Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Support for International Students’ Mental Health Fails As Federal Visa Revocations Rise

News

Support for International Students’ Mental Health Fails As Federal Visa Revocations Rise

holding hands

The University of Washington’s international student population is raising concerns about the lack of mental health support provided to them by International Student Services, particularly in the context of visa revocations.

“I've personally sacrificed so much to get to UW,” first-year Kaira Wullur said. “I know my parents have also sacrificed so much. It is super draining to think that what I've been working towards could be stripped away from people who don't even know who I am.”


The concerns first arose following President Donald Trump's administration’s declaration to terminate the visas of foreign students. The decision was met with fierce opposition from courts nationwide, which issued restraining orders to protect international students in the United States. While the visas have since been reinstated, the unsettling feeling of uncertainty among University of Washington students remains.

“Before coming here, my parents warned me,” Wullur, originally from Jakarta, Indonesia, said. “I always kind of like shot them down, like, oh, it's going to be fine as long as I'm studying. But obviously that changed a month or two ago, where even people who haven't necessarily done anything bad have had their visas revoked. So, definitely comfort levels right now are not good.”

While Wullur acknowledges that UW’s International Student Services does its best to keep students updated through a weekly newsletter, she believes their services could extend further, specifically through counseling with an assigned advisor.

“I think what helped me a lot in the fall academically was having an advisor because every student kind of gets their own advisor and you know them by name,” Wullur said. “But because the International Student Services is like an organization, they don't necessarily have a personal connection to you. You don't get a [specific] International Student Services advisor. I think that should be introduced at the beginning of the year to all international students going to UW.”

Establishing a sound relationship with an advisor who understands the unique situations international students face is vital in creating a welcoming environment. Through personal connection and extensive knowledge of international student life, more students will come to advisors when they know all aspects of their experience are understood.

“If we're going to talk about how this whole situation, this thing [that is] draining and taxing to our mental health, we wouldn't want to talk about it to somebody who just met us on that day,” Wullur said.

According to a study at Purdue University in 2021, roughly 50% of international students screen positive for major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, an eating disorder, non-suicidal self-injury, or suicidal ideation. Their study also states that international students are significantly less likely to seek out help or assistance from mental health services compared to domestic students.

By installing a more accessible path to mental health therapy and medication services, Wullur believes international students will be more likely to utilize them, resulting in a 50% decrease.

“I didn't have anybody to talk to about this because I'm not friends with a lot of international students,” Wullur said. “Most of my friends are, if not in state, out of state, and definitely not out of the country. So I don't think their support was sufficient in regards to mental health.”

International students’ mental health is just one part of a mental health crisis spreading across college campuses nationwide. By catering to their specific needs, the University of Washington’s large international student population will grow not only in strength but in numbers.

Unfortunately, the university is facing significant budget cuts, and introducing a new program with a multitude of new faculty members may not be the ideal solution. Instead, a solution can be found in expanding the counseling center with the addition of a few counselors who specialize in the intricacies of non-domestic student life.

The University of Washington’s mental wellbeing website already has a statement that reads: “To our international students: We see you, we support you. We know these times can feel overwhelming and uncertain. You’re not alone—if you need someone to talk to, we’re here for you. Don’t hesitate to reach out. #YouBelongHere #MentalHealthMatters #InternationalStudents #uwcounseling”.

A branch of UW’s counseling dedicated to the international students that make up 16.2% of its student body would join many other campuses nationwide with programs similar, such as American University, Tufts University, and the University of California, Los Angeles, all of which have a smaller population of international students than UW.

“During all of it, I would have a really hard time enjoying myself at UW,” Wullur said. “I knew that at any point, that could be taken away from me without any valid reason, and I wouldn't even have the power to do anything about it. I feel helpless, and I know it can’t be solved, but it can be mitigated in some way.”

Laney Jordan is a third-year Journalism and Public Interest Communications student at the University of Washington.

