Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Fight Back for the Future: Reinstate Federally Funded TRIO Programs

Opinion

Fight Back for the Future: Reinstate Federally Funded TRIO Programs
aerial view of graduates wearing hats

As a first-generation, low-income college student, I took every opportunity to learn more, improve myself, build leadership and research skills, and graduate from college. I greatly benefited from the federally funded U.S. Department of Education TRIO Programs.

TRIO Programs include Student Support Services, coordinated through the Office of Supportive Services (OSS) and the McNair Post-Baccalaureate Achievement Program (McNair Scholars Program). This was named in honor of Ronald E. McNair, a NASA astronaut and physicist who lost his life during the 1986 Space Shuttle Challenger mission.


The 2025 defunding efforts of TRIO Programs hurt millions of students, who are the country’s future leaders, thinkers, and changemakers, who need support resources and opportunities to thrive in a society dominated by structural inequities. President Donald Trump’s funding bill cut 120 TRIO programs across the country, up to $660 million in funding.

Only a very few lucky TRIO programs are funded, such as a recent Eastern Oregon University grant of more than $1 million, while most other programs have been cut or severely limited in funding.

Today, the Department of Education website, under its Federal Student Aid programs, lists only Military Families and International Study as possibilities. This is devastating for low-income students who are considering their college careers now and applying for student aid for the 2026-2027 school year.

Meanwhile, millions of student loan borrowers face penalties and taxation on their outstanding student loan balances. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau recently released a report stating that thousands of borrower complaints cannot be ignored.

The reductions in federal funding impact TRIO Programs nationwide, including Upward Bound, Talent Search, and Education Opportunity Centers, causing major disruptions, downsizing, and freezes that limit the impact and effectiveness of these vital programs.

The loss of TRIO Programs would be devastating to millions of students. The Council for Opportunity in Education (COE) TRIO Fact Sheet reports that more than 6 million Americans have benefited from TRIO since its founding.

TRIO Programs empowered me with the self-determination and self-efficacy to pursue my aspirations and dreams. I believed anything was possible and still do. These programs vastly helped me succeed as an undergraduate student at Michigan State University in the late 1990s-early 2000s.

As an undergraduate TRIO program participant, the OSS provided me with mentors, tutoring, and student opportunities that helped me develop essential leadership skills. I served as a Student Assistant, a leadership position that taught me to organize and plan programs to help first-year OSS students succeed and to serve as a liaison between students and professional staff.

While holding this position, I carried a caseload of nearly 20 students, an exceptional task for a college sophomore balancing full-time classes. This program opened opportunities to other leadership positions on campus.

I was soon accepted into the McNair Scholars Program, designed to increase access for underrepresented students to pursue graduate study, serving 151 universities nationwide. The COE TRIO Fact Sheet asserts that diverse faculty mentorship is a key element in bridging the equity gap for students from disadvantaged backgrounds.

Though the total number of students the McNair Scholars Program has served since its inception in the late 1980s is not available, the Department of Education Fast Facts 2019-2020 Report states that McNair grantees supported 5,242 participants that year.

The program offered research support, mentorship, research methods courses, and free test preparation for examinations such as the GRE for graduate school, the MCAT for medical school, and the LSAT for law school.

Faculty mentorship had the capacity to powerfully influence students’ cognitive skills in their research field. For example, some students learned how to run a research lab, secure multi-year grants, and collect longitudinal data — all practical career skills. Students cultivated lifelong relationships with their research faculty.

The McNair Scholars Program provided opportunities for students to network in academic settings, enhance oral and poster presentation skills, and take etiquette classes on place setting for formal dinners. Community service was an essential component that ensured students understood the linkages between their research work and community empowerment.

Through the development of study abroad programs, global outreach became an added aspect of the McNair Scholars Program. These services equipped students with the social and cultural capital necessary for graduate education, careers in higher education, and an understanding of the local and international impact of their research.

As a McNair student, I was paired with a faculty member, a leading epidemiologist in my research area of women’s health, to work on a project analyzing cortisol levels and self-reported stress in pregnant women. The program enabled me to present my research at a professional academic conference and connect with other McNair students from universities across the country.

The program covered the cost of my GRE test-prep course and exam. I also received support with my graduate school applications and did not have to stress about the cost of the application fees.

I participated in community work with Habitat for Humanity in Jamaica. Without a doubt, I would not have been prepared for graduate study if it were not for this program.

I graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Interdisciplinary Studies in Social Science-Health Studies and went on to complete my Master of Arts in African American and African Studies at The Ohio State University and my Doctor of Philosophy in African American and African Studies at Michigan State University.

TRIO Programs address equity and inclusion gaps across the nation’s education system and provide students with the resources and opportunities to succeed. Now in 2026, they are under assault, as well as other attacks on higher education, such as the rollback and dismantling of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs, the end of affirmative action in higher education, and other actions that harm minoritized higher education students, faculty, and staff.

A 2020 study conducted by Rachel Renbarger, an educational psychology scholar at FHI 360, and Alexander Beaujean, a psychology professor at Baylor University, analyzed graduate school enrollment among McNair students and disproved the claim made by Mick Mulvaney, the Director of Management and Budget, during a 2017 White House press briefing. He asserted that the McNair Scholars’ achievement was “6 percent effective,” despite the 2020 research study indicating that the program “is more effective than is being represented.”

His outright lie to the public is a gross misrepresentation of a life-changing program that serves minoritized and underserved students. The assault on TRIO Programs is about race and class. It’s structural racism in action, and it needs to make everyone furious.

It is urgent for policymakers, students, parents, faculty, administrators, and all citizens to get involved by contacting local elected officials, writing letters, and sharing personal stories.

These TRIO programs matter not just for some students, but for the future of this country.

Mary Frances Phillips is an associate professor of African American Studies at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and a Public Voices fellow with The OpEd Project. She is the author of Black Panther Woman: The Political and Spiritual Life of Ericka Huggins.


Read More

Vouchers, Patriotism and Prayer: The Trump Administration’s Plan to Remake Public Education
A stack of books sitting on top of a table
Photo by Saung Digital on Unsplash

Vouchers, Patriotism and Prayer: The Trump Administration’s Plan to Remake Public Education

Linda McMahon, the nation’s secretary of education, says public schools are failing.

In November, she promised a “hard reset” of the system in which more than 80% of U.S. children learn. But rather than invest in public education, she has been working to dismantle the Department of Education and enact wholesale changes to how public schools operate.

Keep Reading Show less
The Fulcrum Opens Applications for 2026 Summer Journalism Fellowship

a person is writing into a notebook

The Fulcrum Opens Applications for 2026 Summer Journalism Fellowship

The Fulcrum is now accepting applications for its 2026 Fulcrum Fellowship, a 10‑week summer program designed to train the next generation of journalists in solutions‑focused reporting and narrative complexity. The fellowship will run from June 8 through August 14, 2026 and is part of The Fulcrum’s broader NextGen initiative, which aims to expand opportunities for emerging journalists across the country.

The Fulcrum Fellowship builds on the success of its inaugural cohort and reflects the organization’s commitment to nurturing young journalists who can move beyond polarized, one‑dimensional storytelling. The program helps storytellers illuminate not only the challenges facing democracy but also the responses and innovations happening in communities nationwide. Fellows learn to produce stories that counter oversimplified narratives and elevate underrepresented voices.

Keep Reading Show less
Entrance Sign at the University of Florida

Universities are embracing “institutional neutrality,” but at places like the University of Florida it’s becoming a tool to silence faculty and erode academic freedom.

Getty Images, Bryan Pollard

When Insisting on “Neutrality” Becomes a Gag Order

Universities across the country are adopting policies under the banner of “institutional neutrality,” which, at face value, sounds entirely reasonable. A university’s official voice should remain measured, cautious, and focused on its core mission regardless of which elected officials are in office. But two very different interpretations of institutional neutrality are emerging.

At places like the University of Wisconsin – Madison and Harvard, neutrality is applied narrowly and traditionally: the institution itself refrains from partisan political statements, while faculty leaders and scholars remain free to speak in their professional and civic capacities. Elsewhere, the same term is being applied far more aggressively — not to restrain institutions, but to silence individuals.

Keep Reading Show less
Federal Funding Cuts Are Only One Problem Facing America’s Colleges and Universities
Getty Images, tc397

Federal Funding Cuts Are Only One Problem Facing America’s Colleges and Universities

Higher education is under stress. The highest-profile threat has been the Trump administration’s efforts to cut funding to several universities, including Harvard, Columbia and Northwestern.

Research universities heavily depend on federal money to conduct research and carry out other areas of work. For example, after tuition, federal money allocated for research made up 40% of the total revenue for two major research universities – Johns Hopkins University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology – in the 2022-23 academic year.

Keep Reading Show less