Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Reducing Political Divides Must – and Can – Occur at Massive Scale

Opinion

Reducing Political Divides Must – and Can – Occur at Massive Scale

American flag, megaphone

Photo by Mikhail Nilov/pexels.com

Efforts to bring the country back together must collectively achieve massive scale, impacting at least 85 million Americans (and probably more). It may seem daunting, but the right efforts can plausibly achieve this goal.

These efforts include what is sometimes called “ depolarization ” or “ bridge-building,” though initiatives must go well beyond today’s overwhelmingly conversation-based methods to achieve this scale. Structural reforms are another key element.


In terms of America’s democratic stability, the most pressing need for these efforts comes from dramatic misperceptions of the threat posed by everyday Americans from the other political party. Americans are much less supportive of breaking democratic norms than the other side believes, think members of the other party dehumanize them more than twice as much as in reality, and overestimate the share in the other party supportive of political violence by more than 10x.

This is coupled with both short-term and long-term increases in “ affective” (emotional) polarization.

These misperceptions and negative emotions are widespread among the American public. Thus, any efforts to deal with them must also be widespread.

A low-end estimate for the number to target is over 85 million when looking at the number of 2024 voters, divided by political affiliation who have a “ very unfavorable ” view of the other party.**

Add in some non-voting adults, soon-to-be voting teenagers, those with only unfavorable (instead of very unfavorable) views of the other party, and so on, and the target audience quickly blows past nine digits to over 100 million.

How can we meaningfully affect this many people?

Americans’ views of each other can change via either the information environment or conversations. The information environment offers much more obvious avenues for scale, though messaging about conversations can contribute.

Messaging and stories in the information environment from various sectors can directly correct negative misperceptions of each other. See social media content from Builders and All We Share, the goals of Bridge Entertainment Labs, and top-performing video interventions from the Strengthening Democracy Challenge led by Stanford. One of the authors, James, is Co-Founder and Executive Director of More Like US, which offers guidance for those in the Arts.

Messaging can also encourage conversations, as seen in videos produced with NFL players as part of StoryCorps’s One Small Step, or can give memorable conversation guidance, like the ABCs of Constructive Dialogue from Urban-Rural Action. However, many Americans may not want to engage in time-consuming conversations with uncertain benefits.

Messaging must be coupled with structural reforms to reverse the perverse incentives in electoral systems, news media, social media, and among special-interest groups that often reward demonization of others with money, fame, and power. Electoral structural reformers play an important role, as do key initiatives to try to change advertising flows for news, like the partnership between Ad Fontes Media and The Trade Desk or efforts of the Council for Responsible Social Media.

Meanwhile, conversation workshops are decently effective at reducing political divides among participants, but sufficient scale seems impossible. A daily workshop for 20 new people in each state would take well over 200 years to reach the low-end target of 85 million…a single time.

Attitudinal change on this scale may seem overwhelming but recognize that massive societal perspective changes are possible. Take interracial marriage, support for which was 4% in 1958 but is now at 94%.

We can change attitudes about each other across politics at society-wide scales. We need to start now.

** As of writing, there were 155.2 million 2024 voters, Pew found political affiliation around Republicans (32%), Democrats (33%), and Independents (35%), and YouGov found 74% of Democrats and 68% of Republicans had a “ very unfavorable ” of the other party, along with a low of 29% of Independents very unfavorably viewing Republicans. Multiplication across leads to a target audience of 87.4 million.

James Coan is the co-founder and executive director of More Like US. Coan can be contacted at James@morelikeus.org

Imre Huss is a current intern at More Like US.







Read More

Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

People gather over a giant Declaration of Independence

Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images.

Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

As America approaches the 250th anniversary of its independence, I am more in the mood to protest than to celebrate. Does that make me unpatriotic? The answer depends on how we understand “patriotism.” For a nation that is founded in revolution, let’s affirm a deeper and more profound love of country, a civic patriotism celebrative of our larger ideals including pluralism, dissent, and a commitment to social change.

Two Types of Patriotism

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together
Political polarization
Polarization and the politics of love

A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together

As we face ever-growing partisan polarization in American society, the need for large-scale action becomes increasingly urgent. As James Coan and I have written about in the Fulcrum during my time at More Like US, there are approaches grounded in a significant body of social psychological research that can help address this rapidly growing problem, namely different variations of social contact theory, especially vicarious contact. Until recently, much of the research and thus much of the basis for our articles has been focused on applying social contact theory to other problems facing society: prejudice against members of the LGBTQ community, individuals with autism, and immigrant schoolchildren, among other examples.

It was therefore exciting when last fall I saw the publication of an article in Political Science Research and Methods titled "Content That's as Good as Contact?: Vicarious Intergroup Contact and the Promise of Depolarization at Scale." The study, conducted in 2022 in conjunction with YouGov, finally attempted to measure the effectiveness of indirect contact as a path to depolarization, primarily through the vicarious experience of productive political conversation. Encompassing over 2,000 participants gathered from a nationally representative sample recruited by YouGov’s online panel, the study looked to test affective polarization, measured attitudinally, and interest and investment in depolarization, measured behaviorally. To this end, the study tested multiple media interventions, namely a 50-minute Braver Angels documentary featuring a “Red-Blue” depolarization workshop; a 50-minute placebo nature documentary about wildebeest migration; a 5-minute version of the Braver Angels documentary; a second 5-minute version that emphasized partisan misperception correction; and a pure control group, with no treatment.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

United States Marine Corps Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II STOVL stealth multirole fighters belonging to the VMFA-121 "Green Knights" taxiing at the MCAS Iwakuni in Yamaguchi, Japan, on March 23, 2017.

(viper-zero / Getty Images)

How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

In earlier essays, I argued that America’s political division has grown so deep that a peaceful “American Union” of two sovereign nations — one broadly red, one broadly blue — is worth considering. I also argued that relocation fears are overstated, that cooperation could increase economic prosperity, and that separation could help heal the lingering wounds of the Civil War.

But how would this all actually work? What happens to the national debt? Who gets the military bases, federal lands, and nuclear weapons? Will Social Security be protected? Could two nations share the dollar, defend themselves together, and resolve their disagreements?

Keep ReadingShow less
Rear view of teenage boy walking with arm around friends

Why many young men feel politically and socially adrift, how changing gender roles affect masculinity, self-esteem, relationships, and the future of society.

Maskot / Getty Images

Lost Boys - What Is the Role of a Man in Today's Society?

A recent New York Times article stated that young males who provided an important swing vote for Trump in 2024 are discouraged by what Trump has done and not done while in office. But they are nevertheless not particularly inclined to vote Democratic because they don't see the Party as welcoming their view of masculinity and they don't know where they fit in this society.

These young men assume that because the Party supports equality for women in the workplace and because many young women no longer have marriage and having children at the top of their agenda, the Party would not be a welcoming home for them. They see themselves as striving for the masculinity of their fathers' or grandfathers' day, where the man was the breadwinner in the family and had respect and authority. Not the weaker half in relationships with women.

Keep ReadingShow less