Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Counting All Americans Living Abroad in the 2030 Census for Congressional Apportionment

Opinion

census forms

Howard Gorrell outlines the need to include all American citizens who live overseas in the apportionment counts for congressional seats in the 2030 census.

Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images

On Census Day 2020, April 1, two Americans from the three-member Expedition 62 crew—NASA Flight Engineers Jessica Meir and Andrew Morgan—aboard the spacecraft were counted in the 2020 Census for congressional apportionment.

On the same Census Day, I, then a resident of Delaware, was unexpectedly "stranded” in Rijeka, Croatia, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, I was not counted in the 2020 Census.


So, what's the catch? The 2020 Census Residence Criteria states that U.S. citizens living abroad who are not federal government employees, along with their dependents, were generally excluded from the 2020 Census count.

The criteria specify that military or civilian employees of the U.S. government stationed overseas, such as these NASA flight engineers, are counted at their U.S. residence, where they primarily live and sleep before leaving the U.S. on or before Census Day. This means they are still considered part of the U.S. population, even though other U.S. citizens living abroad are not. The United States Census Bureau reported that as of April 1, 2020, there were 350,686 military and federal civilian employees, along with their dependents living with them.

Consider this: the roughly nine million civilian American citizens not counted in the 2020 Census make up about 3% of the country's total population. This staggering number is equal to the combined population of Los Angeles, Chicago, Philadelphia, and Tucson.

Today, after five years of The Fulcrum publishing my commentary, 'Stuck abroad, with no good reason why I'm not counted in the census,' I am more determined than ever. I am rolling up my sleeves to urgently draw Congress's attention to the need to include American citizens who live overseas and are not employed by the federal government, such as digital nomads, in the apportionment counts for congressional seats in the 2030 census.

In the current 118th Congress, at least three legislative bills pertain to potential reforms for the 2030 Census.

Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-TN) and Rep. Chuck Edwards (R-NC) have introduced the Equal Representation Act in their respective chambers. Sen. Hagerty introduced the Senate version of the bill (S.2205) on June 29, 2025, while Rep. Edwards reintroduced the House version (H.R. 151) on January 3, 2025. The third bill was recently introduced by Representative Harold Rogers (R-KY).

These bills seem to mirror the provisions of President Trump’s 2020 presidential memorandum, which would exclude undocumented immigrants from the population count used for apportioning congressional seats.

However, these identical bills lack any provision similar to the Full Count Act of 2018 (sponsored by Rep. Rob Bishop (R-UT), which would “require the U.S. Department of Commerce, beginning with the 2030 decennial census, to take appropriate measures to ensure that all Americans residing abroad on the census date are fully and accurately counted, and are properly attributed to their respective states and proper units of local government.”

After the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform took no action on his bill in 2018, Rep. Bishop appealed to voters, saying, “Currently, the Census Bureau doesn’t count Americans living overseas at the time of the decennial census unless they are affiliated with the federal government. This policy helps states that have lots of residents overseas with the military or other federal government operations, and it hurts those states that have lots of residents who are not affiliated with the federal government.”

In 2004, the U.S. Census Bureau released its report, “Counting Americans Overseas as Part of the Census Would Not Be Feasible,” which claimed that it would be impossible to get an accurate count of civilian Americans worldwide.

According to DemandSage, there are currently 18.1 million American citizens identified as digital nomads, with about 49% of these digital nomads traveling internationally.

After dutifully logging onto the census website from computers on 2020 Census Day, many nomads and I only received the message "Access Denied. You don't have permission to access 2020census.gov on this server." But we had full access to the internet elsewhere.

Do your math! In 2020, the Census Bureau counted 350,686 Americans living abroad, including non-voting children. The Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP) mentioned that around 2.8 million votes were cast overseas (including military personnel), and the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Consular Affairs reported that approximately nine million U.S. citizens resided overseas. The latter figure is almost eight million higher than the former—another point.

Including Americans living abroad in the 2030 Census might influence the congressional redistricting process.

Look at New York. In the 2022 election, it lost one congressional seat because 89 New Yorkers didn’t complete the census. Had New York counted thousands of New Yorkers overseas, all 27 House seats could have been kept, and the loss of representation might have been avoided.

Switch to Utah. If more than 11,000 Mormon missionaries from Utah living abroad had been included in the 2000 census, Utah would have gained a fourth seat in the House of Representatives. Instead, North Carolina received an extra House seat in 2002, with 18,360 overseas military and federal personnel, whose last known U.S. addresses were on military bases in North Carolina, counted in the census.

Therefore, if Congress wants the Census Bureau to include all citizens living abroad in the 2030 census, new legislation would be necessary to make it a requirement.


