Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Trump’s 2.0 Actions Have Harmed Rural America Who Voted for Him

Rural Americans who backed Trump in 2024 now face economic hardship, healthcare cuts, and broken promises across farming and infrastructure.

A Trump 2020 flag outside of a home.

As Trump’s second presidency unfolds, rural America—the foundation of his 2024 election win—is feeling the sting. From collapsing export markets to cuts in healthcare and infrastructure, those very voters are losing faith.

Getty Images, ablokhin

Daryl Royal, the 20-year University of Texas football coach, once said, “You've gotta dance with them that brung ya.” The modern adaptation of that quote is “you gotta dance with the one who brought you to the party.” The expression means you should remain loyal to the people or things that helped you succeed.

Sixty-three percent of America’s 3,144 counties are predominantly rural, and Donald Trump won 93 percent of those counties in 2024. Analyses show that rural counties have become increasingly solid Republican, and Trump’s margin of victory within rural America reached a new high in the 2024 election.


We are at the 260th day of Trump’s 2.0 presidency. Polling by ActiVote reveals that Mr. Trump’s approval rating is rapidly declining with rural Americans (Newsweek, Sept. 5).

Let’s explore why these 2024 election supporters are not happy with Trump’s performance to date.

America’s global agriculture market

Historians note that Presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt (Dem.) and Richard Nixon (Rep.) were the backbone to make the U.S. the global agriculture market leader. Evidence is replete that America’s worldwide agribusiness sector prowess has been evaporating at a quick pace since Trump’s Jan. 20 inauguration (Brennan Center for Justice, Aug. 3).

Economic and agricultural harm

The trade wars initiated by Mr. Trump have devastated export markets for American products like soybeans, corn, wheat, sorghum, cotton, pork, dairy, and beef. For example, China, a top buyer of U.S. soybeans, retaliated against Trump by shifting its purchasing to Brazil and Argentina.

In retaliation to Trump’s tariffs, five countries (China, Canada, Mexico, Turkey, and Russia) and the 27-member European Union have imposed their own levies, causing higher prices on equipment, steel and fertilizer needed by farmers (Tax Foundation, Sept. 26). The trade retaliation will continue to harm small and medium-sized family farms and is already trickling down to all of America.

Trump’s heightened immigration enforcement has led to raids on farms and processing plants, causing severe labor shortages in the agricultural labor sector. It’s sad that the Trump administration is not aware that of the 2.4 million farm workers nationwide, about 1.2 million are undocumented, who help plant, tend, harvest, pack, sort, and prepare food-related products Americans depend upon (CBS News and https://farmonaut.com).

USDA’s faux pas

Withholding USDA funding has created severe financial, operational, and rural community impacts, forcing many farmers into economic distress, threatening farm viability, and damaging rural economies (NRDC, Sept. 10).

USDA payment freezes and staffing cuts have stalled irrigation and rural housing projects, which have extended hardship beyond the farm into rural-based communities.

When the USDA reneged on signed contracts, most farmers lost their trust in USDA partnerships and government commitments (ibid).

Rural health and safety

The Trump 2.0 administration’s cuts to rural health and telehealth programs have put healthcare access at risk for the 64 million people who live in the nation's rural areas.

Trump’s effort to repeal or weaken the Affordable Care Act will disproportionately cause rural Americans—who rely heavily on Medicaid or individual markets—to lose insurance.

Budget reductions of opioid and substance abuse response programs—an acute problem in rural America—will have a devastating impact.

Erosion of community infrastructure

Mr. Trump’s reduced support for clean water infrastructure will directly affect rural public health. Similarly, reducing investments in rural broadband will put rural America further behind its urban and suburban peers.

Trump has imposed less funding for rural roads, bridges, and transit, which will impede economic growth and public safety.

Rural households—who spend around 40 percent more on utilities as a share of their income—will face greater hardship as a result of the Trump administration eliminating not only the low-income home energy assistance program but by reducing the weatherization assistance program.

Social safety nets

President Trump’s cuts to the SNAP program will dramatically make it worse for 9.8 million rural-based school children, as their food insecurity rates are the highest in America (Feeding America, May 14).

These examples collectively illustrate how Trump’s 2.0 actions—in only 260 days—have directly worsened living conditions in rural America by reducing access to essential services, increasing financial insecurity, declining healthcare, eroding community infrastructure, and increasing food insecurity for 9.8 million school children.

Trump’s actions are a slap in the face to about two-thirds of Americans who reside in a rural county, where 93 percent of them danced with him in the 2024 election. More broadly, Trump’s actions affect all Americans, as everyone depends on ag products to exist.

