Barney the purple dinosaur was my first English teacher. Through songs, make-believe, and games, I learned how to greet people, ask kids if they wanted to play, and talk about the weather, which turned out to be useful for conversation in the United States. I also learned about sharing, respecting others, and finding the fun in learning.
Now, with the Presidential administration’s disinvestment in the education system and the cancellation of federal funding geared toward learning, Barney and other PBS favorites like Sesame Street, Arthur, and my personal favorite–The Magic School Bus - have been put on the chopping block by a political system that alleges to prioritize children’s learning. PBS is just one branch under the umbrella of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which also includes National Public Radio (NPR) and accounts for hundreds of national and local television shows and radio stations. This information war disenfranchises everyday people from learning and knowledge. Still, it will especially affect the next generation of children, like my son, who, unlike me (and the last six decades of viewers), won’t have the experience of running home from school to turn on the television and learn about thesaurus and jazz music while watching Arthur at 4 pm.
I moved to the United States with my parents from Mexico when I was three. And up until I started school, I did not speak English. Because we didn't have enough money for cable, I would watch the free channels on public television with my younger brother. We loved all the PBS programming and spent a great deal of time watching Julia Child’s and Jacques Pepin’s cooking shows, although we weren’t allowed to use the stove. Yet what I was permitted to do was read sensitive legal and medical documents for my parents, including any school mail.
I later learned that I wasn’t alone in doing this. First-generation immigrant children often have the added responsibility of being their parents' translators or what is known as language brokers in everyday life, but also in particularly high-stakes scenarios like delicate medical appointments, meetings with lawyers, and translating in their parents’ place of employment what the managers, bosses, and supervisors say. This can lead to a variety of outcomes like increased dependence on children, early adultification, and, in some cases, poor mental health outcomes. However, some argue that it also helps children learn responsibility, among other benefits.
Educational television helps children develop the language skills and vocabulary needed in life. For example, language instruction offered via Big Bird and Elmo helps children learn to read, count, and even identify their emotions. As such, during difficult times of war, global pandemics, and migration crises, when children’s learning is negatively impacted, Sesame Street becomes even more important, extending its reach across the globe. Through the leadership of the International Rescue Commission (IRC), Sesame Street has reached children in conflict zones who would otherwise go without educational instruction. Moreover, in an immigrant household, television, and in particular cartoons, play an important role. Not only is television the first introduction to quintessential American culture, but it also can be how children maintain their innocence and wonder through shows like those being defunded on PBS.
These changes and cancellations are happening faster than we think. In September, PBS fired 100 staff members due to this defunding. This month, Sesame Street was “rescued” when its 56th season premiered on Netflix, making the show available only to paid subscribers after half a century of free public access.
To be sure, some may say that those who want to watch Sesame Street should just get a Netflix account, perhaps arguing that “people prioritize it over food anyway.” Yet in an economic climate where groceries are becoming even more unaffordable, many families may have to choose between milk and a monthly Netflix subscription. Inevitably, this harms children. Moreover, in a society that says it values its young, it is troubling that the social, developmental, and educational support needed to raise children is being defunded through a systematic erosion of everyday American educational figures like Barney, Mr. Rogers, and Ms. Frizzle.
The battle over PBS may be lost, but “viewers like you,” you are still needed in opposing the complete erosion of children’s education.
Silvia Rodriguez Vega is an Assistant Professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara, a Public Voices Fellow with the Op-ed Project, and author of Drawing Deportation: Art and Resistance Among Immigrant Children.




















U.S. President Donald Trump boards Air Force One on August 14, 2026 at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland. Trump is traveling to Long Island to tour law enforcement facilities in Nassau County and rally support for local Republican candidates ahead of the upcoming midterm elections
Travel Far Enough, You Meet Yourself
Is it possible that our President has simply not traveled enough?
Born and raised in Queens and attending Fordham University in the Bronx, Donald Trump has no record of traveling outside New York until he was over 20, when he transferred to a college in the neighboring state of Pennsylvania. Were his formative years amiss, then, in his learning about other places and other people?
Is his view akin to the famous New Yorker cover by Saul Steinberg, an illustration of the United States with New York City as the epicenter of the country and the Hudson River the border of the known world? We can now at least add Washington, D.C., and Mar-a-Lago to the map of “the realm.”
Our President has now traveled some, but what we recommend is another kind of travel. Not a state-sponsored trip or a venture to scout locations for future Trump Towers. This would be a genuine travel experience, enriching and eye-opening, showcasing other cultures and ways of living.
It will extend far beyond viewing military parades, hobnobbing with such “understanding” world leaders as Kim Jong Un, or taking tea with the King.
WHERE, then, should the President go? As Elon Musk’s Starship spacecraft is not yet ready to take passengers to Mars, perhaps he could explore our own vast country?
Maybe he could travel to “flyover country,” the farming states, where his ying-yanging tariffs and trade restrictions have played havoc with rural economies. Or possibly to California, number one in homeless U. S. citizens, and while there, regale homeless veterans (approximately 32,500 nationwide) with tales of his brave exploits invading and bombing foreign countries.
Or he might tour the Great Lakes, and rename the other four?
WHEN should he go? This will be tough, as he is very busy building his ballroom and renaming bodies of water.
How about a trip in early November, around the midterm elections? Despite the long-discredited accusation of widespread voter fraud, it would be reassuring to know he might be so caught up divvying out ladles of soup in a soup kitchen somewhere that he wouldn’t remember to deploy the military for “election security.”
HOW will he travel? He should definitely not take his Qatari-donated, newly renovated 747, especially after last time, when he had to be smuggled off clandestinely in a catering truck. It’s unlikely any traveling companions, like the Secretary of State or of the Treasury, are going to fall for the ruse a second time. Besides, we may need those people. No more decoys!
Perhaps the President could fly commercially, although this likely would expose him to undue suffering. Without gold bathroom fixtures and maple wood floors, the trip will be no “Luxury Experience.” If only he still had his “Trump Shuttle,” bought with a massive loan he later defaulted on, saying then, “I’m smart. I got out at a good time.”
Considering the potential pitfalls, maybe it’s best the President travel incognito, disguised perhaps as an elderly woman wearing a lot of bronzer.
Wherever, whenever, however: our President needs a vacation.
Moreover, we need a vacation from him.
If the President refuses our travel suggestions, here’s another idea:
Let’s get him a pet! He has never owned a pet. As we know with our children, pets teach essential life lessons: compassion and empathy; they instill a sense of responsibility. There is a well-established connection between those who can care for a pet and those who can care for people.
So, which pet should we choose? A puppy? A kitten? A boa constrictor?
Imagine, the President may even decide he likes having a pet. After all, what is more obedient than a well-trained dog, besides possibly the Cabinet? And what is more docile than a sweet kitten, other than plausibly the Supreme Court?
The President may even become more mellow with a pet afoot and less likely to slap tariffs on our allies, or attempt to annex our neighbors, or bully our Congress. (Realizing, of course, a bully requires active participation from the bullied to maintain his status.)
Maybe we should do both: get the President a pet and devise a travel plan for him. (Do you think we could possibly convince him to leave his phone at home?)
Let’s go for it! After all:
Travel far enough, you meet yourself. (David Mitchell)
And for our President, that would likely be the most profound discovery of all.
Amy Lockard is an Iowa resident who regularly contributes to regional newspapers and periodicals. She is working on the second of a four-book fictional series based on Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice."