Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

‘Death By a Thousand Cuts’: Longer Renewal Times Are Making DACA Recipients Deportable

Opinion

‘Death By a Thousand Cuts’: Longer Renewal Times Are Making DACA Recipients Deportable

Young immigrants who were brought to the United States as children and are undocumented, also known as “Dreamers” stand behind lawmakers at the Capitol in Washington, Wednesday, May 18, 2022.

(AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Eva Santos Veloz used to spend her days in neighborhoods across New York City, meeting residents and attending protests. As a community affairs organizer for a local nonprofit, her work — perhaps surprisingly — also required her to travel to other states sometimes. But it was always the personal interactions with people that the 36-year-old mother says she enjoyed the most.

However, since mid-February, Santos Veloz has been unable to work. Her work permit, tied to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, expired despite being filed 144 days ago — longer than the average 6 weeks that it had taken on multiple previous occasions she renewed since joining the program in 2014. Processing delays have left her without a job, and without the protection from deportation that the program had provided for more than a decade.

DACA is an Obama-era program that provides temporary protection from deportation to certain undocumented immigrants who were brought to the country as children, but it does not however confer legal status. Beneficiaries of the program can also apply for an Employment Authorization Document, valid for the duration of their protection from deportation (deferred action), which has to be renewed every two years. Traveling opportunities outside the country are also limited. Those with DACA status are commonly referred to as “Dreamers.”


“I am not entirely sure why, after 12 years of the program, it is worse than the beginning,” Santos Veloz said, adding that even before the renewal process had been digitized, renewals took on average three months to be processed. “I was never expecting for my permit to fully expire and for almost two months to go by.”

Santos Veloz’s case is not unique. Across the country, DACA recipients are losing employment as processing delays at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) stretch well beyond expected timelines — leaving them without legal status to work or live in the U.S. through no fault of their own.

Some advocates and politicians believe that the Trump administration is intentionally delaying renewals of immigration benefits as a way to meet the president’s mass deportation agenda, which has already seen more than 250 DACA recipients arrested by ICE since Trump took office.

As of Sep. 30, 2025, the latest available figures, there were 505,940 active DACA recipients nationwide, and 19,580 of them live in New York. Documented spoke with beneficiaries of the DACA program who have been waiting for their renewals — some of whom have wait times that have surpassed the 120-150 day window recommended by USCIS to file a renewal. Those interviewed said losing employment has impacted their families financially, and many have chosen to limit leaving their homes due to fear of encountering immigration officers.

“I’m always outside yelling, trying to protest. I haven’t gone to a protest just because I’m super afraid,” said Santos Veloz, who is also the primary breadwinner for her three children. “There’s a lot of hiding on my end now that I didn’t have before.”

Earlier this month, Santos Veloz said she could not attend a family event on the West Coast due to fear of getting arrested by ICE at the airport, especially now that she’s living without protection from the program. Without a salary, she has had to use her savings to support her family. “I have three children. I have a son that is going to college this year. I have a mom [to support],” she said. “It’s not even an idea of like, ‘hey, we are taking this long, and by this time you’ll get a response’. It’s just completely in limbo.”

Pedro Chavez, an immigration attorney, believes the Trump administration is slowly trying to get rid of the program. “Death by a thousand cuts, it’s like how people say,” Chavez said, adding that the administration tried to end DACA in 2017, during Trump’s first term. “The courts have said that there is no way to truly get rid of DACA. So he has been looking for ways to eliminate this protection to make people panic, to stress them so that they auto-deport.”

Chavez explained that more of his clients have reached out to him lately who, like Santos Veloz, have also reached their expiration dates. “They did everything right. They sent their petitions, they asked for renewal 150 days before it expired, but now they are nearing that expiration date and will soon be unable to work,” he said.

He warned that many beneficiaries are running the risk of accruing unlawful presence during the lapse of their DACA. Unlawful presence bars individuals from re-entering the United States for either 3 years or 10 years, depending on the amount of time they accrued without any sort of immigration status, unless they obtain a waiver for reentry.

