Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Distress signals: The American flag as a political weapon

Person holding an upside down American flag

A woman protests Joe Biden's inauguration on Jan. 20, 2021, by waving an upside down American Flag.

Watchara Phomicinda/MediaNews Group/The Press-Enterprise via Getty Images

Becvar is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and executive director of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund, the parent organization of The Fulcrum.

Comparing the year leading up to the 2020 presidential election to this year, it’s striking how much has changed in the American consciousness. The divisions that deepened after the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection often seem irreparable. Once unimaginable discord with family, friends and neighbors has now become commonplace. This new reality includes a further divide over what the American flag represents.


In the weeks leading up to Flag Day, I wrote about the difficulty of the flag representing a unifying ideal in a complex country. The flag's meaning has become contentious in a politically divided America, often seen as aligning with conservative ideologies. I offered that to reclaim the flag as a unifying emblem, Americans must engage in open dialogue, acknowledging the country’s complex history and fostering understanding and empathy in search of common ground.

However, many readers disagreed with the idea that dialogue and the search for a new common ideal could bridge the severe partisan poisoning of their patriotism. They felt it was naïve to believe that a conversation about the flag's meaning could reconcile the stark ideological differences between liberals and conservatives.

I still believe that dialogue is the best option we have for overcoming our differences. But I also acknowledge the concrete reasons people are upset by the politicization of the flag. With Independence Day approaching, it is a good time to finish this thought.

In less polarizing times, even the most ardent flag hardliners took things like flag code violations in stride in the spirit of celebrating the Fourth of July. Now, differences in perception and use of the flag mirror the vast differences among Americans in all aspects of life. Seeing flags flown in ways many people feel are disrespectful by those who have positioned themselves as the most patriotic of Americans can cause anger and frustration. The politicization of the flag is taking its toll. And for conflict profiteers, that's precisely the point.

The flag is not new to being used for political purposes. During the Vietnam War, supporters of the war waved the flag, claiming true patriotism against anti-war protesters. Initially, flag-wavers came from both major political parties. By the end of the Vietnam era, the flag became more associated with the Republican Party.

Today, under Trump’s influence, the flag has become a symbol of exclusive, party-branded loyalty and defiance. The Jan. 6 insurrection exemplified this manipulation, with rioters using flagpoles as weapons and carrying flags while committing acts of violence. These individuals, convinced that free and legal elections were corrupted, claimed the flag and called themselves patriots while acting in contradiction to true patriotism. Their actions have deepened divisions and turned many patriotic Americans against the symbol of their country. Many are military personnel and veterans, part of one of America’s most diverse communities. Regardless of their heritage, color, gender, or political beliefs, they have defended the flag and the country it represents. Now, many in the military and veteran communities see the flag as desecrated by partisan politics.

Another form of flag desecration for political purposes is the use of the inverted flag. What should be a signal of dire distress in instances of extreme danger to life or property has become a signal of frustration and anger with opposing political power. Its use in issue-based protests has been observed since the 19th century, but its usage as a partisan symbol was ramped up by Tea Party advocates after Barack Obama’s reelection in 2012 and has reached a fever pitch during the Trump era.

In January 2021, many Trump supporters flew their flags upside-down as an anti-Biden protest, falsely claiming the election was stolen. Last month, it was revealed that even Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito flew the flag upside-down at his home during that time. This symbol has gained even more prominence since Trump was found guilty of falsifying business records related to the 2016 presidential election. In response, right-wing figures and supporters displayed the inverted flag on social media, accompanied by messages of distress, outrage, and calls for civil war.

I am fully aware of how difficult the task ahead of us is — repairing a country filled with such anger. I also know that dialogue alone will not cure what ails us. The foundation of the Bridge Alliance is the belief that it will take a diverse ecosystem of solutions working in tandem to bring about a healthier country. But I also know that of those solutions, the ones that every individual can move forward every day is dialogue — and we can use points of connection such as the flag to start those conversations. Few alternatives do not include individuals taking action to turn the tide of division; after all, we know that sending a distress signal isn’t going to help. It’s up to all of us to fix it.