This begs the question: when will our 535 Congressional delegates – regardless of their political persuasion – wake up to the economic mess Donald Trump and his cabinet acolytes have created and take action to save America from further domestic and international ruin? Without Congressional intervention, the next 1,200 days of Trump 2.0 are going to be quite cloudy and murky.


Steve Corbin is Professor Emeritus of Marketing, University of Northern Iowa, and a non-paid freelance opinion editor and guest columnist who receives no remuneration, funding, or endorsement from any for-profit business, not-for-profit organization, political action committee, or political party

Read More

Combatting the Trump Administration’s Militarized Logic

Members of the National Guard patrol near the U.S. Capitol on October 1, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Al Drago/Getty Images)

Combatting the Trump Administration’s Militarized Logic

Approaching a year of the new Trump administration, Americans are getting used to domestic militarized logic. A popular sense of powerlessness permeates our communities. We bear witness to the attacks against innocent civilians by ICE, the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and we naturally wonder—is this the new American discourse? Violent action? The election of Zohran Mamdani as mayor of New York offers hope that there may be another way.

Zohran Mamdani, a Muslim democratic socialist, was elected as mayor of New York City on the fourth of November. Mamdani’s platform includes a reimagining of the police force in New York City. Mamdani proposes a Department of Community Safety. In a CBS interview, Mamdani said, “Our vision for a Department of Community Safety, the DCS, is that we would have teams of dedicated mental health outreach workers that we deploy…to respond to those incidents and get those New Yorkers out of the subway system and to the services that they actually need.” Doing so frees up NYPD officers to respond to actual threats and crime, without a responsibility to the mental health of civilians.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Four Top Officials Can Win Back Public Trust


Image generated by IVN staff.

How Four Top Officials Can Win Back Public Trust

Mandate for Change: The Public Calls for a Course Correction

The honeymoon is over. A new national survey from the Independent Center reveals that a plurality of American adults and registered voters believe key cabinet officials should be replaced—a striking rebuke of the administration’s current direction. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. are all underwater with the public, especially among independents.

But the message isn’t just about frustration—it’s about opportunity. Voters are signaling that these leaders can still win back public trust by realigning their policies with the issues Americans care about most. The data offers a clear roadmap for course correction.

Health and Human Services: RFK Jr. Is Losing the Middle

Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is emerging as a political liability—not just to the administration, but to the broader independent movement he once claimed to represent. While his favorability ratings are roughly even, the plurality of adults and registered voters now say he should be replaced. This sentiment is especially strong among independents, who once viewed Kennedy as a fresh alternative but now see him as out of step with their values.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump Administration Faces Record 530 Lawsuits in 2025 — Far Exceeding Biden, Obama, and Bush

An analysis of the 530 lawsuits filed against the Trump administration in 2025, how they compare to past presidents, key Supreme Court rulings, and what unresolved cases could mean for constitutional checks and balances.

Getty Images, Roberto Schmidt

Trump Administration Faces Record 530 Lawsuits in 2025 — Far Exceeding Biden, Obama, and Bush

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.


On April 22 of this year, I wrote a column in The Fulcrum entitled Just the Facts: Courts’ Actions Against the Trump Administration when there were over 186 legal actions filed against the Trump administration. At the time, these lawsuits challenged various executive orders and actions, including immigration policies and the use of the Alien Enemies Act.

Keep ReadingShow less
A thick cloud of exhaust rises up from a chimney in the blue sky

A comparative look at how New Jersey and Texas regulate refinery and chemical-plant pollution—and how weakened federal protections leave communities breathing unequal risks.

Getty Image, Hartmut Kosig

The Wind Doesn’t Know State Lines, Washington Doesn’t Seem To Care

As you cross the George Washington Bridge heading west, you can smell New Jersey. You pass through notorious Superfund marshes and speed through Newark's refinery smokestacks. East Coasters love to mock this “pollution alley," but here’s the twist: starting in the 1970s, New Jersey built some of the tightest refinery regulations in the country. If that corridor still feels toxic 50 years later, what's happening in states with far fewer protections?

When federal safeguards weaken, local rules decide how clean—or how dirty—the air gets. In mid-2025, the White House granted two-year delays for certain hazardous-air-pollutant standards covering dozens of large chemical-manufacturing facilities, including one within the Phillips 66 complex in Borger, Texas. Meanwhile, its sister refinery in New Jersey must carry on under the full force of both federal and state oversight. For families living near these plants, geography now dictates protection. Nearly 845,000 residents live within ten miles of New Jersey’s Bayway refinery—barely 2,200 around Borger’s—two very different stories emanating from similar operations and riding similar winds.

Keep ReadingShow less