Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Innovating America’s Democracy Is Our Tradition and Our Responsibility

Opinion

Girls drawing an American flag with chalk
United States continues to be a ‘flawed democracy’ in annual study
LWA/Dann Tardif/Getty Images

The American story is one of constant innovation and renewal, where democracy rises to meet the challenges of each new age. Our history documents a journey of transformation, inviting us to reflect on centuries of innovation in American democracy. Citizens have routinely amended outdated practices, reinforced core tenets, and forged new institutions. Our story highlights that reform is not only possible—it is tradition.

As we celebrate America’s 250th year, which began on July 4, 2025, we must also reflect on the nature of innovations in our democracy as a platform for encouraging Americans to embrace the next phase of reform. If we are successful in adding a new set of reforms to the historical arc, ones that remove the overly partisan influences on our electoral system, we might be able to reverse the hyperpartisan spiral George Washington warned us about; and we may re-align our electoral incentives to promote the kind of cooperation among elected leaders that might allow us to have on-time responsible budgets and the kinds of practical policies the country needs. It feels like a daunting task, but our forebears often tackled what were monumental revisions to our democracy in their times. And it would be a shame to let the 250th anniversary of our country come and go without taking up the charge given to us by those who came before us, the responsibility to leave our generation’s mark on our improving democracy. We have all the tools and ideas we need. We must decide if we have the will.


As we enter what may become an unfortunately polarizing period related to our country’s 250th birthday, we need to keep our focus on the task, to appropriately commemorate our country’s quarter-millennial birthday in a way that keeps our history of innovation going while carefully navigating the current political environment.

One method to maintain our focus is to keep grounded in the progression of our innovations. The Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress has newly launched a Democracy Innovation Timeline, one phase in its Quarter Millennial Program work to celebrate the arc of America’s historical reform and renewal. The product is designed to be informative, visually enticing, and inspirational—a reflection on the past and a call to action for our time.

The timeline describes early innovations on democracy that borrowed civic concepts of representation and compromise from ancient Greek and Roman civilizations and concepts used in colonial America to transition from monarchical European and English models to a more ethical system grounded in the idea that all men are created equal. From the beginning, the new aspirational system needed improvement, as only a small percentage of the population were permitted to share in the freedom to vote or even be considered citizens. Slavery was in wide practice. Over the decades that followed, improvements were made to fix some of the initial failings but also to iterate on the details of the system that determined how well it functioned, from secret ballots to popular participation in selecting candidates and choosing senators.

The timeline is designed to mark some of the key innovations in our democracy over the past 250 years and reminds us that Americans who came before us saw a periodic need to update the mechanisms of democracy. Gerrymandering existed through most of our history; however, sincere efforts have been made over the past 75 years to replace partisan line drawing with more independent processes, for example. Partisan primaries have been designed by party actors to limit access to ballots and control who gets to run for office, resulting in a system that rewards party ideology over cooperation, while voters have started proposing and trying innovations that fix that misalignment of incentives. The process of innovation continues, though our history also shows that reform consistently faces resistance. Hope can be found in the insistence of innovators to keep the cycle of reform alive.

The project was primarily the work of Jessica Firestone and Seth English, two Nevins Fellows from Penn State who dedicated their summer to creating this reflection on the history of American democratic reform. They are part of a rising generation of leaders who will give the needed energy and dedication to this cause. If their work can form part of a larger movement to heed the call, to continue our brave tradition of innovation, then our democracy has a chance at earning another 250 years. Let their inspiration be a call to all of us to do our part.


Glenn Nye is the President and CEO of the Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress.

Read More

The election voting process, bidding, hands raised up with papers

Confidence in U.S. elections has fallen to 55% ahead of the 2026 midterms. The real risk isn't who wins — it's whether the loser accepts it.

Svetlana Shamshurina/Getty Images

The Real Test of the 2026 Midterms Comes After the Vote

Less than three months before Americans vote in the 2026 midterms, a federal judge on August 11 blocked the U.S. Postal Service from implementing part of President Donald Trump’s executive order tightening mail-in voting rules. The ruling came amid an intensifying fight over how November’s elections will be administered. That fight underscores a deeper problem: the real question in American politics is no longer simply who wins the next election, but whether large numbers of people will still accept the result when their side loses.

Elections in the United States were supposed to settle arguments. One side wins, the other accepts defeat, and the country moves on. That quiet agreement is under growing pressure as the midterms approach. Control of Congress still matters, but beneath that contest lies a more consequential question: if the outcome goes against one of the two major political camps, will that camp still trust the process that declared it the loser?

Keep ReadingShow less
Historical documents representing founding principles of United States on flag backdrop

As the US Constitution turns 250, one expert argues it was designed as an antidote to tyranny — and warns that antidote is now at risk.

photovs/Getty Images

Why the Constitution Remains Our Defense Against Tyranny

There are many analogies for constitutions, for example, a social contract, a blueprint, a roadmap. But as we mark the 250th birthday of the United States of America, I propose another: constitution as antidote.

Constitutions are always intentionally and carefully designed, more often than not as antidotes to heal and ward off ills that a country wishes - or existentially needs - to avoid. This is, and has historically been, true all around the world, although the study of how constitutions and constitutional change can address root causes of conflict and instability has evolved greatly, allowing us to harness their healing power more effectively.

Keep ReadingShow less
A rose stands on the 9/11 Memorial for the North Tower in front of 3 and 4 World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

A rose stands on the 9/11 Memorial for the North Tower in front of 3 and 4 World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

Gary Hershorn/Getty Images

The 9/11 Town Hall That Helped Rebuild Ground Zero—and Democracy

As the nation and the world pause this week to honor and reflect on the 25th Anniversary of the terrorist attack that brought down the twin towers of the World Trade Center and killed more than 3,000 people, I am moved to share a very personal reflection.

After serving as Chief of Staff to Governor Celeste of Ohio and in the Clinton-Gore Administration, where I experienced firsthand how the major institutions in our country interact to favor the powerful over we the people, I became deeply concerned about the health of our democracy. It was clear to me that, beyond voting and national polling, the American people were not at the table to influence the decisions that most affect their lives.

Keep ReadingShow less
People casting their ballots.

Voters cast their ballots at the Buckhead Library for the primary runoff election on June 16, 2026 in Atlanta, Georgia.

Jessica McGowan/Getty Images

Bridgers in the House Face Disproportionate Headwinds in the Midterms

Congressional collaboration on Capitol Hill has become a lost art.

At Bridge Grades, we compile non-partisan 3rd party data to rank members of Congress on how collaboratively (or divisively) they govern. Our thesis is that a more collaborative and bipartisan Congress benefits Americans through a healthier Legislative Branch, stronger checks-and-balances, and more win-win legislation in our common interests.

Keep ReadingShow less