Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Where Is the Democratic Party’s Clarion Voice?

Opinion

Where Is the Democratic Party’s Clarion Voice?

Democratic Donkey with megaphone

Editor's Notes: below is a new version of the article published earlier today (2:13 pm EST, 8/9/25)

The Democratic Party is in disarray, trying to determine how best to defeat Trump and the MAGA movement in the next midterm and presidential elections.


Their disarray is unfortunately not new. After the 2004 election, Vice President Mondale said, ""Unless we have a vision and the arguments to match, I don’t think we’re going to truly connect with the American people.“ They still have no vision, yet it is there for the asking.

The Pledge of Allegiance says, "with liberty and justice for all." It's about equality. The pledge and the concept of preserving American values should be the rallying cry of Democrats.

Yet when doing a Google search for “preserving American values," not a single Democratic Party organization showed up. But many state and local Republican Party organizations did because they use that phrase in policy documents.

Then last week, looking for a new platform for my blog, I entered the title "Preserving American Values" and the tagline: "Our nation stands under attack ... from within not without.." One platform, using AI, designed a new blog for me, but AI had assumed because of the words I used that I was a MAGA adherent. Talk about proof for the following argument.

I have for the past 2 decades—since writing the book, We Still Hold These Truths—argued that the Democratic Party should embrace America’s founding document—the Declaration of Independence—as the basis for their policies, making it their Mission statement. They should rightfully wrap themselves in the flag.

But they have not followed my advice. Instead, it is the MAGA Republicans who have embraced, deceitfully, the phrase “Preserving American Values;” deceitful in that their take on the values is always self-serving, it's about their rights.

By Democrats not tying their policies to our founding documents, they have left themselves open to Republican criticism for being “elite”, un-American, and not supporting the working man.

Whereas in actuality, it is the Republicans who have always sided with the true elite—large corporations and banks—and against the working man. Trump talks rousingly in support of the working man, but he has in fact done little. Democrats must expose Trump and MAGA Republicans for what they are … hypocrites masquerading as the party of the people.

Why have Democrats not claimed the provenance of our founding documents for their policies? Everything the Party has worked for since the turn of the 20th century derives from the Declaration of Independence: the right of all people—including women, workers, the poor, and people of color— to equality, to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.. Yet they never talk about the Declaration.

Democrats must fight for the hearts and minds of the American people by adopting a vision that resonates with the people. A centrist liberal vision that speaks to all Americans, that does not pit one segment against another, and promotes economic well-being for all. And this includes corporations; they have a vital role to play, but they cannot to be allowed to control government or act against the greater good.

Luckily, there is a vision at hand that is as American as apple pie—the words of the Declaration of Independence. You couldn't draft a more appropriate mission statement for the Democratic Party.

I therefore proposed in 2004, and have often since, that the Party adopt a Mission statement based on the words of the Declaration:

“To build a country of greater opportunity where:

  • each and every American has a real chance to experience the promises made in the Declaration of Independence: 'that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness' ;
  • government meets its responsibility as set forth in the Declaration—‘to secure these rights’—; and
  • all citizens have a shared responsibility to support the government’s efforts to secure these rights and promote the public good, each according to his ability.”

These words from the Declaration of Independence are the moral philosophy, the heart, the soul of American democracy. This is, or at least until recently was, America’s common faith. Democrats must restore that faith.

True, there were aspects of the American experiment that went against these values—slavery and the continuing inequality of women—but the exigencies and mores of the time do not negate the aspirational nature of the words, and indeed they have proven to be the light that has guided us.

Besides the concept of equality, the role of government noted in the Declaration and implemented in the Constitution is critical. That role is "to secure these rights."

What does that mean? It means that government must do what is necessary to insure that all Americans—whether White or people of color; whether rich, middle class, or poor; whether male or female—have a truly equal opportunity to pursue the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

And the government insures that opportunity by enacting policies that promote the education, jobs and economic stability necessary to allow people to advance themselves and feel financially secure. Once the government insures equal opportunity, it is the individual's responsibility to take advantage of it.

For example, welfare is not charity, but an example of the government's providing support so children have an equal opportunity to have a good education. You can't do well in school if you're hungry, if your housing is not secure. But it is then a child's and his parents' responsibility make the most of that opportunity.

But beyond the problem of not having a vision, another major problem is that the Party sees itself one way—the party of the people, the average man—while a large number of those very people—the White middle class worker—see the Party differently. What happened?

The Party must understand its role in this, Yes, the Party worked hard during the 20th century to increase people's rights and their standard of living, first for the American worker and later for the poor and people of color.

But it must realize that in the last decades of the 20th century, it was so focused on righting the discrimination that people of color and the poor suffered historically, that it didn't notice the depths to which the formerly middle class worker sank during the following decades They must do a mea culpa and insure those worker that they are now, once again, whole-heartedly included in the Party's vision for all Americans.

