Skip to content
Project 2025
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories
US Supreme Court building in Washington, DC.

Supreme Court Restores Flawed Federal Voter‑Check System

U.S. economic crisis as markets crash. Concept showing a slowing market behind a black and white United States Capitol

Our National Debt Won’t Bankrupt Us. It Can Still Paralyze Us.

library

Beyond Campus Walls: Why the Attack on Minority Support Should Worry Every Donor

President Trump on a large TV screen behind a woman wearing a statue of liberty inspired crown.

How Anti-Bribery Laws Apply to Trump’s Promise of $5,000 Payments if Republicans Keep Control of Congress

American Flag, Capitol building and the United States Constitution

Lawyers Must Reaffirm Their Oath to Defend the Constitution

U.S. Captures Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in Overnight Strike: What It Means for Washington

News

U.S. Captures Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in Overnight Strike: What It Means for Washington

President of Venezuela Nicolás Maduro on November 21, 2025 in Caracas, Venezuela.

(Photo by Jesus Vargas/Getty Images)
Hugo Balta
By Hugo BaltaJan 03, 2026
Hugo Balta
Hugo Balta is a journalist, educator, and communicator. Hugo is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and a board member of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund, the parent organization of The Fulcrum. He is the publisher of the Latino News Network, a trainer with the Solutions Journalism Network, and an adjunct professor teaching journalism courses.
See More Writings by author

The United States carried out a “large‑scale strike” on Venezuela early Saturday, capturing President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, in a rapid military operation that lasted less than 30 minutes. President Donald Trump confirmed that the pair were “captured and flown out of the country” to face narco‑terrorism charges in U.S. courts.

Explosions and low‑flying aircraft were reported across Caracas as U.S. forces—identified by officials as Delta Force—hit multiple military and government sites. Venezuelan officials said civilians were killed, though the scale of casualties remains unclear.

The Venezuelan government condemned the strike as an “imperialist attack” and urged citizens to mobilize in the streets.

Attorney General Pam Bondi said Maduro and his wife have been indicted in the Southern District of New York on narco‑terrorism and weapons charges, and will “face the full wrath of American justice on American soil”.

According to U.S. officials, the operation was carried out by Delta Force. This elite U.S. Army special operations unit transported Maduro to a U.S. warship before his transfer to the United States for prosecution.

World leaders responded sharply to the U.S. action

  • Cuba’s President Miguel Díaz‑Canel condemned the strike as a “criminal attack,” accusing the U.S. of violating regional peace agreements.
  • Colombian President Gustavo Petro expressed “deep concern,” warning that the strikes risk destabilizing the region and escalating conflict.
  • Other governments urged restraint as the situation continues to unfold, with many monitoring the power vacuum left in Venezuela following Maduro’s removal.

    • Venezuela’s attorney general reported that civilians were killed during the U.S. strikes, though the number of casualties has not been independently verified. The government accused Washington of targeting civilian infrastructure in addition to military sites.

    President Trump said the U.S. will be “very strongly involved” in determining Venezuela’s political future and suggested that the country’s oil industry will play a significant role in upcoming decisions. When asked who would lead Venezuela in the interim, Trump said, “We’re going to have to look at it right now.

    The capture of Maduro marks one of the most dramatic U.S. military operations in Latin America in decades, and the long‑term implications for Venezuela’s governance and regional stability remain uncertain.

    Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network


    Latest news

    Flag
    Democracy

    Americans Stay Committed to Democracy as Confidence Declines

    Classsroom
    Governance & Legislation

    Who Gets a Seat?: Florida’s New Bans on Undocumented Students in Public Higher Education

    Donald Trump with Brazil flag
    Ethics & Leadership

    Trump Cannot Cry “Election Interference” in the US While Meddling in Brazil

    ​U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally.
    Ethics & Leadership

    The President Invited Iran to Bomb My Home

    Read More

    Capitol building
    white concrete building during daytime
    Photo by Ian Hutchinson on Unsplash

    Congress Broke the Constitutional Order — And Now They Want Voters to Forget

    How can leaders who broke the constitutional order, ignored their oath, weakened rights, and harmed the people now ask Americans to forget — and reward them with reelection? The question is not abstract — it goes to the heart of what the Constitution demands from those who swear an oath to uphold it.

    The constitutional order is the framework that protects the Republic: three branches, checks and balances, oversight, limits on executive power, and the oath every member of Congress swears — to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. Yet in recent years, Congress has allowed that order to erode. Oversight collapsed. Guardrails bent. Silence replaced accountability. Loyalty to a president replaced loyalty to the Constitution.

