Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Congress Bill Spotlight: Easter Monday Act, Federal Holiday

News

A child holding a basket full of colorfully painted eggs.

A proposed bill in Congress could make Easter Monday a U.S. federal holiday. Here’s what the Easter Monday Act would do, why supporters back it, and critics’ concerns.

Getty Images, Evgeniia Siiankovskaia

Easter traditions: chocolate bunnies, egg rolling contests out on the lawn… and the day off?

What the legislation does


The Easter Monday Act would officially make “Easter Monday” a federal holiday. In the next three years, that would mean: April 6 in 2026, March 29 in 2027, and April 17 in 2028.

Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO) introduced the Senate version last April 10. Rep. Riley Moore (R-WV2) introduced the House version one week later: last April 17. That was mere days before Easter actually occurred last year: April 20.

If enacted, it would become the 12th annual federal holiday, alongside the other 11: New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King Day, Presidents' Day, Memorial Day, Juneteenth, Independence Day (July 4), Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving, and Christmas.

Context: Easter

In Christianity, Easter celebrates the resurrection of Jesus on the third day after his burial, which is commemorated on Good Friday.

However, unlike Christmas, which celebrates the birth of Jesus and is always on December 25, Easter’s date fluctuates. Specifically, it’s always celebrated on the first Sunday after an astronomical phenomenon called the Paschal Full Moon. Because that phenomenon can occur across a range of weeks, Easter can take place anywhere from March 22 to April 25.

(This year, it’s April 5.)

What supporters say

Supporters argue that one of the biggest days on the calendar should have the day off.

“81% of Americans celebrate Easter. But our current holiday schedule makes it way too difficult for families to celebrate together,” Sen. Schmitt posted on X, formerly Twitter. “Easter falls on the longest unbroken work stretch of the calendar. March and April are the only back-to-back months without a federal holiday.”

(Indeed: Presidents' Day is in February, then Memorial Day is in May. The 81% stat came from a 2024 survey by the National Retail Federation. The organization’s 2025 survey found a slightly-smaller but still overwhelming 79% celebrate Easter.)

“Nor is this some boutique left-wing micro-holiday, commemorating ‘Trans Visibility’ or ‘Indigenous Mourning,’” Sen. Schmitt continued. “This is not partisan. It's not a ‘Republican’ or ‘Democrat’ holiday. It's an American holiday, allowing a fuller celebration of the defining moment of the faith that shaped our nation and civilization.”

What opponents say

Opponents may counter that the legislation would violate the separation of church and state or the First Amendment’s “establishment of religion” clause.

However, there is some precedent for this, since Christmas has been a federal holiday since 1870. Few people argue against this: that’s just the federal government acknowledging the reality that few people in a majority-Christian nation would go to work or school that day, not that the government is declaring Christianity to be the “official religion,” per se.

Even just on a practical level, though, some may argue against this legislation on more nitpicking grounds: Easter Monday isn’t that important in the Christian tradition. Easter Sunday is really the holiday, not so much Easter Monday.

What happens now?

The House bill has attracted one Republican cosponsor, Rep. Addison McDowell (R-NC6), and was referred to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

The Senate bill has not yet attracted any cosponsors and was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

As of this writing, this year’s Easter is imminent – but who knows, perhaps this legislation could still be enacted shortly before then? After all, look at how the last new federal holiday was added: Juneteenth in 2021.

The Senate passed it by unanimous consent on June 15, the House passed it by a 415-14 vote the next day on June 16, then President Joe Biden signed it into law the next day on June 17… only two days before the June 19 holiday itself.

Jesse Rifkin is a freelance journalist with The Fulcrum. Don’t miss his report, Congress Bill Spotlight, on The Fulcrum. Rifkin’s writings about politics and Congress have been published in the Washington Post, Politico, Roll Call, Los Angeles Times, CNN Opinion, GovTrack, and USA Today.

