Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Just the Facts: Vaccine Safety, RFK Jr.’s Claims, and Florida’s Mandate Rollback

Inside the Vaccine Controversy: Facts, Fears, and the Fight Over Mandates

News

A medical professional wearing gloves, putting a band-aid on a patient's shoulder.

RFK Jr. has publicly challenged the safety of vaccines, although the evidence he cites is widely disputed by mainstream scientists, medical institutions, and public health experts.

Getty Images, Jackyenjoyphotography

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is currently the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services and is responsible for shaping national health policy, managing public health programs, and guiding medical research and regulatory frameworks.

He has publicly challenged the safety of vaccines, including required childhood immunizations and COVID-19 vaccines. However, the evidence he cites is widely disputed by mainstream scientists, medical institutions, and public health experts.


What are the facts?

What the Research Says About Safety

  • Hundreds of large-scale studies have examined the safety of vaccines like MMR (measles, mumps, rubella), DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis), polio, and others.
  • These studies consistently show that routine childhood vaccines are safe, with no link to autism, diabetes, fertility issues, or developmental delays.
  • The American Academy of Pediatrics, CDC, and World Health Organization all affirm that the risk of serious adverse effects is extremely low.

What Are the Known Side Effects

Most vaccine side effects are short-lived and mild:

  • Fever
  • Soreness at the injection site
  • Fatigue or fussiness

However, There Are Rare but Documented Risks, Which Include:

  • Febrile seizures (linked to fever, not brain damage)
  • Severe allergic reactions (anaphylaxis occurs in about one in a million doses)
  • Blood clotting issues (extremely rare and typically treatable)

These risks are tracked through systems like VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and Vaccine Safety Datalink, which monitor and investigate any patterns.

What Are the Issues Related to Vaccination Misinformation

  • The MMR-autism myth has been thoroughly debunked. Over 27 studies have shown no causal link.
  • Experts caution that repeating misinformation—even to refute it—can reinforce false associations. That’s why clarity and nuance are key in public discourse.

Why Do Vaccine Mandates Exist

Required vaccines are designed to:

  • Protect individual children from serious illness
  • Create herd immunity to prevent outbreaks
  • Safeguard vulnerable populations (e.g., infants, immunocompromised individuals)

When mandates are weakened, as seen in recent policy shifts in Florida, experts warn of increased risk for outbreaks of preventable diseases like measles and polio.

What Are RFK Jr.'s Key Claims?

  1. Vaccines cause harm, including death, especially among young people. He has endorsed statements like:
  2. Doctors recommend vaccines for financial gain. He claimed pediatricians are “pressured to follow the money, not the science,” suggesting financial incentives drive vaccine recommendations.
  3. Aluminum in vaccines causes autism and other chronic conditions. He misrepresented a large Danish study, claiming its supplementary data showed “calamitous evidence of harm,” despite the study concluding no link between aluminum-containing vaccines and autism.
  4. Children receive an excessive number of shots. He has claimed that children get up to 92 mandatory shots, which is factually incorrect. Most states require around 30–32 shots across 10–12 diseases.

What Are the Scientific Rebuttals to RFK’s Claims

  • Medical experts and fact-checkers have repeatedly shown that RFK Jr. cherry-picks data, misinterprets studies, and relies on anecdotal or non-peer-reviewed sources.
  • The CDC, FDA, WHO, and American Academy of Pediatrics maintain that vaccines are rigorously tested and monitored, with benefits far outweighing risks.
  • VAERS, a system RFK Jr. often cites, collects unverified reports and explicitly warns that entries do not imply causation.

Are There National Mandates for Child Vaccines or Do Just States Mandate Vaccinations?

  • Under the Tenth Amendment, states hold the “police power” to protect public health and safety. This was affirmed in the landmark 1905 Supreme Court case Jacobson v. Massachusetts, which upheld a state’s authority to mandate smallpox vaccination during an outbreak.
  • The federal government does not impose universal vaccine mandates for children. Its role is more about guidance and funding—for example, through the CDC’s recommended immunization schedule and programs like Vaccines for Children (VFC).

School Entry Requirements

  • Every U.S. state requires certain vaccines for children to attend public (and often private) schools.
  • These typically include:
    • DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis)
    • MMR (measles, mumps, rubella)
    • Polio
    • Varicella (chickenpox)
    • Hepatitis B
  • States also define exemptions, which vary widely:
    • Medical exemptions (allowed in all states)
    • Religious exemptions (allowed in most)
    • Philosophical exemptions (allowed in some)

Does the Federal Government Have Any Influence on Vaccination Mandates?

While the federal government doesn’t mandate vaccines for schoolchildren, it can:

  • Require vaccines for immigrants, military personnel, and federal employees
  • Tie funding conditions to vaccine compliance in healthcare settings (e.g., Medicare/Medicaid facilities)

Is Florida Considering Ending the Mandates for Vaccines?

Florida is actively working to end all childhood vaccine mandates, which would make it the first state in the U.S. to do so. Governor Ron DeSantis and Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo announced plans to phase out vaccine requirements for schoolchildren, including those for:

  • Measles
  • Polio
  • Chickenpox
  • Hepatitis B
  • DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis)

Ladapo described current mandates as “immoral” and likened them to “slavery,” arguing they infringe on parental rights and bodily autonomy.

