Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Innovating America’s Democracy Is Our Tradition and Our Responsibility

Opinion

Girls drawing an American flag with chalk
United States continues to be a ‘flawed democracy’ in annual study
LWA/Dann Tardif/Getty Images

The American story is one of constant innovation and renewal, where democracy rises to meet the challenges of each new age. Our history documents a journey of transformation, inviting us to reflect on centuries of innovation in American democracy. Citizens have routinely amended outdated practices, reinforced core tenets, and forged new institutions. Our story highlights that reform is not only possible—it is tradition.

As we celebrate America’s 250th year, which began on July 4, 2025, we must also reflect on the nature of innovations in our democracy as a platform for encouraging Americans to embrace the next phase of reform. If we are successful in adding a new set of reforms to the historical arc, ones that remove the overly partisan influences on our electoral system, we might be able to reverse the hyperpartisan spiral George Washington warned us about; and we may re-align our electoral incentives to promote the kind of cooperation among elected leaders that might allow us to have on-time responsible budgets and the kinds of practical policies the country needs. It feels like a daunting task, but our forebears often tackled what were monumental revisions to our democracy in their times. And it would be a shame to let the 250th anniversary of our country come and go without taking up the charge given to us by those who came before us, the responsibility to leave our generation’s mark on our improving democracy. We have all the tools and ideas we need. We must decide if we have the will.


As we enter what may become an unfortunately polarizing period related to our country’s 250th birthday, we need to keep our focus on the task, to appropriately commemorate our country’s quarter-millennial birthday in a way that keeps our history of innovation going while carefully navigating the current political environment.

One method to maintain our focus is to keep grounded in the progression of our innovations. The Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress has newly launched a Democracy Innovation Timeline, one phase in its Quarter Millennial Program work to celebrate the arc of America’s historical reform and renewal. The product is designed to be informative, visually enticing, and inspirational—a reflection on the past and a call to action for our time.

The timeline describes early innovations on democracy that borrowed civic concepts of representation and compromise from ancient Greek and Roman civilizations and concepts used in colonial America to transition from monarchical European and English models to a more ethical system grounded in the idea that all men are created equal. From the beginning, the new aspirational system needed improvement, as only a small percentage of the population were permitted to share in the freedom to vote or even be considered citizens. Slavery was in wide practice. Over the decades that followed, improvements were made to fix some of the initial failings but also to iterate on the details of the system that determined how well it functioned, from secret ballots to popular participation in selecting candidates and choosing senators.

The timeline is designed to mark some of the key innovations in our democracy over the past 250 years and reminds us that Americans who came before us saw a periodic need to update the mechanisms of democracy. Gerrymandering existed through most of our history; however, sincere efforts have been made over the past 75 years to replace partisan line drawing with more independent processes, for example. Partisan primaries have been designed by party actors to limit access to ballots and control who gets to run for office, resulting in a system that rewards party ideology over cooperation, while voters have started proposing and trying innovations that fix that misalignment of incentives. The process of innovation continues, though our history also shows that reform consistently faces resistance. Hope can be found in the insistence of innovators to keep the cycle of reform alive.

The project was primarily the work of Jessica Firestone and Seth English, two Nevins Fellows from Penn State who dedicated their summer to creating this reflection on the history of American democratic reform. They are part of a rising generation of leaders who will give the needed energy and dedication to this cause. If their work can form part of a larger movement to heed the call, to continue our brave tradition of innovation, then our democracy has a chance at earning another 250 years. Let their inspiration be a call to all of us to do our part.


Glenn Nye is the President and CEO of the Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress.

Read More

People waving US flags

People waving US flags

LeoPatrizi/Getty Images

Democracy Fellowship Spotlight: Joel Gurin on Trustworthy Data

Earlier this year, the Bridge Alliance and the National Academy of Public Administration launched the Fellows for Democracy and Public Service Initiative to strengthen the country's civic foundations. This fellowship unites the Academy’s distinguished experts with the Bridge Alliance’s cross‑sector ecosystem to elevate distributed leadership throughout the democracy reform landscape. Instead of relying on traditional, top‑down models, the program builds leadership ecosystems: spaces where people share expertise, prioritize collaboration, and use public‑facing storytelling to renew trust in democratic institutions. Each fellow grounds their work in one of six core sectors essential to a thriving democratic republic.

Recently, I interviewed Joel Gurin, who founded and now leads the Center for Open Data Enterprise (CODE) and wrote Open Data Now. Before launching CODE in 2015, he chaired the White House Task Force on Smart Disclosure, which studied how open government data can improve consumer markets. He also led as Chief of the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at the Federal Communications Commission and spent over a decade at Consumer Reports.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

People clear rubble in a house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. The United States and Israel continued their joint attack on Iran that began on February 28. Iran retaliated by firing waves of missiles and drones at Israel, and targeting U.S. allies in the region.

Getty Images, Majid Saeedi

Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

Most of what we have heard from the administration as it pertains to the Iran War is swagger and bro-talk. A few days into the war, the White House released a social media video that combined footage of the bombardment with clips from video games. Not long after, it released a second video, titled “Justice the American Way,” that mixed images of the U.S. military with scenes from movies like Gladiator and Top Gun Maverick.

Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon, War Secretary Pete Hegseth boasted of “death and destruction from the sky all day long.” “They are toast, and they know it,” he said. “This was never meant to be a fair fight... we are punching them while they’re down.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Bomb First, Debate Later: The Hidden Cost of How America Makes War Now

A general view of Tehran with smoke visible in the distance after explosions were reported in the city, on March 02, 2026 in Tehran, Iran.

Getty Images, Contributor

Bomb First, Debate Later: The Hidden Cost of How America Makes War Now

For those old enough to remember the first Gulf War, the scenes feel painfully familiar: smoke rising over Tehran. Babies carried out of a bombed-out hospital in incubators. Missiles striking cities across the Middle East. Oil markets in turmoil as Iran threatens to close the Strait of Hormuz. The war of choice that began with Israeli and American strikes on Iran is widening by the hour, pulling in multiple countries, including NATO allies, and producing casualties that mount by the day.

Much of the early discussion has focused on obvious questions. How far will the conflict spread? How many people will die? What will it cost the United States in money, lives, and global stability?

Keep ReadingShow less