Read More

High School Civic Innovators Bridging America’s Divide

At just 17 years of age, Sophie Kim was motivated to start her organization, Bipartisan Bridges, to bring together people from both ends of the political spectrum. What started as just an idea during her freshman year of high school took off after Sophie placed in the Civics Unplugged pitch contest, hosted for alumni in Spring 2024. Since then, Sophie has continued to expand Bipartisan Bridges' impact, creating spaces that foster civil dialogue and facilitate meaningful connections across party lines.

Sophie, a graduate of the Spring 2024 Civic Innovators Fellowship and the Summer 2025 Civic Innovation Academy at UCLA, serves as the founder and executive director of Bipartisan Bridges. In this role, Sophie has forged a partnership with the organization Braver Angels to host depolarization workshops and has led the coordination and capture of conversations on climate change, abortion, gun control, foreign aid, and the 100 Men vs. a Gorilla debate. In addition, this year, Sophie planned and oversaw Bipartisan Bridges’ flagship Politics and Polarization Fellowship, an eight-week, in-person program involving youth from Tustin, Irvine, Costa Mesa, and Huntington Beach, California. A recent Bipartisan Bridges session featuring youth from both Los Angeles and Orange County will be featured in Bridging the Gap, an upcoming documentary.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two speech bubbles overlapping each other.

Democrats can reclaim America’s founding principles, rebuild the rural economy, and restore democracy by redefining the political battle Trump began.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

Defining the Democrat v. Republican Battle

Winning elections is, in large part, a question of which Party is able to define the battle and define the actors. Trump has so far defined the battle and effectively defined Democrats for his supporters as the enemy of making America great again.

For Democrats to win the 2026 midterm and 2028 presidential elections, they must take the offensive and show just the opposite–that it is they who are true to core American principles and they who will make America great again, while Trump is the Founders' nightmare come alive.

Keep ReadingShow less
Mirror, Mirror On the Wall, Who's the Most Patriotic of All?

Trump and the MAGA movement have twisted the meaning of patriotism. It’s time we collectively reclaim America’s founding ideals and the Pledge’s promise.

Getty Images, LeoPatrizi

Mirror, Mirror On the Wall, Who's the Most Patriotic of All?

Republicans have always claimed to be the patriotic party, the party of "America, right or wrong," the party willing to use force to protect American national interests abroad, the party of a strong military. In response, Democrats have not really contested this perspective since Vietnam, basically ceding the patriotic badge to the Republicans.

But with the advent of Donald Trump, the Republican claim to patriotism has gotten broader and more troubling. Republicans now claim to be the party that is true to our founding principles. And it is not just the politicians; they have support from far-right scholars at the Heritage Foundation, such as Matthew Spalding. The Democratic Party has done nothing to counter these claims.

Keep ReadingShow less
Communication concept with multi colored abstract people icons.

Research shows that emotional, cognitive, and social mechanisms drive both direct and indirect contact, offering scalable ways to reduce political polarization.

Getty Images, Eoneren

“Direct” and “Indirect” Contact Methods Likely Work in Similar Ways, so They Should Both Be Effective

In a previous article, we argued that efforts to improve the political environment should reach Americans as media consumers, in addition to seeking public participation. Reaching Americans as media consumers uses media like film, TV, and social media to change what Americans see and hear about fellow Americans across the political spectrum. Participant-based efforts include dialogues and community-based activities that require active involvement.

In this article, we show that the mechanisms underlying each type of approach are quite similar. The categories of mechanisms we cover are emotional, cognitive, relational, and repetitive. We use the terms from the academic literature, “direct” and “indirect” contact, which are fairly similar to participant and media consumer approaches, respectively.

Keep ReadingShow less