Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Counting All Americans Living Abroad in the 2030 Census for Congressional Apportionment

census forms

Howard Gorrell outlines the need to include all American citizens who live overseas in the apportionment counts for congressional seats in the 2030 census.

Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images

On Census Day 2020, April 1, two Americans from the three-member Expedition 62 crew—NASA Flight Engineers Jessica Meir and Andrew Morgan—aboard the spacecraft were counted in the 2020 Census for congressional apportionment.

On the same Census Day, I, then a resident of Delaware, was unexpectedly "stranded” in Rijeka, Croatia, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, I was not counted in the 2020 Census.


So, what's the catch? The 2020 Census Residence Criteria states that U.S. citizens living abroad who are not federal government employees, along with their dependents, were generally excluded from the 2020 Census count.

The criteria specify that military or civilian employees of the U.S. government stationed overseas, such as these NASA flight engineers, are counted at their U.S. residence, where they primarily live and sleep before leaving the U.S. on or before Census Day. This means they are still considered part of the U.S. population, even though other U.S. citizens living abroad are not. The United States Census Bureau reported that as of April 1, 2020, there were 350,686 military and federal civilian employees, along with their dependents living with them.

Consider this: the roughly nine million civilian American citizens not counted in the 2020 Census make up about 3% of the country's total population. This staggering number is equal to the combined population of Los Angeles, Chicago, Philadelphia, and Tucson.

Today, after five years of The Fulcrum publishing my commentary, 'Stuck abroad, with no good reason why I'm not counted in the census,' I am more determined than ever. I am rolling up my sleeves to urgently draw Congress's attention to the need to include American citizens who live overseas and are not employed by the federal government, such as digital nomads, in the apportionment counts for congressional seats in the 2030 census.

In the current 118th Congress, at least three legislative bills pertain to potential reforms for the 2030 Census.

Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-TN) and Rep. Chuck Edwards (R-NC) have introduced the Equal Representation Act in their respective chambers. Sen. Hagerty introduced the Senate version of the bill (S.2205) on June 29, 2025, while Rep. Edwards reintroduced the House version (H.R. 151) on January 3, 2025. The third bill was recently introduced by Representative Harold Rogers (R-KY).

These bills seem to mirror the provisions of President Trump’s 2020 presidential memorandum, which would exclude undocumented immigrants from the population count used for apportioning congressional seats.

However, these identical bills lack any provision similar to the Full Count Act of 2018 (sponsored by Rep. Rob Bishop (R-UT), which would “require the U.S. Department of Commerce, beginning with the 2030 decennial census, to take appropriate measures to ensure that all Americans residing abroad on the census date are fully and accurately counted, and are properly attributed to their respective states and proper units of local government.”

After the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform took no action on his bill in 2018, Rep. Bishop appealed to voters, saying, “Currently, the Census Bureau doesn’t count Americans living overseas at the time of the decennial census unless they are affiliated with the federal government. This policy helps states that have lots of residents overseas with the military or other federal government operations, and it hurts those states that have lots of residents who are not affiliated with the federal government.”

In 2004, the U.S. Census Bureau released its report, “Counting Americans Overseas as Part of the Census Would Not Be Feasible,” which claimed that it would be impossible to get an accurate count of civilian Americans worldwide.

According to DemandSage, there are currently 18.1 million American citizens identified as digital nomads, with about 49% of these digital nomads traveling internationally.

After dutifully logging onto the census website from computers on 2020 Census Day, many nomads and I only received the message "Access Denied. You don't have permission to access 2020census.gov on this server." But we had full access to the internet elsewhere.

Do your math! In 2020, the Census Bureau counted 350,686 Americans living abroad, including non-voting children. The Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP) mentioned that around 2.8 million votes were cast overseas (including military personnel), and the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Consular Affairs reported that approximately nine million U.S. citizens resided overseas. The latter figure is almost eight million higher than the former—another point.

Including Americans living abroad in the 2030 Census might influence the congressional redistricting process.

Look at New York. In the 2022 election, it lost one congressional seat because 89 New Yorkers didn’t complete the census. Had New York counted thousands of New Yorkers overseas, all 27 House seats could have been kept, and the loss of representation might have been avoided.

