Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Ukrainian Teen, U.S. Student: A Shared Fight for Stability

Opinion

Hands raised in a classroom.​
In the summer of 2025, the Trump administration’s education agenda is beginning to mirror the blueprint laid out in the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025.
Getty Images, FreshSplash

Heart-stopping: not the description that comes to mind for most high school volunteer projects. But on a Friday afternoon late last March, my role as a virtual English tutor with ENGin was exactly that.

For nearly a year, I’ve been meeting weekly over Zoom with a 14-year-old Ukrainian teenager named Max. During our sessions, we’ll chat about everything from Marvel movies to the latest football scores—he’s a die-hard Real Madrid fan—and play games like charades or "Would You Rather." But on that particular Friday, Max wasn’t online.


Worried, I checked my phone. Max had sent a rushed message: I’m not zoom there are bombs I am shelter.

Panicked, I refreshed my phone for hours, hoping for a response. Nothing. The silence was deafening. Would Max be okay? Until, finally: a text.

He was safe, for now. So was I—yet looking around my cozy dorm room, safety felt increasingly elusive.

For Max, being able to go to school every day remains a question. He’s since shared how much he struggles to pursue the limited opportunities available in his war-torn home. Once, when we were discussing goals, he shrugged and said, “My goal is to finish one normal week.” Another time, when we practiced the word routine, he joked, “My only routine is sirens.”

That week changed our dynamic. We didn’t just practice English anymore—we talked about survival, hope, and what it means to keep learning in chaos: how to stay calm during air raid sirens, where to find reliable news, what dreams still felt possible, and how to hold onto them.

As for me, I’m a Canadian who came to the U.S. for a better education. I’ve attended boarding school in Connecticut for the past two years, starting at age fifteen. While fully aware of the privilege such an opportunity represents, I was unprepared for the political fragility that increasingly defines what it means to study in America as an international student.

Recently, I’ve been questioned more at the U.S. border than ever before—where I go to school, the details of my classes, how long I plan to stay, and even why I chose to study in the U.S. instead of attending high school in Canada. The questions seem innocuous at first, but they quickly shift in tone—probing, skeptical, like I’m trying to game the system rather than pursue an education. A month ago, several of my Canadian boarding school classmates were pulled aside for intensive questioning—frightening, stressful interrogations none of us had ever experienced before. It felt like we were being treated less like students and more like suspects. I remember clutching my passport as the officer asked why I didn’t just stay in Canada, as if ambition itself were a threat.

That experience has changed me. I now think twice before planning trips home for holiday breaks—not because I don’t want to see family but because the border has become a point of anxiety, a place where the legitimacy of my goals gets put on trial.

It’s made me realize that the education and plans I’ve worked so hard for can be taken away in an instant. After years of Dean’s List-worthy academic effort, all aimed at earning a spot at a top American university, I’ve started to seriously consider Canadian schools—places I had once ruled out in hopes of a U.S. degree. I now understand that the universities of my home country offer something the U.S. no longer guarantees: stability. I never thought I’d have to choose safety over ambition. That shift has left me disappointed and angry—resentful, even—after all the sacrifices I’ve made to study abroad. For the first time, I’ve felt what it’s like to be bullied out of my potential. And in that feeling, I’ve come to better understand Max’s reality: the instability I now fear shadows his everyday. Ever since I met Max, his future has been fragile, shaped by forces entirely beyond his control.

On February 28, President Trump met with President Zelenskyy to discuss a resolution to the Russia-Ukraine war. Watching that now-famously tense meeting, I couldn’t help but feel that Zelenskyy was being bullied. He came to America to seek help for a nation under attack. Instead, he was dismissed and undermined. Taken within the context that English is not Zelenskyy’s first language, Trump’s comment“You don’t have the cards”—felt especially cruel.

Towards the end of the meeting, Zelenskyy made a comment that has stayed with me. “Everybody has problems, and even you. But you have a nice ocean and don’t feel it now. But you will feel it in the future.”

Rather than extending its self-proclaimed values of liberty, equality, and democracy, that meeting exposed the U.S. government inching closer to a Putin-style regime. It ended in contention, with Trump pulling all U.S. funding from Ukraine. This is a profound mistake that sends a dangerous signal to the world. Worse yet, Trump again falsely blamed Zelenskyy for starting the war, including dangerous pro-Russian rhetoric—“You don't start a war against someone 20 times your size and then hope that people give you some missiles”—as if Ukrainians had sought out invasion.

