Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Trump’s Immigration Crackdown Spurs Brain Drain of International Talent

News

Trump’s Immigration Crackdown Spurs Brain Drain of International Talent

Close up of american visa label in passport.

Getty Images/Alexander W. Helin

This article is part of a short series examining the Trump administration’s impact on international students in American higher education. This is the second and final installment of the series, which is focused on F1 student visa-to-citizenship pipelines.

The first part of the series, entitled “ Legal Battles Continue for International Students With Pro-Palestinian Views,” was about ongoing litigation against the Trump administration for ideological deportations in higher education.


One of the main reasons a Northwestern Chinese international student came to the U.S. for his Ph.D. after being admitted to universities in several countries was that he thought “the U.S. is the most powerful country in the world, and they probably had the most advanced technology.” He was originally planning to look for a job in the U.S. after finishing his Ph.D. The Ph.D. student is being kept anonymous for fear of retaliation against his legal status for speaking out.

“This kind of chaos has made me not only confused, but also very concerned about the future of staying in the U.S.,” he said. “Because if they can't justify their actions, it is intuitive to think they can do whatever they want to international students. This visa revocation thing, it really changed my career planning in the future.”

He said that while considering leaving the U.S., he’s open to moving to other countries besides China after finishing his Ph.D. here. In a recent poll from Nature, 255 of 340 Ph.D. student respondents said the disruptions to scientific research and funding by the Trump administration prompted them to consider leaving the U.S.

“I just came here to join the lab and to do the research I want to do,” he said.

Sarah Spreitzer from the American Council on Education said she worries that the instability surrounding immigration will make the U.S. less competitive for international students, propelling a brain drain.

“We've not only seen efforts to try to recruit international students who may be worried about studying in the U.S., but we have also seen efforts from various countries in recruiting scientists who previously may have been working in the United States,” Spreitzer said. “That's not only our domestic scientists, but also our international people.”

The American higher education system — lauded internationally for its STEM and Humanities research, innovation and advancement of technology and culture, and diverse student bodies — has offered a viable pathway to U.S. citizenship for international students through the F1 visa since the 1950s.

However, the Trump administration’s recent visa revocations and subsequent restorations, as well as its sweeping deportation agenda, have forced many international students to rethink their post-graduate plans for employment and consider other countries to start their careers.

According to Pew Research, the U.S. has long hosted the world’s largest share of international students and set its own record for the highest number of international students, at 1.1 million in November 2024, according to the Institute for International Education.

The most common pathway for international students to stay in the U.S. after their collegiate tenure is to transition from an F1 student visa to the H-1B work visa or to the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program, which allows the holder to continue residing in the U.S. on the condition of employment. According to Pew Research, between 2004-2016, the U.S. offered almost 1.5 million OPT work authorizations and 1.5 million H-1B work authorizations.

The latest advancements in technology and equipment, as well as research opportunities, are two reasons international students choose to study abroad in the U.S. Professor Anthony Hernandez at the Educational Policy Studies Department at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, said one of his international students shared with him how scarce research opportunities were becoming.

“One of my students shared with me yesterday that students who are in graduate programs, who are international students, who are in postdocs, are seeing the money dry up and the opportunities dry up,” he said. “My students are hard-working and tremendous at this place. You really have to be a top student to be here.”

Hernandez added that the Trump administration’s visa revocations were part of a broader attack on the diversity of college campuses.

“They are intentionally attacking diversity, and then who can be seen as part of the American identity,” he said. “Imagine all of their hopes and dreams as young international students coming to this place, but with this type of project being weaponized to exclude students from international backgrounds, it would render invisible their experiences and try to portray a particular American profile that is not reflective of them.”

The Ph.D. international student from Northwestern cited the diversity of American universities as one of his primary reasons for choosing the U.S. for his studies.

“I've always seen the U.S. as a very diverse country, as a country with a very diverse people, which is what I want, just to interact with different people and to experience different cultures,” he said. “Most people I met, even I would say, all of the people I met, they are super friendly and they are super inclusive. I have had a very great time talking with them and working with them, but I also understand that the country itself is shifting a little bit toward not very friendly to foreign nationals.”

Another Chinese international student from Northwestern said she saw a lot of unverified information on Red Note—a Chinese social media platform that has gained traction as a TikTok alternative in the U.S.—about the Trump administration’s F1 visa revocations. She shared how one post alleged that a domestic dispute between a woman and her boyfriend, in which the police were called but no charges were filed, led to a visa revocation.

The international student is being kept anonymous for fear of retaliation against her legal status for speaking out.

Such posts, combined with the lack of transparency around why international students’ visas were being revoked, led to many taking measures such as reducing their social media presence or not discussing political opinions in public settings or platforms. Others felt such measures defeated the purpose of studying abroad.

