Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Millions at Risk: How Trump’s Insurance Cuts Threaten Latino Communities in California

News

Millions at Risk: How Trump’s Insurance Cuts Threaten Latino Communities in California

Two people converse at CHIRLA's office in Los Angeles.

Credit: Alex Segura

When President Donald Trump signed his sweeping tax and spending bill into law last week, much of the attention focused on corporate tax breaks and the repeal of key climate protections. But buried deep within the legislation, hailed by its allies as the “One Big Beautiful Bill,” are provisions that could radically reshape the country’s healthcare system. And for millions of Latino families, the consequences could be devastating.

At the heart of the reform is a fundamental restructuring of Medicaid, the public health insurance program that covers more than 80 million low-income Americans. The new law introduces work requirements, tightens eligibility rules, and slashes federal funding to states. Policy experts say these changes will disproportionately affect the Latino population, particularly in states like California, Texas, Florida, and Arizona.


"Unfortunately, more than 16 million people are going to be directly affected by these cuts," said Dr. Ilan Shapiro, Chief Health Correspondent and Medical Affairs Officer at AltaMed. "The real problem is that the community, specifically the Latino community, already tends to use medical services much less. And now, with this restriction, even fewer people will be able to access care."

According to data from the Kaiser Family Foundation, nearly one in three Latino adults receives health coverage through Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program. Among Latino children, that number climbs even higher, with over 50 percent covered by these safety net programs.

Many of these gains stem from the Affordable Care Act, which expanded Medicaid eligibility and dramatically increased enrollment among Hispanic populations. But Trump's new law reverses much of that progress. By capping federal reimbursements and introducing six-month eligibility checks, analysts estimate that between 8 and 12 million people could lose coverage in the next three years.

"This will lead to an increase in chronic and preventable conditions that our community could face," warned Shapiro. "We have to keep in mind that people will end up in emergency rooms with complications from diabetes, high blood pressure, and other issues like cancer in much more advanced stages than we used to see."

While exemptions exist for caregivers and people with disabilities, immigrant families, especially mixed-status households, face particular vulnerability. Many fear that any interaction with government programs could be used against them in immigration proceedings, even if the public charge rule is no longer in effect.

"When providing care mired in politics, race, and power, our patients become more vulnerable, and our caregivers are placed in untenable ethical positions which are counter to our role as patient advocates," said Oriana Beaudet, Vice President of Nursing Innovation at the American Nurses Association. "Healthcare clinics and hospitals are economic drivers for communities across our country. When the demand for care increases and reimbursable care decreases, healthcare facilities close, putting everyone at risk."

Shapiro noted that this pressure will have real consequences for health systems nationwide. "This will increase the number of people going to the ER, and these services, unfortunately, will cause many community and rural clinics and hospitals to shut down or be forced to make cuts to doctors, nurses, and other staff because it will simply be too difficult to afford to provide these medical services."

According to Dr. Arturo Vargas Bustamante, professor of Health Policy at UCLA, the new law puts states like California in a bind. "Even though California has strongly opposed Medicaid work requirements in the past, the new federal law may force the state into a tough position, either complying in some form or risking losing federal funding. State leaders might try to fight the requirements in court or create new programs to protect those who lose coverage, but those options take time and money."

"In the short run, the most immediate impact will not come from people refusing to work. It will come from people getting caught up in red tape," explained Bustamante. "Thousands could lose their Medi-Cal coverage simply because they miss a deadline, do not understand the rules, or cannot easily report their hours. That means more uninsured individuals, more pressure on county clinics and hospitals, and more costs for the safety net. Communities that already face barriers to care, especially low-income workers, racial and ethnic minorities, and those in rural areas, will be hit hardest."

Latino enrollment in Medi-Cal and Covered California is also expected to decline, not because people no longer qualify, but because the system becomes more challenging and intimidating to navigate. "Trust between a patient and their care provider is critical to better health outcomes," said Beaudet. "When people do not feel safe accessing healthcare services, they delay or avoid care needs, which can lead to an exacerbation of health problems and the need for higher-cost emergency care. The confusion of navigating complex enrollment systems for public health programs, coupled with fear, inhibits individuals from accessing necessary healthcare services."