SUGGESTIONS:

Congress Bill Spotlight: SERVE Act, To Undo Trump Renamings

Congress Bill Spotlight: MAMDANI Act, Blocking Funds to NYC

Congress Votes With Only One House or Senate Dissenter, 2025

Vice President J.D. Vance’s Tiebreaking Senate Votes, 2025


Read More

An ICE agent monitors hundreds of asylum seekers being processed upon entering the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building on June 6, 2023 in New York City. New York City has provided sanctuary to over 46,000 asylum seekers since 2013, when the city passed a law prohibiting city agencies from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement agencies unless there is a warrant for the person's arrest.(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)
An ICE agent monitors hundreds of asylum seekers being processed.
(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)

The Power of the Purse and Executive Discretion: ICE Expansion Under the Trump Administration

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key Takeaways

  • Core Constitutional Debate: Expanded ICE enforcement under the Trump Administration raises a core constitutional question: Does Article II executive power override Article I’s congressional power of the purse?
  • Executive Justification: The primary constitutional justification for expanded ICE enforcement is The Unitary Executive Theory.
  • Separation of Powers: Critics argue that the Unitary Executive Theory undermines Congress’s power of the purse.
  • Moral Conflict: Expanded ICE enforcement has sparked a moral debate, as concerns over due process and civil liberties clash with claims of increased public safety and national security.

Where is ICE Funding Coming From?

Since the beginning of the current Trump Administration, immigration enforcement has undergone transformative change and become one of the most contested issues in the federal government. On his first day in office, President Trump issued Executive Order 14159, which directs executive agencies to implement stricter immigration enforcement practices. In order to implement these practices, Congress passed and President Trump signed into law the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), a budget reconciliation package that paired state and local tax cuts with immigration funding. This allocated $170.7 billion in immigration-related funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to spend by 2029.

Keep ReadingShow less
Towards a Reformed Capitalism
oval brown wooden conference table and chairs inside conference room

Towards a Reformed Capitalism

Despite all the laws and regulations that apply to corporations, which for the most part are designed to make corporations more responsive to the greater good, corporations have wreaked great harm on our environment, their workers, their customers, and the general public. Despite all the rules, capitalism can still pretty much do what it wants.

The problem is not that the laws and regulations are not enforced, although that is partly true. The problem is more that the laws and regulations are weak because of the strong influence corporations have on both Congress (this is true of Democrats as well as Republicans) and those responsible for regulating.

Keep ReadingShow less
Families of Americans Overseas Wrongfully Detained Bring Advocacy to Capitol Hill

The Bring Our Families Home campaign brought together loved ones of Americans wrongly detained overseas to display portraits in the Senate Russell Rotunda on Wednesday, May 6.

(Jacques Abou-Rizk, MNS)

Families of Americans Overseas Wrongfully Detained Bring Advocacy to Capitol Hill

WASHINGTON – American journalist Reza Valizadeh visited his elderly Iranian parents in March 2024 for the first time in 15 years. Valizadeh’s stories for Voice of America and other U.S. government-funded outlets often criticized the Iranian regime. So before traveling, he sought and received confirmation that he would be safe from a high-ranking commander in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, a branch of Iran’s armed forces. However, in September that same year, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps arrested Valizadeh, and Tehran’s Revolutionary Court sentenced him to ten years in prison for “collaboration with a hostile government.”

In the Rotunda of the Senate Russell Building last week, the Bring Our Families Home campaign set up portraits of Valizadeh and 12 other Americans currently wrongfully detained overseas. The group, family members of illegitimately detained Americans, appealed to Congress to push for their safe return. Each foam poster board included the name, home state, and country of detainment. The display also included portraits of the 33 people released after advocacy by the James W. Foley Foundation.

Keep ReadingShow less
DHS Funding During the Shutdown
Getty Images, Charles-McClintock Wilson

DHS Funding During the Shutdown

When Congress failed to approve funding for the Department of Homeland Security for the remainder of this fiscal year in February, almost all of its employees began to work without pay. That situation changed, however, on April 3, when President Donald Trump issued a memorandum ordering the DHS secretary and director of the Office of Management and Budget to “use funds that have a reasonable and logical nexus to the functions of DHS” to pay its employees and issue back pay.

Trump shifted money to avoid the political embarrassment that would be caused by the collapse of airport security screening through the actions of disgruntled agents and the disruption to air travel that would ensue. But it’s legally dubious.

Keep ReadingShow less