Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Vance Makes Push To Increase Support for Trump’s Big Bill in Ohio, but Locals Remain Divided

News

Vance Makes Push To Increase Support for Trump’s Big Bill in Ohio, but Locals Remain Divided

Vice President JD Vance speaks to the Metallus workers in Canton, Ohio to speak on the Big Beautiful Bill on Monday, July 28, 2025.

Angeles Ponpa/Medill News Service

CANTON, Ohio — Vice President JD Vance returned to Ohio on Monday to promote the Trump administration’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” casting it as a path to revive local industry and reward workers.

Inside the Metallus steel plant, Vance was welcomed by local officials and workers who embraced the tax and labor provisions. Outside, critics voiced concern over cuts to health care, education, and safety-net programs.


The event showed the Trump administration's efforts to use the vice president to increase support for the bill, over which public opinion is polarized.

The vice president also used the appearance to call out Democratic Rep. Emilia Sykes, highlighting her absence and lack of support for the legislation.

Speaking to about 100 steel workers in orange and red hard hats, Vance framed the legislation as a correction to decades of economic decline.

“For 40 years, while those great American factories closed their doors, we know what went right along with them. It was great American jobs, it was great American dignity and it was great American wages,” he said. “We are going to reward American companies for investing in American companies, not foreign workers for a change.”

For Mike Reed, a steelworker at Metallus who attended the event, the message resonated.

“He’s from the Rust Belt, where businesses like ours used to thrive, and hopefully we’ll be thriving again in the near future,” Reed said. “He worked his way up from a rough start, and I think he can identify with workers here more than other politicians can.”

Stark County Commissioner Richard Regula also praised the bill’s potential to retain workers and raise wages. “It’s an incentive,” Regula said. “We need workers, we need good wages.”

He highlighted the no-tax-on-overtime provision as a key way the bill would keep laborers rooted in Northeast Ohio, a priority Vance echoed in his remarks.

“When people grow up in Northeast Ohio, they ought to have the opportunity to stay in Northeast Ohio,” Vance said. “We’re going to fix that by building things in this country again.”

Outside the plant, a few dozen people protested, questioning the bill’s deeper impacts and Vance’s true intentions for choosing a steel plant in his home state to promote it.

Laura Hollins (left) and a volunteer (right) holding up a sign painting by Hollins saying “Shame on you,” while protesting in front of the Metallus, where Vice President JD Vance gave his speech on Monday, July 28, 2025. Angeles Ponpa/Medill News Service.

“I’m here because this is an opportunity to let our vice president know that we’re really unhappy with the way things are going,” said Lorraine Wilburn, a local business owner and an administrator for Action Together Stark, a pro-Democratic political group that’s part of Indivisible.

She described the venue choice as a “slap in the face” to steelworkers who have faced years of layoffs.

“We don’t agree with losing funding for education,” said Laura Hollis, also an administrator for Action Together Stark and a local Ohioan teacher. “We don’t agree with hurting working people, hurting children, hurting the elderly, and the most vulnerable in our society.”

Hollis said she protested outside the event to show her students how to engage peacefully in civic action. “He’s not a good representation of Ohioans,” she said.

“The Big Beautiful Bill is going to harm people,” said Kevin Conner, a retired worker from Ohio. “It’s going to take health care away from thousands of Ohioans.”

He pointed specifically to the tax provisions: “The tax cuts are permanent for the 1%,” he said. “They are going to expire for the rest of us. Even the no tax on tips is going to expire.”

A recent analysis by the Bipartisan Policy Center finds the legislative package would cost about $3.4 trillion over the next decade, largely financed by cuts to Medicaid, SNAP, and student loan programs.

The bill would also extend high-income tax cuts permanently, while letting several middle- and low-income provisions be predicted to sunset after 2028.

During the event, Vance also publicly criticized Democratic Rep. Emilia Sykes, framing her absence from the event as symbolic of Democratic resistance to the bill. Sykes later told reporters in an interview that she was not invited and accused the vice president of spreading fear instead of solutions.

“I could not support a bill that's going to lead to joblessness and unemployment in my community. I can't support a bill that is going to increase energy rates up to $400 a year. I can't support a bill that's going to add $3.4 trillion to the United States' deficit,” she said.

