Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

“The Pitt”: Emergency Department TV Fiction Or Prediction IRL?

Opinion

Emergency Medical Team Rushing Down a Hospital Corridor, Carefully Pushing a Stretcher with an Injured Patient. Nurses and Doctors Coordinate the Urgent Situation

An emergency doctor with 28 years on the front lines explains why HBO Max's award-winning drama "The Pitt" isn't Hollywood exaggeration, but an urgent, accurate look inside America's buckling healthcare safety net.

gorodenkoff/Getty Images

In its first two seasons, the HBO Max series “The Pitt” about the fictional Pittsburgh Trauma Medical Center, has received over 30 nominations and has won 11 Emmy’s including Outstanding Drama Series for the last two consecutive years. It may be fair to say, “The Pitt” has connected.

People ask me constantly: Is "The Pitt" real?


They ask it half-joking, expecting me to laugh and say, “Of course not,” at Hollywood's usual over-the-top exaggeration and glamorization of a busy emergency department.

But when it comes to "The Pitt," I don't laugh, I nod.

The response I immediately get is universal. “Wait, what, are you serious?”

After working in emergency departments for 28 years, I see this show is less entertainment with a medical backdrop, and more like a documentary with a script. And that distinction matters, because "The Pitt" has quietly become something unique in American television-- a modern-day canary in the coal mine.

In the late 1800s, British physiologist John Scott Haldane began investigating why coal mine explosions kept killing miners even when no fire or blast ever reached them. He traced it back to carbon monoxide, a gas with no color and no smell, invisible until it was fatal. The canary became an early-warning instrument, making an invisible danger visible before it became lethal.

That's precisely the role "The Pitt" is playing now. For years, emergency medicine has been trying to describe an invisible gas: ED boarding and a safety net stretched past its design limits. It took “The Pitt” putting crisis in front of 11 million viewers, in real time, over a single continuous shift, to make the connection.

"The Pitt" doesn't dramatize emergency medicine so much as it exposes it with uncomfortable accuracy. That includes admitted patients “boarding” in hallways because there are no inpatient beds to admit. So a physician must decide, in real time, whom to see first when everyone needs to be seen now. None of this is exaggerated for drama. If anything, it's restrained.

That's the deeper truth the show gets right: the emergency department has become the place where the breakdown of the American health care system eventually lands. The patient who can't get a primary care appointment for six weeks comes to the emergency department instead.

The patient with no insurance, no stable housing, uncontrolled diabetes, or a mental health crisis with nowhere else to go comes to the emergency department. Emergency departments have become the safety net of last resort, and the show captures what it feels like to be the thread that net is fraying on.

“The PITT” offers proximity. Watch the fictional Dr. Michael “Robby” Robinavitch played by Noah Wyle, try to hold his department together for 12 straight hours, and something clicks. Entertainment succeeds where advocacy alone often stalls, because it makes people feel what you’re saying: this system is buckling, and it's buckling in front of patients who have nowhere to go.

"The Pitt" now dramatizes for a national audience that the ED isn't just where emergencies happen. It is where health inequity becomes visible, measurable, and, if we pay attention, addressable.

The U.S. healthcare ecosystem needs capacity, emergency departments need capacity, and without it systems become overwhelmed. The traditional economics of supply and demand are not optimal when it comes to the healthcare sector because healthcare is not the same as widgets.

It is critical then to think outside the box to make an inefficient system more efficient. That starts with creating operational capacity across our entire healthcare ecosystem.

There is not one single all-encompassing solution, but likely a path forward that involves small but impactful actions such as efforts around optimizing patient flow, streamlining operations, and leveraging data without relying on the creation of more inefficient systems.

"The Pitt" has done its job; it has made the invisible visible. Now it's up to the healthcare collective – policymakers, administrators, medical staff, advocates, volunteers, patients, funders--to fix the air, not just admire the canary that warned us.


Dr. Heather Prendergast is a Professor of Emergency Medicine, Attending Physician, and Vice Dean of Clinical Affairs at the University of Illinois College of Medicine , and a Public Voices Fellow of the OpED Project at the University of Illinois.


Read More

Illustration of a man and woman arguing

Arguments or debates, disputes or conflicts, verbal clashes. Angry men and women roar at each other

Getty Images

What If Polarization Is the Wrong Diagnosis?

I just listened to political scientist Lilliana Mason challenge one of the most familiar explanations of what is wrong with American politics.

We are constantly told that America suffers from polarization. Republicans and Democrats have moved too far apart. They distrust each other, increasingly regard one another as enemies, and have lost the ability to compromise. The prescribed remedies are familiar: more civility, more dialogue, less hostility, and a return to the political center.

Keep Reading Show less
 Vintage Computer with AI Text on Screen and Neon Lighting, figures of people standing around it.

Calling AI “super” makes it sound omniscient. A faith leader coalition explains why the word “artificial” matters and what to do instead.

Royalty-free/Getty Images

Reject the Sand God. Call AI by Its True Name

President Trump recently signed an executive order telling federal agencies to replace the term "artificial intelligence" with "Super Intelligence." He said the word "artificial" makes the technology sound fake.

Many Americans already treat AI as a “super intelligence” that knows better and that they should confide in. Many already assign it the role of spiritual counsel, close confidante, or even romantic partner. In a Common Sense Media survey, one-third of teenagers claimed they had discussed serious personal matters with an AI instead of a person, and 31 percent said talking with an AI companion was as satisfying as talking with friends, or even more so. Bible Chat, an app that offers scripture-based advice and prayers, has been downloaded more than 30 million times.

Keep Reading Show less
news video camera
black video camera
Photo by Matt C on Unsplash

When the Cameras Went Dark: What a Press Ban Reveals About American Journalism

When I came to the United States from India in 1982, I did not trust newspapers. Back home, everyone knew which party a paper favored before reading a line. American television felt different. My family watched Peter Jennings every evening, and later I found Larry King on CNN, who let his guests talk instead of telling viewers what to think. That habit of holding everyone to one standard has mostly faded.

On Sept. 18, President Trump announced he was banning CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House, saying their reporting was fake news. The next morning the Secret Service took reporters’ badges at the gate. The outlets sued on Monday, and Fox, ABC, NBC and CBS declined to take CNN’s turn in the television pool. On Sept. 24, Judge Timothy Kelly, whom Trump appointed, blocked the ban for 14 days. He found the outlets likely to win on due process, because reporters got no notice and no chance to respond, and he doubted the government’s national security explanation. Trump’s answer was to call the judge “totally disloyal.”

Keep Reading Show less
Woman sitting and typing on laptop on her lap.

AI chatbots are always guessing, even when they sound sure. Experts and Claude itself explain the AI trust gap, bias and why to check sources.

Oscar Wong/Getty Images

AI’s Information Crisis: Why Trust Is Harder to Sustain Than Ever

In all the debates about human and machine intelligence, one thing has become clear: We humans love to talk about AI. We’ve speculated whether AI will create or eliminate jobs, revolutionize or destroy science, comfort or torment us, entertain us brilliantly or rot our brains, or some combination of all these things. But amid the noise, we may have paid too little attention to a subtler impact: how AI is disrupting our relationship to information and making it harder to know what to believe.

The problem isn’t just deepfakes, the malicious manipulation of images, video, and audio. Even benign, well-intentioned AI applications can be profoundly misleading. The nature of the large language models that power chatbots means that they are always guessing, however confident they seem. How can we use AI to produce reliable information that improves public discourse rather than distorting it?

Keep Reading Show less