Pearl is a clinical professor of plastic surgery at the Stanford University School of Medicine and is on the faculty of the Stanford Graduate School of Business. He is a former CEO of The Permanente Medical Group.
Five years ago, with the 2018 midterm elections fast approaching, voters pegged healthcare as their No. 1 election issue.
Since that time, the U.S. healthcare system has fallen further behind its global peers, notching far more failures than wins.
Looking back, the rate of chronic disease has climbed while life expectancy has fallen. Nearly half of American adults now struggle to afford healthcare as a growing mental-health crisis grips our country. Maternal mortality is on the rise while healthcare disparities continue expanding along racial and socioeconomic lines.
The Biden administration, for its part, aims to remedy these failings by making healthcare (and healthcare costs, in particular) a signature issue of the president’s reelection bid. But beyond efforts to lower drug prices, there’s not much in the political pipeline to suggest the next five years of healthcare will be better than the last five.
What we need are practicable, cost-effective measures that elected officials and medical leaders can implement relatively quickly. Here are three actions that would reshape American medicine and improve our nation’s health:
Shore Up Primary Care
The world’s most-effective and highest-performing healthcare systems deliver better quality of care at significantly lower costs than in the United States. One major difference: primary care.
In most high-income nations, primary care makes up roughly half of the physician workforce. In the United States, it accounts for less than 30% —with a projected shortage of 48,000 primary care physicians by 2034.
More than any other specialty, primary care improves life expectancy while lowering overall medical expenses. It happens by (a) screening for and preventing diseases and (b) helping patients with chronic illness avoid the deadliest, costliest complications (heart attack, stroke, cancer).
However, it takes three years after medical school to train a primary care physician. So, to reverse the deficit, the government must act immediately.
First, Congress would earmark an additional $200 million toward annual resident education funding. The money would create 1,000 more primary-care residency positions each year (at less than 0.2% of total federal spending on medical care).
Then, to attract the best medical students to primary care, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) would shift reimbursement rates, narrowing the $108,000 pay gap between primary care and specialist physicians.
These actions would shore up primary care and bolster the health of millions.
Use Technology To Expand Access
Thirty million Americans live without health insurance. Tens of millions more are underinsured.
To make matters worse, national medical expenditures are projected to rise from $4.3 trillion to $7.2 trillion over the next eight years. The Medicare trust fund will become insolvent years earlier. Healthcare is rapidly becoming unaffordable and inaccessible for most Americans.
Most industries that have overcome similar financial headwinds relied on technology as a solution. Healthcare can take a page from this playbook by expanding the use of telemedicine and generative AI.
During the pandemic, telehealth enabled convenient, cost-effective, high-quality medical care. Virtual visits accounted for 69% of all physician appointments. However, its use is now plummeting as states reinstitute outdated restrictions, prohibiting doctors from providing telemedical care to patients in neighboring states.
It’s illogical that a patient can drive across state lines for care but can’t get the same expertise virtually and more affordably from home. Legislators need to loosen these restrictions to facilitate greater access for patients with both physical and mental-health problems.
Likewise, the “hospital at home” approach emerged during the pandemic as physicians faced a shortage of beds. As with telemedicine, patients and clinicians praised the quality and convenience of home-based care.
Building on that success, doctors can now effectively monitor the clinical progress of patients 24/7, at home, by combining wearable devices with generative AI tools like ChatGPT.
To encourage broad implementation, the Federal Drug Administration and National Institute of Health should support pilot projects. And rather than restricting powerful and inexpensive technologies like generative AI, regulators should spur and facilitate their use.
Reduce Disparities In Medical Care
American healthcare is a system of haves and have-nots, where income and race heavily determine the quality of care patients receive.
Black patients, in particular, experience poorer medical outcomes and greater difficulty accessing state-of-the-art treatments. In childbirth, Black mothers die at twice the rate of white women, even when data are corrected for insurance and financial status.
Generative AI applications like ChatGPT can help, provided that clinicians use them to provide more inclusive, equitable care. Whereas researchers designed past AI tools to replicate how doctors practice—consequently including human bias in the data—today’s technologies can detect and even prevent prejudicial care.
To accomplish this, hospital leaders would connect electronic health record (EHR) systems with next-gen AI. With the right prompts, these systems would notify clinicians when they’re providing inferior medical treatment to patients of different racial or socioeconomic backgrounds. To support the effort, CMS would provide financial incentives to hospitals that use this technology for greater equality.
Bringing bias to consciousness will help reverse our nation’s embarrassingly high maternal mortality rate.
