Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Innovating America’s Democracy Is Our Tradition and Our Responsibility

Opinion

Girls drawing an American flag with chalk
United States continues to be a ‘flawed democracy’ in annual study
LWA/Dann Tardif/Getty Images

The American story is one of constant innovation and renewal, where democracy rises to meet the challenges of each new age. Our history documents a journey of transformation, inviting us to reflect on centuries of innovation in American democracy. Citizens have routinely amended outdated practices, reinforced core tenets, and forged new institutions. Our story highlights that reform is not only possible—it is tradition.

As we celebrate America’s 250th year, which began on July 4, 2025, we must also reflect on the nature of innovations in our democracy as a platform for encouraging Americans to embrace the next phase of reform. If we are successful in adding a new set of reforms to the historical arc, ones that remove the overly partisan influences on our electoral system, we might be able to reverse the hyperpartisan spiral George Washington warned us about; and we may re-align our electoral incentives to promote the kind of cooperation among elected leaders that might allow us to have on-time responsible budgets and the kinds of practical policies the country needs. It feels like a daunting task, but our forebears often tackled what were monumental revisions to our democracy in their times. And it would be a shame to let the 250th anniversary of our country come and go without taking up the charge given to us by those who came before us, the responsibility to leave our generation’s mark on our improving democracy. We have all the tools and ideas we need. We must decide if we have the will.


As we enter what may become an unfortunately polarizing period related to our country’s 250th birthday, we need to keep our focus on the task, to appropriately commemorate our country’s quarter-millennial birthday in a way that keeps our history of innovation going while carefully navigating the current political environment.

One method to maintain our focus is to keep grounded in the progression of our innovations. The Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress has newly launched a Democracy Innovation Timeline, one phase in its Quarter Millennial Program work to celebrate the arc of America’s historical reform and renewal. The product is designed to be informative, visually enticing, and inspirational—a reflection on the past and a call to action for our time.

The timeline describes early innovations on democracy that borrowed civic concepts of representation and compromise from ancient Greek and Roman civilizations and concepts used in colonial America to transition from monarchical European and English models to a more ethical system grounded in the idea that all men are created equal. From the beginning, the new aspirational system needed improvement, as only a small percentage of the population were permitted to share in the freedom to vote or even be considered citizens. Slavery was in wide practice. Over the decades that followed, improvements were made to fix some of the initial failings but also to iterate on the details of the system that determined how well it functioned, from secret ballots to popular participation in selecting candidates and choosing senators.

The timeline is designed to mark some of the key innovations in our democracy over the past 250 years and reminds us that Americans who came before us saw a periodic need to update the mechanisms of democracy. Gerrymandering existed through most of our history; however, sincere efforts have been made over the past 75 years to replace partisan line drawing with more independent processes, for example. Partisan primaries have been designed by party actors to limit access to ballots and control who gets to run for office, resulting in a system that rewards party ideology over cooperation, while voters have started proposing and trying innovations that fix that misalignment of incentives. The process of innovation continues, though our history also shows that reform consistently faces resistance. Hope can be found in the insistence of innovators to keep the cycle of reform alive.

The project was primarily the work of Jessica Firestone and Seth English, two Nevins Fellows from Penn State who dedicated their summer to creating this reflection on the history of American democratic reform. They are part of a rising generation of leaders who will give the needed energy and dedication to this cause. If their work can form part of a larger movement to heed the call, to continue our brave tradition of innovation, then our democracy has a chance at earning another 250 years. Let their inspiration be a call to all of us to do our part.


Glenn Nye is the President and CEO of the Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress.

Read More

American flag
American flag
SimpleImages/Getty Images

From the Ashes, What Would A ‘Re-Founding’ of American Democracy Look Like?

Things rarely change unless there is a crisis. The present administration has certainly precipitated unprecedented challenges at all levels of our government. With the likelihood that the crisis will only deepen, the more pertinent question is how far will the destruction go?

A society’s capacity for change is often proportionate to the disaster’s depth. From the ashes of the Civil War, the ratification of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments would go on to play such an important role in the American polity that their passage is considered by some to be a “Second Founding” of American democracy. Amidst the backdrop of decades of political decay and voter cynicism due to gerrymandering, inequities in voter representation, and political gridlock, we do not have the luxury of hoping after the current administration that “things will go back to normal.” Depending on the scale of the mounting assaults challenging our Constitutional system—made even more dire with concerns that future elections may be disrupted or manipulated—we must be prepared to harness a potential groundswell to pass reforms that update our democracy in the most concrete and durable ways.

Keep ReadingShow less
FBI Search of Reporter Marks Alarming Escalation Against the Press
The Protect Reporters from Excessive State Suppression (PRESS) Act aims to fill the national shield law gap by providing two protections for journalists.
Getty Images, Manu Vega

FBI Search of Reporter Marks Alarming Escalation Against the Press

The events of the past week have made the dangers facing a free press even harder to ignore. Journalists Don Lemon and Georgia Fort (who is also the vice president of the Minneapolis chapter of the National Association of Black Journalists) were indicted for covering a public event, despite a judge’s earlier refusal to issue an arrest warrant.

Press‑freedom organizations have condemned the move as an extraordinary escalation, warning that it signals a willingness by the government to use law‑enforcement power not to protect the public, but to intimidate those who report on it. The indictment of Lemon and Fort is not an isolated incident; it is part of a broader pattern in which the administration has increasingly turned to subpoenas, warrants, and coercive tactics to deter scrutiny and chill reporting before it ever reaches the public.

Keep ReadingShow less
Police tape and a batch of flowers lie at a crosswalk.
Police tape and a batch of flowers lie at a crosswalk near the site where Renee Good was killed a week ago on January 14, 2026 in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Getty Images, Stephen Maturen

Who Is Made To Answer When ICE Kills?

By now, we have all seen the horrific videos—more than once, from more than one angle.

The killings of Renée Nicole Good and Alex Jeffrey Pretti weren’t hidden or disputed. They happened in public, were captured on camera, and circulated widely. There is no mystery about what occurred.

Keep ReadingShow less
March in memory of George Floyd

Black History Month challenges America to confront how modern immigration and ICE policies repeat historic patterns of racial exclusion and state violence.

Stephen Maturen/Getty Images

Black History Month 2026: When Memory Becomes a Moral Test

Imagine opening a history textbook and not seeing the faces of key contributors to America's story. Every February, America observes Black History Month. It started in 1926 as Negro History Week, founded by historian Carter G. Woodson, and was never meant to be just a ceremony. Its purpose was to make the nation face the truth after erasing Black people from its official story. Woodson knew something we still struggle with: history is not only about the past. It reflects our present.

We celebrate Black resilience, yet increasing policies of exclusion expose a deep national contradiction. Honoring Dr. King’s dream has become a hollow ritual amid policies echoing Jim Crow and the resurgence of surveillance targeting Black communities. Our praise for pioneers like Frederick Douglass rings empty while state power is deployed with suspicion against the same communities they fought to liberate. This contradiction is not just an idea. We see it on our streets.

Keep ReadingShow less