Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Elephant in the DNC's 2024 Election Report

Opinion

An American flag waves in front to the U.S. Capitol Building

An American flag waves in front to the U.S. Capitol Building on a clear, spring day on May 30, 2026 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Kevin Carter/Getty Images)

Kevin Carter / Getty Images

And no, I don't mean the Republican elephant. I mean the elephant in the room that is being ignored.

The DNC's 2024 Election Report fails to even note what I consider to be a major failure by the Party—the elephant in the Democratic Party's room—not just of the Harris campaign, but of all Democratic campaigns of the past 20 years: the Party's failure to acknowledge and address the plight of blue-collar middle-class Americans.


In 2011, I wrote a post, "Democrats Better Pay Attention to the Needs of the Middle Class." In that post, I examined why the Tea Party was so angry and why formerly solid Democrats were so open to the demagoguery of Sarah Palin and Republican pundits. The answer was not just the election of a Black President, Barack Obama. Blue-collar middle-class workers were hurting—their standard of living and quality of life had been drifting downward as globalization resulted in manufacturing jobs disappearing and wages stagnating over the previous 30 years. And during those years, while they saw the Party fighting for the poor and people of color, they felt neglected. (See also the Foreword to my book, We Still Hold These Truths.)

The world as the middle class knew it since WWII had been turned upside down. Small wonder they were and are scared, angry, and alienated. Yet this important shift in the American social fabric was never acknowledged by Democrats. Politicians continued to talk vaguely about the need to protect the middle class, but the evisceration that had already occurred was not mentioned. Even when Trump appeared on the scene and vociferously voiced compassion for blue-collar workers and vowed to restore them to financial well-being, the Democrats countered with nothing.

I have written previously that it is the Democratic Party's fault that our country finds itself in the dreadful place it has been since Trump was elected and took control of the Republican Party. Most Democrats will probably find this an extreme claim. But if the Party had paid attention to the plight of this core segment of the historic Democratic coalition, if the Party had spoken to them, if they had issued a mea culpa, if they had proposed and enacted policies to help these workers back to prosperity, Trump would have never been able to attract these voters and would never have won either in 2016 or 2024.

What to do now? It is not too late to do what should have been done years ago. The Party, together with all Democratic politicians, must issue a very public mea culpa to America's blue-collar middle class. And it must propose policies and programs to restore their financial well-being that the Party will enact if it is restored to power in Congress and the presidency. The moment could not be more propitious, as Trump's blue-collar supporters are feeling the pain of inflation as never before due to his actions.

But don't try to regain their support by trashing Trump. Trump supporters are fiercely loyal to him and will never agree with negative attacks on him. They may also feel that such attacks are indirect attacks on them since they supported him in all these matters.

No, the approach to blue-collar America must be to issue, unabashedly, a mea culpa—forgive me for I have neglected you. No one else is at fault, no one else is criticized, no excuses made (e.g. economists all thought globalization was a great idea). A mea culpa coupled with strong, common-sense policies and programs intended to help the blue-collar worker—and effectively communicated to them—will bring the disaffected blue-collar worker back to the Party.

The last point about effective communication is critical. Biden's huge Infrastructure measure could—should—have brought many of these disaffected blue-collar workers back to the Party if they had been told this was enacted to help them, not just to invest in the future and transform our economy. But they were never mentioned, never spoken to; Biden and Harris traveled around the country to benefit politically from all the projects, but they never mentioned the plight of the blue-collar worker and their intent to help them back to financial well-being. And so the opportunity was lost.

The appeal should be, "Are you better off now than you were 2 years ago? Come back home to the Democratic Party. You will be welcomed and nurtured and you will prosper again."


Ronald L. Hirsch is a teacher, legal aid lawyer, survey researcher, nonprofit executive, consultant, composer, author, and volunteer. He is a graduate of Brown University and the University of Chicago Law School and the author of We Still Hold These Truths. Read more of his writing at www.PreservingAmericanValues.com


Read More

What the World Cup Teaches Us About Democracy

Charles De Ketelaere #17 of Belgium scores his team’s first goal past Unai Simon #23 of Spain during the FIFA World Cup 2026 Quarter Final match between Spain and Belgium at Los Angeles Stadium on July 10, 2026, in Inglewood, California.

(Photo by David Ramos/Getty Images)

What the World Cup Teaches Us About Democracy

As live sporting events go, nothing comes close to the World Cup. I was in the stands when South Africa, my birth country, hosted the event in 2010 after decades of exclusion from global athletics. In June of this year, I had a full-circle moment when South Africa played in the knockout rounds for the first time, and I stood with my two American sons, arms around them, singing South Africa's anthem — the only national anthem that weaves multiple languages into a single, unifying song. Later in the week, I was in the stands again, cheering Spain's win over Austria, a country to which my only connections are a brief holiday…and the fact that my mother's family fled from there during the Inquisition.

The magic of the World Cup is that everyone in the stands wears the flags and shirts of countries that are “theirs” in some way. For some, it’s where they were born; for others, where they live or where their ancestors hailed from. For some, it is simply a country they have adopted for the afternoon. It is impossible to know how deep a person’s connection runs simply by looking at them. And next to a person waving one team’s colors is a stranger, family member, or close friend supporting the opposing team—or wearing the jersey of a team that isn’t playing that day at all.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Former President Joe Biden, former President Barack Obama, former President George W. Bush, and former President Bill Clinton pose together.

Former President Joe Biden, former President Barack Obama, former President George W. Bush, and former President Bill Clinton pose ahead of the dedication ceremony for the opening of the Barack Obama Presidential Center, in John Lewis Plaza, on June 18, 2026, in Chicago, Illinois.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais - Pool / Getty Images

America Shouldn't Need a Political Savior to Hold It Together

America is waiting for a political savior, but the problem is structural.

This dynamic was illustrated during two recent broadcast appearances by journalist Katy Tur. Discussing modern secessionist movements on June 15, 2026, Tur found optimism in a poll showing 54 percent of Americans still believe we share core values, and she later expressed hope that future leaders could reunite the country.

Keep ReadingShow less
Constitution of the United State with the U.S. flag in the background.

The Framers designed a republic with the intention to manage factionalism through deliberate compromise and institutional guardrails, whereas 21st-century polarization often treats compromise as a moral failing.

Douglas Sacha, Getty Images

Our Framers on 21st Century Primaries and Polarization

The Framers would view 21st-century closed primaries and political polarization as the exact manifestation of "factionalism" they spent the 1787 Constitutional Convention trying to prevent. They would argue these systems force candidates to appeal to ideological extremes rather than the broad, moderate consensus required for stable governance.

The Danger of Factionalism: In Federalist No. 10, James Madison defined a "faction" as a group of citizens united by a passion or interest adverse to the rights of others. He argued that while factions are inevitable, their effects must be controlled. The Framers would recognize 21st-century hyper-polarization as the dominance of unyielding factions that prioritize absolute ideological purity over democratic compromise.

Keep ReadingShow less