Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The American Flag's Meaning: Hope and Heartache

Opinion

The American Flag's Meaning: Hope and Heartache

American flag waves outside house, Chicago, Illinois

Hugo Balta

The American flag has long stood as a unifying emblem of democracy, freedom, and national identity. Still, its meaning shifts over time and in different contexts, influenced by political events, social movements, and individual interpretations. Our current deeply divided civic climate is no exception.

The strongest memory I have of raising the "Stars and Stripes" was on the days following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.


I was in New York City when it happened. I was a producer at NBC New York at the time. While I had no intention of leaving my post in the newsroom, once Manhattan was locked down, I couldn't go anywhere. I spent the next couple of days working around the clock reporting on the latest developments with brief breaks to rest.

When I finally went home, I was met by a row of American flags waving from most, if not all, of the houses in my street. Before entering the front door or saying a word to my wife, I went into the garage, found my flag, and placed it outside our house. We stood in front of it, holding each other, sobbing, mourning.

In the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, the American flag became a powerful symbol of unity, resilience, and shared grief. Displayed not just on homes, but on cars, public buildings, and people, like a blanket or shield—perhaps both. It served as a visual reminder of solidarity during a time of national trauma. Politicians, celebrities, and ordinary citizens alike embraced the flag as a nonpartisan emblem, temporarily setting aside their differences to remember the victims and honor the first responders. While interpretations of patriotism varied, the widespread display of the flag reflected a collective desire for cohesion in the face of tragedy. Over time, its meaning evolved, but in those immediate post-9/11 days, it functioned as a rare unifying force in a deeply shaken nation.

That Was Then, This Is Now

This week, I raised the American flag outside my home again. It has been a while since I have done so. Perhaps because I have taken for granted that all the flag stands for, beginning with democracy, will always be present. After all, democracy is often tested but ultimately endures. Still, this year is different. I hesitated to put up the flag.

As an independent voter, who has backed Democrats and Republicans in elections, but never voted for Trump —I feared being labeled as a supporter of his political agenda.

The return of Donald Trump to the White House has been met with judgment for actions that some observers argue undermine democratic norms and institutions. For instance, critics highlight challenges to the integrity of electoral processes, attempts to influence regulatory bodies and the judicial system, which have prompted discussions about the separation of powers and the potential erosion of checks and balances. While supporters of the administration argue that it is merely seeking to reform and hold existing systems accountable, the ongoing debates reveal deep divisions regarding the state of democracy in the United States.

As reported by the Associated Press, Trump has pardoned those who attacked the U.S. Capitol to overturn his 2020 election loss, placed loyalists atop the FBI and military, and purged the Department of Justice, which dropped investigations against Trump allies. He declared control over independent agencies, such as the Federal Election Commission, and punished media outlets for coverage he disliked. His allies suggested he could defy court orders. And that was just his first six weeks back in office.

A recent NPR/PBS News/Marist poll found that three-quarters of Americans say democracy is under serious threat. The U.S. is grappling with what it means to be American, who is essential to its story, who belongs, who doesn't, and which direction the country should take — all while Americans are expressing very little faith in its political leadership, the survey finds, reports NPR. I am among the concerned.

The American flag is frequently displayed at Trump rallies. Does anyone remember the video of Trump hugging and kissing the flag at CPAC 2020? It's uncomfortable to watch even now.

Some argue that the American flag has become heavily associated with Trump and his political movement, leading to a perception that it represents an "us" versus "them" mentality rather than unity. This has led some to feel the flag has been "hijacked by the political right". After all, the flag was prominently on display during the January 6 Capitol riot—where many carried flags alongside extremist insignia—in that moment, the Stars and Stripes took on a more polarized meaning for some Americans.

For many on the right, the flag represents patriotism, law and order, and resistance to perceived threats against traditional values. Meanwhile, some progressives have grown hesitant to embrace the flag, arguing that type of patriotism is associated with exclusionary ideologies. Polls suggest that younger, liberal-leaning Americans are less likely to display the American flag than older, more conservative Americans. Others, however, like myself, reject the idea that extremists should dictate its meaning, insisting that the flag belongs to all Americans.

In last month's “No Kings” protests nationwide, the flag was flown. In the anti-ICE demonstrations in Los Angeles, the flag was flown. I promise you that in the "Free America" rallies this Independence Day, you will see the American flag waving.

Standing Up and Speaking Out

As I raised my American flag outside my home in Chicago, Illinois, celebrating the United States' birthday, I reflected on what it means to me. I thought of my parents, immigrants from Peru, and their struggle to make a good life in their adoptive country. I thought about marching with my daughter, Isabella, advocating for equal rights and social acceptance of the LGBTQ+ community. I thought of my cousin-in-law, Phil Giordano, who enlisted in the military after the 911 attacks. I thought of all the good and the bad the flag has represented these past 249 years. And I thought, this is not the time to hide, to stay quiet, to wait until the storm blows over.

