Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Colleges Are Under Siege—Defending Them Is Defending Democracy

Opinion

college graudation cap on a pile of money
Michael Burrell/Getty Images

Critical perspectives and inconvenient facts are anathema to would-be autocrats. So, it’s no surprise that President Donald Trump has again placed fact-finders – journalists, inspectors general, nonpartisan governmental data-generating agencies, and the like – squarely in his crosshairs. Make no mistake, truth is out of favor at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

If that were not enough, Trump has launched a vicious campaign to undermine another locus of independent research and critical thought: our colleges and universities. He has promised to "reclaim"them from their “Marxist maniac … and lunatic …” leaders. It’s a familiar pattern. Historically, educational institutions and their faculties appear among the first targets of authoritarian regimes. As do the "dangerous" books scholars write and study with their students.


Trump’s current assault on higher ed comes from many directions.

Indiscriminate funding cuts to the NIH, other agencies, and now to universities themselves have already jeopardized thousands of medical and scientific research programs, both threatening public health and impeding discoveries. Trump wants to abolish the Department of Education altogether, without demonstrating awareness of what it does for millions of students. His Secretary of Education laid off “nearly 50 percent” of DOE staff, eviscerating her department and crippling its data-collection capacity. Before it disappears, however, Trump’s DOE issued a "Dear Colleague" letter to all colleges and universities prohibiting even the discussion of a broad set of ideas relating to race and other “DEI” topics – an obvious assault on academic freedom. Now the DOE is investigating more than 50 universities for “DEI violations.”

In lockstep with radical-right allies such as Christopher Rufo et al., Trump has proposed changing accrediting agencies and standards to “promote conservative values and [allow] state governments to take on the role of accreditors.” In Florida and Hungary, we’ve seen where this leads. More recently, the arrest by I.C.E. of Columbia grad student Mahmoud Khalil, over his prominent role in last year’s protests, sends a clear warning message to international students: Free speech is still permitted – provided it aligns with Trumpian perspectives.

Colleges and universities make an inviting scapegoat for populist resentment. They already face an array of vexing issues: from public perceptions that they "push political agendas"to fostering an intellectually free and open campus in an age of social media, political hyper-polarization, and grievance. Substantial investments in financial aid at almost every school across the country have not alleviated the perception – and in some cases the reality – that high tuition “sticker prices” still present barriers to many poor and working-class students. The intransigence of these and other daunting problems helps explain why the average tenure of a college or university president has slipped below six years.

However, we must not allow these formidable challenges to mask the crucial role colleges and universities play in our politics. Our nation’s founders understood the necessary function of education—from public schools to colleges—in “keeping” our republic. Today, colleges and universities also safeguard "America's national security and competitiveness."More than ever, U.S. higher education represents a public good that we fail to preserve at our peril.

So, what is to be done?

First, higher education leaders, trustees, alumni, faculty members, and students need to partner with commentators, journalists, and sympathetic politicians to oppose attacks on higher education's autonomy as part of resisting the broader assault on information. Administrators and faculty members alike must model the type of rigorous exchange of ideas that has always been a hallmark of human progress.

Second, college and university presidents must defy political pressures to abandon their institutions’ fundamental values of truth-seeking, knowledge-building, and critical thinking. They must articulate and fearlessly defend those principles on every possible occasion. The instinct to remain silent will not serve.

Third, we must champion higher education’s often-underappreciated role in generating, preserving, and publicizing research-based data, which is essential to informed public debate, especially now that such information is vanishing from government sites.

Fourth, we must support the besieged humanities – history, political theory, philosophy, literature, etc. – which develop the knowledge, conceptual tool-kits, and critical capacities that empower citizens to understand and, as is their right, alter political trends.

Lastly, we must understand that undermining higher education’s economic foundations makes expanding access for students with limited financial means impossible. Indeed, it poses an existential threat to countless colleges and universities. They cannot support democracy if they cease to exist.

George Orwell’s iconic novel “ 1984 ” dramatized how impoverished language prevents citizens from opposing a totalitarian political regime. Accordingly, college and university scholars must fight censorship, continue to develop diagnostic concepts such as “ state capture ” and call out politicians who twist phrases like “weaponization of government” to partisan purposes. Words matter in a democracy.

Despite its challenges, our system of higher education is respected worldwide and elevates the lives of countless students every year. For their sake and that of our troubled republic, we must preserve and protect this national resource against the clear and present danger it confronts.

Now … before it’s too late.

Philip A. Glotzbach, a nationally recognized figure in higher education, is president emeritus of Skidmore.







