Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Elephant in the DNC's 2024 Election Report

Opinion

An American flag waves in front to the U.S. Capitol Building

An American flag waves in front to the U.S. Capitol Building on a clear, spring day on May 30, 2026 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Kevin Carter/Getty Images)

Kevin Carter / Getty Images

And no, I don't mean the Republican elephant. I mean the elephant in the room that is being ignored.

The DNC's 2024 Election Report fails to even note what I consider to be a major failure by the Party—the elephant in the Democratic Party's room—not just of the Harris campaign, but of all Democratic campaigns of the past 20 years: the Party's failure to acknowledge and address the plight of blue-collar middle-class Americans.


In 2011, I wrote a post, "Democrats Better Pay Attention to the Needs of the Middle Class." In that post, I examined why the Tea Party was so angry and why formerly solid Democrats were so open to the demagoguery of Sarah Palin and Republican pundits. The answer was not just the election of a Black President, Barack Obama. Blue-collar middle-class workers were hurting—their standard of living and quality of life had been drifting downward as globalization resulted in manufacturing jobs disappearing and wages stagnating over the previous 30 years. And during those years, while they saw the Party fighting for the poor and people of color, they felt neglected. (See also the Foreword to my book, We Still Hold These Truths.)

The world as the middle class knew it since WWII had been turned upside down. Small wonder they were and are scared, angry, and alienated. Yet this important shift in the American social fabric was never acknowledged by Democrats. Politicians continued to talk vaguely about the need to protect the middle class, but the evisceration that had already occurred was not mentioned. Even when Trump appeared on the scene and vociferously voiced compassion for blue-collar workers and vowed to restore them to financial well-being, the Democrats countered with nothing.

I have written previously that it is the Democratic Party's fault that our country finds itself in the dreadful place it has been since Trump was elected and took control of the Republican Party. Most Democrats will probably find this an extreme claim. But if the Party had paid attention to the plight of this core segment of the historic Democratic coalition, if the Party had spoken to them, if they had issued a mea culpa, if they had proposed and enacted policies to help these workers back to prosperity, Trump would have never been able to attract these voters and would never have won either in 2016 or 2024.

What to do now? It is not too late to do what should have been done years ago. The Party, together with all Democratic politicians, must issue a very public mea culpa to America's blue-collar middle class. And it must propose policies and programs to restore their financial well-being that the Party will enact if it is restored to power in Congress and the presidency. The moment could not be more propitious, as Trump's blue-collar supporters are feeling the pain of inflation as never before due to his actions.

But don't try to regain their support by trashing Trump. Trump supporters are fiercely loyal to him and will never agree with negative attacks on him. They may also feel that such attacks are indirect attacks on them since they supported him in all these matters.

No, the approach to blue-collar America must be to issue, unabashedly, a mea culpa—forgive me for I have neglected you. No one else is at fault, no one else is criticized, no excuses made (e.g. economists all thought globalization was a great idea). A mea culpa coupled with strong, common-sense policies and programs intended to help the blue-collar worker—and effectively communicated to them—will bring the disaffected blue-collar worker back to the Party.

The last point about effective communication is critical. Biden's huge Infrastructure measure could—should—have brought many of these disaffected blue-collar workers back to the Party if they had been told this was enacted to help them, not just to invest in the future and transform our economy. But they were never mentioned, never spoken to; Biden and Harris traveled around the country to benefit politically from all the projects, but they never mentioned the plight of the blue-collar worker and their intent to help them back to financial well-being. And so the opportunity was lost.

The appeal should be, "Are you better off now than you were 2 years ago? Come back home to the Democratic Party. You will be welcomed and nurtured and you will prosper again."


Ronald L. Hirsch is a teacher, legal aid lawyer, survey researcher, nonprofit executive, consultant, composer, author, and volunteer. He is a graduate of Brown University and the University of Chicago Law School and the author of We Still Hold These Truths. Read more of his writing at www.PreservingAmericanValues.com


Read More

The election voting process, bidding, hands raised up with papers

Confidence in U.S. elections has fallen to 55% ahead of the 2026 midterms. The real risk isn't who wins — it's whether the loser accepts it.

Svetlana Shamshurina/Getty Images

The Real Test of the 2026 Midterms Comes After the Vote

Less than three months before Americans vote in the 2026 midterms, a federal judge on August 11 blocked the U.S. Postal Service from implementing part of President Donald Trump’s executive order tightening mail-in voting rules. The ruling came amid an intensifying fight over how November’s elections will be administered. That fight underscores a deeper problem: the real question in American politics is no longer simply who wins the next election, but whether large numbers of people will still accept the result when their side loses.

Elections in the United States were supposed to settle arguments. One side wins, the other accepts defeat, and the country moves on. That quiet agreement is under growing pressure as the midterms approach. Control of Congress still matters, but beneath that contest lies a more consequential question: if the outcome goes against one of the two major political camps, will that camp still trust the process that declared it the loser?

Keep ReadingShow less
Historical documents representing founding principles of United States on flag backdrop

As the US Constitution turns 250, one expert argues it was designed as an antidote to tyranny — and warns that antidote is now at risk.

photovs/Getty Images

Why the Constitution Remains Our Defense Against Tyranny

There are many analogies for constitutions, for example, a social contract, a blueprint, a roadmap. But as we mark the 250th birthday of the United States of America, I propose another: constitution as antidote.

Constitutions are always intentionally and carefully designed, more often than not as antidotes to heal and ward off ills that a country wishes - or existentially needs - to avoid. This is, and has historically been, true all around the world, although the study of how constitutions and constitutional change can address root causes of conflict and instability has evolved greatly, allowing us to harness their healing power more effectively.

Keep ReadingShow less
A rose stands on the 9/11 Memorial for the North Tower in front of 3 and 4 World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

A rose stands on the 9/11 Memorial for the North Tower in front of 3 and 4 World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

Gary Hershorn/Getty Images

The 9/11 Town Hall That Helped Rebuild Ground Zero—and Democracy

As the nation and the world pause this week to honor and reflect on the 25th Anniversary of the terrorist attack that brought down the twin towers of the World Trade Center and killed more than 3,000 people, I am moved to share a very personal reflection.

After serving as Chief of Staff to Governor Celeste of Ohio and in the Clinton-Gore Administration, where I experienced firsthand how the major institutions in our country interact to favor the powerful over we the people, I became deeply concerned about the health of our democracy. It was clear to me that, beyond voting and national polling, the American people were not at the table to influence the decisions that most affect their lives.

Keep ReadingShow less
People casting their ballots.

Voters cast their ballots at the Buckhead Library for the primary runoff election on June 16, 2026 in Atlanta, Georgia.

Jessica McGowan/Getty Images

Bridgers in the House Face Disproportionate Headwinds in the Midterms

Congressional collaboration on Capitol Hill has become a lost art.

At Bridge Grades, we compile non-partisan 3rd party data to rank members of Congress on how collaboratively (or divisively) they govern. Our thesis is that a more collaborative and bipartisan Congress benefits Americans through a healthier Legislative Branch, stronger checks-and-balances, and more win-win legislation in our common interests.

Keep ReadingShow less