This is the time to stand up and speak out! What that means to me personally is to leverage my lived experiences, including my privilege, to do as John Lewis, one of my heroes, once said:

"Do not get lost in a sea of despair. Be hopeful, be optimistic. Our struggle is not the struggle of a day, a week, a month, or a year, it is the struggle of a lifetime. Never, ever be afraid to make some noise and get in good trouble, necessary trouble."

What that means to me as a journalist is to call truth to power:

-Ensuring that those in positions of authority are held accountable for their actions and decisions.

-Act as a check on power by providing the public with information needed to make informed decisions and participate in self-governance.

-Transparency in reporting that is fair and accurate.

And always, unapologetically defend the role of a free, independent press enshrined in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution because an informed citizenry is essential to the health of our democracy.

In these times of political turmoil, social unrest, and economic challenges, democratic institutions and processes face significant tests. However, the strain on democratic norms can also foster increased civic engagement and encourage dialogue among citizens.
Democracy has consistently demonstrated its ability to adapt under pressure, addressing diverse perspectives and changing societal needs. Despite these challenges, it has the potential to recalibrate and restore itself, reaffirming its foundational principles of representation, accountability, and the rule of law.

So, go ahead, wave that beautiful red, white, and blue on its birthday, and every day.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network. Balta is the only person to serve twice as president of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists (NAHJ).

Read More

Communication concept with multi colored abstract people icons.

Research shows that emotional, cognitive, and social mechanisms drive both direct and indirect contact, offering scalable ways to reduce political polarization.

Getty Images, Eoneren

“Direct” and “Indirect” Contact Methods Likely Work in Similar Ways, so They Should Both Be Effective

In a previous article, we argued that efforts to improve the political environment should reach Americans as media consumers, in addition to seeking public participation. Reaching Americans as media consumers uses media like film, TV, and social media to change what Americans see and hear about fellow Americans across the political spectrum. Participant-based efforts include dialogues and community-based activities that require active involvement.

In this article, we show that the mechanisms underlying each type of approach are quite similar. The categories of mechanisms we cover are emotional, cognitive, relational, and repetitive. We use the terms from the academic literature, “direct” and “indirect” contact, which are fairly similar to participant and media consumer approaches, respectively.

Keep ReadingShow less
The American Experiment Requires Robust Debate, Not Government Crackdowns

As political violence threatens democracy, defending free speech, limiting government overreach, and embracing pluralism matters is critical right now.

Getty Images, Javier Zayas Photography

The American Experiment Requires Robust Debate, Not Government Crackdowns

The assassinations of conservative leader Charlie Kirk and Democratic lawmakers in Minnesota have triggered endorsements of violence and even calls for literal war on both the far right and far left. Fortunately, an overwhelming majority of Americans reject political violence, but all of us are in a fight to keep our diverse and boisterous brand of democracy alive. Doing so requires a renewed commitment to pluralism and a clear-headed recognition of the limits of government, especially when proposals entail using the criminal justice system to punish speech.

Pluralism has been called the lifeblood of a democracy like ours, in which being an American is not defined by race or religion. It requires learning about and accepting our differences, and embracing the principle that, regardless of them, every person is entitled to be protected by our Constitution and have a voice in how we’re governed. In contrast, many perpetrators of political violence rationalize their acts by denying the basic humanity of those with whom they disagree. They are willing to face the death penalty or life in prison in an attempt to force everyone to conform to their views.

Keep ReadingShow less
A woman sitting down and speaking with a group of people.

The SVL (Stories, Values, Listen) framework—which aims to bridge political divides with simple, memorable steps for productive cross-partisan conversations—is an easy-to-use tool for making an impact at scale.

Getty Images, Luis Alvarez

Make Talking Politics Easier and More Scalable: Be SVL (Stories, Values, Listen)

How can one have a productive conversation across the political spectrum?

We offer simple, memorable guidance: Be SVL (pronounced like “civil”). SVL stands for sharing Stories, relating to a conversation partner’s Values, and closely Listening.

Keep ReadingShow less
St. Patrick’s Cathedral’s Mural: Art, Immigration, and the American Spirit

People attend a mass and ceremony for a new mural dedicated to New York City’s immigrant communities and honoring the city’s first responders at St. Patrick’s Cathedral on September 21, 2025 in New York City.

(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

St. Patrick’s Cathedral’s Mural: Art, Immigration, and the American Spirit

In a bold fusion of sacred tradition and contemporary relevance, artist Adam Cvijanovic has unveiled a sweeping new mural at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York City—one that reimagines the historic narthex as a vibrant ode to peace, migration, and spiritual continuity.

In an age of polarization and performative politics, it’s rare to find a work of art that speaks with both spiritual clarity and civic urgency. Yet that’s exactly what “What’s So Funny About Peace, Love and Understanding” accomplishes. The piece is more than a visual upgrade to a “dreary” entranceway—it’s a theological and cultural intervention, one that invites every visitor to confront the moral stakes of our immigration discourse.

Keep ReadingShow less