Zach Kahler, spokesperson for USCIS, told Documented that “under the leadership of President Trump, USCIS is safeguarding the American people by more thoroughly screening and vetting all aliens, which can lengthen processing times. DACA does not confer any form of legal status in this country.”

On April 20, 16 members of Congress sent a letter to Joseph Edlow, Director of USCIS, to demand answers regarding the current DACA renewal processing delays that have incurred since Trump took office, as well as inquire about what has changed in the renewal process since December 2024, when former President Biden was in office.

“The Trump Administration is intentionally processing DACA renewals slowly. This has resulted in Dreamers experiencing high levels of anxiety and uncertainty, and it has resulted in some of them losing their jobs due to a lapse in their status from the delays, which has caused many DACA recipients and their families to face economic challenges,” the letter said. “ Moreover, a lapse in their DACA status due to the Trump Administration’s slow processing times has also put Dreamers at risk for deportation, which impacts their families, communities, and workplaces.”

These DACA renewal delays come amid a new ruling by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which on Friday issued a decision in Matter of Santiago-Santiago — a case about Catalina “Xóchitl” Santiago, an El Paso DACA recipient who was arrested at a U.S. airport and put on deportation proceedings.

Santiago’s removal proceedings were closed on Sept. 9 by an immigration judge, which was appealed to the BIA by DHS. “The Immigration Judge erred in terminating removal proceedings based solely on the fact that the respondent has been accorded DACA protection and without considering the reasons for any opposition to termination,” the BIA decision said.

Essentially, Chavez explained, the ruling restricts the ability to close a case in immigration court solely based on the person’s DACA protection, as it was in the past. What that means is that the judge will now have to consider if there is any opposition to the case before closing the case.

Also Read: Am I Still Protected from Deportation If I Have DACA?

For Giancarla C., 39, a beneficiary of the program living in Virginia, the consequences of losing her DACA extend beyond her immediate family, she said. She was put on leave of absence on April 10, after her work permit expired, even though she had sent her renewal on Nov. 23 — 158 days ago. As a legal representative accredited by the Department of Justice, Giancarla had been responsible for overseeing 200 clients, filing petitions and declarations U Visas for victims of crimes, asylum and other cases, and said her co-workers had to absorb many of her clients and rebuild trust with them.

“A lot of clients hear things on TikTok, or wherever. There’s a lot of fear-mongering,” she said.

Giancarla said has avoided driving to her usual gym, or taking her dog to a park 30 minutes away from her apartment complex due to fear of running into ICE agents. “Thankfully, the grocery store is next to my apartment complex,” she said. “I wake up and it’s just like I don’t have anything to do. I’ve been walking around with my dog in the neighborhood.”

Veloz Santos said that she also knows of other DACA recipients who have also been limiting their time outside, and in some cases, even moved from their neighborhoods due to ICE presence. “We see what ICE did to two great humans that were protecting our community,” she said, referring to Alex Pretti and Renee Good, who were killed by immigration agents in Minneapolis earlier this year. “So even those that are trying to help us and protect us are taking steps back because they are being attacked.”

‘Death By a Thousand Cuts’: Longer Renewal Times Are Making DACA Recipients Deportable was first published by Documented and was republished with permission.

Rommel H. Ojeda is a bilingual journalist and filmmaker based in New York City. Ojeda is the Community Correspondent for Documented.



Read More

An empty grocery cart in a market.

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani proposes five city-run grocery stores. See the arguments for and against, from food deserts to bodega concerns and the $70M cost.

Getty Images, Kwangmoozaa

Government-Owned Grocery Stores: Accessible Nutrition or Government Overreach?

Issue Introduction

Over the past few years, affordability has become the most central issue affecting Americans and the quality of life in the United States. The prices of groceries and basic necessities have risen 25-30% since the COVID-19 pandemic and are projected to rise another 3.2% in 2026. At the same time, the exodus of grocery chains from rural and low-income areas has scattered food deserts throughout individual states. Recent mass closures include Grocery Outlet’s shuttering of 36 stores and continued shut-downs of many Albertsons locations. These factors have led politicians to make affordability a major campaign issue.