The long-term consequences could be even more severe. "Health is a culmination of our communities, the environments in which we live, our families, access to food and water, and education," said Beaudet. "Health is then supported by our healthcare system. Poverty and healthcare inequality disproportionately impact minority and non-citizen immigrants, with language and cultural barriers magnifying risks. Health policies inhibiting access to care will put people across our country at higher risk for disease, illness, and even death."

Faced with this reality, Shapiro urged communities to take action where they can. "Right now, we must be proactive and think about what we can do to prevent disease, including maintaining a healthy weight, managing our stress as best as we can, and continuing to stay active and exercise. These three things, and making health a priority in our communities, can help us stay a little healthier, especially now that access to healthcare is going to become much more difficult."

The Medicaid overhaul has triggered fierce political backlash. A coalition of attorneys general from 20 states, led by California, is preparing a legal challenge, arguing that the bill violates federal protections and unfairly targets immigrant and minority communities. At the same time, advocacy groups like UnidosUS and the Latino Community Foundation are launching national campaigns to raise awareness and encourage families to seek out trusted enrollment counselors.

Alex Segura is a bilingual, multiple-platform journalist based in Southern California.


Read More

Virginia voters will decide the future of abortion access

Virginia has long been a haven for abortion care in the South, where many states have near-total bans.

(Konstantin L/Shutterstock/Cage Rivera/Rewire News Group)

Virginia voters will decide the future of abortion access

Virginia lawmakers have approved a constitutional amendment that would protect reproductive rights in the Commonwealth. The proposed amendment—which passed 64-34 in the House of Delegates on Wednesday and 21-18 in the state Senate two days later—will be presented to voters later this year.

“Residents of the Commonwealth of Virginia can no longer allow politicians to dominate their bodies and their personal decisions,” said House of Delegates Majority Leader Charniele Herring, the resolution’s sponsor, during a committee debate before the final vote.

Keep ReadingShow less
What Really Guides Lawmakers’ Decisions on Capitol Hill
us a flag on white concrete building

What Really Guides Lawmakers’ Decisions on Capitol Hill

The following article is excerpted from "Citizen’s Handbook for Influencing Elected Officials."

Despite the efforts of high school social studies teachers, parents, journalists, and political scientists, the workings of our government remain a mystery to most Americans. Caricatures, misconceptions, and stereotypes dominate citizens’ views of Congress, contributing to our reluctance to engage in our democracy. In reality, the system works pretty much as we were taught in third grade. Congress is far more like Schoolhouse Rock than House of Cards. When all the details are burned away, legislators generally follow three voices when making a decision. One member of Congress called these voices the “Three H’s”: Heart, Head, and Health—meaning political health.

Keep ReadingShow less
Illustration of someone holding a strainer, and the words "fakes," "facts," "news," etc. going through it.

Trump-era misinformation has pushed American politics to a breaking point. A Truth in Politics law may be needed to save democracy.

Getty Images, SvetaZi

The Need for a Truth in Politics Law: De-Frauding American Politics

“Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last?” With those words in 1954, Army lawyer Joseph Welch took Senator Joe McCarthy to task and helped end McCarthy’s destructive un-American witch hunt. The time has come to say the same to Donald Trump and his MAGA allies and stop their vile perversion of our right to free speech.

American politics has always been rife with misleading statements and, at times, outright falsehoods. Mendacity just seems to be an ever-present aspect of politics. But with the ascendency of Trump, and especially this past year, things have taken an especially nasty turn, becoming so aggressive and incendiary as to pose a real threat to the health and well-being of our nation’s democracy.

Keep ReadingShow less
Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

Waiting for the Door to Open: Advocates and older workers are left in limbo as the administration’s decision to abandon a harsh disability rule exists only in private assurances, not public record.

AI-created animation

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

We reported in the Fulcrum on November 30th that in early November, disability advocates walked out of the West Wing, believing they had secured a rare reversal from the Trump administration of an order that stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers.

The public record has remained conspicuously quiet on the matter. No press release, no Federal Register notice, no formal statement from the White House or the Social Security Administration has confirmed what senior officials told Jason Turkish and his colleagues behind closed doors in November: that the administration would not move forward with a regulation that could have stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers. According to a memo shared by an agency official and verified by multiple sources with knowledge of the discussions, an internal meeting in early November involved key SSA decision-makers outlining the administration's intent to halt the proposal. This memo, though not publicly released, is said to detail the political and social ramifications of proceeding with the regulation, highlighting its unpopularity among constituents who would be affected by the changes.

Keep ReadingShow less