Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Just the Facts: Vaccine Safety, RFK Jr.’s Claims, and Florida’s Mandate Rollback

Inside the Vaccine Controversy: Facts, Fears, and the Fight Over Mandates

A medical professional wearing gloves, putting a band-aid on a patient's shoulder.

RFK Jr. has publicly challenged the safety of vaccines, although the evidence he cites is widely disputed by mainstream scientists, medical institutions, and public health experts.

Getty Images, Jackyenjoyphotography

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is currently the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services and is responsible for shaping national health policy, managing public health programs, and guiding medical research and regulatory frameworks.

He has publicly challenged the safety of vaccines, including required childhood immunizations and COVID-19 vaccines. However, the evidence he cites is widely disputed by mainstream scientists, medical institutions, and public health experts.


What are the facts?

What the Research Says About Safety

  • Hundreds of large-scale studies have examined the safety of vaccines like MMR (measles, mumps, rubella), DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis), polio, and others.
  • These studies consistently show that routine childhood vaccines are safe, with no link to autism, diabetes, fertility issues, or developmental delays.
  • The American Academy of Pediatrics, CDC, and World Health Organization all affirm that the risk of serious adverse effects is extremely low.

What Are the Known Side Effects

Most vaccine side effects are short-lived and mild:

  • Fever
  • Soreness at the injection site
  • Fatigue or fussiness

However, There Are Rare but Documented Risks, Which Include:

  • Febrile seizures (linked to fever, not brain damage)
  • Severe allergic reactions (anaphylaxis occurs in about one in a million doses)
  • Blood clotting issues (extremely rare and typically treatable)

These risks are tracked through systems like VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and Vaccine Safety Datalink, which monitor and investigate any patterns.

What Are the Issues Related to Vaccination Misinformation

  • The MMR-autism myth has been thoroughly debunked. Over 27 studies have shown no causal link.
  • Experts caution that repeating misinformation—even to refute it—can reinforce false associations. That’s why clarity and nuance are key in public discourse.

Why Do Vaccine Mandates Exist

Required vaccines are designed to:

  • Protect individual children from serious illness
  • Create herd immunity to prevent outbreaks
  • Safeguard vulnerable populations (e.g., infants, immunocompromised individuals)

When mandates are weakened, as seen in recent policy shifts in Florida, experts warn of increased risk for outbreaks of preventable diseases like measles and polio.

What Are RFK Jr.'s Key Claims?

  1. Vaccines cause harm, including death, especially among young people. He has endorsed statements like:
  2. Doctors recommend vaccines for financial gain. He claimed pediatricians are “pressured to follow the money, not the science,” suggesting financial incentives drive vaccine recommendations.
  3. Aluminum in vaccines causes autism and other chronic conditions. He misrepresented a large Danish study, claiming its supplementary data showed “calamitous evidence of harm,” despite the study concluding no link between aluminum-containing vaccines and autism.
  4. Children receive an excessive number of shots. He has claimed that children get up to 92 mandatory shots, which is factually incorrect. Most states require around 30–32 shots across 10–12 diseases.

What Are the Scientific Rebuttals to RFK’s Claims

  • Medical experts and fact-checkers have repeatedly shown that RFK Jr. cherry-picks data, misinterprets studies, and relies on anecdotal or non-peer-reviewed sources.
  • The CDC, FDA, WHO, and American Academy of Pediatrics maintain that vaccines are rigorously tested and monitored, with benefits far outweighing risks.
  • VAERS, a system RFK Jr. often cites, collects unverified reports and explicitly warns that entries do not imply causation.

Are There National Mandates for Child Vaccines or Do Just States Mandate Vaccinations?

  • Under the Tenth Amendment, states hold the “police power” to protect public health and safety. This was affirmed in the landmark 1905 Supreme Court case Jacobson v. Massachusetts, which upheld a state’s authority to mandate smallpox vaccination during an outbreak.
  • The federal government does not impose universal vaccine mandates for children. Its role is more about guidance and funding—for example, through the CDC’s recommended immunization schedule and programs like Vaccines for Children (VFC).

School Entry Requirements

  • Every U.S. state requires certain vaccines for children to attend public (and often private) schools.
  • These typically include:
    • DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis)
    • MMR (measles, mumps, rubella)
    • Polio
    • Varicella (chickenpox)
    • Hepatitis B
  • States also define exemptions, which vary widely:
    • Medical exemptions (allowed in all states)
    • Religious exemptions (allowed in most)
    • Philosophical exemptions (allowed in some)

Does the Federal Government Have Any Influence on Vaccination Mandates?

While the federal government doesn’t mandate vaccines for schoolchildren, it can:

  • Require vaccines for immigrants, military personnel, and federal employees
  • Tie funding conditions to vaccine compliance in healthcare settings (e.g., Medicare/Medicaid facilities)

Is Florida Considering Ending the Mandates for Vaccines?

