Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Trump’s Betrayal of Ukraine Leaves Blood on His Hands and a Stain on the Country He Leads

Opinion

​President Donald Trump

President Donald Trump speaks in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House on November 09, 2026 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The Bible is filled with stories of betrayal and warnings of human treachery. Recall that Cain betrayed his brother Abel after God showed Abel his favor. Cain’s response was to lure Abel into a field where he killed him.

Or recall how Samson was betrayed by Delilah, the woman he loved. As the book of Judges says, she lured him into showing her “the secret of his great strength and how we can overpower him so we may tie him up and subdue him.” In return, she received “eleven hundred shekels of silver.”


But, alas, stories of betrayal aren’t confined to biblical texts. They have special resonance in political life.

As the famous Italian political commentator Niccolò Machiavelli put it, “For this can be said of men in general: that they are ungrateful, fickle, hypocrites and dissemblers, avoiders of dangers, greedy for gain; and while you benefit them, they are entirely yours, offering you their blood, their goods, their life, their children,...when need is far away, but when you actually become needy, they turn away.”

Those lines could have been written with Donald Trump in mind.

It has been hard to watch over the last few days as he turns his back on Ukraine, blames it for problems of his own making, stands by while hundreds of Ukrainian citizens are killed in Russian missile attacks, and has the temerity to tell Ukrainians that they should replace their president.

Trump’s betrayal of Ukraine will be the stuff of nightmares when the history of our era is written; it, and he, will live in infamy. That betrayal will do untold damage to the nation he leads and to its reputation worldwide.

As the Guardian notes, “Volodymyr Zelenskyy has said he feels personally betrayed by Donald Trump after it emerged that Ukraine’s military has had its access to Elon Musk’s Starlink satellite squeezed, raising doubts about long-term US support for Kyiv.”

“I am sure,” Zelensky added, “they knew what they did, absolutely. Because it was 1 am at night, Starlink was blocked by SpaceX and the United States…This decision will bring a lot of human losses … of course, people will die.”

And there is more to Trump’s betrayal.

Think about his deal to lift sanctions on Russia in exchange for diesel fuel. Supplies. Senators from both parties wrote to the president that his deal “only provides Putin with more fuel to finance his war machine and enables Russia to continue its brutal attacks on Ukrainian civilians.”

“Granting Moscow the ability to sell Russian diesel freely in global markets damages American security interests and is a betrayal of the people of Ukraine, who continue to defend themselves from Putin’s murderous, illegal war. This deal is a gift to our adversary and a betrayal of our Allies.”

Betrayal involves a rupture, an undoing of a trusting relationship. It is a disruption and undoing of expectations. Writing about Avishai Margalit’s book On Betrayal, the political theorist Michael Walzer observes that in Margalit’s view, “Betrayal…always depends on a relationship; there is always someone or some group that has been betrayed…. (U)nless someone else was counting on my faithfulness, I am not a betrayer.”

Of course, sometimes we think of such a rupture as morally virtuous, for example, when a whistleblower reveals nefarious and dangerous behavior, or when police choose to break “the blue wall of silence.” And, whether virtuous or not, for Machiavelli, the skillful Prince needs to anticipate and be ready for betrayal.

And one cannot really imagine that Zelensky was surprised by Trump’s latest acts that put Ukraine in jeopardy. He should not have been.

As he has shown throughout his career, Donald Trump is, as The Guardian’s Jonathan Freeland puts it, a “master of betrayal.” That is why it is hardly surprising that he would betray Ukraine.

He has done it more than once.

In 2019, Trump held up hundreds of millions in military aid to pressure Zelenskyy into investigating Joe Biden and his son, Hunter. In February 2025, barely a month into his second term, Trump “delivered an on-camera dressing down of Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office, seeking to humiliate the Ukrainian leader by telling him, ‘you don’t have the cards,’ even as JD Vance demanded their visitor show gratitude.”

By the end of 2025, the Washington Post reported that Trump had changed his position on the war in Ukraine 19 times. He has become the living and breathing embodiment of the political theorist Judith Shklar’s observation that “In a tricky and unstable world, fidelity may be in such short supply that betrayals become the norm….(and) betrayal…lose(s) its primitive horror.”

Nonetheless, Freeland captures the horror of Trump’s latest betrayal when he notes, “Just as Russia’s military position was looking precarious, Donald Trump has come riding to the rescue. Throw in the US invitation to Putin to attend December’s G20 meeting at one of Trump’s golf clubs in Florida, and you have a US president who might as well be skywriting his support for Russia and his betrayal of Ukraine.”

The result of all this is that the United States has lost its standing as a bastion of freedom and a reliable ally and partner.