What Is the Legal Path Forward in Florida?

  • The Florida Department of Health can repeal mandates it enacted through its own rulemaking.
  • However, some vaccine requirements are written into state law, so legislative action will be needed to eliminate them entirely.
  • A new “Make America Healthy Again” commission has been formed to guide this effort, chaired by Lt. Gov. Jay Collins and First Lady Casey DeSantis.

Has There Been Pushback From Experts to the Florida Proposal?

  • Pediatricians and public health officials warn that this could lead to outbreaks of preventable diseases, especially in schools.
  • Florida already has a higher-than-average exemption rate, with most being nonmedical.
  • Critics say the move prioritizes ideology over science, while supporters frame it as a win for medical freedom.
David Nevins is publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Read More

President Donald Trump speaks to members of the media

White House communications aide Danielle Alvarez (R) films with her phone as U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to members of the media as he departs on the South Lawn of the White House on October 23, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Finn Gomez/Getty Images

Trump’s Arch Plan Defies Law and Warps D.C.’s Historic Core

The Trump Arch construction controversy is the latest vanity project by Donald Trump using taxpayer money without Congressional approval, placing his ego-based physical stamp on not only American historical architecture but also the American psyche. With no good reason for constructing this arch, it’s an act of self-aggrandizement meant to make him look powerful and important. The project is unconstitutional, illegal, and patently un-American. Three Vietnam War veterans and an architectural historian have also filed a lawsuit against it.

Like all other actors in government, executive agencies, like the National Park Service, must follow the rule of law and respect ‘separation of powers’ established by the U.S. Constitution. This means following the laws enacted by Congress, which has the power to distribute public funds and determine how they are spent, not the Executive Branch, including the President.

Keep ReadingShow less
An empty grocery cart in a market.

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani proposes five city-run grocery stores. See the arguments for and against, from food deserts to bodega concerns and the $70M cost.

Getty Images, Kwangmoozaa

Government-Owned Grocery Stores: Accessible Nutrition or Government Overreach?

Issue Introduction

Over the past few years, affordability has become the most central issue affecting Americans and the quality of life in the United States. The prices of groceries and basic necessities have risen 25-30% since the COVID-19 pandemic and are projected to rise another 3.2% in 2026. At the same time, the exodus of grocery chains from rural and low-income areas has scattered food deserts throughout individual states. Recent mass closures include Grocery Outlet’s shuttering of 36 stores and continued shut-downs of many Albertsons locations. These factors have led politicians to make affordability a major campaign issue.

During his progressive campaign for mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani raised the idea of opening grocery stores owned and operated by the city government to provide New Yorkers with affordable groceries. In his April 2026 public address that marked his first 100 days in office, Mayor Mamdani announced plans for the first of five city-run grocery stores. Mamdani’s proposed initiative will use $70 million in capital funding to build five city-owned municipal stores–one in each borough–and place them under control of the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). NYCEDC will then select third-party operating staff in accordance with city standards for affordability and proper labor practices. Public opinion following the announcement continues to be divided between uproar and support.

Keep ReadingShow less
​U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testifies during a Senate Committee on Appropriations hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on July 21, 2026. Hegseth is crafting a strong and masculine identity for his audience as he reportedly contemplates a presidential run.

(Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

Politicians Can’t Just ’Give the People What They Want’

For reasons that will baffle my many detractors, I am often asked for advice about being an opinion journalist. One of my standard responses is: You have to be willing to disappoint your biggest fans.

What I mean is that if you start to see your job as telling fans what they want to hear, you risk becoming an entertainer rather than a thinker, and eventually you become a caricature. I’ve seen it happen numerous times. Patrick Buchanan was a brilliant columnist and a serious person. But over the course of his career, he listened too much to the people who said, “Go Pat, go!” and too little to friends who said, “I think that’s taking it too far.”

Keep ReadingShow less
White marble exterior of the United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government

Congress approval is at a record-low 10%. Moderation and consensus-building, not partisan theatrics, are how Washington gets problems solved.

Richard Sharrocks / Getty Images

Reclaiming the Politics of the Possible

Washington is stuck in a cycle of performative conflict. The incentives seem to reward outrage, not outcomes that last; purity tests, not problem‑solving. So it’s no surprise that after three shutdowns in less than a year, public approval of Congress collapsed to just 10 percent this spring. (Gallup, April 2026.) But the country we live in — where many middle-income families report persistent financial strain and businesses are navigating unprecedented technological upheaval — cannot be governed by theatrics. Breaking this cycle requires moderation, consensus‑building, and a cooperative approach to governance.

This is not a call for centrism as an ideology. Instead, this is a call for transformative leaders to embrace moderation as their governing strategy, recognizing that in a pluralistic country of nearly 350 million people durable solutions require broad and stable alliances. Ultimately, this is a call for the 240 million of us who are eligible to vote in November to elect consensus-builders instead of bomb-throwers, and healers instead of arsonists.

Keep ReadingShow less