Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Vance Makes Push To Increase Support for Trump’s Big Bill in Ohio, but Locals Remain Divided

News

Vance Makes Push To Increase Support for Trump’s Big Bill in Ohio, but Locals Remain Divided

Vice President JD Vance speaks to the Metallus workers in Canton, Ohio to speak on the Big Beautiful Bill on Monday, July 28, 2025.

Angeles Ponpa/Medill News Service

CANTON, Ohio — Vice President JD Vance returned to Ohio on Monday to promote the Trump administration’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” casting it as a path to revive local industry and reward workers.

Inside the Metallus steel plant, Vance was welcomed by local officials and workers who embraced the tax and labor provisions. Outside, critics voiced concern over cuts to health care, education, and safety-net programs.


The event showed the Trump administration's efforts to use the vice president to increase support for the bill, over which public opinion is polarized.

The vice president also used the appearance to call out Democratic Rep. Emilia Sykes, highlighting her absence and lack of support for the legislation.

Speaking to about 100 steel workers in orange and red hard hats, Vance framed the legislation as a correction to decades of economic decline.

“For 40 years, while those great American factories closed their doors, we know what went right along with them. It was great American jobs, it was great American dignity and it was great American wages,” he said. “We are going to reward American companies for investing in American companies, not foreign workers for a change.”

For Mike Reed, a steelworker at Metallus who attended the event, the message resonated.

“He’s from the Rust Belt, where businesses like ours used to thrive, and hopefully we’ll be thriving again in the near future,” Reed said. “He worked his way up from a rough start, and I think he can identify with workers here more than other politicians can.”

Stark County Commissioner Richard Regula also praised the bill’s potential to retain workers and raise wages. “It’s an incentive,” Regula said. “We need workers, we need good wages.”

He highlighted the no-tax-on-overtime provision as a key way the bill would keep laborers rooted in Northeast Ohio, a priority Vance echoed in his remarks.

“When people grow up in Northeast Ohio, they ought to have the opportunity to stay in Northeast Ohio,” Vance said. “We’re going to fix that by building things in this country again.”

Outside the plant, a few dozen people protested, questioning the bill’s deeper impacts and Vance’s true intentions for choosing a steel plant in his home state to promote it.

Laura Hollins (left) and a volunteer (right) holding up a sign painting by Hollins saying “Shame on you,” while protesting in front of the Metallus, where Vice President JD Vance gave his speech on Monday, July 28, 2025. Angeles Ponpa/Medill News Service.

“I’m here because this is an opportunity to let our vice president know that we’re really unhappy with the way things are going,” said Lorraine Wilburn, a local business owner and an administrator for Action Together Stark, a pro-Democratic political group that’s part of Indivisible.

She described the venue choice as a “slap in the face” to steelworkers who have faced years of layoffs.

“We don’t agree with losing funding for education,” said Laura Hollis, also an administrator for Action Together Stark and a local Ohioan teacher. “We don’t agree with hurting working people, hurting children, hurting the elderly, and the most vulnerable in our society.”

Hollis said she protested outside the event to show her students how to engage peacefully in civic action. “He’s not a good representation of Ohioans,” she said.

“The Big Beautiful Bill is going to harm people,” said Kevin Conner, a retired worker from Ohio. “It’s going to take health care away from thousands of Ohioans.”

He pointed specifically to the tax provisions: “The tax cuts are permanent for the 1%,” he said. “They are going to expire for the rest of us. Even the no tax on tips is going to expire.”

A recent analysis by the Bipartisan Policy Center finds the legislative package would cost about $3.4 trillion over the next decade, largely financed by cuts to Medicaid, SNAP, and student loan programs.

The bill would also extend high-income tax cuts permanently, while letting several middle- and low-income provisions be predicted to sunset after 2028.

During the event, Vance also publicly criticized Democratic Rep. Emilia Sykes, framing her absence from the event as symbolic of Democratic resistance to the bill. Sykes later told reporters in an interview that she was not invited and accused the vice president of spreading fear instead of solutions.

