Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Colleges Are Under Siege—Defending Them Is Defending Democracy

college graudation cap on a pile of money
Michael Burrell/Getty Images

Critical perspectives and inconvenient facts are anathema to would-be autocrats. So, it’s no surprise that President Donald Trump has again placed fact-finders – journalists, inspectors general, nonpartisan governmental data-generating agencies, and the like – squarely in his crosshairs. Make no mistake, truth is out of favor at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

If that were not enough, Trump has launched a vicious campaign to undermine another locus of independent research and critical thought: our colleges and universities. He has promised to "reclaim"them from their “Marxist maniac … and lunatic …” leaders. It’s a familiar pattern. Historically, educational institutions and their faculties appear among the first targets of authoritarian regimes. As do the "dangerous" books scholars write and study with their students.


Trump’s current assault on higher ed comes from many directions.

Indiscriminate funding cuts to the NIH, other agencies, and now to universities themselves have already jeopardized thousands of medical and scientific research programs, both threatening public health and impeding discoveries. Trump wants to abolish the Department of Education altogether, without demonstrating awareness of what it does for millions of students. His Secretary of Education laid off “nearly 50 percent” of DOE staff, eviscerating her department and crippling its data-collection capacity. Before it disappears, however, Trump’s DOE issued a "Dear Colleague" letter to all colleges and universities prohibiting even the discussion of a broad set of ideas relating to race and other “DEI” topics – an obvious assault on academic freedom. Now the DOE is investigating more than 50 universities for “DEI violations.”

In lockstep with radical-right allies such as Christopher Rufo et al., Trump has proposed changing accrediting agencies and standards to “promote conservative values and [allow] state governments to take on the role of accreditors.” In Florida and Hungary, we’ve seen where this leads. More recently, the arrest by I.C.E. of Columbia grad student Mahmoud Khalil, over his prominent role in last year’s protests, sends a clear warning message to international students: Free speech is still permitted – provided it aligns with Trumpian perspectives.

Colleges and universities make an inviting scapegoat for populist resentment. They already face an array of vexing issues: from public perceptions that they "push political agendas"to fostering an intellectually free and open campus in an age of social media, political hyper-polarization, and grievance. Substantial investments in financial aid at almost every school across the country have not alleviated the perception – and in some cases the reality – that high tuition “sticker prices” still present barriers to many poor and working-class students. The intransigence of these and other daunting problems helps explain why the average tenure of a college or university president has slipped below six years.

However, we must not allow these formidable challenges to mask the crucial role colleges and universities play in our politics. Our nation’s founders understood the necessary function of education—from public schools to colleges—in “keeping” our republic. Today, colleges and universities also safeguard "America's national security and competitiveness."More than ever, U.S. higher education represents a public good that we fail to preserve at our peril.

So, what is to be done?

First, higher education leaders, trustees, alumni, faculty members, and students need to partner with commentators, journalists, and sympathetic politicians to oppose attacks on higher education's autonomy as part of resisting the broader assault on information. Administrators and faculty members alike must model the type of rigorous exchange of ideas that has always been a hallmark of human progress.

Second, college and university presidents must defy political pressures to abandon their institutions’ fundamental values of truth-seeking, knowledge-building, and critical thinking. They must articulate and fearlessly defend those principles on every possible occasion. The instinct to remain silent will not serve.

Third, we must champion higher education’s often-underappreciated role in generating, preserving, and publicizing research-based data, which is essential to informed public debate, especially now that such information is vanishing from government sites.

Fourth, we must support the besieged humanities – history, political theory, philosophy, literature, etc. – which develop the knowledge, conceptual tool-kits, and critical capacities that empower citizens to understand and, as is their right, alter political trends.

Lastly, we must understand that undermining higher education’s economic foundations makes expanding access for students with limited financial means impossible. Indeed, it poses an existential threat to countless colleges and universities. They cannot support democracy if they cease to exist.

George Orwell’s iconic novel “ 1984 ” dramatized how impoverished language prevents citizens from opposing a totalitarian political regime. Accordingly, college and university scholars must fight censorship, continue to develop diagnostic concepts such as “ state capture ” and call out politicians who twist phrases like “weaponization of government” to partisan purposes. Words matter in a democracy.

Despite its challenges, our system of higher education is respected worldwide and elevates the lives of countless students every year. For their sake and that of our troubled republic, we must preserve and protect this national resource against the clear and present danger it confronts.

Now before it’s too late.

Philip A. Glotzbach, a nationally recognized figure in higher education, is president emeritus of Skidmore.







