Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Barney, Big Bird, and Immigrant Children Need You!

Opinion

Barney, Big Bird, and Immigrant Children Need You!
Big Bird and the Count | Selena N. B. H. | Flickr

Barney the purple dinosaur was my first English teacher. Through songs, make-believe, and games, I learned how to greet people, ask kids if they wanted to play, and talk about the weather, which turned out to be useful for conversation in the United States. I also learned about sharing, respecting others, and finding the fun in learning.

Now, with the Presidential administration’s disinvestment in the education system and the cancellation of federal funding geared toward learning, Barney and other PBS favorites like Sesame Street, Arthur, and my personal favorite–The Magic School Bus - have been put on the chopping block by a political system that alleges to prioritize children’s learning. PBS is just one branch under the umbrella of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which also includes National Public Radio (NPR) and accounts for hundreds of national and local television shows and radio stations. This information war disenfranchises everyday people from learning and knowledge. Still, it will especially affect the next generation of children, like my son, who, unlike me (and the last six decades of viewers), won’t have the experience of running home from school to turn on the television and learn about thesaurus and jazz music while watching Arthur at 4 pm.


I moved to the United States with my parents from Mexico when I was three. And up until I started school, I did not speak English. Because we didn't have enough money for cable, I would watch the free channels on public television with my younger brother. We loved all the PBS programming and spent a great deal of time watching Julia Child’s and Jacques Pepin’s cooking shows, although we weren’t allowed to use the stove. Yet what I was permitted to do was read sensitive legal and medical documents for my parents, including any school mail.

I later learned that I wasn’t alone in doing this. First-generation immigrant children often have the added responsibility of being their parents' translators or what is known as language brokers in everyday life, but also in particularly high-stakes scenarios like delicate medical appointments, meetings with lawyers, and translating in their parents’ place of employment what the managers, bosses, and supervisors say. This can lead to a variety of outcomes like increased dependence on children, early adultification, and, in some cases, poor mental health outcomes. However, some argue that it also helps children learn responsibility, among other benefits.

Educational television helps children develop the language skills and vocabulary needed in life. For example, language instruction offered via Big Bird and Elmo helps children learn to read, count, and even identify their emotions. As such, during difficult times of war, global pandemics, and migration crises, when children’s learning is negatively impacted, Sesame Street becomes even more important, extending its reach across the globe. Through the leadership of the International Rescue Commission (IRC), Sesame Street has reached children in conflict zones who would otherwise go without educational instruction. Moreover, in an immigrant household, television, and in particular cartoons, play an important role. Not only is television the first introduction to quintessential American culture, but it also can be how children maintain their innocence and wonder through shows like those being defunded on PBS.

These changes and cancellations are happening faster than we think. In September, PBS fired 100 staff members due to this defunding. This month, Sesame Street was “rescued” when its 56th season premiered on Netflix, making the show available only to paid subscribers after half a century of free public access.

To be sure, some may say that those who want to watch Sesame Street should just get a Netflix account, perhaps arguing that “people prioritize it over food anyway.” Yet in an economic climate where groceries are becoming even more unaffordable, many families may have to choose between milk and a monthly Netflix subscription. Inevitably, this harms children. Moreover, in a society that says it values its young, it is troubling that the social, developmental, and educational support needed to raise children is being defunded through a systematic erosion of everyday American educational figures like Barney, Mr. Rogers, and Ms. Frizzle.

The battle over PBS may be lost, but “viewers like you,” you are still needed in opposing the complete erosion of children’s education.

Silvia Rodriguez Vega is an Assistant Professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara, a Public Voices Fellow with the Op-ed Project, and author of Drawing Deportation: Art and Resistance Among Immigrant Children.

Read More

The Fulcrum Opens Applications for 2026 Summer Journalism Fellowship

a person is writing into a notebook

The Fulcrum Opens Applications for 2026 Summer Journalism Fellowship

The Fulcrum is now accepting applications for its 2026 Fulcrum Fellowship, a 10‑week summer program designed to train the next generation of journalists in solutions‑focused reporting and narrative complexity. The fellowship will run from June 8 through August 14, 2026 and is part of The Fulcrum’s broader NextGen initiative, which aims to expand opportunities for emerging journalists across the country.

The Fulcrum Fellowship builds on the success of its inaugural cohort and reflects the organization’s commitment to nurturing young journalists who can move beyond polarized, one‑dimensional storytelling. The program helps storytellers illuminate not only the challenges facing democracy but also the responses and innovations happening in communities nationwide. Fellows learn to produce stories that counter oversimplified narratives and elevate underrepresented voices.

Keep ReadingShow less
Entrance Sign at the University of Florida

Universities are embracing “institutional neutrality,” but at places like the University of Florida it’s becoming a tool to silence faculty and erode academic freedom.

Getty Images, Bryan Pollard

When Insisting on “Neutrality” Becomes a Gag Order

Universities across the country are adopting policies under the banner of “institutional neutrality,” which, at face value, sounds entirely reasonable. A university’s official voice should remain measured, cautious, and focused on its core mission regardless of which elected officials are in office. But two very different interpretations of institutional neutrality are emerging.

At places like the University of Wisconsin – Madison and Harvard, neutrality is applied narrowly and traditionally: the institution itself refrains from partisan political statements, while faculty leaders and scholars remain free to speak in their professional and civic capacities. Elsewhere, the same term is being applied far more aggressively — not to restrain institutions, but to silence individuals.

Keep ReadingShow less
Federal Funding Cuts Are Only One Problem Facing America’s Colleges and Universities
Getty Images, tc397

Federal Funding Cuts Are Only One Problem Facing America’s Colleges and Universities

Higher education is under stress. The highest-profile threat has been the Trump administration’s efforts to cut funding to several universities, including Harvard, Columbia and Northwestern.

Research universities heavily depend on federal money to conduct research and carry out other areas of work. For example, after tuition, federal money allocated for research made up 40% of the total revenue for two major research universities – Johns Hopkins University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology – in the 2022-23 academic year.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ensuring Care on Campus: Inside the College Student Continuation of Mental Health Care Act

The proposed 2025 Act promises continuous telehealth for students, but critics warn of tech barriers, privacy issues, and the limits of virtual care. What will this mean for campus mental health?

Getty Images, Tanja Ivanova

Ensuring Care on Campus: Inside the College Student Continuation of Mental Health Care Act

Introduction

The damage to intervention systems on college campuses has caused a drastic decline in students’ mental health, exponentially heightening the demand for improved mental health services provided by universities. With increased pressure on college administrations, telehealth appointments—providing faster and wider access to care—have become more widely used within universities. While digital mental health services have decreased anxiety and depression in students, the gaps in continuous care caused by holidays and semester breaks impede this.

Thus, the College Students Continuation of Mental Health Care Act of 2025 was introduced to address such issues by requiring virtual mental health coverage for all students enrolled in participating institutions. The Act focuses on two core issues: geographic barriers and insurance. By allowing students to access treatment remotely and regardless of insurance status, this legislation guarantees the permanent and continuous care needed to prevent and de-escalate students’ mental health struggles. Despite the plan’s potential benefits, issues arise when it comes to students’ varying preferences for care and technological inaccessibility.

Keep ReadingShow less