Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

U.S. Captures Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in Overnight Strike: What It Means for Washington

News

U.S. Captures Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in Overnight Strike: What It Means for Washington

President of Venezuela Nicolás Maduro on November 21, 2025 in Caracas, Venezuela.

(Photo by Jesus Vargas/Getty Images)

The United States carried out a “large‑scale strike” on Venezuela early Saturday, capturing President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, in a rapid military operation that lasted less than 30 minutes. President Donald Trump confirmed that the pair were “captured and flown out of the country” to face narco‑terrorism charges in U.S. courts.

Explosions and low‑flying aircraft were reported across Caracas as U.S. forces—identified by officials as Delta Force—hit multiple military and government sites. Venezuelan officials said civilians were killed, though the scale of casualties remains unclear.


The Venezuelan government condemned the strike as an “imperialist attack” and urged citizens to mobilize in the streets.

Attorney General Pam Bondi said Maduro and his wife have been indicted in the Southern District of New York on narco‑terrorism and weapons charges, and will “face the full wrath of American justice on American soil”.

According to U.S. officials, the operation was carried out by Delta Force. This elite U.S. Army special operations unit transported Maduro to a U.S. warship before his transfer to the United States for prosecution.

World leaders responded sharply to the U.S. action

  • Cuba’s President Miguel Díaz‑Canel condemned the strike as a “criminal attack,” accusing the U.S. of violating regional peace agreements.
  • Colombian President Gustavo Petro expressed “deep concern,” warning that the strikes risk destabilizing the region and escalating conflict.
  • Other governments urged restraint as the situation continues to unfold, with many monitoring the power vacuum left in Venezuela following Maduro’s removal.

  • Venezuela’s attorney general reported that civilians were killed during the U.S. strikes, though the number of casualties has not been independently verified. The government accused Washington of targeting civilian infrastructure in addition to military sites.

    President Trump said the U.S. will be “very strongly involved” in determining Venezuela’s political future and suggested that the country’s oil industry will play a significant role in upcoming decisions. When asked who would lead Venezuela in the interim, Trump said, “We’re going to have to look at it right now.

    The capture of Maduro marks one of the most dramatic U.S. military operations in Latin America in decades, and the long‑term implications for Venezuela’s governance and regional stability remain uncertain.

    Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network


    Read More

    THE POLITICS OF EXCLUSION: When Abuse of Power Pushes Communities Out of the American Story

    An opinion essay traces America's cycle of welcoming immigrants and communities of color for labor, then excluding them once they gain power.

    Westend61/Getty Images

    THE POLITICS OF EXCLUSION: When Abuse of Power Pushes Communities Out of the American Story

    The politics of exclusion is the deliberate use of power to push certain communities out of the American story through fear, cruelty, erasure, and unequal treatment. It is what happens when leaders abandon constitutional ideals and replace them with grievance, retaliation, and division.

    The late John McCain warned that we weaken our greatness when we confuse patriotism with tribalism. Liz Cheney cautioned that no one should support a leader who uses fear and division to hold onto power. Adam Kinzinger called it authoritarianism. Mitt Romney said plainly, “He has caused fear and division.” Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez observed that “the cruelty is the point,” and the late John Lewis reminded us that “democracy is not a state; it is an act.” Together, these voices describe the elephant in the room. America is confronting a pattern bigger than corruption and bigger than authoritarian drift. It is the social, racial, and moral dimension of democratic erosion — lying, cheating, cruelty, intimidation, erasure, and exclusion masquerading as patriotism.

    Keep ReadingShow less
    Trump and Carney standing next to American flag

    U.S. President Donald Trump welcomes Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney to the White House on Oct. 7, 2025 in Washington, D.C.

    (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images/TCA)

    Trump’s war on Canada a pitiful own goal

    This summer, America played host to one of the biggest international events on the planet, the World Cup, drawing millions of foreigners to our cities and towns, our stadiums and our national parks, where many of them had never been before.

    The consensus was, America is awesome — visitors from Bolivia, Scotland, Uzbekistan, and everywhere in between marveled at the sheer size of our great nation, the diversity of our topography, the deliciousness of our foodstuffs, and, perhaps most importantly, the kindness of our people. (Not to mention, our eighth wonder of the world — Buc-ee’s.)

    Keep ReadingShow less
    The Sleeping Giant Woke Up. Trump is Asleep.

    U.S. Marines wait for the arrival of U.S. President Donald Trump before a Freedom 250 Grand Prix showcase on West Executive Avenue between the West Wing of the White House and the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on July 13, 2026 in Washington, DC.

    Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

    The Sleeping Giant Woke Up. Trump is Asleep.

    After Senator Lindsey Graham died in office, South Carolina’s governor appointed his sister, Darline Graham, to serve out the remainder of his term. Just over a month later, campaigning for a full term of her own, when asked at a debate whether Taiwan and the South China Sea are national security issues for the United States, she said she was “not that informed on national security.” The President has endorsed her candidacy. Call me old-fashioned, but I want a Congress that is informed on national security. The founding fathers seemed to agree: Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution hands Congress the power to declare war, “raise and support Armies,” “provide and maintain a Navy,” and “make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces.” That’s the job description, and I want a president who doesn’t endorse someone for that job who can’t handle that responsibility.

    Our Commander-in-Chief and Secretary of Defense have turned away from Taiwan and the South China Sea. When I was a Navy pilot, the spoken and unspoken adversary of our future was China. I don’t mean to make a judgment about whether that was the right call, but just to say that in my 14 years affiliated with the Navy, of every potential adversary we discussed, China was always the most formidable. As I trained to be a mission commander, most of the simulations I flew and the scenarios I hashed out on oral boards revolved around the South China Sea. That’s the fight we trained to fight. Then, a few months after I separated from the Navy, Secretary Hegseth announced our priorities were shifting away from the Pacific to “restore U.S. military dominance in the Western Hemisphere.” That didn’t stop us from starting a war with Iran we can’t seem to get out of, but the promise to take focus away from the Pacific does seem to have held.

    Keep ReadingShow less
    A crowd of people at a military base with President Trump speaking in front of them.

    U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a visit to the Fort Bragg U.S. Army base on February 13, 2026 in Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

    Nathan Howard/Getty Images

    Reagan’s Strength vs. Trump’s Retreat: U.S. Alliances at Risk

    How a country treats its allies and its adversaries says everything about what it believes strength means — a question that was already on my mind the night I sat in a movie theater watching "The Brink of War" when news broke.

    The film reconstructs the 1986 Reykjavik summit, where President Ronald Reagan and General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Mikhail Gorbachev spent a tense weekend negotiating over the fate of the world's nuclear arsenals.

    Keep ReadingShow less