Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The American Flag's Meaning: Hope and Heartache

Opinion

The American Flag's Meaning: Hope and Heartache

American flag waves outside house, Chicago, Illinois

Hugo Balta

The American flag has long stood as a unifying emblem of democracy, freedom, and national identity. Still, its meaning shifts over time and in different contexts, influenced by political events, social movements, and individual interpretations. Our current deeply divided civic climate is no exception.

The strongest memory I have of raising the "Stars and Stripes" was on the days following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.


I was in New York City when it happened. I was a producer at NBC New York at the time. While I had no intention of leaving my post in the newsroom, once Manhattan was locked down, I couldn't go anywhere. I spent the next couple of days working around the clock reporting on the latest developments with brief breaks to rest.

When I finally went home, I was met by a row of American flags waving from most, if not all, of the houses in my street. Before entering the front door or saying a word to my wife, I went into the garage, found my flag, and placed it outside our house. We stood in front of it, holding each other, sobbing, mourning.

In the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, the American flag became a powerful symbol of unity, resilience, and shared grief. Displayed not just on homes, but on cars, public buildings, and people, like a blanket or shield—perhaps both. It served as a visual reminder of solidarity during a time of national trauma. Politicians, celebrities, and ordinary citizens alike embraced the flag as a nonpartisan emblem, temporarily setting aside their differences to remember the victims and honor the first responders. While interpretations of patriotism varied, the widespread display of the flag reflected a collective desire for cohesion in the face of tragedy. Over time, its meaning evolved, but in those immediate post-9/11 days, it functioned as a rare unifying force in a deeply shaken nation.

That Was Then, This Is Now

This week, I raised the American flag outside my home again. It has been a while since I have done so. Perhaps because I have taken for granted that all the flag stands for, beginning with democracy, will always be present. After all, democracy is often tested but ultimately endures. Still, this year is different. I hesitated to put up the flag.

As an independent voter, who has backed Democrats and Republicans in elections, but never voted for Trump —I feared being labeled as a supporter of his political agenda.

The return of Donald Trump to the White House has been met with judgment for actions that some observers argue undermine democratic norms and institutions. For instance, critics highlight challenges to the integrity of electoral processes, attempts to influence regulatory bodies and the judicial system, which have prompted discussions about the separation of powers and the potential erosion of checks and balances. While supporters of the administration argue that it is merely seeking to reform and hold existing systems accountable, the ongoing debates reveal deep divisions regarding the state of democracy in the United States.

As reported by the Associated Press, Trump has pardoned those who attacked the U.S. Capitol to overturn his 2020 election loss, placed loyalists atop the FBI and military, and purged the Department of Justice, which dropped investigations against Trump allies. He declared control over independent agencies, such as the Federal Election Commission, and punished media outlets for coverage he disliked. His allies suggested he could defy court orders. And that was just his first six weeks back in office.

A recent NPR/PBS News/Marist poll found that three-quarters of Americans say democracy is under serious threat. The U.S. is grappling with what it means to be American, who is essential to its story, who belongs, who doesn't, and which direction the country should take — all while Americans are expressing very little faith in its political leadership, the survey finds, reports NPR. I am among the concerned.

The American flag is frequently displayed at Trump rallies. Does anyone remember the video of Trump hugging and kissing the flag at CPAC 2020? It's uncomfortable to watch even now.

Some argue that the American flag has become heavily associated with Trump and his political movement, leading to a perception that it represents an "us" versus "them" mentality rather than unity. This has led some to feel the flag has been "hijacked by the political right". After all, the flag was prominently on display during the January 6 Capitol riot—where many carried flags alongside extremist insignia—in that moment, the Stars and Stripes took on a more polarized meaning for some Americans.

For many on the right, the flag represents patriotism, law and order, and resistance to perceived threats against traditional values. Meanwhile, some progressives have grown hesitant to embrace the flag, arguing that type of patriotism is associated with exclusionary ideologies. Polls suggest that younger, liberal-leaning Americans are less likely to display the American flag than older, more conservative Americans. Others, however, like myself, reject the idea that extremists should dictate its meaning, insisting that the flag belongs to all Americans.

In last month's “No Kings” protests nationwide, the flag was flown. In the anti-ICE demonstrations in Los Angeles, the flag was flown. I promise you that in the "Free America" rallies this Independence Day, you will see the American flag waving.

Standing Up and Speaking Out

As I raised my American flag outside my home in Chicago, Illinois, celebrating the United States' birthday, I reflected on what it means to me. I thought of my parents, immigrants from Peru, and their struggle to make a good life in their adoptive country. I thought about marching with my daughter, Isabella, advocating for equal rights and social acceptance of the LGBTQ+ community. I thought of my cousin-in-law, Phil Giordano, who enlisted in the military after the 911 attacks. I thought of all the good and the bad the flag has represented these past 249 years. And I thought, this is not the time to hide, to stay quiet, to wait until the storm blows over.