Howard Gorrell is an advocate for the deaf, a former Republican Party election statistician, and a longtime congressional aide. He has been advocating against partisan gerrymandering for four decades.


Read More

Five men sitting on one side of a table, as a panel at an event.

Harvard's Guy-Uriel Charles (left) listens to David Walker, Chair of the Federal Fiscal Sustainability Foundation. Fellow panelists (L-R) are Michael Farris, Convention of States Project; Samuel Fieldman, Wolf Pack; and Jim Rubens, FFSA and American Promise.

Photo by Martha Stewart

Congressional Inaction Raises Constitutional Change Alternative

Voting is the anchor of democracy, as we are reminded every two years. But this anchor rests on unstable ground today, signaling that our political roots need examining too.

In the United States, the Constitution itself becomes the focus when serious problems prompt such foundational civic dives. Our current challenges may not be as severe as the Civil War or the excesses of the Gilded Age, which produced waves of amendments, but today’s erosion of our system of checks and balances requires us to revisit our constitutional underpinnings.

Keep ReadingShow less
​U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testifies during a Senate Committee on Appropriations hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on July 21, 2026. Hegseth is crafting a strong and masculine identity for his audience as he reportedly contemplates a presidential run.

(Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

Politicians Can’t Just ’Give the People What They Want’

For reasons that will baffle my many detractors, I am often asked for advice about being an opinion journalist. One of my standard responses is: You have to be willing to disappoint your biggest fans.

What I mean is that if you start to see your job as telling fans what they want to hear, you risk becoming an entertainer rather than a thinker, and eventually you become a caricature. I’ve seen it happen numerous times. Patrick Buchanan was a brilliant columnist and a serious person. But over the course of his career, he listened too much to the people who said, “Go Pat, go!” and too little to friends who said, “I think that’s taking it too far.”

Keep ReadingShow less
White marble exterior of the United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government

Congress approval is at a record-low 10%. Moderation and consensus-building, not partisan theatrics, are how Washington gets problems solved.

Richard Sharrocks / Getty Images

Reclaiming the Politics of the Possible

Washington is stuck in a cycle of performative conflict. The incentives seem to reward outrage, not outcomes that last; purity tests, not problem‑solving. So it’s no surprise that after three shutdowns in less than a year, public approval of Congress collapsed to just 10 percent this spring. (Gallup, April 2026.) But the country we live in — where many middle-income families report persistent financial strain and businesses are navigating unprecedented technological upheaval — cannot be governed by theatrics. Breaking this cycle requires moderation, consensus‑building, and a cooperative approach to governance.

This is not a call for centrism as an ideology. Instead, this is a call for transformative leaders to embrace moderation as their governing strategy, recognizing that in a pluralistic country of nearly 350 million people durable solutions require broad and stable alliances. Ultimately, this is a call for the 240 million of us who are eligible to vote in November to elect consensus-builders instead of bomb-throwers, and healers instead of arsonists.

Keep ReadingShow less
Adult man holds a microphone while asking a question during a town hall meeting.

Congress ignored 90% of public support for background checks. Learn how citizen assemblies and sortition helped Ireland break gridlock and could work in the US.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

Consensus Without Power: How Sortition Could Break America's Legislative Gridlock

In April 2013, four months after the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting killed twenty children, the US Senate voted on the Manchin-Toomey Act to expand background checks and to include gun-show and internet sales of firearms. Roughly nine in ten Americans, including a majority of gun owners, supported the bill—a figure that has held steady across more than a decade of polling. It fell short of the 60-vote threshold by six votes. This was not an outlier. On complex issues, representatives often fail to translate public consensus into reality. Research shows that legislators consistently vote in line with donor and interest group preferences over constituent opinion. Before the vote, the National Rifle Association (NRA) warned every senator it would “rate” their vote on its annual rating system, and a low NRA rating could cost senators their next primary. Consequently, the bill died 54-46, and the majority of Americans watched, powerless, as their consensus was overridden by self-interested representatives.

Liberal democracies need a method to bypass electoral incentives that run counter to public opinion. One already exists: Ireland faced the same stalemate on complex issues before it instituted a process called sortition. The beauty of sortition lies in its removal of the primary pressure that misaligns representatives’ interests from public interest: reelection. Much like jury duty, citizens are randomly drawn from the population. An independent body then stratifies the pool, so the final group mirrors the country by age, gender, geography, and income. The group meets over weeks or months, hearing from experts and the public, as well as debating frequently. At the end, it issues a recommendation that parliament may then put to a referendum or pass into law.

Keep ReadingShow less