Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Reclaiming the American flag: A symbol of unity in a divided nation

Flag Day banner
Perumal Eathiraj/Getty Images

Becvar is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and executive director of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund, the parent organization of The Fulcrum.

Flag Day is observed annually on June 14, commemorating the adoption of the American flag by the Second Continental Congress in 1777. This day is rooted in a desire to honor the symbol of the nation's values and aspirations, cemented by President Woodrow Wilson's proclamation in 1916 and the official law signed by President Harry Truman in 1949.

Flying the American flag symbolizes national pride, evoking a sense of unity and shared values. It represents freedom, democracy and the relentless pursuit of a more perfect union. The flag has served as a stand-in for the nation for many years, representing a shared identity and a common set of beliefs about the country's meaning. However, as the country has self-sorted into tribes with conflicting identities, Americans are much less likely to agree on what set of beliefs the flag has come to represent. Over time, the flag has become a contentious symbol, representing divergent political views and igniting debate about its meaning. Often, displaying the flag is seen as aligning with a specific political ideology, commonly associated with conservative values.


Some people have made it a habit to display signs of tribal affiliations alongside their American flag. In more liberal enclaves, you might see a pride flag or a Black Lives Matter flag accompanying the American flag, though more often, these flags fly alone. Conversely, in conservative circles, the American flag is frequently paired with the Gadsden flag, Trump flags, Blue Lives Matter flags and even Confederate flags.

Even as a stand-alone symbol, the American flag can invoke conflicting meanings. It can be inclusive, representing a diverse group united in supporting a broad understanding of freedom. But it can also be exclusive, a symbol of nationalism — an "us" in opposition to a less worthy or virtuous "them."

For many Americans, the flag is a testament to the sacrifices made by countless individuals to uphold the values of liberty and justice. Because so many Americans have died wearing the flag in military pursuits, it's hard not to see it as both a sign of honor for those lives lost and as a symbol of foreign military intervention. This duality can foster feelings of separation among those hesitant to support military interventionist policies.

The flag of our country, by definition, symbolizes nationalism. With a large cohort of the current Republican Party advocating for a form of nationalism — Christian Nationalism — it is understandable that the flag can be seen as affiliated with one political party. The perception of nationalism as exclusionary can also create a sense of alienation for those who feel excluded from this narrative, particularly marginalized communities who have historically struggled to attain the full promise of American democracy.

The flag has also played a significant role in social and political movements throughout American history. During the civil rights movement, activists often carried the flag to symbolize their fight for equality and justice. In recent years, the flag has been prominently featured in protests and rallies, whether flown by those advocating for social change or those resisting it, highlighting its dual role as a symbol of unity and dissent.

Americans with varied beliefs continue to feel a sense of ownership in their country while assigning meaning to the flag based on their beliefs. However, we are missing the cohesion that came from a time when we had a more widely shared identity. The challenge, then, lies in reclaiming the flag as a unifying symbol that transcends political divides in a time with more diversity in America than ever. The flag, a symbol that should represent all Americans, has the potential to embody the diverse tapestry of cultures, beliefs and experiences that define the nation. It should remind us of our collective responsibility to strive for a society where everyone can enjoy the freedoms and opportunities that the flag symbolizes, inspiring us all to work towards a common goal of unity and shared values.

To achieve this, engaging in open, respectful dialogue about what the flag means to different people is crucial. By actively listening to each other's perspectives, we can begin to heal the divisions and reclaim the flag as a symbol of inclusivity and shared values. This process requires acknowledging the flag's complex history and the different ways it is perceived while also reaffirming our commitment to the core principles that unite us as a nation. We can pave the way for a more inclusive and united America by fostering understanding and empathy through dialogue.

The American flag should not be a symbol of division but a reminder of our collective journey toward a more equitable and just society. It is time to reframe the flag to represent our shared aspirations and a beacon of hope for all Americans. By doing so, we can honor the true spirit of the flag and the ideals it stands for, fostering a sense of unity and pride that encompasses our nation's rich diversity.

Read More

High School Civic Innovators Bridging America’s Divide

At just 17 years of age, Sophie Kim was motivated to start her organization, Bipartisan Bridges, to bring together people from both ends of the political spectrum. What started as just an idea during her freshman year of high school took off after Sophie placed in the Civics Unplugged pitch contest, hosted for alumni in Spring 2024. Since then, Sophie has continued to expand Bipartisan Bridges' impact, creating spaces that foster civil dialogue and facilitate meaningful connections across party lines.

Sophie, a graduate of the Spring 2024 Civic Innovators Fellowship and the Summer 2025 Civic Innovation Academy at UCLA, serves as the founder and executive director of Bipartisan Bridges. In this role, Sophie has forged a partnership with the organization Braver Angels to host depolarization workshops and has led the coordination and capture of conversations on climate change, abortion, gun control, foreign aid, and the 100 Men vs. a Gorilla debate. In addition, this year, Sophie planned and oversaw Bipartisan Bridges’ flagship Politics and Polarization Fellowship, an eight-week, in-person program involving youth from Tustin, Irvine, Costa Mesa, and Huntington Beach, California. A recent Bipartisan Bridges session featuring youth from both Los Angeles and Orange County will be featured in Bridging the Gap, an upcoming documentary.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two speech bubbles overlapping each other.

Democrats can reclaim America’s founding principles, rebuild the rural economy, and restore democracy by redefining the political battle Trump began.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

Defining the Democrat v. Republican Battle

Winning elections is, in large part, a question of which Party is able to define the battle and define the actors. Trump has so far defined the battle and effectively defined Democrats for his supporters as the enemy of making America great again.

For Democrats to win the 2026 midterm and 2028 presidential elections, they must take the offensive and show just the opposite–that it is they who are true to core American principles and they who will make America great again, while Trump is the Founders' nightmare come alive.

Keep ReadingShow less
Mirror, Mirror On the Wall, Who's the Most Patriotic of All?

Trump and the MAGA movement have twisted the meaning of patriotism. It’s time we collectively reclaim America’s founding ideals and the Pledge’s promise.

Getty Images, LeoPatrizi

Mirror, Mirror On the Wall, Who's the Most Patriotic of All?

Republicans have always claimed to be the patriotic party, the party of "America, right or wrong," the party willing to use force to protect American national interests abroad, the party of a strong military. In response, Democrats have not really contested this perspective since Vietnam, basically ceding the patriotic badge to the Republicans.

But with the advent of Donald Trump, the Republican claim to patriotism has gotten broader and more troubling. Republicans now claim to be the party that is true to our founding principles. And it is not just the politicians; they have support from far-right scholars at the Heritage Foundation, such as Matthew Spalding. The Democratic Party has done nothing to counter these claims.

Keep ReadingShow less
Communication concept with multi colored abstract people icons.

Research shows that emotional, cognitive, and social mechanisms drive both direct and indirect contact, offering scalable ways to reduce political polarization.

Getty Images, Eoneren

“Direct” and “Indirect” Contact Methods Likely Work in Similar Ways, so They Should Both Be Effective

In a previous article, we argued that efforts to improve the political environment should reach Americans as media consumers, in addition to seeking public participation. Reaching Americans as media consumers uses media like film, TV, and social media to change what Americans see and hear about fellow Americans across the political spectrum. Participant-based efforts include dialogues and community-based activities that require active involvement.

In this article, we show that the mechanisms underlying each type of approach are quite similar. The categories of mechanisms we cover are emotional, cognitive, relational, and repetitive. We use the terms from the academic literature, “direct” and “indirect” contact, which are fairly similar to participant and media consumer approaches, respectively.

Keep ReadingShow less