Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Michael Chippendale: Realistic, Not Idealistic Government

Michael Chippendale: Realistic, Not Idealistic Government

Michael Chippendale, Minority Leader of the Rhode Island House of Representatives

Credit: Hugo Balta

Michael Chippendale is a seasoned Republican legislator and the current Minority Leader of the Rhode Island House of Representatives. Representing District 40—which includes Coventry, Foster, and Glocester—Chippendale has served in the General Assembly since 2010, steadily rising through the ranks of GOP leadership.

Chippendale was unanimously elected House Minority Leader in June 2022 and re-elected in December 2024. Prior to this, he served as Minority Whip from 2018 to 2022. His leadership style is marked by a focus on government efficiency, tax reform, and regulatory relief for small businesses.


- YouTube youtu.be

I spoke with Rep. Chippendale while on assignment in Providence, producing the first episode of The 50, a four-year multimedia project in which the Fulcrum visits different communities across all 50 states to learn what motivated them to vote in the 2024 presidential election and see how the Donald Trump administration is meeting those concerns and hopes.

Chippendale acknowledged the concerns many people are having about President Donald Trump’s heavy-handed approach and the speed with which changes are being implemented. He also said that the American public has started to become disenchanted with politicians who promise things that they never do.

"He had to act quickly. He had to fulfill those promises," Chippendale said. "So, when he made such bold promises on the campaign trail and then immediately enacted so many of them, I think that weathered the people who are going to feel the pain from the economic policies enough to say, 'I'm going to be ok. I trust that he's going to do what he says he's going to do."

- YouTube youtu.be

Rep. Chippendale shared how a family trip to Philadelphia inspired him to run for public office. "So, we went to the Pennsylvania State House. I saw the desk at which the two delegates from Rhode Island sat when the Declaration of Independence was signed, when the Constitution was being argued. And this patriotic, romantic American spirit took over." When the family left Philadelphia, the next day, Chippendale said he told his wife he was going to run for office.

The Democratic Party controls the office of governor and both chambers of the state legislature. Rep. Chippendale also spoke to the Fulcrum about being strategic as a political superminority. "When you set your goals to a level that is realistic and not idealistic, you have a better chance of realizing those goals. And I'm going to run with that if I think it will improve the lives of the people I represent. If it's a good enough idea, I've found, and if you approach it the right way, you can even win the support of the supermajority if you can make a persuasive argument."

Mr. Chippendale collaborates with fellow elected officials to improve people's participation in the electoral process, starting with investing time in students.

Secretary Amore hosts the Rhode Island Civic Leadership Program, in which State Representative Chippendale has participated. The immersive, year-long nonpartisan initiative is designed to connect high school students to their government and build skills and habits that foster lifelong civic engagement.

SUGGESTIONS:

Johanny Cepeda-Freytiz: Connecting With Community

David Guo: Combining Art and Civic Engagement

Rich Harwood: A Philosophy of Civic Faith

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network.

Read More

Where Is the Democratic Party’s Clarion Voice?

Democratic Donkey with megaphone

Where Is the Democratic Party’s Clarion Voice?

Editor's Notes: below is a new version of the article published earlier today (2:13 pm EST, 8/9/25)

The Democratic Party is in disarray, trying to determine how best to defeat Trump and the MAGA movement in the next midterm and presidential elections.

Keep ReadingShow less
Are Community Partnership Visas the Solution To Boost Local Economies in the United States?

The American Academy of Arts and Sciences gave a presentation on their findings on their idea for Community Partnership Visas to a crowd at the American Enterprise Institute on May 29, 2025.

Angeles Ponpa/Medill News Service

Are Community Partnership Visas the Solution To Boost Local Economies in the United States?

Immigration has taken center stage in political discourse across the United States for more than a decade. A politically divided two-party system continues to claim it holds the solution to a deeply complex system. Meanwhile, immigration raids have increased since President Donald Trump took office. Yet some believe the issue remains worth tackling because the country has not fully recognized the power of immigrant labor.

One group believes it has found a bipartisan solution by proposing the Community Partnership Visa. The place-based visa aims to boost local economic growth and allow counties across the country to benefit from immigration, if it proves successful.

Keep ReadingShow less

Changing Conversations Around Immigration

At FrameWorks, we consider it our personal and moral mission to support those working to build a more humane immigration system. While we certainly don’t have all the answers, we join in the shared outrage over current injustices and harms and want to offer support where we can.

One thing we know is that the language we use to demand that change affects how people think about immigration. And if we aren’t intentional, the language we use to highlight protections for immigrants can inadvertently lead people towards thinking about the need to protect “us” from immigrants.

Keep ReadingShow less
"They want us divided sign" that represents partisanship among democrats and republicans.

In recent philosophical and political discourse, the concept of “deep disagreement” has gained traction as a diagnostic for the dysfunction of contemporary public debate.

Getty Images, Jena Ardell

Manufacturing Dissent: How ‘Deep Disagreement’ Serves the Anti-Democratic Elite

In recent philosophical and political discourse, the concept of “deep disagreement” has gained traction as a diagnostic for the dysfunction of contemporary public debate. The premise is simple yet highly seductive: Some disagreements we are told are so fundamental, so rooted in incompatible worldviews or paradigmatically incommensurable epistemologies, that no meaningful argumentation is possible between the disagreeing parties. The implication is stark: Reason and Dialogue cannot bridge the gulf. But this diagnosis, while sounding sobering and serious, is in fact a dangerous illusion. It is an intellectual sleight of hand that masks both the manufactured nature of such disagreements and the vested interests that thrive on perpetuating them.

Indeed, contrary to its glossy surface neutrality, the notion of “deep disagreement” is not merely a philosophical tool but has become a performative trope, perfectly suited for an age of outrage, polarization, and algorithmic amplification. It helps rationalize the breakdown of dialogue, casting it not as a product of bad faith, deliberate miscommunication, or elite manipulation, but as a tragic inevitability of divergent rationalities. In doing so, it gives cover to a much darker political agenda: The delegitimation of democracy itself.

Keep ReadingShow less