Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Does My Vote Still Matter?

Does My Vote Still Matter?
white and red heart sticker
Photo by Dan Dennis on Unsplash

The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists. To learn about the many NextGen initiatives we are leading, click HERE.

We asked Roselyn Gonzalez, a recent graduate of the University of Nebraska–Lincoln and a cohort member with the Fulcrum Fellowship, to share her thoughts on what democracy means to her and her perspective on its current health.


Here’s her insight on the topic.

Civic responsibilities, such as citizen-initiated proposals, allow voters to bypass their state legislature. But what happens when representatives adamantly undermine their constituents by drastically altering voter-approved measures? As a Nebraskan, I am one of many voters who feel as if their government is not working in their best interest.

Notably, the state has a unicameral legislature, which was implemented in 1934 when voters approved a constitutional amendment. Among many reasons Nebraskans decided to adopt the structure was to minimize legislative gridlock, a situation where the legislative process stalls because lawmakers cannot agree.

During Nebraska’s 2025 legislative session, voter-approved initiatives were heavily debated, despite receiving an overwhelming amount of support. Ballot Measure 437 was approved by 71% of voters, allowing the use of up to five ounces of cannabis for medical purposes, and Measure 436 received a 75% approval rate, obligating businesses to offer paid sick leave. If a business has at least 20 employees, it must allow up to seven days of leave. If the company has fewer than 20 employees, the allowed leave is five days.

But several paid sick leave benefits were rolled back, and medical marijuana is still unregulated because our legislators couldn’t work together.

“It’s pretty clear an effort to undermine, at least in part, if not entirely, the verdict that the Nebraska voters came to,” said political consultant Ryan Horn. “Politically, that’s kind of a dangerous game.”

While we are seeing active developments towards the regulation of medical marijuana, there are barriers in the way of breakthroughs: the implementation of the new committee of The Nebraska Medical Cannabis Commission, current lawsuits, and the possibility that the Department of Health and Human Services will be contracted to partner with the commission which is problematic. The citizen-led ballot was a way to divert from DHHS.

Notably, the health agency has strongly opposed legalization for years. They have the potential to derail the intent of the cannabis measure.

On the other hand, the paid sick leave initiative is set to take effect on October 1, 2025; however, it has been drastically altered. One example is the modification of waiting periods for paid sick leave. The measure initially stated that employees would be able to use accrued paid sick leave, but it was later modified to allow paid sick leave after 80 hours of consecutive employment.

Voters disapproved of this.

It’s essential to note that Nebraskans have consistently voted for Republican candidates. The support levels of these measures would not be high without Republican votes. Although we are in a period of political polarization, this is not about which party you align with – our representatives are working against us.

“Republicans vote for these things a lot,” said Horn, referring to progressive ballot initiatives despite affiliation with the Republican party. “You don't win 60% of the vote in Nebraska without winning a lot of Republican votes.”

In 2022, citizens voted to raise the minimum wage by $1.50 each year through 2026. By 2027, the minimum wage is scheduled to increase in line with the cost of living.

The initiative was brought into question during this legislative session. Again, threatening direct democracy.

Alarmingly, this is not exclusive to my home state. Many other states are facing a similar fate, with some approving efforts to make it harder for voters to have the opportunity to change laws. In 2026, Utah citizens will have to choose to require ballot initiatives to receive at least 60% of the vote if the law calls for tax increases. Currently, the state’s constitutional amendment requires a simple majority vote for a law to be enacted. Utah Senate President Stuart Adams argues that if citizen-led initiatives are not regulated, it can destroy the state.

In Missouri, the legislature voted to repeal paid sick leave after voters approved it. Just a month after it was passed, the lawmakers acted quickly to reverse the measures.

The exhaustion voters are experiencing is causing citizens to disengage from politics. Overwhelmed by national politics, it's hard to keep up with what's going on in your home state. The local media coverage is scarcer than ever; there is no megaphone to sound the alarm. There are still ways to have your voice heard. Don’t back down; it is up to us to hold our representatives accountable.

