Imagining The Path Forward for The Healthy Democracy Ecosystem

In the last decade, the ecosystem working toward a healthy democracy has grown from dozens to thousands of organizations tackling everything from electoral reform to civic education, bridge-building to institutional repair. This represents an extraordinary surge of civic energy.

But growth and impact aren't the same thing. After Donald Trump's return to the presidency, those of us in this space faced an uncomfortable question: If we've built such a robust movement, why does American democracy still feel so fragile?

That question prompted the Bridge Alliance Education Fund to examine our collective efforts through interviews, surveys, and field assessments. Our new report, "The Path Forward for the Healthy Democracy Ecosystem,” offers both honest critique and actionable direction for democracy work in the Trump era.

An Ecosystem Rich in Energy, Poor in Connection

The research reveals a movement caught between promise and performance. Yes, we've built impressive networks spanning electoral reform, funding, civic engagement and education, bridging, dialogue facilitation, and institutional reform. BIPOC-led organizations, youth initiatives, and faith-based groups play increasingly prominent roles. Innovations like ranked choice voting and citizens' assemblies have expanded democracy's imagination.

But we've also created what one survey respondent called a field "rich in intention, poor in impact." Too many efforts remain isolated pilot projects rather than scaled solutions. Organizations often agree on shared threats while lacking consensus on shared values, goals, or even language. Most critically, there's a persistent disconnect between elite strategy and grassroots reality—reform proposals designed in national think-tanks that fail to resonate in communities that feel democracy has already failed them.

Many groups building civic trust or facilitating dialogue frame their work as youth development or community healing, not democracy work. These vital efforts often get excluded from national strategy tables or funding pipelines.

The result is fragmentation precisely when coordination matters most.

Beyond Defensive Postures

Perhaps our most important finding is how practitioners are rethinking their work. While defending institutions remains crucial, purely defensive strategies aren't inspiring or sustainable. Worse, they often alienate communities that haven't felt well-served by those institutions.

"We're not just in a fight over process anymore," one respondent told us. "We're in a cultural and moral struggle over the meaning of democracy itself."

This shift is driving the field toward deeper questions: What does democracy mean to Americans across ideological lines? How do we foster discussion and bridge divides in an information ecosystem so fragmented that different groups seem to operate from entirely different facts? How do we rebuild trust and belonging in communities where civic institutions feel distant or hostile?

The answer requires recognizing that structural fixes and cultural repair must work together, but neither is currently meeting Americans where they're seeking answers.

A Path Forward Rooted in Connection

Based on practitioner input, we identified a framework for four mutually reinforcing capacities that our ecosystem needs to build.

1. Narrative Capacity: From Policy to Shared Story. Democracy work must move beyond policy language toward narratives that speak to lived experiences and cultural values. Americans need to see themselves inside the democracy story, not just as its beneficiaries. This also means tying our proposed solutions to people’s personal and community needs. For example, how does what we’re talking about address the cost of living? Community health and safety?
2. Relational Capacity: Belonging as Civic Infrastructure. Democracy thrives where people feel they belong, are heard, and can shape outcomes. This means investing in trust-building, creating accessible civic onramps, and local leadership training. This also means recognizing that work is being done in countless communities under different names than we may use in the democracy space, and we need to build connections to and support for them where they are already succeeding.
3. Courage Capacity: Principled Action Across Difference. The field must model democratic values internally, making room for dissent, supporting moral courage across ideologies, and maintaining curiosity about different perspectives rather than dismissing them. Too often, leaders hesitate to speak plainly about disinformation, extremism, or authoritarian drift. If we want Americans to have curious conversations about the state of our democracy, we need to be able to have the difficult discussions and model principled, pluralistic leadership.
4. Coordination Capacity: Scaffolding for Collective Power. The ecosystem needs connective infrastructure: shared tools, connected platforms, shared data and measurement systems, resourced networks, and coordinated narratives that reduce duplication while amplifying what works. Initiatives like Press Forward for local news have done what we believe could be a model for funders in how we approach creating sustainable infrastructure for scale.

The Fulcrum's Role

These findings directly inform our decision to position The Fulcrum as communications infrastructure for the broader ecosystem. We plan on using the report as a starting point for a collaborative action plan for The Fulcrum and are exploring how we can allocate resources in the coming months to co-create a plan to do so for the greatest impact.

With up to one million monthly readers and built on the partnerships the Bridge Alliance Education Fund has developed across the democracy space, The Fulcrum can serve as both convener and amplifier, facilitating the narrative coordination our research shows is essential while preserving the ideological diversity that gives the movement legitimacy.

Democracy as Practice, Not Just Promise

American democracy faces unprecedented pressures; not just from leaders rejecting constraints, but from millions questioning its relevance to their lives.

Meeting this challenge requires more than defending what exists. It demands reimagining democracy as something Americans actively practice together rather than passively consume. That work begins with building the movement for democracy itself—building the collective identity, compelling narrative, courageous leadership, and shared infrastructure that our research shows remains essential but elusive.

The path forward isn't choosing between reform and relationship, or local versus national efforts. It's weaving them together with the skill, courage, and imagination this moment demands.

Our report doesn't have all the answers, but it offers a framework—a compass, not a map—for navigating this next phase. We invite all who care about America's future to read it, respond to it, and build on it.

The full "Path Forward for the Healthy Democracy Ecosystem" report is available here. Kristina Becvar is Executive Director of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund and Co-Publisher of The Fulcrum.