During his progressive campaign for mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani raised the idea of opening grocery stores owned and operated by the city government to provide New Yorkers with affordable groceries. In his April 2026 public address that marked his first 100 days in office, Mayor Mamdani announced plans for the first of five city-run grocery stores. Mamdani’s proposed initiative will use $70 million in capital funding to build five city-owned municipal stores–one in each borough–and place them under control of the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). NYCEDC will then select third-party operating staff in accordance with city standards for affordability and proper labor practices. Public opinion following the announcement continues to be divided between uproar and support.

Keep ReadingShow less
​U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testifies during a Senate Committee on Appropriations hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on July 21, 2026. Hegseth is crafting a strong and masculine identity for his audience as he reportedly contemplates a presidential run.

(Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

Politicians Can’t Just ’Give the People What They Want’

For reasons that will baffle my many detractors, I am often asked for advice about being an opinion journalist. One of my standard responses is: You have to be willing to disappoint your biggest fans.

What I mean is that if you start to see your job as telling fans what they want to hear, you risk becoming an entertainer rather than a thinker, and eventually you become a caricature. I’ve seen it happen numerous times. Patrick Buchanan was a brilliant columnist and a serious person. But over the course of his career, he listened too much to the people who said, “Go Pat, go!” and too little to friends who said, “I think that’s taking it too far.”

Keep ReadingShow less
White marble exterior of the United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government

Congress approval is at a record-low 10%. Moderation and consensus-building, not partisan theatrics, are how Washington gets problems solved.

Richard Sharrocks / Getty Images

Reclaiming the Politics of the Possible

Washington is stuck in a cycle of performative conflict. The incentives seem to reward outrage, not outcomes that last; purity tests, not problem‑solving. So it’s no surprise that after three shutdowns in less than a year, public approval of Congress collapsed to just 10 percent this spring. (Gallup, April 2026.) But the country we live in — where many middle-income families report persistent financial strain and businesses are navigating unprecedented technological upheaval — cannot be governed by theatrics. Breaking this cycle requires moderation, consensus‑building, and a cooperative approach to governance.

This is not a call for centrism as an ideology. Instead, this is a call for transformative leaders to embrace moderation as their governing strategy, recognizing that in a pluralistic country of nearly 350 million people durable solutions require broad and stable alliances. Ultimately, this is a call for the 240 million of us who are eligible to vote in November to elect consensus-builders instead of bomb-throwers, and healers instead of arsonists.

Keep ReadingShow less
Adult man holds a microphone while asking a question during a town hall meeting.

Congress ignored 90% of public support for background checks. Learn how citizen assemblies and sortition helped Ireland break gridlock and could work in the US.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

Consensus Without Power: How Sortition Could Break America's Legislative Gridlock

In April 2013, four months after the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting killed twenty children, the US Senate voted on the Manchin-Toomey Act to expand background checks and to include gun-show and internet sales of firearms. Roughly nine in ten Americans, including a majority of gun owners, supported the bill—a figure that has held steady across more than a decade of polling. It fell short of the 60-vote threshold by six votes. This was not an outlier. On complex issues, representatives often fail to translate public consensus into reality. Research shows that legislators consistently vote in line with donor and interest group preferences over constituent opinion. Before the vote, the National Rifle Association (NRA) warned every senator it would “rate” their vote on its annual rating system, and a low NRA rating could cost senators their next primary. Consequently, the bill died 54-46, and the majority of Americans watched, powerless, as their consensus was overridden by self-interested representatives.

Liberal democracies need a method to bypass electoral incentives that run counter to public opinion. One already exists: Ireland faced the same stalemate on complex issues before it instituted a process called sortition. The beauty of sortition lies in its removal of the primary pressure that misaligns representatives’ interests from public interest: reelection. Much like jury duty, citizens are randomly drawn from the population. An independent body then stratifies the pool, so the final group mirrors the country by age, gender, geography, and income. The group meets over weeks or months, hearing from experts and the public, as well as debating frequently. At the end, it issues a recommendation that parliament may then put to a referendum or pass into law.

Keep ReadingShow less