Combatting the Trump Administration’s Militarized Logic

Approaching a year of the new Trump administration, Americans are getting used to domestic militarized logic. A popular sense of powerlessness permeates our communities. We bear witness to the attacks against innocent civilians by ICE, the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and we naturally wonder—is this the new American discourse? Violent action? The election of Zohran Mamdani as mayor of New York offers hope that there may be another way.

Zohran Mamdani, a Muslim democratic socialist, was elected as mayor of New York City on the fourth of November. Mamdani’s platform includes a reimagining of the police force in New York City. Mamdani proposes a Department of Community Safety. In a CBS interview, Mamdani said, “Our vision for a Department of Community Safety, the DCS, is that we would have teams of dedicated mental health outreach workers that we deploy…to respond to those incidents and get those New Yorkers out of the subway system and to the services that they actually need.” Doing so frees up NYPD officers to respond to actual threats and crime, without a responsibility to the mental health of civilians.

Mamdani’s proposed reforms demonstrate that he does not see his citizens as a force to be contained. Mamdani’s rhetoric recognizes citizens with needs, which can be met with common sense and empathy, rather than militarized action to fortify his own position.

Meanwhile, Trump continues with an opposite approach. The Trump administration, dissatisfied “with the pace of deportations,” is consolidating militarized power in our major metropoles. A Washington Examiner report tipped off the public to leadership changes within the ICE administration. According to anonymous informants, ICE officials in several major cities will be replaced by Border Patrol agents. The shift is unprecedented, expanding Border Patrol’s administrative territory exponentially, and moving federal agents in a way not seen before.

The leadership shakeup reveals the Trump administration’s central assumptions. The Trump administration operates on the assumption of dissent. Trump continues to pass militarized landholdings into the hands of sympathizers, undermining the inherent dignity of civilians (and non-civilians). Almost like a bad artist, he is reaching into the clay of the public to create a vision of his own face, terrified, looking back at him.

Eventually, administration logic leaks into the public consciousness. I can only wonder who among us feels that violent action is the only language that will be heard at the moment. But Mamdani’s election in our most populous city spells an opposite hope. A major territory now relies on sympathetic logic, focusing on the dignity of the working class. Clearly, peaceful popular action continues to have an impact. The ballot is still an effective place for discourse. I hope Mamdani’s election will call on Americans to find their own dignity in the face of delegates. If we continue to look to our electorate and see only representatives of the 1%, our sense of power will continue to assume the insecure character of the Trump administration.