About the Author

Philip A. Glotzbach is president emeritus of Skidmore College, where he served for seventeen years. His recent book, “Embrace Your Freedom: Winning Strategies to Succeed in College and in Life,” offers guidance to college students, and their parents, in these chaotic times.

www.philipglotzbach.com

Read More

Declaration of Independence
When, in 2026, the United States marks the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, we should take pride in our collective journey.
Douglas Sacha/Getty Images

What Exactly Does "All Men Are Created Equal" Mean in the Declaration of Independence?

I used to think the answer was obvious; it was self-evident. But it's not, at least not in today's political context. MAGA Republicans and Democrats have a very different take on the meaning of this phrase in the Declaration.

I said in my book, We Still Hold These Truths: An America Manifesto, that it is in the interpretation of our founding documents that both the liberal and conservative ideologies that have run throughout our history can be found. This is a perfect example.

Keep ReadingShow less
Washington, DC, skyline
A country in crisis needs to call a truce with its government
Michael Lee/Getty Images

Defending Democracy in the Heart of Democracy - Washington, D.C.

The Crisis in Our Capital

Washington, D.C. is at the center of American democracy. Yet today, its residents — taxpayers, veterans, workers, families, people like you an I, American citizens — are being stripped of their right to self-government. The recent surge of out-of-state National Guard troops into the District under federal order has highlighted a deep flaw in our system: D.C. does not have the same authority to govern itself that the 50 states enjoy.Keith

We are told this militarization is about “public safety,” but violent crime in D.C. is near a 30-year low . What we are witnessing is not a crime-fighting measure, but an unprecedented encroachment on local authority. The consent of the people — the foundation of democracy — is being sidelined to pursue a political or even personal agenda.

The Ethical and Constitutional Problem

Legally, a president can request National Guard support through interstate compacts. But legality is not the same as legitimacy. True democracy requires consent, not unilateral fiat. Under the Home Rule Act, federal control over D.C. is only supposed to last 30 days in emergencies. Yet the use of state-based National Guard units circumvents this safeguard and seems to demonstrate a hidden agenda. This is a loophole — one that undermines D.C.’s right to self-governance and sets a dangerous precedent for federal overreach.

An Urgent Legislative Answer

It is not enough to critique the abuse of power — we must fix it. That is why I have drafted the D.C. Defense of Self-Government Act, which closes this loophole and restores constitutional balance. The draft bill is now available for public review on my congressional campaign website:

Read the D.C. Defense of Self-Government Act here

This legislation would require explicit, expedited approval from Congress before federal or state National Guard troops can be deployed into the District. It ensures no president — Republican. Democrat or Independent — can bypass the will of the people of Washington, D.C.

This moment also reminds us of a deeper injustice that has lingered for generations: the people of Washington, D.C., remain without full representation in Congress. Over 700,000 Americans—more than the populations of several states—are denied a voting voice in the very body that holds sway over their lives. This lack of representation makes it easier for their self-government to be undermined, as we see today. That must change. We will need to revisit serious legislation to finally fix this injustice and secure for D.C. residents the same democratic rights every other American enjoys.

The Bigger Picture

This fight is not about partisan politics. It is about whether America will live up to its founding ideals of self-rule and accountability. Every voter, regardless of party, should ask: if the capital of our democracy can be militarized without the consent of the people, what stops it from happening in other cities across America?

A Call to Action

When I ran for president, my wife told me I was going to make history. I told her making history didn’t matter to me — what mattered to me then and what matters to me now is making a difference. I'm not in office yet so I have no legal authority to act. But, I am still a citizen of the United States, a veteran of the United States Air Force, someone who has taken the oath of office, many times since 1973. That oath has no expiration date. Today, that difference is about ensuring the residents of D.C. — and every American city — are protected from unchecked federal overreach.

I urge every reader to share this bill with your representatives. Demand that Congress act now. We can’t wait until the mid-terms. Demand that they defend democracy where it matters most — in the heart of our capital — because FBI and DEA agents patrolling the streets of our nation's capital does not demonstrate democracy. Quite the contrary, it clearly demonstrates autocracy.

Davenport is a candidate for U.S. Congress, NC-06.
The Return of Loyalty Tests and the Decline of American Democracy

Faded American flag

The Return of Loyalty Tests and the Decline of American Democracy

Remember when loyalty oaths were used to ferret out and punish people suspected of being Communists? They were a potent and terrifying tool, designed to produce conformity and compliance at the height of the late 1940s, early 1950s Red Scare.

Today, they are back, but in more subtle, if no less coercive, forms. The Trump Administration is using them in hiring and retaining federal employees, in dispensing federal grants, and in passing out perks.

Keep ReadingShow less