Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Congress Bill Spotlight: Easter Monday Act, Federal Holiday

News

A child holding a basket full of colorfully painted eggs.

A proposed bill in Congress could make Easter Monday a U.S. federal holiday. Here’s what the Easter Monday Act would do, why supporters back it, and critics’ concerns.

Getty Images, Evgeniia Siiankovskaia

Easter traditions: chocolate bunnies, egg rolling contests out on the lawn… and the day off?

What the legislation does


The Easter Monday Act would officially make “Easter Monday” a federal holiday. In the next three years, that would mean: April 6 in 2026, March 29 in 2027, and April 17 in 2028.

Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO) introduced the Senate version last April 10. Rep. Riley Moore (R-WV2) introduced the House version one week later: last April 17. That was mere days before Easter actually occurred last year: April 20.

If enacted, it would become the 12th annual federal holiday, alongside the other 11: New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King Day, Presidents' Day, Memorial Day, Juneteenth, Independence Day (July 4), Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving, and Christmas.

Context: Easter

In Christianity, Easter celebrates the resurrection of Jesus on the third day after his burial, which is commemorated on Good Friday.

However, unlike Christmas, which celebrates the birth of Jesus and is always on December 25, Easter’s date fluctuates. Specifically, it’s always celebrated on the first Sunday after an astronomical phenomenon called the Paschal Full Moon. Because that phenomenon can occur across a range of weeks, Easter can take place anywhere from March 22 to April 25.

(This year, it’s April 5.)

What supporters say

Supporters argue that one of the biggest days on the calendar should have the day off.

“81% of Americans celebrate Easter. But our current holiday schedule makes it way too difficult for families to celebrate together,” Sen. Schmitt posted on X, formerly Twitter. “Easter falls on the longest unbroken work stretch of the calendar. March and April are the only back-to-back months without a federal holiday.”

(Indeed: Presidents' Day is in February, then Memorial Day is in May. The 81% stat came from a 2024 survey by the National Retail Federation. The organization’s 2025 survey found a slightly-smaller but still overwhelming 79% celebrate Easter.)

“Nor is this some boutique left-wing micro-holiday, commemorating ‘Trans Visibility’ or ‘Indigenous Mourning,’” Sen. Schmitt continued. “This is not partisan. It's not a ‘Republican’ or ‘Democrat’ holiday. It's an American holiday, allowing a fuller celebration of the defining moment of the faith that shaped our nation and civilization.”

What opponents say

Opponents may counter that the legislation would violate the separation of church and state or the First Amendment’s “establishment of religion” clause.

However, there is some precedent for this, since Christmas has been a federal holiday since 1870. Few people argue against this: that’s just the federal government acknowledging the reality that few people in a majority-Christian nation would go to work or school that day, not that the government is declaring Christianity to be the “official religion,” per se.

Even just on a practical level, though, some may argue against this legislation on more nitpicking grounds: Easter Monday isn’t that important in the Christian tradition. Easter Sunday is really the holiday, not so much Easter Monday.

What happens now?

The House bill has attracted one Republican cosponsor, Rep. Addison McDowell (R-NC6), and was referred to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

The Senate bill has not yet attracted any cosponsors and was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

As of this writing, this year’s Easter is imminent – but who knows, perhaps this legislation could still be enacted shortly before then? After all, look at how the last new federal holiday was added: Juneteenth in 2021.

The Senate passed it by unanimous consent on June 15, the House passed it by a 415-14 vote the next day on June 16, then President Joe Biden signed it into law the next day on June 17… only two days before the June 19 holiday itself.

Jesse Rifkin is a freelance journalist with The Fulcrum. Don’t miss his report, Congress Bill Spotlight, on The Fulcrum. Rifkin’s writings about politics and Congress have been published in the Washington Post, Politico, Roll Call, Los Angeles Times, CNN Opinion, GovTrack, and USA Today.

SUGGESTIONS:

Congress Bill Spotlight: SERVE Act, To Undo Trump Renamings

Congress Bill Spotlight: MAMDANI Act, Blocking Funds to NYC

Congress Votes With Only One House or Senate Dissenter, 2025

Vice President J.D. Vance’s Tiebreaking Senate Votes, 2025


Read More

First Amendment being torn

First Amendment text of the US Constitution ripped in half -- Freedom of Speech , Religion or Press unconstitutional concept

Getty Images

Lawsuit Says Press Access Is Essential to Democratic Accountability

When POLITICO, CNN, and MS NOW announced Monday that they were filing a federal lawsuit to restore their reporters’ access to the White House, they challenged more than the sudden and unexplained revocation of press credentials. They underscored a fundamental constitutional principle: a free press does not operate at the government's discretion.

According to their joint statement, the outlets are seeking urgent relief after the Secret Service denied their reporters entry to the White House complex on Saturday and confiscated their credentials. The action followed recent stories by these outlets examining the administration’s handling of classified documents and raising questions about transparency related to policy meetings. They wrote, “Without notice or process, the White House revoked our journalists’ credentials because it objected to our reporting. Left unchallenged, this threatens press freedom and the public’s right to independent journalism free from government interference.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Gavel on top of binders

A full rundown of this week's congressional action: 7 bills headed to the President, a stalled data center bill, and the votes lawmakers wanted on record.

May Lim / 500px/Getty Images

House Crams in Votes Before Extended Break

The House wasn’t expected to stay in session past this week and, in fact, they left a day early after Rep. Massie (R-KY4) introduced an impeachment resolution against Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. Nonetheless, they powered through many more votes than usual. We’ll cover the seven soon-to-be new laws and the bills of interest we highlighted in this week’s preview. As is its usual function, the Senate mostly acted as a break on legislation that had passed the House.

New Laws

These bills have all passed both chambers in identical form, so they next go to the President for signing.

Keep ReadingShow less
Capitol building, Washington, D.C.
The United States Capitol building with its white dome against a blue sky

Republicans Are Walking Away From Congress’s Core Duties

The story of this political moment keeps getting written like President Donald Trump is the main character — his impulses, his conflicts, his latest post on Truth Social.

But the more important story is happening one branch over, where a Republican-controlled Congress has spent the last several weeks demonstrating, in real time, what it looks like when a legislature declines to legislate.

Keep ReadingShow less
Cardboard ballot box with a voter slip being placed into it by a hand, with a blue and red coloured background.

Cardboard ballot box with a voter slip being placed into it by a hand, with a blue and red coloured background.

Getty Images

The Leverage Ethic and the Spirit of Tripartisanship

I made the immodest proposal in my edited interdisciplinary volume Leveraging: A Political, Economic, and Societal Framework that the contemporary analogue to what Max Weber called the "Protestant Work Ethic" in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism was what I called "the Leverage Ethic."

Moreover, I suggested that the Leverage Ethic has more or less replaced what the late Harvard sociologist Daniel Bell called the "Consumer Ethic" in his classic book The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, which he argued more or less replaced the Protestant Work Ethic.

Keep ReadingShow less