress collapsed to just 10 percent this spring. (Gallup, April 2026.) But the country we live in — where many middle-income families report persistent financial strain and businesses are navigating unprecedented technological upheaval — cannot be governed by theatrics. Breaking this cycle requires moderation, consensus‑building, and a cooperative approach to governance.

This is not a call for centrism as an ideology. Instead, this is a call for transformative leaders to embrace moderation as their governing strategy, recognizing that in a pluralistic country of nearly 350 million people durable solutions require broad and stable alliances. Ultimately, this is a call for the 240 million of us who are eligible to vote in November to elect consensus-builders instead of bomb-throwers, and healers instead of arsonists.

Keep ReadingShow less
Adult man holds a microphone while asking a question during a town hall meeting.

Congress ignored 90% of public support for background checks. Learn how citizen assemblies and sortition helped Ireland break gridlock and could work in the US.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

Consensus Without Power: How Sortition Could Break America's Legislative Gridlock

In April 2013, four months after the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting killed twenty children, the US Senate voted on the Manchin-Toomey Act to expand background checks and to include gun-show and internet sales of firearms. Roughly nine in ten Americans, including a majority of gun owners, supported the bill—a figure that has held steady across more than a decade of polling. It fell short of the 60-vote threshold by six votes. This was not an outlier. On complex issues, representatives often fail to translate public consensus into reality. Research shows that legislators consistently vote in line with donor and interest group preferences over constituent opinion. Before the vote, the National Rifle Association (NRA) warned every senator it would “rate” their vote on its annual rating system, and a low NRA rating could cost senators their next primary. Consequently, the bill died 54-46, and the majority of Americans watched, powerless, as their consensus was overridden by self-interested representatives.

Liberal democracies need a method to bypass electoral incentives that run counter to public opinion. One already exists: Ireland faced the same stalemate on complex issues before it instituted a process called sortition. The beauty of sortition lies in its removal of the primary pressure that misaligns representatives’ interests from public interest: reelection. Much like jury duty, citizens are randomly drawn from the population. An independent body then stratifies the pool, so the final group mirrors the country by age, gender, geography, and income. The group meets over weeks or months, hearing from experts and the public, as well as debating frequently. At the end, it issues a recommendation that parliament may then put to a referendum or pass into law.

Keep ReadingShow less
© Copyright 2026