This is the time to stand up and speak out! What that means to me personally is to leverage my lived experiences, including my privilege, to do as John Lewis, one of my heroes, once said:

"Do not get lost in a sea of despair. Be hopeful, be optimistic. Our struggle is not the struggle of a day, a week, a month, or a year, it is the struggle of a lifetime. Never, ever be afraid to make some noise and get in good trouble, necessary trouble."

What that means to me as a journalist is to call truth to power:

-Ensuring that those in positions of authority are held accountable for their actions and decisions.

-Act as a check on power by providing the public with information needed to make informed decisions and participate in self-governance.

-Transparency in reporting that is fair and accurate.

And always, unapologetically defend the role of a free, independent press enshrined in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution because an informed citizenry is essential to the health of our democracy.

In these times of political turmoil, social unrest, and economic challenges, democratic institutions and processes face significant tests. However, the strain on democratic norms can also foster increased civic engagement and encourage dialogue among citizens.
Democracy has consistently demonstrated its ability to adapt under pressure, addressing diverse perspectives and changing societal needs. Despite these challenges, it has the potential to recalibrate and restore itself, reaffirming its foundational principles of representation, accountability, and the rule of law.

So, go ahead, wave that beautiful red, white, and blue on its birthday, and every day.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network. Balta is the only person to serve twice as president of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists (NAHJ).


Read More

Group of young adult students sit at desks in classroom listening to teacher

Why do Americans respond so differently to hard history lessons? A look at the three psychological mindsets driving the patriotism debate — and a path past it.

Lighthouse Films/Getty Images

“They Hate America”: Patriotism in the Face of Historical Updates

I happened upon a civil discussion blog and read a post by a man who said he was happy to report that when he attended a panel discussion about teaching patriotism in the schools, all went well. He said that’s because most of the people in the bridging organization that hosted the event are “pretty patriotic.” He clarified that by writing, “None of the type of bad actors (and there are many) who want to teach kids to hate America and Western Civilization were represented.”

Someone made a comment about why we can’t incorporate historical change into curriculum and objected to the notion that a segment of the population wants to teach kids to hate America. The man who posted cited what he believes is proof. A last commenter simply input the emoji for a sleeping person, as though the argument was boring or unimportant.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Utah Governor Spencer Cox

Utah Governor Spencer Cox

Getty Images

Spencer Cox’s Off Ramp and Utah’s Tradition of Bipartisan Leadership

Utah has long impressed me as a place where governors take bipartisan leadership seriously, and my own experience confirms it. I first saw this more than a decade ago when I met former Utah Governor Jon Huntsman through No Labels. In January 2013, Huntsman, then a Republican, joined Democrat Joe Manchin as national co‑chairs of the organization, a partnership built on the belief that durable solutions require leaders willing to cross the aisle. Working with both of them during that period left a lasting impression on me. Their partnership embodied a simple but powerful truth: when leaders choose cooperation over contempt, they expand what’s possible for the country. Huntsman and Manchin worked deliberately to model cross‑partisan problem‑solving—demonstrating that principled disagreement can coexist with shared purpose.

That experience left a lasting impression on me, and it’s one reason Governor Spencer Cox’s new book Off Ramp: How to Be a Peacemaker in an Age of Contempt resonates so strongly with me today.

Keep ReadingShow less
Windows of a house

Low-angle view of two dormer windows protruding from townhouse roof

Grace Cary, Getty Images

Go Home

The distance from Washington, D.C., to my hometown of York, Pennsylvania, is 100 miles. When I worked as a Congressional staffer in D.C., I could get out of town and be back where I grew up in about an hour and a half, at least so long as I avoided rush hour traffic. Those last miles as I crossed the Pennsylvania-Maryland border brought a sense of gratitude for the relationships I would be keeping up. At my nephew’s soccer game, at an English-style pub with my long-time best friends, with my mother at the breakfast table having a local newspaper in her hands, life was ordinary.

I would return to work in D.C. feeling grounded. I felt better connected to

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Capitol with a flag waving in front of it.

As Washington stalls, young bipartisan lawmakers in Alaska, Mississippi, and beyond are proving that cross-partisan collaboration still wins.

Douglas Rissing/Getty Images

The Politicians Who Can Fix America's Polarization Problem Will Win

Political predictions are notoriously unreliable, but here is one I am willing to stand behind: the elected officials who figure out how to govern across difference will dominate the next decade of American politics. With dysfunction and paralysis having become the status quo in Washington, elected officials who work together to get things done will turn heads, offering desperate voters a much-needed alternative to a broken system.

Consider what happened in Alaska last year. The state’s lawmaking structure does not encourage political independence. Alaska has the nation's highest veto-override threshold: three-quarters. So when a popular education bill promising smaller class sizes, a cellphone ban, and vocational training funding cleared the legislature, only to be vetoed twice by the governor, it looked dead in the water.

Keep ReadingShow less