And they must show all Americans that their interests are not really separate or opposed. That by enacting policies that ensure all citizens—White and people of color, the poor and disadvantaged as well as the middle-class worker—have a realistic opportunity to pursue their rights, all benefit. All benefit, even the rich and corporations, from policies that move all people forward because it will create a more prosperous country. Democrats must counter the prevalent us v them attitude.

It is past time for Democrats to regain the rhetorical upper hand and reclaim their position as the party of the people, the party of America’s historic values.. Democrats must go on the offensive.

Ronald L. Hirsch is a teacher, legal aid lawyer, survey researcher, nonprofit executive, consultant, composer, author, and volunteer. He is a graduate of Brown University and the University of Chicago Law School and the author of We Still Hold These Truths. Read more of his writing at www.PreservingAmericanValues.com


Read More

The Reward — Angela and James: An American Dynasty

Ring–Fitzgerald Homestead, Will County (1987). A house still true to its original form, carrying forward the Rings’ steadiness, aspiration, and good citizenship across five generations.

Photo courtesy by Patrick Fitzgerald.

The Reward — Angela and James: An American Dynasty

They got an early start; the morning light came on fast. The Ring siblings were headed to the Joliet depot with young Angela in tow — the same depot where Lincoln’s funeral train had passed in silence thirty years earlier. Now they were bound for the White City, forty miles northeast. The Columbian Exposition was a turning point for both Angela and America. Buffalo Bill’s Wild West Show, pitched just outside the fairgrounds, rivaled the Exhibition itself.

One photograph captured it all. Taken in a fairground photo booth, the Ring siblings stood in their summer clothes, huddled around eleven-year-old Angela. Their faces were bright and open — a single moment preserved in time. Determined to outshine the 1889 Paris Exhibition and its Eiffel Tower, Chicago answered with George Ferris’s great wheel. At night, the city glowed, outlined in electric white light.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Knicks and the Practice of Us

Jalen Brunson #11 of the New York Knicks celebrates with the Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy during the New York Knicks Championship ticker tape parade and victory rally celebrating winning the 2026 NBA Finals on June 18, 2026 in New York City.

(Photo by Angelina Katsanis/Getty Images)

The Knicks and the Practice of Us

I didn’t grow up anywhere near Madison Square Garden. My childhood unfolded in the Midwest, far from New York’s tangled boroughs and yellow cabs. My father brought the city with him, tucked in the vowels of his accent and the teams he rooted for. He was a Jersey boy at first. Then, a reluctant Midwesterner. Geography, though, never truly loosened its grip. In our house, sports allegiance wasn’t a choice. It was inherited—an expectation passed like a family recipe. Or a story retold until it blurs into fact.

For my father, and then for me, the Knicks were never just a team. They were a test of endurance. Before I could distinguish a pick-and-roll from a triangle offense, I understood Knicks loyalty: you waited. You hoped in public, persisted when heartbreak was routine. Knicks fandom was boot camp for disappointment. The main skill was getting up after being knocked down.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

People gather over a giant Declaration of Independence

Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images.

Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

As America approaches the 250th anniversary of its independence, I am more in the mood to protest than to celebrate. Does that make me unpatriotic? The answer depends on how we understand “patriotism.” For a nation that is founded in revolution, let’s affirm a deeper and more profound love of country, a civic patriotism celebrative of our larger ideals including pluralism, dissent, and a commitment to social change.

Two Types of Patriotism

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together
Political polarization
Polarization and the politics of love

A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together

As we face ever-growing partisan polarization in American society, the need for large-scale action becomes increasingly urgent. As James Coan and I have written about in the Fulcrum during my time at More Like US, there are approaches grounded in a significant body of social psychological research that can help address this rapidly growing problem, namely different variations of social contact theory, especially vicarious contact. Until recently, much of the research and thus much of the basis for our articles has been focused on applying social contact theory to other problems facing society: prejudice against members of the LGBTQ community, individuals with autism, and immigrant schoolchildren, among other examples.

It was therefore exciting when last fall I saw the publication of an article in Political Science Research and Methods titled "Content That's as Good as Contact?: Vicarious Intergroup Contact and the Promise of Depolarization at Scale." The study, conducted in 2022 in conjunction with YouGov, finally attempted to measure the effectiveness of indirect contact as a path to depolarization, primarily through the vicarious experience of productive political conversation. Encompassing over 2,000 participants gathered from a nationally representative sample recruited by YouGov’s online panel, the study looked to test affective polarization, measured attitudinally, and interest and investment in depolarization, measured behaviorally. To this end, the study tested multiple media interventions, namely a 50-minute Braver Angels documentary featuring a “Red-Blue” depolarization workshop; a 50-minute placebo nature documentary about wildebeest migration; a 5-minute version of the Braver Angels documentary; a second 5-minute version that emphasized partisan misperception correction; and a pure control group, with no treatment.

Keep ReadingShow less