“I feel like if I have to do so many extra things, then why did I come here in the first place. At least back home, I know where everyone stands,” she said. “I'm not going to change my views, or change how I talk about things to people I trust just because there's this sword over my head.”

In April, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced it would begin monitoring visa and green card holders’ social media and screening them for national security threats and antisemitism. Some Democrats have been concerned with how the Trump administration has weaponized antisemitism against critics of the state of Israel, particularly against college students participating in protests like Mahmoud Khalil and Leqaa Kordia from Columbia University.

“EVERYONE should be on notice. If you’re a guest in our country – act like it. Our robust social media vetting program to identify national security & public safety risks never stops,” USCIS tweeted on April 29.

Most university student governments have a representative for the international student community. These international student representatives, who personally navigate the uncertainty around student visas while simultaneously representing other international students, have come under the spotlight as their campus constituents face unprecedented challenges.

Student leaders at the UC quickly pushed for remote learning opportunities for impacted students. As part of their advocacy, they called for timely disclosures of Immigration and Customs Enforcement's presence on University of California campuses.

“It's like an obligation in the student perspective, to stand up for times where these kinds of crackdowns happen and times students feel like they're being or honestly are being threatened,” an international student representative from the University of California said. She is being kept anonymous for fear of retaliation against his legal status for speaking out.

Atmika Iyer is a graduate student in Northwestern Medill’s Politics, Policy, and Foreign Affairs reporting program. Atmika is also a journalism intern with the Fulcrum.

The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists. Learn how by clicking HERE.


Read More

NRF Moves to Defend Utah’s Fair Map Against Gerrymandering Lawsuit

USA Election Collage With The State Map Of Utah.

Getty Images

NRF Moves to Defend Utah’s Fair Map Against Gerrymandering Lawsuit

On Wednesday, February 11, the National Redistricting Foundation (NRF) asked a federal court to join a newly filed lawsuit to protect Utah’s new, fair congressional map and defend our system of checks and balances.

The NRF is a non‑profit foundation whose mission is to dismantle unfair electoral maps and create a redistricting system grounded in democratic values. By helping to create more just and representative electoral districts across the country, the organization aims to restore the public’s faith in a true representative democracy.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Constitutional Provision We Ignored for 150 Years

Voter registration in Wisconsin

Michael Newman

A Constitutional Provision We Ignored for 150 Years

Imagine there was a way to discourage states from passing photo voter ID laws, restricting early voting, purging voter registration rolls, or otherwise suppressing voter turnout. What if any state that did so risked losing seats in the House of Representatives?

Surprisingly, this is not merely an idle fantasy of voting rights activists, but an actual plan envisioned in Section 2 of the 14th Amendment, which was ratified in 1868 – but never enforced.

Keep ReadingShow less
People wearing vests with "ICE" and "Police" on the back.

The latest shutdown deal kept government open while exposing Congress’s reliance on procedural oversight rather than structural limits on ICE.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

A Shutdown Averted, and a Narrow Window Into Congress’s ICE Dilemma

Congress’s latest shutdown scare ended the way these episodes usually do: with a stopgap deal, a sigh of relief, and little sense that the underlying conflict had been resolved. But buried inside the agreement was a revealing maneuver. While most of the federal government received longer-term funding, the Department of Homeland Security, and especially Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), was given only a short-term extension. That asymmetry was deliberate. It preserved leverage over one of the most controversial federal agencies without triggering a prolonged shutdown, while also exposing the narrow terrain on which Congress is still willing to confront executive power. As with so many recent budget deals, the decision emerged less from open debate than from late-stage negotiations compressed into the final hours before the deadline.

How the Deal Was Framed

Democrats used the funding deadline to force a conversation about ICE’s enforcement practices, but they were careful about how that conversation was structured. Rather than reopening the far more combustible debate over immigration levels, deportation priorities, or statutory authority, they framed the dispute as one about law-enforcement standards, specifically transparency, accountability, and oversight.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pier C Park waterfront walkway and in the background the One World Trade Center on the left and the Erie-Lackawanna Railroad and Ferry Terminal Clock Tower on the right

View of the Pier C Park waterfront walkway and in the background the One World Trade Center on the left and the Erie-Lackawanna Railroad and Ferry Terminal Clock Tower on the right

Getty Images, Philippe Debled

The City Where Traffic Fatalities Vanished

A U.S. city of 60,000 people would typically see around six to eight traffic fatalities every year. But Hoboken, New Jersey? They haven’t had a single fatal crash for nine years — since January 17, 2017, to be exact.

Campaigns for seatbelts, lower speed limits and sober driving have brought national death tolls from car crashes down from a peak in the first half of the 20th century. However, many still assume some traffic deaths as an unavoidable cost of car culture.

Keep ReadingShow less