Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Eliminating HIV Prevention Is a Public Health Crisis

Opinion

Eliminating HIV Prevention Is a Public Health Crisis

A vaccine bottle and syringe for an injection preventing HIV.

Getty Images, Kitsawet Saethao

The Trump administration is planning to eliminate the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Division of HIV Prevention. The collapse of HIV prevention will mean 143,000 additional people in the United States will acquire HIV in the next five years. We are on the cusp of a public health crisis.

The most recent attack on the reproductive health center in Palm Springs is a wake-up call to what could be to come if we continue to be bystanders in the erasure of reproductive and sexual health rights. A profound crack in an already fragile public health infrastructure continues to grow as government officials consider eliminating vital public health structures that monitor health trends, outbreaks, and our ability to prepare and respond to an ongoing HIV epidemic.


HIV does not discriminate, and there are over 1.2 million people in the United States living with HIV. We could find ourselves back in a time, like the 1980s, of hopelessness and devastation for frontline communities that are already burdened with ending the HIV epidemic with limited funding and high treatment costs, which are estimated to increase to $60 billion by 2030 from new HIV diagnoses.

With the closure of the CDC's Sexually Transmitted Infections Lab in April, a critical investigative tool to track possible outbreaks, the staggering impact on marginalized communities' barriers to access testing and education while also navigating deep-rooted stigma and discrimination is cause for deep concern. Especially now that funding to disseminate free HIV self-testing kits is coming to an end, scaling back will set us back.

I’m a public health practitioner with over a decade of experience in health equity and sexual reproductive health and an advocate for the importance of ensuring that individuals have the necessary information to make informed decisions about their sexual health and well-being. Reducing the public health workforce and eliminating funding for awareness, prevention, and treatment will mean individuals will be more susceptible to developing more serious health problems, such as opportunistic infections or certain cancers, due to a weakened immune system.

While we have made great strides in the decades of scientific biomedical advancements to prevent HIV by promoting the use of regular testing, condoms, pre-exposure prophylaxis, and treatment of the virus with antiretroviral therapy, there is still no cure. It is a manageable chronic condition with medication adherence to maintain viral loads to undetectable levels and ensure HIV cannot be transmitted.

However, the chances of acquiring HIV are increased with other STIs like chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis, which have steadily been on the rise in the United States. The active dismantling of sexual health infrastructure and education will leave an indelible mark on the future of public health for everyone. The reduced focus on sexual health and limited public health interventions at the national level place an enormous strain on the waning resilience of state and local entities to respond to the next public health emergency and endure a surge or a potential outbreak.

Once more, marginalized communities will face the brunt of the burden, especially LGBTQ+, Black, and Latine communities and women of color living in the South, a region accounting for 53% of new HIV diagnoses.

This is a profoundly challenging time as public health practitioners and sexual and reproductive health practitioners like myself continue to see their life's work and important health information disappear as we navigate the uncertain road before us; It was a chilling revelation as I looked for information for a community member on the impact of HIV and the page was no longer available on the CDC website. Many of us are burnt out, exhausted, and jaded by the current political landscape because we see the impact in the communities we work alongside and serve, but we have done more with less. This is the time to leverage our innovation and strengthen collaborations to find solutions and move us closer to ending the HIV epidemic by 2030.

We cannot turn our backs on this crisis.

People’s lives depend on our continued ability to speak out on the implications of eliminating HIV prevention, ensure we’re making investments in educational resources that inform the public on the importance of testing, prevention, and treatment, and collaborate with our networks to support those disproportionately impacted by HIV.

HIV is preventable and treatable. We have the science, tools, and information. We have been at this crossroads before, a time of little resources and support from the federal government, but through collective action, we can continue to build a future where sexual health is nurtured and promoted as a fundamental right for everyone.

Vanessa A. Castro, MPA, MPH, is a Public Voices fellow of the OpEd Project, The National Latina Institute for Reproductive Justice and the Every Page Foundation, working in the nonprofit sector to promote health equity through a Sexual and Reproductive Health Equity Framework rooted in research and education to empower individuals in marginalized communities to make informed decisions about their health and wellbeing.