We can stop the slide of American healthcare over the next five years, but only by acting now. I urge medical leaders and elected officials to join forces and implement these highly effective, inexpensive approaches to rebuilding primary care, lowering medical costs, improving access and making medical practice more equitable. There’s no more time to waste.




















A golden tray sits on the Resolute Desk as President Donald Trump speaks during an announcement on American nuclear innovation in the Oval Office at the White House on July 24, 2026, in Washington, D.C. Trump is signing multiple executive orders targeting the nuclear energy sector and easing rules for new reactors and nuclear fuel supply chains.
Trump’s hubris rivals the fallen heroes of ancient Greek mythology
In January, the New York Times asked President Donald Trump if there were any limits on his global powers.
“Yeah,” the president responded, “there is one thing. My own morality. My own mind. It’s the only thing that can stop me.”
That was eight months ago, but fortunately Christopher Nolan’s blockbuster adaptation of “The Odyssey” has made ancient Greek literature newly relevant. Before that window closes, I’d like to talk about hubris.
Today, the term mostly means excessive pride or arrogance. That’s part of what the Greeks meant by it too, but the meaning was a bit richer and more specific. Hubris was an insolent or outrageous act that offended the gods, often because the transgressor was claiming abilities or authorities that solely belonged to supreme beings.
Nolan renamed and slightly modified the concept of xenia for the film, calling it “Zeus’ law.” In the director’s telling, mortals should follow the rules laid out by the gods, specifically the requirement to treat strangers with respect lest they be gods in disguise.
In a sense, hubris is the opposite, or at least the rejection, of xenia. The hubris of the suitors, and at times Odysseus himself, invites punishment by the gods and their mortal instruments.
Which brings me back to Donald Trump. His claim that there are no constraints on his personal power to dictate events on the global stage was one of the greatest expressions of hubris ever uttered by a political leader.
Trump’s claim was obviously false when he made it.
He vowed that he could end the Russia-Ukraine war in 24 hours. He’s proved powerless to make that happen. If he had divine powers to work his will, why would he have balked at implementing his tariffs so often that Wall Street adopted the “TACO trade” term for his deals? “TACO” stands for “Trump always chickens out.”
And why would Trump have made so many embarrassing concessions to China — from rescinding tariffs on Chinese goods to allowing them to buy crucial and incredibly valuable computer chips?
But Trump saw his success at capturing Venezuelan strongman Nicolas Maduro as proof of his ability to launch missiles to the same effect as Zeus’ lightning bolts. Trump believed he was the most powerful man who ever lived.
This is no exaggeration. In March, when the Iran invasion seemed successful, Trump gave a document penned by“Presidential Historian David King” to New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan purporting to prove that Trump was “the most powerful person to have EVER walked this planet.” King was, in fact, a businessman and occasional caddy for legendary golfer Gary Player.
King compared Trump favorably to many of history’s most powerful, and often heinous, figures: Alexander the Great, Attila the Hun, William the Conqueror, Napoleon Bonaparte, Joseph Stalin, Genghis Khan, Mao Tse Tung, Adolf Hitler and Vladimir Lenin. Many of these men thought they were the most powerful person in the world, too. And many were defeated precisely because they believed it.
At least Napoleon and Hitler had a string of truly impressive victories before they learned the folly of hubris. The limits on Trump’s power have been exposed by far less august forces than the combined might of the allies in World War II or the fearsome Russian winter.
Iran is a comparatively middling power. But the regime’s ability to absorb punishment while imposing its will on the Strait of Hormuz has proved to be a greater constraint on Trump’s power than his morality or mind. We should note that, at least rhetorically, his morality has not proved much of a constraint. He has repeatedly promised to destroy Iranian “civilization” if the regime refuses to capitulate.
But they haven’t — and won’t anytime soon — because the regime’s tolerance for pain far outstrips Trump’s. The combined fear of skyrocketing oil prices, outrage of Gulf state potentates, diminishing weapon supplies and domestic unpopularity is doing the work that international law, congressional oversight and the collective opinion of foreign policy experts can’t or won’t do.
If I considered Trump more heroic than reason and facts could allow, I would say his Sisyphean predicament has the whiff of Greek tragedy to it. Trump is vexed by the fact that the Iranians won’t honor deals or ratify his countless premature claims of victory — giving new meaning to his vow that his presidency would make people tired of winning. It’s almost like they’re out-Trumping Trump.
Things might have gone better if he’d heeded that great Greek tragedian Sophocles: “For Zeus utterly abhors the boasts of a proud tongue.”
____
Jonah Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch and the host of The Remnant podcast. His Twitter handle is @JonahDispatch.