Florida is actively working to end all childhood vaccine mandates, which would make it the first state in the U.S. to do so. Governor Ron DeSantis and Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo announced plans to phase out vaccine requirements for schoolchildren, including those for:

  • Measles
  • Polio
  • Chickenpox
  • Hepatitis B
  • DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis)

Ladapo described current mandates as “immoral” and likened them to “slavery,” arguing they infringe on parental rights and bodily autonomy.

What Is the Legal Path Forward in Florida?

  • The Florida Department of Health can repeal mandates it enacted through its own rulemaking.
  • However, some vaccine requirements are written into state law, so legislative action will be needed to eliminate them entirely.
  • A new “Make America Healthy Again” commission has been formed to guide this effort, chaired by Lt. Gov. Jay Collins and First Lady Casey DeSantis.

Has There Been Pushback From Experts to the Florida Proposal?

  • Pediatricians and public health officials warn that this could lead to outbreaks of preventable diseases, especially in schools.
  • Florida already has a higher-than-average exemption rate, with most being nonmedical.
  • Critics say the move prioritizes ideology over science, while supporters frame it as a win for medical freedom.
David Nevins is publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Read More

Presidential Incapacity and the Limits of the 25th Amendment

Lynn Schmidt explains how a strong 25th Amendment would protect the presidency itself "by ensuring smooth transitions and public confidence in executive leadership..."

Getty Images, Pool

Presidential Incapacity and the Limits of the 25th Amendment

The authors of the 25th Amendment to the Constitution established and explained the complete order of presidential succession, as well as a series of contingency plans to fill any executive vacancies. It was written as a response to the weaknesses found in Article II after the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and what was learned about the inadequacies related to presidential illnesses and hospitalizations.

It feels like the time is not only right but needed for another updated response.

Keep ReadingShow less
Examining Florida’s Controversial New Immigration Bills: SB 2-C and SB 4-C

On February 13, 2025, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed into law two major immigration enforcement bills: Senate Bill 2-C (SB 2-C) and Senate Bill 4-C (SB 4-C).

Metin Ozer on Unsplash

Examining Florida’s Controversial New Immigration Bills: SB 2-C and SB 4-C

On February 13, 2025, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed into law two major immigration enforcement bills: Senate Bill 2-C (SB 2-C) and Senate Bill 4-C (SB 4-C). Introduced by Senator Joe Gruters and co-sponsored by Senator Randy Fine, these bills build upon Florida’s ongoing efforts to increase state involvement in immigration enforcement. Florida’s immigration laws come amid rising state-federal tension over immigration authority, particularly in states led by Republican governors.

SB 2-C includes initiatives relating to funding, cooperation with federal immigration agencies, and law enforcement infrastructure. SB 4-C introduces provisions that criminalize entry and reentry into Florida by undocumented immigrants and create new state-level immigration-related offenses. This brief explores the major provisions of Florida’s SB 2-C and SB 4-C, analyzing the legal, political, and humanitarian arguments for and against their enforcement.

Keep ReadingShow less
The State of Health in America: A Political and Scientific Crossfire

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. testifies before the Senate Finance Committee at the Dirksen Senate Office Building on September 04, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

The State of Health in America: A Political and Scientific Crossfire

At the heart of the Trump administration’s health agenda is a dramatic reorientation of public health priorities. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. declared during a Senate hearing last week:

“We at HHS are enacting a once-in-a-generation shift from a sick-care system, to a true health care system that tackles the root causes of chronic disease.”

“Make America Healthy Again” has been met with both praise and fierce resistance. Republican Senator Mike Crapo supported the initiative, saying:

Keep ReadingShow less
When Politicians Pick Voters: Why Gerrymandering Is Undermining Democracy

An image depicting a map of a district with unusually shaped boundaries, highlighting how areas are divided in a non-compact or fragmented way.

AI generated

When Politicians Pick Voters: Why Gerrymandering Is Undermining Democracy

The partisan fight to draw maps that determine how Americans are represented has entered a dangerous spiral. Texas is racing ahead with a mid-decade congressional redraw designed to lock in additional seats after President Donald J. Trump called upon state lawmakers to find five seats. California’s leaders responded in kind to offset the Texas map, but will hold a special election in which voters must decide whether to put aside the state’s Congressional maps drawn by an independent redistricting commission for the next three election cycles. Other states are openly weighing similar moves. But this “map wars” logic is dangerous, and voters from all backgrounds stand to lose as districts harden into safe seats and politicians’ accountability to voters further withers.

Large majorities of Americans say that gerrymandering — which lets politicians pick their voters instead of the other way around — is unfair and a problem. When politicians and party insiders draw their own districts, the maps can be engineered to protect incumbents, not voters. As a result, gerrymandering contributes to the erosion of public confidence in elections. It lessens people’s sense that change can happen, and reduces the ability of voters to hold leaders accountable.

Keep ReadingShow less