Read More

An ICE agent monitors hundreds of asylum seekers being processed upon entering the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building on June 6, 2023 in New York City. New York City has provided sanctuary to over 46,000 asylum seekers since 2013, when the city passed a law prohibiting city agencies from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement agencies unless there is a warrant for the person's arrest.(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)
An ICE agent monitors hundreds of asylum seekers being processed.
(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)

The Power of the Purse and Executive Discretion: ICE Expansion Under the Trump Administration

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key Takeaways

  • Core Constitutional Debate: Expanded ICE enforcement under the Trump Administration raises a core constitutional question: Does Article II executive power override Article I’s congressional power of the purse?
  • Executive Justification: The primary constitutional justification for expanded ICE enforcement is The Unitary Executive Theory.
  • Separation of Powers: Critics argue that the Unitary Executive Theory undermines Congress’s power of the purse.
  • Moral Conflict: Expanded ICE enforcement has sparked a moral debate, as concerns over due process and civil liberties clash with claims of increased public safety and national security.

Where is ICE Funding Coming From?

Since the beginning of the current Trump Administration, immigration enforcement has undergone transformative change and become one of the most contested issues in the federal government. On his first day in office, President Trump issued Executive Order 14159, which directs executive agencies to implement stricter immigration enforcement practices. In order to implement these practices, Congress passed and President Trump signed into law the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), a budget reconciliation package that paired state and local tax cuts with immigration funding. This allocated $170.7 billion in immigration-related funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to spend by 2029.

Keep ReadingShow less
Towards a Reformed Capitalism
oval brown wooden conference table and chairs inside conference room

Towards a Reformed Capitalism

Despite all the laws and regulations that apply to corporations, which for the most part are designed to make corporations more responsive to the greater good, corporations have wreaked great harm on our environment, their workers, their customers, and the general public. Despite all the rules, capitalism can still pretty much do what it wants.

The problem is not that the laws and regulations are not enforced, although that is partly true. The problem is more that the laws and regulations are weak because of the strong influence corporations have on both Congress (this is true of Democrats as well as Republicans) and those responsible for regulating.

Keep ReadingShow less
Families of Americans Overseas Wrongfully Detained Bring Advocacy to Capitol Hill

The Bring Our Families Home campaign brought together loved ones of Americans wrongly detained overseas to display portraits in the Senate Russell Rotunda on Wednesday, May 6.

(Jacques Abou-Rizk, MNS)

Families of Americans Overseas Wrongfully Detained Bring Advocacy to Capitol Hill

WASHINGTON – American journalist Reza Valizadeh visited his elderly Iranian parents in March 2024 for the first time in 15 years. Valizadeh’s stories for Voice of America and other U.S. government-funded outlets often criticized the Iranian regime. So before traveling, he sought and received confirmation that he would be safe from a high-ranking commander in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, a branch of Iran’s armed forces. However, in September that same year, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps arrested Valizadeh, and Tehran’s Revolutionary Court sentenced him to ten years in prison for “collaboration with a hostile government.”

In the Rotunda of the Senate Russell Building last week, the Bring Our Families Home campaign set up portraits of Valizadeh and 12 other Americans currently wrongfully detained overseas. The group, family members of illegitimately detained Americans, appealed to Congress to push for their safe return. Each foam poster board included the name, home state, and country of detainment. The display also included portraits of the 33 people released after advocacy by the James W. Foley Foundation.

Keep ReadingShow less
DHS Funding During the Shutdown
Getty Images, Charles-McClintock Wilson

DHS Funding During the Shutdown

When Congress failed to approve funding for the Department of Homeland Security for the remainder of this fiscal year in February, almost all of its employees began to work without pay. That situation changed, however, on April 3, when President Donald Trump issued a memorandum ordering the DHS secretary and director of the Office of Management and Budget to “use funds that have a reasonable and logical nexus to the functions of DHS” to pay its employees and issue back pay.

Trump shifted money to avoid the political embarrassment that would be caused by the collapse of airport security screening through the actions of disgruntled agents and the disruption to air travel that would ensue. But it’s legally dubious.

Keep ReadingShow less