About the Author

Philip A. Glotzbach is president emeritus of Skidmore College, where he served for seventeen years. His recent book, “Embrace Your Freedom: Winning Strategies to Succeed in College and in Life,” offers guidance to college students, and their parents, in these chaotic times.

www.philipglotzbach.com


Read More

A male senior stands in the shadow of a Social Security card with bite missing.

Social Security faces automatic cuts in 2032 and Medicare in 2033. New polling suggests that gives Democrats a powerful election issue. Here’s the case.

DNY59 / Getty Images

Will the Debt Crisis Engineered by Republicans Succeed in Cutting Social Security and Medicare?

Overview

The Republican Party’s long game to reduce administrative state entitlement spending centers on creating a debt crisis to provide an excuse for limiting such spending. It may soon pay off. That strategy involved a quarter-century of engineered tax cuts responsible for the stunning rise in sovereign U.S. debt, threatening an eventual economic crisis.

Social Security benefits are projected under current law to be automatically cut in 2032. And Medicare benefits are projected to be automatically cut in 2033. Congressional Republicans intend for those automatic cuts to occur, opposing new taxes to prevent cuts. And they are using the ballooning national debt as an excuse to also oppose new general revenue spending to prevent benefit cuts.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) and U.S. President Donald Trump followed by Chinese first lady Peng Liyuan and U.S. first lady Melania Trump arrive for a state dinner at the White House.

Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) and U.S. President Donald Trump followed by Chinese first lady Peng Liyuan and U.S. first lady Melania Trump arrive for a state dinner in the East Room of the White House on September 24, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

When Leaders Disagree, Ceremony Plays an Important Role

When Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived at the White House on 24 September, the U.S. welcomed him with an elaborate display of ceremony. The Army Herald Trumpets sounded a fanfare, the Chinese and American national anthems were played, and the Old Guard Fife and Drum Corps performed. A military review was followed by a flyover involving a B-2 bomber and four F-22 fighter jets, according to the White House. It was an extraordinary production for two countries that still disagree on some of the most important issues in international politics.

Talks between President Donald Trump and Xi touched on trade, artificial intelligence and Taiwan. The visit was marked by warm words and some signs of cooperation, but it did not erase the fundamental competition between the United States and China. So why was all this ceremony staged? It is tempting to dismiss political pomp as mere window dressing: an expensive historical relic surrounding the serious business taking place behind closed doors. As a music historian, however, I think this misunderstands what ceremony does. Ceremony can become particularly valuable when words alone are not enough.

Keep ReadingShow less
Americans Voting in an Election

Americans Voting in an Election

Getty Images

Voting Is Not Just a Privilege It Is Every Citizens’ Responsibility

Despite the consistent determinations that US elections are secure across the country and there is virtually no evidence of non-citizens voting, in reports released as recently as September 2026; President Trump has doubled down on his claims that voter fraud is a major problem in America and on October 20th, he announced a new $25 Million Fraud Whistleblower program to be administered by the Department of Justice.

This announcement achieves a variety of the president’s goals: (i) It intentionally perpetuates the misinformation, that voter fraud is a serious problem in the United States; (ii) it undermines the trust in the voting systems, as well as in the states administering the elections; (iii) it fosters distrust amongst neighbors, who are more likely to suspect people of color and report them for a reward. This has the concomitant benefit of (iv) intimidating people who are in fear of going to the polls and (v) It gives the illusion that the federal government is prepared to give away more free money (along with the Tariff rebate checks, the Trump Accounts, the DOGE dividend, the direct payments for healthcare and the $5,000 for supporting GOP midterm candidates.)

Keep ReadingShow less
Capitol building with American flag behind it

Political Polarization and Extremism

Getty Images

Both Parties Have Forgotten How to Lose: It’s Time for Guardrails

On November 3 Americans vote in the midterm elections, and the most important question may be whether the losers accept the result. A Pew survey this summer found that just 55 percent of Americans are confident the midterms will be run fairly and accurately, down from 64 percent in 2022. The partisan detail is more revealing. Since 2024, Republican confidence has risen and Democratic confidence has fallen from 77 percent to 58 percent. Trust in the referee now depends on who holds power.

Democracy rests on a kind of sportsmanship agreement. The theologian Reinhold Niebuhr put it well: man’s capacity for justice makes democracy possible, but his inclination to injustice makes it necessary. B. R. Ambedkar, the chief architect of India’s constitution, called democracy a method of bringing revolutionary change without bloodshed. Both understood that the system works only if the losing side agrees to try again next time instead of burning down the field. Americans in both parties are forgetting how to do that.

Keep ReadingShow less