    Keep ReadingShow less
    U.S. President Donald Trump speaks from the Cross Hall of the White House on April 1, 2026 in Washington, DC.

    U.S. President Donald Trump speaks from the Cross Hall of the White House on April 1, 2026 in Washington, DC.

    Pool/Getty Images

    How Presidential Primetime Addresses Shape Public Trust in Democratic Institutions

    A question still being studied is the effects on public trust when the head of the Executive casts doubt on the institutions that run elections, enforce laws, and decide legal disputes. The President of the United States is arguably the most powerful man in the world. He is the commander in chief of a nation #1 in nominal gross domestic product as well as #1 in military power, budget, and spending as of 2026. The actions he takes spew ripple effects across the world and follow many generations. A way you can measure the executive's power can also be measured in how much influence his speeches have on the markets, opinions of the masses, news outlets, lawmakers, social media reactions, etc. His framing of an issue can shape the next day’s political conversation.

    These conversations become extremely dangerous/consequential when discussing a principle as embedded in our country as Democracy. In his July primetime speech, Trump continued to pedal the claims about election security and argued for stricter voting rules. He continued to portray the country as facing a moment of corruption and uncertainty, followed by presenting himself as the one prepared to restore order. The address continued with repeated claims about his loss in the 2020 election that have not been supported by the evidence compiled over years of investigation by many parties. Professional reviews, audits, and courts have yet to find significant evidence of foul play substantial enough to influence the outcome of that election.

    Keep ReadingShow less
    unrecognizable businessman giving speech to professional audience

    Brain science explains why voters reward charisma over results — and why the leaders who "fix" the most get credit for the least. A behavioral look at elections.

    alvaro gonzalez/Getty Images

    The Résumé Should Outvote the Smile

    There's an old joke about a couple who finally solved years of arguing over decisions. "Since you're the man of the house," the wife said, "you handle the big things -- our stance on foreign wars, who we send to the Senate. I'll take care of the small stuff: groceries, the mortgage, where we live, what we eat." The husband agreed happily, certain he had won the better half of the deal. A few years later he realized the trade had gone entirely the other way. He held forth on geopolitics at dinner parties while his wife quietly ran every detail that actually touched his life: what he ate, where he lived, how his money was spent. What looked like ultimate authority was, in practice, near-total abdication over the things that shaped his days.

    Voters make the same trade, and pay for it the same way. We keep hiring leaders for the qualities we would want in a spouse -- warmth, charm, a commanding voice, the sense that they see us -- instead of the qualities we would want in a mechanic: someone who can find what is broken and fix it before the whole system fails. We evaluate candidates the way we choose intimate partners, not the way we hire people to run complex, high-stakes systems.

    Keep ReadingShow less
    US soldier with American flag patch on his arm.
    a group of soldiers in uniform
    Photo by Oleg Ivanov on Unsplash

    Moral Leadership Can Protect Service Members' Psychological Well-Being

    It has recently been reported that President Trump and Secretary of War Hegseth disparaged the mental health concerns, including suicide attempts, expressed by the sailors serving aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln during the carrier’s record deployment. Their comments brought back the disquiet I felt several months ago while attending a performance of the US Naval Academy Glee Club at the Church of St. Ignatius Loyola in Manhattan. Usually, when I attend choral concerts in the church’s imposing Baroque sanctuary, my mind quiets, and I find myself immersed in the music. But not on that occasion. Instead, as I enjoyed the exuberant singing, my mind filled with resentment. The Glee Club, handsome midshipmen in formal dress, is a multiethnic group of men and women. The harmonious singing of a chorus composed of individuals of widely varied backgrounds seemed a metaphor for how our country and its military should work.

    My upset originated with the realization that during their time at the Naval Academy, these midshipmen had witnessed the firing of the Black Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force General C. Q. Brown, Jr., as part of an apparent purge of those supporting diversity in the military. Even uglier was the implication that Brown, a highly decorated officer, had been elevated to his position as a ‘DEI’ hire. They also had seen the firing of trailblazing women leaders in the military, including Admiral Linda Fagan, the first woman Coast Guard Commandant, and Admiral Yvette Davids, the first woman Superintendent of the Naval Academy at Annapolis, the very institution they were attending. I was offended and angered by the message these firings conveyed to the men and women of the Academy’s Glee Club, especially the women and minority midshipmen, who had volunteered to serve their nation and, ultimately, to place themselves in harm’s way for it.

    Keep ReadingShow less
    © Copyright 2026