In May, Russian forces intensified attacks on Kharkiv and Odesa, while Ukraine’s eastern counteroffensive stalled amid reduced U.S. aid. Aid groups have reported record shortages in food and medical supplies. Meanwhile, more lives are senselessly lost—not only to bombs and bullets but to the absence of clear, principled diplomacy. By cutting aid, withdrawing from negotiations, and signaling unpredictability to both allies and adversaries, the U.S. is no longer the stabilizing force it once claimed to be. Its retreat leaves allies like Ukraine exposed and emboldens authoritarian regimes that thrive on chaos. Each diplomatic silence, each broken promise, accelerates the slide toward a wider, deadlier conflict.

What strikes me is that this erosion of stability isn't limited to the battlefield. It mirrors what’s happening between Canada and the U.S.

Already, the global ripple effects are undeniable. In mid-March, the S&P 500 dropped nearly eight percent. Germany passed a historic defense spending package. Earlier this month, Russia launched its largest drone and missile attack of the war—nearly 500 projectiles hit cities like Kyiv and Odesa, damaging hospitals and heritage sites. Ukraine struck back with a covert drone campaign inside Russia, and ground offensives have escalated in Sumy and Dnipropetrovsk. As the war intensifies and peace grows even more distant, markets remain volatile, allies more cautious, and my own country of Canada continues its search for more stable trade partners. Trust in America’s protective capacity is eroding.

While, thankfully, military conflict between the U.S. and Canada doesn’t extend beyond Trump’s threats of invasion—he even floated the idea of “annexing” Canada as a 51st state and pressuring it with tariffs to that end—it's hard not to notice the parallel erosion of stability. Like Ukraine, Canada is watching long‑standing international norms dissolve. Internationally recognized promises once taken for granted are being rolled back, fraying protective, peace‑promoting alliances.

And let’s be clear: Canada’s southern border was already less safe due to American neglect. More drugs flow into Canada from the U.S., including meth, cocaine, and fentanyl, than the reverse, which is a minuscule 0.2%. The same goes for illicit firearms. If border issues are truly Trump's concern, it’s the responsibility of the U.S.—not Canada—to protect their border from illegal items entering the country.

Back home, America’s shifting loyalties have been a significant blow. Canadians once viewed the U.S. as a trusted partner, yet the federal government has issued caution for Canadian travelers to the United States. And on April 15, the Canadian Association of University Teachers warned Canadian academics against Stateside travel. Trump’s comments about Canada—calling us “the 51st state” or referring to our federal prime minister as “Governor”—are not just insulting, they’re ominous.

This rhetoric sets the stage for a darker future. I fear the U.S. is preparing for a slow economic war against its closest allies that will remake the current world order. These policies may yield short-term material wins, but the long-term global consequences will be devastating.

Russia, China, Iran—the new “Axis of Upheaval”—are the players set to gain from such disruption. With each new tariff, another move is made in this high-stakes game with our global stability. And America holds the dice.

Trump—along with his unelected, now explosively dismissed, associate Elon Musk—treats everything, including humanitarian crises, like business transactions. Allegedly, Trump pushed Zelenskyy to sign a $500 million mineral deal in exchange for security. That kind of bargaining reveals the true cost of appeasement: it turns lives into leverage.

Preventing a violent dictatorship shouldn’t be a matter of profit margins or resource deals. It’s about protecting real people—like Max—whose futures are being dismantled by war. It’s about defending the right to learn, to grow, and to dream without fear.

That’s why I started tutoring Max: to do my small part to remedy the tragedy he has to endure in his most formative years. From threats to his education to his physical safety, this war will mark his entire future. And lately, I’ve found myself wondering: what kind of future will I have—as a Canadian, as an international student—if borders grow hostile and institutions more unstable? I’ve always assumed I belonged in North America: I speak English fluently, attend a well-known boarding school, carry a “friendly” passport, and come from a close ally. Even with all that, I now find myself questioning my stability. If I feel displaced by uncertainty, how much more destabilizing must it be for Max? The greed of a few has forever altered his opportunity to learn and thrive. It’s disheartening, unfair, and demoralizing. But I also know that one weekly hour of practicing English together can open doors to opportunities outside of Ukraine.

The U.S. has been lucky to avoid internal conflict for generations, but that comfort has turned into complacency. Now is the time for Americans to reject greed and isolation, restore trust with their closest allies, and recommit to the values that once made their country a beacon of hope—not only within its borders but against any threat to those ideals abroad, from Ukraine and beyond.