“I could not support a bill that's going to lead to joblessness and unemployment in my community. I can't support a bill that is going to increase energy rates up to $400 a year. I can't support a bill that's going to add $3.4 trillion to the United States' deficit,” she said.

The National Republican Congressional Committee has targeted Sykes’s seat in the upcoming midterm race for Ohio’s 13th Congressional District.

Angeles Ponpa is a graduate student at Northwestern Medill in the Politics, Policy, and Foreign Affairs specialization, and a Fulcrum summer intern.

The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists. To learn about the many NextGen initiatives we are leading, click HERE.

Please help the Fulcrum in its mission of nurturing the next generation of journalists by donating HERE!


Read More

A Constitutional Provision We Ignored for 150 Years

Voter registration in Wisconsin

Michael Newman

A Constitutional Provision We Ignored for 150 Years

Imagine there was a way to discourage states from passing photo voter ID laws, restricting early voting, purging voter registration rolls, or otherwise suppressing voter turnout. What if any state that did so risked losing seats in the House of Representatives?

Surprisingly, this is not merely an idle fantasy of voting rights activists, but an actual plan envisioned in Section 2 of the 14th Amendment, which was ratified in 1868 – but never enforced.

Keep ReadingShow less
People wearing vests with "ICE" and "Police" on the back.

The latest shutdown deal kept government open while exposing Congress’s reliance on procedural oversight rather than structural limits on ICE.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

A Shutdown Averted, and a Narrow Window Into Congress’s ICE Dilemma

Congress’s latest shutdown scare ended the way these episodes usually do: with a stopgap deal, a sigh of relief, and little sense that the underlying conflict had been resolved. But buried inside the agreement was a revealing maneuver. While most of the federal government received longer-term funding, the Department of Homeland Security, and especially Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), was given only a short-term extension. That asymmetry was deliberate. It preserved leverage over one of the most controversial federal agencies without triggering a prolonged shutdown, while also exposing the narrow terrain on which Congress is still willing to confront executive power. As with so many recent budget deals, the decision emerged less from open debate than from late-stage negotiations compressed into the final hours before the deadline.

How the Deal Was Framed

Democrats used the funding deadline to force a conversation about ICE’s enforcement practices, but they were careful about how that conversation was structured. Rather than reopening the far more combustible debate over immigration levels, deportation priorities, or statutory authority, they framed the dispute as one about law-enforcement standards, specifically transparency, accountability, and oversight.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pier C Park waterfront walkway and in the background the One World Trade Center on the left and the Erie-Lackawanna Railroad and Ferry Terminal Clock Tower on the right

View of the Pier C Park waterfront walkway and in the background the One World Trade Center on the left and the Erie-Lackawanna Railroad and Ferry Terminal Clock Tower on the right

Getty Images, Philippe Debled

The City Where Traffic Fatalities Vanished

A U.S. city of 60,000 people would typically see around six to eight traffic fatalities every year. But Hoboken, New Jersey? They haven’t had a single fatal crash for nine years — since January 17, 2017, to be exact.

Campaigns for seatbelts, lower speed limits and sober driving have brought national death tolls from car crashes down from a peak in the first half of the 20th century. However, many still assume some traffic deaths as an unavoidable cost of car culture.

Keep ReadingShow less
Congress Has Forgotten Its Oath — and the Nation Is Paying the Price

US Capitol

Congress Has Forgotten Its Oath — and the Nation Is Paying the Price

What has happened to the U.S. Congress? Once the anchor of American democracy, it now delivers chaos and a record of inaction that leaves millions of Americans vulnerable. A branch designed to defend the Constitution has instead drifted into paralysis — and the nation is paying the price. It must break its silence and reassert its constitutional role.

The Constitution created three coequal branches — legislative, executive, and judicial — each designed to balance and restrain the others. The Framers placed Congress first in Article I (U.S. Constitution) because they believed the people’s representatives should hold the greatest responsibility: to write laws, control spending, conduct oversight, and ensure that no president or agency escapes accountability. Congress was meant to be the branch closest to the people — the one that listens, deliberates, and acts on behalf of the nation.

Keep ReadingShow less