Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Eliminating HIV Prevention Is a Public Health Crisis

Eliminating HIV Prevention Is a Public Health Crisis

A vaccine bottle and syringe for an injection preventing HIV.

Getty Images, Kitsawet Saethao

The Trump administration is planning to eliminate the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Division of HIV Prevention. The collapse of HIV prevention will mean 143,000 additional people in the United States will acquire HIV in the next five years. We are on the cusp of a public health crisis.

The most recent attack on the reproductive health center in Palm Springs is a wake-up call to what could be to come if we continue to be bystanders in the erasure of reproductive and sexual health rights. A profound crack in an already fragile public health infrastructure continues to grow as government officials consider eliminating vital public health structures that monitor health trends, outbreaks, and our ability to prepare and respond to an ongoing HIV epidemic.


HIV does not discriminate, and there are over 1.2 million people in the United States living with HIV. We could find ourselves back in a time, like the 1980s, of hopelessness and devastation for frontline communities that are already burdened with ending the HIV epidemic with limited funding and high treatment costs, which are estimated to increase to $60 billion by 2030 from new HIV diagnoses.

With the closure of the CDC's Sexually Transmitted Infections Lab in April, a critical investigative tool to track possible outbreaks, the staggering impact on marginalized communities' barriers to access testing and education while also navigating deep-rooted stigma and discrimination is cause for deep concern. Especially now that funding to disseminate free HIV self-testing kits is coming to an end, scaling back will set us back.

I’m a public health practitioner with over a decade of experience in health equity and sexual reproductive health and an advocate for the importance of ensuring that individuals have the necessary information to make informed decisions about their sexual health and well-being. Reducing the public health workforce and eliminating funding for awareness, prevention, and treatment will mean individuals will be more susceptible to developing more serious health problems, such as opportunistic infections or certain cancers, due to a weakened immune system.

While we have made great strides in the decades of scientific biomedical advancements to prevent HIV by promoting the use of regular testing, condoms, pre-exposure prophylaxis, and treatment of the virus with antiretroviral therapy, there is still no cure. It is a manageable chronic condition with medication adherence to maintain viral loads to undetectable levels and ensure HIV cannot be transmitted.

However, the chances of acquiring HIV are increased with other STIs like chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis, which have steadily been on the rise in the United States. The active dismantling of sexual health infrastructure and education will leave an indelible mark on the future of public health for everyone. The reduced focus on sexual health and limited public health interventions at the national level place an enormous strain on the waning resilience of state and local entities to respond to the next public health emergency and endure a surge or a potential outbreak.

Once more, marginalized communities will face the brunt of the burden, especially LGBTQ+, Black, and Latine communities and women of color living in the South, a region accounting for 53% of new HIV diagnoses.

This is a profoundly challenging time as public health practitioners and sexual and reproductive health practitioners like myself continue to see their life's work and important health information disappear as we navigate the uncertain road before us; It was a chilling revelation as I looked for information for a community member on the impact of HIV and the page was no longer available on the CDC website. Many of us are burnt out, exhausted, and jaded by the current political landscape because we see the impact in the communities we work alongside and serve, but we have done more with less. This is the time to leverage our innovation and strengthen collaborations to find solutions and move us closer to ending the HIV epidemic by 2030.

We cannot turn our backs on this crisis.

People’s lives depend on our continued ability to speak out on the implications of eliminating HIV prevention, ensure we’re making investments in educational resources that inform the public on the importance of testing, prevention, and treatment, and collaborate with our networks to support those disproportionately impacted by HIV.

HIV is preventable and treatable. We have the science, tools, and information. We have been at this crossroads before, a time of little resources and support from the federal government, but through collective action, we can continue to build a future where sexual health is nurtured and promoted as a fundamental right for everyone.

Vanessa A. Castro, MPA, MPH, is a Public Voices fellow of the OpEd Project, The National Latina Institute for Reproductive Justice and the Every Page Foundation, working in the nonprofit sector to promote health equity through a Sexual and Reproductive Health Equity Framework rooted in research and education to empower individuals in marginalized communities to make informed decisions about their health and wellbeing.

Read More

Trump-Era Budget Cuts Suspend UCLA Professor’s Mental Health Research Grant

Professor Carrie Bearden (on the left) at a Stand Up for Science rally in spring 2025.

Photo Provided

Trump-Era Budget Cuts Suspend UCLA Professor’s Mental Health Research Grant

UC Los Angeles Psychology professor Carrie Bearden is among many whose work has been stalled due to the Trump administration’s grant suspensions to universities across the country.

“I just feel this constant whiplash every single day,” Bearden said. “The bedrock, the foundation of everything that we're doing, is really being shaken on a daily basis … To see that at an institutional level is really shocking. Yes, we saw it coming with these other institutions, but I think everybody's still sort of in a state of shock.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Border Patrol in Texas
"Our communities fear that the police and deportation agents are one and the same," the authors write.
John Moore/Getty Images

Who deported more migrants? Obama or Trump? We checked the numbers

We received a question through our Instagram account asking "if it's true what people say" that President Barack Obama deported more immigrants than Donald Trump. To answer our follower, Factchequeado reviewed the public deportation data available from 1993 to June 2025, to compare the policies of both presidents and other administrations.

Deportation statistics ("removals") are not available in a single repository, updated information is lacking, and there are limitations that we note at the end of this text in the methodology section.

Keep ReadingShow less
RFK Jr. Vowed To Find the Environmental Causes of Autism. Then He Shut Down Research Trying To Do Just That.

Erin McCanlies spent almost two decades at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health studying how parents’ exposure to chemicals affects the chance that they will have a child with autism. This spring, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. eliminated her entire division.

Nate Smallwood for ProPublica

RFK Jr. Vowed To Find the Environmental Causes of Autism. Then He Shut Down Research Trying To Do Just That.

Erin McCanlies was listening to the radio one morning in April when she heard Robert F. Kennedy Jr. promising to find the cause of autism by September. The secretary of Health and Human Services said he believed an environmental toxin was responsible for the dramatic increase in the condition and vowed to gather “the most credible scientists from all over the world” to solve the mystery.

Nothing like that has ever been done before, he told an interviewer.

Keep ReadingShow less
When Politicians Draw Their Own Victories: Why and How To End Gerrymandering

Alyssa West from Austin holds up a sign during the Fight the Trump Takeover rally at the Texas Capitol on Saturday, August. 16, 2025.

(Aaron E. Martinez/Austin American-Statesman via Getty Images)

When Politicians Draw Their Own Victories: Why and How To End Gerrymandering

From MAGA Republicans to progressive Democrats to those of us in the middle, Americans want real change – and they’re tired of politics as usual. They’re craving authenticity, real reform, and an end to the status quo. More and more, voters seem to be embracing disruption over the empty promises of establishment politicians, who too often live by the creed that “one bad idea deserves a bigger one.” Just look at how both parties are handling gerrymandering in Texas and California, and it’s difficult to see it as anything other than both parties trying to rig elections in their favor.

Instead of fixing the system, politicians are fueling a turbocharged redistricting arms race ahead of high-stakes midterm 2026 elections that will determine control of the U.S. Congress. In Texas, Republicans just redrew congressional lines, likely guaranteeing five new Republican seats, which has sparked Democratic strongholds like California and New York to threaten their own gerrymandered counterattacks.

Keep ReadingShow less