Because if liberal values like peace, freedom, and safety—values America claims to uphold around the world—are not protected, it’s only a matter of time before a crisis comes to our North American shores and Zelenskyy’s prophecy is proven true.

If conflict crosses the ocean, what will you do?


Lexi Kert is a rising senior at Choate Rosemary Hall in Wallingford, Connecticut.

Read More

Voter receives a pen from poll worker at polling station.

A civic petition calling for constitutional restraint, civil discourse, bipartisan cooperation, and equal justice to strengthen American democracy and national unity.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

A Contemporary Olive Branch Petition

To the President of the United States, the Leaders of the Congress, and Our Fellow Americans Entrusted with the Powers of Government:

When, in the ordinary course of a free republic, disagreements arise among citizens concerning the proper exercise of power, it is neither unusual nor dishonorable that earnest convictions should differ. Such diversity has long been the strength of our nation, for liberty has never depended upon unanimity of opinion, but upon mutual respect under a common Constitution.

Keep ReadingShow less
Close-up shot of a Black woman's hands receiving a mail-in ballot to vote in a USA Presidential, Senatorial, Congressional, or local election

Federal investigators spent eight months reviewing the Allied Pilots Association election, examining ballot secrecy, observer rights, election records and transparency before allowing the results to stand.

Jeremy Poland/Getty Images

What a Federal Investigation of a Union Election Can Teach Us About Democratic Trust

For eight months, federal investigators examined allegations involving ballot secrecy, observer rights, election records and reporting procedures in a contested union election before allowing the result to stand.

Following a disputed election within the Allied Pilots Association (APA), complaints led to a formal review by the U.S. Department of Labor's Office of Labor-Management Standards. Investigators spent months going through election records, audit logs, witness testimony and technical documentation before reaching their conclusion.

Keep ReadingShow less
50501 Movement – Thomas Paine’s Political Philosophy in the 21st Century

circa 1770: The English-born American revolutionary philosopher Thomas Paine, (1737 - 1809), who wrote and published 'The Rights of Man', (1791 - 1792), in England. In it he expressed his support for the French Revolution and called for the overthrow of the British monarchy.

(Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

50501 Movement – Thomas Paine’s Political Philosophy in the 21st Century

The 50501 Movement can be viewed as a 21st-century manifestation of the anti-authoritarian, pro-egalitarian framework that Thomas Paine championed in Common Sense. Both movements share a core belief in challenging entrenched power and mobilizing the collective voice of everyday people to defend democracy. By utilizing decentralized, nationwide grassroots mobilization to challenge executive overreach and billionaire consolidation, the 50501 movement directly echoes Paine’s anti-authoritarianism, his belief in collective civic power, and his demand that power remains in the hands of the people.

The 50501 Movement mirrors the spirit of Paine’s Common Sense through three primary parallels:

Keep ReadingShow less
  Creative Images & Video Creative Images & Video Images Creative Editorial Video Creative Editorial  Search by image or video I Voted Today paper sticker on mans finger on rustic wooden table

How class, identity, and political recognition shaped the Democratic Party's relationship with rural white working-class voters over two decades.

BackyardProduction/Getty Images

The Thousand Injuries: The Not-Qwhite Voter and the Politics of Recognition

In the fall of 2003, Howard Dean said he wanted to be the candidate for guys with Confederate flags in the back windows of their pickup trucks. It was clumsy but not dishonest. He meant that his party had written off a whole category of American voter and wanted to change that. He was attacked at once, mostly by his own side, and walked it back within forty-eight hours. The lesson his party drew was not that the outreach had been badly phrased; It was that the outreach itself was impermissible, that to pursue the rural white working class voter was to be complicit with everything he was presumed to represent. Dean was the last major Democrat to try, and the consequences have accumulated in the shape of the electoral map.

Edgar Allan Poe understood something the party still does not. "The Cask of Amontillado" opens with a line that ought to hang in every campaign office: the thousand injuries of Fortunato the narrator had borne as best he could, but when Fortunato ventured upon insult, he vowed revenge. Injuries can be borne as long as the injured man believes his tormentors still regard his suffering as real. The insult is different. It reframes the injuries as deserved, telling the sufferer he is the kind of person who deserves to suffer. Poe's narrator does not recalculate his interests; he takes his revenge at great cost to himself. That is not irrational but human, and it is the most precise framework we have for what has happened to rural white working-class voters over the last twenty years.

Keep ReadingShow less