Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Vance Makes Push To Increase Support for Trump’s Big Bill in Ohio, but Locals Remain Divided

News

jd vance speaks in ohio

Vice President JD Vance speaks to the Metallus workers in Canton, Ohio to speak on the Big Beautiful Bill on Monday, July 28, 2025.

Angeles Ponpa/Medill News Service

CANTON, Ohio — Vice President JD Vance returned to Ohio on Monday to promote the Trump administration’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” casting it as a path to revive local industry and reward workers.

Inside the Metallus steel plant, Vance was welcomed by local officials and workers who embraced the tax and labor provisions. Outside, critics voiced concern over cuts to health care, education, and safety-net programs.


The event showed the Trump administration's efforts to use the vice president to increase support for the bill, over which public opinion is polarized.

The vice president also used the appearance to call out Democratic Rep. Emilia Sykes, highlighting her absence and lack of support for the legislation.

Speaking to about 100 steel workers in orange and red hard hats, Vance framed the legislation as a correction to decades of economic decline.

“For 40 years, while those great American factories closed their doors, we know what went right along with them. It was great American jobs, it was great American dignity and it was great American wages,” he said. “We are going to reward American companies for investing in American companies, not foreign workers for a change.”

For Mike Reed, a steelworker at Metallus who attended the event, the message resonated.

“He’s from the Rust Belt, where businesses like ours used to thrive, and hopefully we’ll be thriving again in the near future,” Reed said. “He worked his way up from a rough start, and I think he can identify with workers here more than other politicians can.”

Stark County Commissioner Richard Regula also praised the bill’s potential to retain workers and raise wages. “It’s an incentive,” Regula said. “We need workers, we need good wages.”

He highlighted the no-tax-on-overtime provision as a key way the bill would keep laborers rooted in Northeast Ohio, a priority Vance echoed in his remarks.

“When people grow up in Northeast Ohio, they ought to have the opportunity to stay in Northeast Ohio,” Vance said. “We’re going to fix that by building things in this country again.”

Outside the plant, a few dozen people protested, questioning the bill’s deeper impacts and Vance’s true intentions for choosing a steel plant in his home state to promote it.

shame on you sign Laura Hollins (left) and a volunteer (right) holding up a sign painting by Hollins saying “Shame on you,” while protesting in front of the Metallus, where Vice President JD Vance gave his speech on Monday, July 28, 2025. Angeles Ponpa/Medill News Service

“I’m here because this is an opportunity to let our vice president know that we’re really unhappy with the way things are going,” said Lorraine Wilburn, a local business owner and an administrator for Action Together Stark, a pro-Democratic political group that’s part of Indivisible.

She described the venue choice as a “slap in the face” to steelworkers who have faced years of layoffs.

“We don’t agree with losing funding for education,” said Laura Hollis, also an administrator for Action Together Stark and a local Ohioan teacher. “We don’t agree with hurting working people, hurting children, hurting the elderly, and the most vulnerable in our society.”

Hollis said she protested outside the event to show her students how to engage peacefully in civic action. “He’s not a good representation of Ohioans,” she said.

“The Big Beautiful Bill is going to harm people,” said Kevin Conner, a retired worker from Ohio. “It’s going to take health care away from thousands of Ohioans.”

He pointed specifically to the tax provisions: “The tax cuts are permanent for the 1%,” he said. “They are going to expire for the rest of us. Even the no tax on tips is going to expire.”

A recent analysis by the Bipartisan Policy Center finds the legislative package would cost about $3.4 trillion over the next decade, largely financed by cuts to Medicaid, SNAP, and student loan programs.

The bill would also extend high-income tax cuts permanently, while letting several middle- and low-income provisions be predicted to sunset after 2028.

During the event, Vance also publicly criticized Democratic Rep. Emilia Sykes, framing her absence from the event as symbolic of Democratic resistance to the bill. Sykes later told reporters in an interview that she was not invited and accused the vice president of spreading fear instead of solutions.