The National Republican Congressional Committee has targeted Sykes’s seat in the upcoming midterm race for Ohio’s 13th Congressional District.

Angeles Ponpa is a graduate student at Northwestern Medill in the Politics, Policy, and Foreign Affairs specialization, and a Fulcrum summer intern.

The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists. To learn about the many NextGen initiatives we are leading, click HERE.

Please help the Fulcrum in its mission of nurturing the next generation of journalists by donating HERE!


Read More

Illustration of someone holding a strainer, and the words "fakes," "facts," "news," etc. going through it.

Trump-era misinformation has pushed American politics to a breaking point. A Truth in Politics law may be needed to save democracy.

Getty Images, SvetaZi

The Need for a Truth in Politics Law: De-Frauding American Politics

“Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last?” With those words in 1954, Army lawyer Joseph Welch took Senator Joe McCarthy to task and helped end McCarthy’s destructive un-American witch hunt. The time has come to say the same to Donald Trump and his MAGA allies and stop their vile perversion of our right to free speech.

American politics has always been rife with misleading statements and, at times, outright falsehoods. Mendacity just seems to be an ever-present aspect of politics. But with the ascendency of Trump, and especially this past year, things have taken an especially nasty turn, becoming so aggressive and incendiary as to pose a real threat to the health and well-being of our nation’s democracy.

Keep ReadingShow less
Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

Waiting for the Door to Open: Advocates and older workers are left in limbo as the administration’s decision to abandon a harsh disability rule exists only in private assurances, not public record.

AI-created animation

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

We reported in the Fulcrum on November 30th that in early November, disability advocates walked out of the West Wing, believing they had secured a rare reversal from the Trump administration of an order that stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers.

The public record has remained conspicuously quiet on the matter. No press release, no Federal Register notice, no formal statement from the White House or the Social Security Administration has confirmed what senior officials told Jason Turkish and his colleagues behind closed doors in November: that the administration would not move forward with a regulation that could have stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers. According to a memo shared by an agency official and verified by multiple sources with knowledge of the discussions, an internal meeting in early November involved key SSA decision-makers outlining the administration's intent to halt the proposal. This memo, though not publicly released, is said to detail the political and social ramifications of proceeding with the regulation, highlighting its unpopularity among constituents who would be affected by the changes.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

A memorial for Ashli Babbitt sits near the US Capitol during a Day of Remembrance and Action on the one year anniversary of the January 6, 2021 insurrection.

(John Lamparski/NurPhoto/AP)

How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

In the wake of the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, President Donald Trump quickly took up the cause of a 35-year-old veteran named Ashli Babbitt.

“Who killed Ashli Babbitt?” he asked in a one-sentence statement on July 1, 2021.

Keep ReadingShow less
Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

Supreme Court, Allen v. Milligan Illegal Congressional Voting Map

Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

A wave of redistricting battles in early 2026 is reshaping the political map ahead of the midterm elections and intensifying long‑running fights over gerrymandering and democratic representation.

In California, a three‑judge federal panel on January 15 upheld the state’s new congressional districts created under Proposition 50, ruling 2–1 that the map—expected to strengthen Democratic advantages in several competitive seats—could be used in the 2026 elections. The following day, a separate federal court dismissed a Republican lawsuit arguing that the maps were unconstitutional, clearing the way for the state’s redistricting overhaul to stand. In Virginia, Democratic lawmakers have advanced a constitutional amendment that would allow mid‑decade redistricting, a move they describe as a response to aggressive Republican map‑drawing in other states; some legislators have openly discussed the possibility of a congressional map that could yield 10 Democratic‑leaning seats out of 11. In Missouri, the secretary of state has acknowledged in court that ballot language for a referendum on the state’s congressional map could mislead voters, a key development in ongoing litigation over the fairness of the state’s redistricting process. And in Utah, a state judge has ordered a new congressional map that includes one Democratic‑leaning district after years of litigation over the legislature’s earlier plan, prompting strong objections from Republican lawmakers who argue the court exceeded its authority.

Keep ReadingShow less