Switch to Utah. If more than 11,000 Mormon missionaries from Utah living abroad had been included in the 2000 census, Utah would have gained a fourth seat in the House of Representatives. Instead, North Carolina received an extra House seat in 2002, with 18,360 overseas military and federal personnel, whose last known U.S. addresses were on military bases in North Carolina, counted in the census.

Therefore, if Congress wants the Census Bureau to include all citizens living abroad in the 2030 census, new legislation would be necessary to make it a requirement.


Howard Gorrell is an advocate for the deaf, a former Republican Party election statistician, and a longtime congressional aide. He has been advocating against partisan gerrymandering for four decades.

Read More

Protecting the U.S. Press: The PRESS Act and What It Could Mean for Journalists

The Protect Reporters from Excessive State Suppression (PRESS) Act aims to fill the national shield law gap by providing two protections for journalists.

Getty Images, Manu Vega

Protecting the U.S. Press: The PRESS Act and What It Could Mean for Journalists

The First Amendment protects journalists during the news-gathering and publication processes. For example, under the First Amendment, reporters cannot be forced to report on an issue. However, the press is not entitled to different legal protections compared to a general member of the public under the First Amendment.

In the United States, there are protections for journalists beyond the First Amendment, including shield laws that protect journalists from pressure to reveal sources or information during news-gathering. 48 states and the District of Columbia have shield laws, but protections vary widely. There is currently no federal shield law. As of 2019, at least 22 journalists have been jailed in the U.S. for refusing to comply with requests to reveal sources of information. Seven other journalists have been jailed and fined for the same reason.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democrats Score Strategic Wins Amid Redistricting Battles

Democrat Donkey is winning arm wrestling match against Republican elephant

AI generated image

Democrats Score Strategic Wins Amid Redistricting Battles

Democrats are quietly building momentum in the 2025 election cycle, notching two key legislative flips in special elections and gaining ground in early polling ahead of the 2026 midterms. While the victories are modest in number, they signal a potential shift in voter sentiment — and a brewing backlash against Republican-led redistricting efforts.

Out of 40 special elections held across the United States so far in 2025, only two seats have changed party control — both flipping from Republican to Democrat.

Keep ReadingShow less
Policing or Occupation? Trump’s Militarizing America’s Cities Sets a Dangerous Precedent

A DC Metropolitan Police Department car is parked near a rally against the Trump Administration's federal takeover of the District of Columbia, outside of the AFL-CIO on August 11, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Policing or Occupation? Trump’s Militarizing America’s Cities Sets a Dangerous Precedent

President Trump announced the activation of hundreds of National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., along with the deployment of federal agents—including more than 100 from the FBI. This comes despite Justice Department data showing that violent crime in D.C. fell 35% from 2023 to 2024, reaching its lowest point in over three decades. These aren’t abstract numbers—they paint a picture of a city safer than it has been in a generation, with fewer homicides, assaults, and robberies than at any point since the early 1990s.

The contradiction could not be more glaring: the same president who, on January 6, 2021, stalled for hours as a violent uprising engulfed the Capitol is now rushing to “liberate” a city that—based on federal data—hasn’t been this safe in more than thirty years. Then, when democracy itself was under siege, urgency gave way to dithering; today, with no comparable emergency—only vague claims of lawlessness—he mobilizes troops for a mission that looks less like public safety and more like political theater. The disparity between those two moments is more than irony; it is a blueprint for how power can be selectively applied, depending on whose power is threatened.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democrats Need To Focus on Communication

Democrat Donkey phone operator

AI illustration

Democrats Need To Focus on Communication

The Democrats have a problem…I realize this isn’t a revelation, but I believe they’re boxed into a corner with limited options to regain their footing. Don’t get me wrong, the party could have a big win in the 2026 midterms with a backlash building against Trump and MAGA. In some scenarios, that could also lead to taking back the White House in 2028…but therein lies the problem.

In its second term, the Trump administration has severely cut government agencies, expanded the power of the Executive branch, enacted policies that will bloat the federal deficit, dismantled parts of the social safety net, weakened our standing in the world, and moved the US closer to a “pay for play” transactional philosophy of operating government that’s usually reserved for Third World countries. America has veered away from being the model emulated by other nations that aim to build a stable democracy.

Keep ReadingShow less