Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Millions at Risk: How Trump’s Insurance Cuts Threaten Latino Communities in California

News

Millions at Risk: How Trump’s Insurance Cuts Threaten Latino Communities in California

Two people converse at CHIRLA's office in Los Angeles.

Credit: Alex Segura

When President Donald Trump signed his sweeping tax and spending bill into law last week, much of the attention focused on corporate tax breaks and the repeal of key climate protections. But buried deep within the legislation, hailed by its allies as the “One Big Beautiful Bill,” are provisions that could radically reshape the country’s healthcare system. And for millions of Latino families, the consequences could be devastating.

At the heart of the reform is a fundamental restructuring of Medicaid, the public health insurance program that covers more than 80 million low-income Americans. The new law introduces work requirements, tightens eligibility rules, and slashes federal funding to states. Policy experts say these changes will disproportionately affect the Latino population, particularly in states like California, Texas, Florida, and Arizona.


"Unfortunately, more than 16 million people are going to be directly affected by these cuts," said Dr. Ilan Shapiro, Chief Health Correspondent and Medical Affairs Officer at AltaMed. "The real problem is that the community, specifically the Latino community, already tends to use medical services much less. And now, with this restriction, even fewer people will be able to access care."

According to data from the Kaiser Family Foundation, nearly one in three Latino adults receives health coverage through Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program. Among Latino children, that number climbs even higher, with over 50 percent covered by these safety net programs.

Many of these gains stem from the Affordable Care Act, which expanded Medicaid eligibility and dramatically increased enrollment among Hispanic populations. But Trump's new law reverses much of that progress. By capping federal reimbursements and introducing six-month eligibility checks, analysts estimate that between 8 and 12 million people could lose coverage in the next three years.

"This will lead to an increase in chronic and preventable conditions that our community could face," warned Shapiro. "We have to keep in mind that people will end up in emergency rooms with complications from diabetes, high blood pressure, and other issues like cancer in much more advanced stages than we used to see."

While exemptions exist for caregivers and people with disabilities, immigrant families, especially mixed-status households, face particular vulnerability. Many fear that any interaction with government programs could be used against them in immigration proceedings, even if the public charge rule is no longer in effect.

"When providing care mired in politics, race, and power, our patients become more vulnerable, and our caregivers are placed in untenable ethical positions which are counter to our role as patient advocates," said Oriana Beaudet, Vice President of Nursing Innovation at the American Nurses Association. "Healthcare clinics and hospitals are economic drivers for communities across our country. When the demand for care increases and reimbursable care decreases, healthcare facilities close, putting everyone at risk."

Shapiro noted that this pressure will have real consequences for health systems nationwide. "This will increase the number of people going to the ER, and these services, unfortunately, will cause many community and rural clinics and hospitals to shut down or be forced to make cuts to doctors, nurses, and other staff because it will simply be too difficult to afford to provide these medical services."

According to Dr. Arturo Vargas Bustamante, professor of Health Policy at UCLA, the new law puts states like California in a bind. "Even though California has strongly opposed Medicaid work requirements in the past, the new federal law may force the state into a tough position, either complying in some form or risking losing federal funding. State leaders might try to fight the requirements in court or create new programs to protect those who lose coverage, but those options take time and money."

"In the short run, the most immediate impact will not come from people refusing to work. It will come from people getting caught up in red tape," explained Bustamante. "Thousands could lose their Medi-Cal coverage simply because they miss a deadline, do not understand the rules, or cannot easily report their hours. That means more uninsured individuals, more pressure on county clinics and hospitals, and more costs for the safety net. Communities that already face barriers to care, especially low-income workers, racial and ethnic minorities, and those in rural areas, will be hit hardest."

Latino enrollment in Medi-Cal and Covered California is also expected to decline, not because people no longer qualify, but because the system becomes more challenging and intimidating to navigate. "Trust between a patient and their care provider is critical to better health outcomes," said Beaudet. "When people do not feel safe accessing healthcare services, they delay or avoid care needs, which can lead to an exacerbation of health problems and the need for higher-cost emergency care. The confusion of navigating complex enrollment systems for public health programs, coupled with fear, inhibits individuals from accessing necessary healthcare services."

The long-term consequences could be even more severe. "Health is a culmination of our communities, the environments in which we live, our families, access to food and water, and education," said Beaudet. "Health is then supported by our healthcare system. Poverty and healthcare inequality disproportionately impact minority and non-citizen immigrants, with language and cultural barriers magnifying risks. Health policies inhibiting access to care will put people across our country at higher risk for disease, illness, and even death."

