Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Innovating America’s Democracy Is Our Tradition and Our Responsibility

Opinion

Girls drawing an American flag with chalk
United States continues to be a ‘flawed democracy’ in annual study
LWA/Dann Tardif/Getty Images

The American story is one of constant innovation and renewal, where democracy rises to meet the challenges of each new age. Our history documents a journey of transformation, inviting us to reflect on centuries of innovation in American democracy. Citizens have routinely amended outdated practices, reinforced core tenets, and forged new institutions. Our story highlights that reform is not only possible—it is tradition.

As we celebrate America’s 250th year, which began on July 4, 2025, we must also reflect on the nature of innovations in our democracy as a platform for encouraging Americans to embrace the next phase of reform. If we are successful in adding a new set of reforms to the historical arc, ones that remove the overly partisan influences on our electoral system, we might be able to reverse the hyperpartisan spiral George Washington warned us about; and we may re-align our electoral incentives to promote the kind of cooperation among elected leaders that might allow us to have on-time responsible budgets and the kinds of practical policies the country needs. It feels like a daunting task, but our forebears often tackled what were monumental revisions to our democracy in their times. And it would be a shame to let the 250th anniversary of our country come and go without taking up the charge given to us by those who came before us, the responsibility to leave our generation’s mark on our improving democracy. We have all the tools and ideas we need. We must decide if we have the will.


As we enter what may become an unfortunately polarizing period related to our country’s 250th birthday, we need to keep our focus on the task, to appropriately commemorate our country’s quarter-millennial birthday in a way that keeps our history of innovation going while carefully navigating the current political environment.

One method to maintain our focus is to keep grounded in the progression of our innovations. The Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress has newly launched a Democracy Innovation Timeline, one phase in its Quarter Millennial Program work to celebrate the arc of America’s historical reform and renewal. The product is designed to be informative, visually enticing, and inspirational—a reflection on the past and a call to action for our time.

The timeline describes early innovations on democracy that borrowed civic concepts of representation and compromise from ancient Greek and Roman civilizations and concepts used in colonial America to transition from monarchical European and English models to a more ethical system grounded in the idea that all men are created equal. From the beginning, the new aspirational system needed improvement, as only a small percentage of the population were permitted to share in the freedom to vote or even be considered citizens. Slavery was in wide practice. Over the decades that followed, improvements were made to fix some of the initial failings but also to iterate on the details of the system that determined how well it functioned, from secret ballots to popular participation in selecting candidates and choosing senators.

The timeline is designed to mark some of the key innovations in our democracy over the past 250 years and reminds us that Americans who came before us saw a periodic need to update the mechanisms of democracy. Gerrymandering existed through most of our history; however, sincere efforts have been made over the past 75 years to replace partisan line drawing with more independent processes, for example. Partisan primaries have been designed by party actors to limit access to ballots and control who gets to run for office, resulting in a system that rewards party ideology over cooperation, while voters have started proposing and trying innovations that fix that misalignment of incentives. The process of innovation continues, though our history also shows that reform consistently faces resistance. Hope can be found in the insistence of innovators to keep the cycle of reform alive.

The project was primarily the work of Jessica Firestone and Seth English, two Nevins Fellows from Penn State who dedicated their summer to creating this reflection on the history of American democratic reform. They are part of a rising generation of leaders who will give the needed energy and dedication to this cause. If their work can form part of a larger movement to heed the call, to continue our brave tradition of innovation, then our democracy has a chance at earning another 250 years. Let their inspiration be a call to all of us to do our part.


Glenn Nye is the President and CEO of the Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress.

Read More

American flag

Analysis of concentrated power in the U.S. political economy, examining inequality, institutional trust, executive authority, and the need for equal access and competitive markets.

Chalermpon Poungpeth/EyeEm/Getty Images

America: What We Want, What We Have, What We Need

Equal Access in an Age of Concentrated Power

The American constitutional system was designed to restrain power, not to pursue a single national mission. Authority was divided across branches, diffused among states, and slowed by deliberate friction. As James Madison wrote in Federalist No. 51, ambition was meant to counteract ambition. The design assumed competing interests would prevent domination.

For more than two centuries, that architecture has endured. The United States remains the world’s largest economy by nominal GDP, according to the World Bank’s World Development Indicators, with deep capital markets and a formidable innovation system.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Disconsent of the Governed

The U.S. Capitol is shown on February 24, 2026 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

The Disconsent of the Governed

President Trump’s administration and Congress have not paid much attention to what legislators call “the normal order” in matters related to codifying laws and implementing programs and policies that are supposed to help mind the public’s business or satisfy petitioners looking for attention and relief. This has been partly by design and partly not.

A serious consequence of our leaders not following “normal order” has been to encourage many of us who aren’t in government to use more polarizing rhetoric and to act out more than usual. While there may be little we would consider “normal” about how our national government has been working recently or how people have risen to support or challenge it, we would be mistaken and doing ourselves a great disservice if we were to dismiss or condemn the agitated steps everyday Americans are taking as unhinged or “the work of domestic terrorists.” Their words and actions may be on the other side of normal, but there’s nothing crazy about them.

Keep ReadingShow less
A tragedy in Mali, West Africa is a reminder of solidarity across difference and the work needed at home in the United States

Map highlighting Mali over Mali flag

AI-generated image

A tragedy in Mali, West Africa is a reminder of solidarity across difference and the work needed at home in the United States

This fall, I got a phone call from a longtime friend in Mali, West Africa. I could hear the familiar hum of insects in the background, even as I heard the audible strain in his voice. A tragedy had just unfolded - innocent people were being displaced, villages destroyed, and people killed in the name of religion and political extremism. Even though it has been over two decades since I last visited, Mali is a place I grew to know and love - and for over 25 years, I’ve been blessed with a close friendship with my host family, with whom I lived during my time in the U.S. Peace Corps. I had been one of just over 2,500 volunteers who had served in the country until security concerns forced the closure of Mali’s Peace Corps program in 2015. And now, the village where I lived had been burned down, and my friends and host family were refugees on the run.

It was a reminder about how quickly things can change. One day, you wake up to the familiar path of sunlight across mud brick walls and the large baobab trees that frame the dirt path leading from the main road. Another day, you wake up to a worst nightmare - a country in chaos, extremism on the loose, and the very real force of violence right at your doorstep. It was also a reminder that political unrest can strike close to home, to the places and people I know and love, and that political instability and violent, polarizing rhetoric takes its toll.

Keep ReadingShow less
A person's hand holding a stamp above a vote deposit box.

A woman casts her vote on the day of the presidential election on May 18, 2025 in Bucharest, Romania. Today's was a second-round vote after a first round on May 4th.

Getty Images, Andrei Pungovsch

When Rivals Converge: Electoral Influence Beyond the Cold War

A recent report issued by Republican staff members on the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, which focused on alleged European censorship practices, cited Romania as a case study of aggressive EU overreach, referencing investigations into the far-right candidate’s campaign financing and the annulment decision. In doing so, elements within the U.S. political system appeared to align rhetorically with Moscow’s framing of the episode as an example of EU elite suppression rather than Russian interference.

This does not constitute evidence of coordination between Russia and the United States. There is no public proof of joint strategy or operational cooperation. But it does suggest something more subtle: narrative convergence in support of the same political force abroad and in opposition to pro-European institutional actors.

Keep ReadingShow less