“I could not support a bill that's going to lead to joblessness and unemployment in my community. I can't support a bill that is going to increase energy rates up to $400 a year. I can't support a bill that's going to add $3.4 trillion to the United States' deficit,” she said.

The National Republican Congressional Committee has targeted Sykes’s seat in the upcoming midterm race for Ohio’s 13th Congressional District.


Angeles Ponpa is a graduate student at Northwestern Medill in the Politics, Policy, and Foreign Affairs specialization, and a Fulcrum summer intern.

The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists. To learn about the many NextGen initiatives we are leading, click HERE.

Please help the Fulcrum in its mission of nurturing the next generation of journalists by donating HERE!


Read More

US Capitol building
The United States Capitol building with its white dome against a blue sky

Would Congressional Term Limits Make Congress Better—or Worse?

Starting in the 1990’s, the idea of putting term limits on members of Congress became a recurring idea to reform the institution and improve democracy. The idea was born out of the theory that replacing the current crop of legislators with a new batch would produce a better Congress. More than 30 years later we now have quantitative and qualitative data showing the impact of term limits.

Twenty-one state legislatures have enacted some kind of term limit on legislators since 1990. Since then, dozens of academic studies have examined the impact on such factors as: complexity of legislation, influence of lobbyists and staff on legislative outcomes, and interactions with constituent. Here are some key findings.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand points to the word tax on a screen

Data calculations

Getty Images

Inconvenient Numbers Are a Sign the System Works

Earlier in October, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that consumer prices rose 3.7 percent over the past year, a little higher than the month before, with gasoline accounting for more than half of September's increase. Rising prices are the kind of news no incumbent politician wants weeks before an election. The report was published anyway, on schedule. That is the quiet discipline of a trustworthy statistical system. It tells us what is true even when the number is unwelcome to whoever holds power.

So, do Americans trust government data? We do. But that trust is incomplete, and it has room to grow.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Pennsylvania state capitol building.

The Pennsylvania state capitol building.

jimfeng/Getty Images

Pennsylvania’s Bipartisan Exchange Is Rebuilding Trust in Governance

The University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics has nearly 40 years of experience working with legislators from different political parties, and it is building on this history by drawing on lessons from the successful American Congressional Exchange model, begun in 2018 at the Bipartisan Policy Center, and from state exchanges now underway in Minnesota and Michigan. The University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics, in collaboration with the Bridge Alliance, has launched the Pennsylvania Legislative Exchange.

This state-based, systematic approach is designed to foster better relationships and build trust across the political aisle with the following guiding principles:

Keep ReadingShow less
An empty grocery cart in a market.

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani proposes five city-run grocery stores. See the arguments for and against, from food deserts to bodega concerns and the $70M cost.

Getty Images, Kwangmoozaa

Government-Owned Grocery Stores: Accessible Nutrition or Government Overreach?

Issue Introduction

Over the past few years, affordability has become the most central issue affecting Americans and the quality of life in the United States. The prices of groceries and basic necessities have risen 25-30% since the COVID-19 pandemic and are projected to rise another 3.2% in 2026. At the same time, the exodus of grocery chains from rural and low-income areas has scattered food deserts throughout individual states. Recent mass closures include Grocery Outlet’s shuttering of 36 stores and continued shut-downs of many Albertsons locations. These factors have led politicians to make affordability a major campaign issue.

During his progressive campaign for mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani raised the idea of opening grocery stores owned and operated by the city government to provide New Yorkers with affordable groceries. In his April 2026 public address that marked his first 100 days in office, Mayor Mamdani announced plans for the first of five city-run grocery stores. Mamdani’s proposed initiative will use $70 million in capital funding to build five city-owned municipal stores–one in each borough–and place them under control of the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). NYCEDC will then select third-party operating staff in accordance with city standards for affordability and proper labor practices. Public opinion following the announcement continues to be divided between uproar and support.

Keep ReadingShow less