Faced with this reality, Shapiro urged communities to take action where they can. "Right now, we must be proactive and think about what we can do to prevent disease, including maintaining a healthy weight, managing our stress as best as we can, and continuing to stay active and exercise. These three things, and making health a priority in our communities, can help us stay a little healthier, especially now that access to healthcare is going to become much more difficult."

The Medicaid overhaul has triggered fierce political backlash. A coalition of attorneys general from 20 states, led by California, is preparing a legal challenge, arguing that the bill violates federal protections and unfairly targets immigrant and minority communities. At the same time, advocacy groups like UnidosUS and the Latino Community Foundation are launching national campaigns to raise awareness and encourage families to seek out trusted enrollment counselors.

Alex Segura is a bilingual, multiple-platform journalist based in Southern California.


Read More

Calling Wealthy Benefactors!
A rusty house figure stands over a city.
Photo by Katja Ano on Unsplash

Calling Wealthy Benefactors!

My housing has been conditional on circumstances beyond my control, and the time is up; the owner is selling.

Securing affordable housing is a stressor for much of the working class. According to recent data, nearly 50% of renters are cost-burdened, meaning they spend over 30% of their take-home income on housing costs. Rental prices in California are especially high, 35% higher than the national average. Renting is routinely insecure. The lords of land need to renovate, their kids need to move in. They need to sell.

Keep ReadingShow less
An ICE agent monitors hundreds of asylum seekers being processed upon entering the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building on June 6, 2023 in New York City. New York City has provided sanctuary to over 46,000 asylum seekers since 2013, when the city passed a law prohibiting city agencies from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement agencies unless there is a warrant for the person's arrest.(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)
An ICE agent monitors hundreds of asylum seekers being processed.
(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)

The Power of the Purse and Executive Discretion: ICE Expansion Under the Trump Administration

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key Takeaways

  • Core Constitutional Debate: Expanded ICE enforcement under the Trump Administration raises a core constitutional question: Does Article II executive power override Article I’s congressional power of the purse?
  • Executive Justification: The primary constitutional justification for expanded ICE enforcement is The Unitary Executive Theory.
  • Separation of Powers: Critics argue that the Unitary Executive Theory undermines Congress’s power of the purse.
  • Moral Conflict: Expanded ICE enforcement has sparked a moral debate, as concerns over due process and civil liberties clash with claims of increased public safety and national security.

Where is ICE Funding Coming From?

Since the beginning of the current Trump Administration, immigration enforcement has undergone transformative change and become one of the most contested issues in the federal government. On his first day in office, President Trump issued Executive Order 14159, which directs executive agencies to implement stricter immigration enforcement practices. In order to implement these practices, Congress passed and President Trump signed into law the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), a budget reconciliation package that paired state and local tax cuts with immigration funding. This allocated $170.7 billion in immigration-related funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to spend by 2029.

Keep ReadingShow less
Towards a Reformed Capitalism
oval brown wooden conference table and chairs inside conference room

Towards a Reformed Capitalism

Despite all the laws and regulations that apply to corporations, which for the most part are designed to make corporations more responsive to the greater good, corporations have wreaked great harm on our environment, their workers, their customers, and the general public. Despite all the rules, capitalism can still pretty much do what it wants.

The problem is not that the laws and regulations are not enforced, although that is partly true. The problem is more that the laws and regulations are weak because of the strong influence corporations have on both Congress (this is true of Democrats as well as Republicans) and those responsible for regulating.

Keep ReadingShow less
Families of Americans Overseas Wrongfully Detained Bring Advocacy to Capitol Hill

The Bring Our Families Home campaign brought together loved ones of Americans wrongly detained overseas to display portraits in the Senate Russell Rotunda on Wednesday, May 6.

(Jacques Abou-Rizk, MNS)

Families of Americans Overseas Wrongfully Detained Bring Advocacy to Capitol Hill

WASHINGTON – American journalist Reza Valizadeh visited his elderly Iranian parents in March 2024 for the first time in 15 years. Valizadeh’s stories for Voice of America and other U.S. government-funded outlets often criticized the Iranian regime. So before traveling, he sought and received confirmation that he would be safe from a high-ranking commander in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, a branch of Iran’s armed forces. However, in September that same year, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps arrested Valizadeh, and Tehran’s Revolutionary Court sentenced him to ten years in prison for “collaboration with a hostile government.”

In the Rotunda of the Senate Russell Building last week, the Bring Our Families Home campaign set up portraits of Valizadeh and 12 other Americans currently wrongfully detained overseas. The group, family members of illegitimately detained Americans, appealed to Congress to push for their safe return. Each foam poster board included the name, home state, and country of detainment. The display also included portraits of the 33 people released after advocacy by the James W. Foley Foundation.

Keep ReadingShow less