And as Ukrainian civilians die because of Trump’s fecklessness, he should remember what God said to Cain after the slaying of Abel: “Now his blood is shouting to me from the ground. So you will be cursed from this ground. Now when you work the soil, the ground will not help your plants grow. You will not have a home in this land. You will wander from place to place.”

All Americans can only hope that because of what Trump has done, this country will not be cursed and banished from the community of nations.

Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell professor of jurisprudence and political science at Amherst College.


Read More

Voters in Iowa

Residents vote at polling station in St. Timothy's Episcopal Church on November 03, 2026 in West Des Moines, Iowa.

(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

The Fork in the Road: What the 2026 Midterms Mean for MAGA, Democrats, and the GOP

The political earthquake of the 2026 midterm elections has left Washington, DC, in a state of whiplash, delivering a sharp rebuke to the Trump administration and fracturing the expansive coalition that carried him to the White House just two years ago. For Donald Trump, his inner circle, and his most ardent followers, the message from the American electorate is unmistakable: the governing chaos, policy overreaches, and exhausting political theater of the last two years will not fly for the next two

Instead of showing humility following a historic defeat, the president’s immediate elevation of immigration hardliner Stephen Miller to White House Chief of Staff signals a defiant doubling down rather than a constructive course correction. For millions of voters—including the critical Latino demographics alienated by the administration's aggressive deportation campaigns—Miller’s promotion feels like a structural mistake that will only deepen the administration's isolation. If MAGA is to survive past Trump’s tenure, the movement must undergo a radical transformation, moving away from unilateral aggression and toward sustainable governance. As former conservative acolyte Rod Dreher soberly observed following the wreckage of the midterms, “MAGA couldn't deliver on good government. And if you can't deliver on good government, it doesn't matter how charismatic the leader is. It's not going to work.”

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche

U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche at the Robert F. Kennedy Department of Justice building on September 30, 2026 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Trump’s Weaponization of the DOJ Threatens Democratic Governance

The dust from the November 2026 midterm elections has barely settled, yet a familiar, toxic chorus of political warfare is already drowning out the clear message from American voters.

With Democrats securing majorities in both the House and Senate, voters signaled a desire for checks, balances, and a focused effort on the pressing economic issues squeezing everyday families. Instead, President Donald Trump has chosen to meet the incoming legislative branch not with an open hand, but with a weaponized Department of Justice.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democratic Presidential candidate U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) holds his first presidential campaign rally at Brooklyn College on March 02, 2019 in Brooklyn, New York.

A lobbyist who worked for both Bernie Sanders and Fortune 500 clients explains what democratic socialist wins mean for business, and how to prepare.

VIEW press/Getty Images

I Campaigned for Bernie Sanders Then Lobbied for Amazon

In 2016, my political outreach company, Firehouse Phones, worked on the presidential campaign of a democratic socialist. It was one of many campaigns my firm touched, but that one stays on my resume for a reason: it taught me more about how persuasion actually works than any client engagement before or since.

Today I run Ohio River South, a government affairs firm focused on the nation's fastest-growing region — the American South. Over the past decade we've advocated for nearly two dozen Fortune 500 companies — Amazon in my earlier lobbying years, and later growing a client roster that included Alphabet, Microsoft, General Motors, United Healthcare, and Capital One.

Keep ReadingShow less
The White House
The white house with green lawn and trees
Photo by Josh on Unsplash

The Politics of Gratitude: Why Washington Punishes the Loyalty It Cannot Price

On a Sunday night in August, Senator Jon Ossoff told a campaign rally in Atlanta that President Trump would rather build his ballroom and “travel with Natalie” than do his job. He never used her last name. He did not need to. Natalie Harp, the White House aide known to colleagues as Trump’s “human printer” for trailing him with a portable printer and transcribing his social-media dictation, had become a punchline before most Americans knew who she was.

The backlash arrived within hours. White House officials accused Ossoff of insinuating an affair; Republican Rep. Brandon Gill noted that Harp survived bone cancer only because the Right to Try Act, which Trump signed in 2018, let her seek an experimental treatment outside the normal approval process, and dismissed any other reading of the moment as unfair. Weeks earlier, Harp had been at the center of a far more consequential story: in July, she was one of a handful of aides, alongside the defense secretary and two senior staffers, chosen to accompany Trump on a covert switch of aircraft as he left a security summit in Turkey after officials detected a credible Iranian threat, while most of the traveling delegation stayed behind on a decoy plane. That is the real proximity Ossoff's line was needling. Then came a detail that complicated the story further: Trump had personally given Harp and several other aides cash gifts of $45,000 apiece, which a former federal ethics official called troublesome, since money on that scale can leave a recipient feeling indebted to whoever signs the check.

Keep ReadingShow less