Laney was a student in Hugo Balta‘s solutions journalism class at UW. Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum. He leads Fulcrum's NextGen initiatives. Balta is also the publisher of the Latino News Network and an accredited Solutions Journalism as well as a Complicating the Narratives trainer with the Solutions Journalism Network.

The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists.

Please help the Fulcrum's NextGen initiatives by donating HERE!


Read More

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

Waiting for the Door to Open: Advocates and older workers are left in limbo as the administration’s decision to abandon a harsh disability rule exists only in private assurances, not public record.

AI-created animation

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

We reported in the Fulcrum on November 30th that in early November, disability advocates walked out of the West Wing, believing they had secured a rare reversal from the Trump administration of an order that stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers.

The public record has remained conspicuously quiet on the matter. No press release, no Federal Register notice, no formal statement from the White House or the Social Security Administration has confirmed what senior officials told Jason Turkish and his colleagues behind closed doors in November: that the administration would not move forward with a regulation that could have stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers. According to a memo shared by an agency official and verified by multiple sources with knowledge of the discussions, an internal meeting in early November involved key SSA decision-makers outlining the administration's intent to halt the proposal. This memo, though not publicly released, is said to detail the political and social ramifications of proceeding with the regulation, highlighting its unpopularity among constituents who would be affected by the changes.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

A memorial for Ashli Babbitt sits near the US Capitol during a Day of Remembrance and Action on the one year anniversary of the January 6, 2021 insurrection.

(John Lamparski/NurPhoto/AP)

How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

In the wake of the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, President Donald Trump quickly took up the cause of a 35-year-old veteran named Ashli Babbitt.

“Who killed Ashli Babbitt?” he asked in a one-sentence statement on July 1, 2021.

Keep ReadingShow less
Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

Supreme Court, Allen v. Milligan Illegal Congressional Voting Map

Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

A wave of redistricting battles in early 2026 is reshaping the political map ahead of the midterm elections and intensifying long‑running fights over gerrymandering and democratic representation.

In California, a three‑judge federal panel on January 15 upheld the state’s new congressional districts created under Proposition 50, ruling 2–1 that the map—expected to strengthen Democratic advantages in several competitive seats—could be used in the 2026 elections. The following day, a separate federal court dismissed a Republican lawsuit arguing that the maps were unconstitutional, clearing the way for the state’s redistricting overhaul to stand. In Virginia, Democratic lawmakers have advanced a constitutional amendment that would allow mid‑decade redistricting, a move they describe as a response to aggressive Republican map‑drawing in other states; some legislators have openly discussed the possibility of a congressional map that could yield 10 Democratic‑leaning seats out of 11. In Missouri, the secretary of state has acknowledged in court that ballot language for a referendum on the state’s congressional map could mislead voters, a key development in ongoing litigation over the fairness of the state’s redistricting process. And in Utah, a state judge has ordered a new congressional map that includes one Democratic‑leaning district after years of litigation over the legislature’s earlier plan, prompting strong objections from Republican lawmakers who argue the court exceeded its authority.

Keep ReadingShow less
New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) (L) and Rep. August Pfluger (R-TX) lead a group of fellow Republicans through Statuary Hall on the way to a news conference on the 28th day of the federal government shutdown at the U.S. Capitol on October 28, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Chip Somodevilla

New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Every January 1st, many Americans face their failings and resolve to do better by making New Year’s Resolutions. Wouldn’t it be delightful if Congress would do the same? According to Gallup, half of all Americans currently have very little confidence in Congress. And while confidence in our government institutions is shrinking across the board, Congress is near rock bottom. With that in mind, here is a list of resolutions Congress could make and keep, which would help to rebuild public trust in Congress and our government institutions. Let’s start with:

1 – Working for the American people. We elect our senators and representatives to work on our behalf – not on their behalf or on behalf of the wealthiest donors, but on our behalf. There are many issues on which a large majority of Americans agree but Congress can’t. Congress should resolve to address those issues.

Keep ReadingShow less