Pushing the legislature can start in many ways; one way to begin is by holding citizen assemblies, a group of citizens selected randomly from the state’s population. The goal is to increase public engagement, sort of like jury duty, but for ordinary people. Initiatives that would be considered are not disclosed until the members are chosen.

Often, citizen-led ballots allow for too many initiatives, which can overwhelm voters; citizen assemblies can help regulate the number of measures on a ballot. Additionally, public hearings on an initiative can provide full transparency before it is presented to legislators. As a result, these tools can help strengthen direct democracy, and the structure can help fulfill the goal of injecting citizen control into the democratic process.

Roselyn Gonzalez is a recent graduate of the University of Nebraska–Lincoln with over three years of experience in multimedia journalism. She’s a passionate photographer and politics enthusiast, and most of her time is spent behind a lens or reading up on public policy. Her work focuses on stories about social issues, civic engagement, and underrepresented voices.


Read More

Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger delivers the Democratic response to U.S. President Donald Trump's State of the Union address on February 24, 2026 in Williamsburg, Virginia.

Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger delivers the Democratic response to U.S. President Donald Trump's State of the Union address on February 24, 2026 in Williamsburg, Virginia.

Getty Images, Mike Kropf

Three Questions Linger After State of the Union Speech

Anyone tuning into the State of the Union expecting responsible governance was sorely disappointed. What they got instead was pure Trumpian spectacle.

All the familiar elements were there: extended applause lines, culture-war provocation, even self-congratulation, praising the U.S. hockey team and folding its victory into a broader narrative of national resurgence. The whole thing was show business, crafted for reaction rather than reflection, for clips rather than consensus.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two individuals Skiing in the Milano Cortina 2026 Winter Paralympic Games.

Oksana Masters of Team United States celebrates after winning gold in the Para Cross Country Skiing Sprint Sitting Final on day four of the Milano Cortina 2026 Winter Paralympic Games at Tesero Cross-Country Skiing Stadium on March 10, 2026 in Val di Fiemme, Italy.

Getty Images, Buda Mendes

The Paralympics Challenge Everything We Think We Know About Sports

If you’re a sports fan, you likely watched coverage of the 2026 Winter Olympics in Milano Cortina. But will you watch the Paralympics when approximately 665 athletes are expected in Italy to compete in the Para sports of alpine skiing, biathlon, cross-country skiing, ice hockey, snowboarding, and wheelchair curling?

The Paralympics, so-called because they are “parallel” to the Olympics, stand alone as the globe’s premier sporting event for elite athletes with disabilities. According to the International Paralympic Committee, 4,400 disabled athletes competed in the 2024 Paris Summer Games in track and field, swimming, and twenty other sports.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Capitol.

Could Trump declare a national emergency to control voting in the 2026 midterms? An analysis of emergency powers, election law, and Congress’s role in protecting democracy.

Photo by Andy Feliciotti on Unsplash

To Save Democracy, Congress Must Curtail the President’s Emergency Powers

On February 26, the Washington Post reported that allies of President Trump are urging him to declare a national emergency so that he can issue rules and regulations concerning voting in the 2026 election. The alleged emergency arises from the threat of foreign interference in our electoral process.

That threat is based on now fully debunked reports that China manipulated registration and voting in 2020. The National Intelligence Council explained that there were “no indications that any foreign actor attempted to alter any technical aspect of the voting process in the 2020 US elections, including voter registration, casting ballots, vote tabulation, or reporting results.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Elite Insulation and the Fragility of Equal Access

A protest group called "Hot Mess" hold up signs of Jeffrey Epstein in front of the Federal courthouse on July 8, 2019 in New York City.

(Photo by Stephanie Keith/Getty Images)

Elite Insulation and the Fragility of Equal Access

In America: What We Want, What We Have, What We Need, I argued that despite partisan division, Americans share core expectations. They want upward mobility that feels real. They want elections that are credible. They want markets where new entrants can compete. They want rules that bind concentrated wealth. They want stability without stagnation.

The Epstein case directly tests those expectations.

Keep ReadingShow less