Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Did We Learn or Not? Why There Can Be No Going Back on COVID Lessons

Opinion

Did We Learn or Not? Why There Can Be No Going Back on COVID Lessons
blue and white plastic bottle

Five years ago this month, COVID-19 changed the world. The first pandemic in a century altered how Americans saw themselves, each other, work, healthcare, relationships, government, mortality, and media. It tangled everyone across the globe in webs of fear, conflict, grief, disbelief, estrangement, and gratitude.

It prompted a parallel pandemic of disinformation that has only deepened in the years since and crescendoed in the last few months. It is foolish to ignore the impact of these past five years on every person in this country and the world, particularly with current policies and practices that ignore this distinct past.


The U.S. has a vaccine skeptic in charge of the Department of Health and Human Services. Without explanation, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. canceled the Food & Drug Administration’s annual meeting this month of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. This group analyzes flu strains likely to affect populations and the types of vaccines needed.

Along with proclaiming that his team is scrutinizing all childhood vaccination schedules, Kennedy has limited funding to the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. An earlier executive order withdrew the U.S. from the World Health Organization, which partnered with the U.S. to share critical data and information during the pandemic and create a global vaccine. This move has been called a “global health massacre.”

All of this is as the bird flu—H5N1-- is spreading to humans. In his first week in his position, Factcheck.org examined six major falsehoods Kennedy promoted. These are precarious moves, as the first measles death of an unvaccinated child happened in Texas, where 150 cases were reported.

Since 2020, every corner of the world has been affected by the pandemic, and the U.S. saw at least 27 million COVID-19 deaths by August 2024. These numbers are low compared to much of the world, as many countries did not have adequate testing or reliable counts on death causes. The WHO reports a total of 777 million deaths from COVID to date.

The WHO and the Centers for Disease Control declared an end to COVID-19 as a public health emergency in May 2023. Unfortunately, Long COVID lingers, with more than 40% of U.S. adults reporting some symptoms of long Covid. The CDC estimates there will be up to 36,000 COVID deaths in this country in February 2025.

To put five years in context, assault, property crimes, embezzlement, or drug offenses can earn a convicted offender five years in prison. In five years, a child grows from infancy to kindergarten, during which time they will learn the alphabet and some favorite songs. Medical residencies take an average of five years, depending on expertise. A fast-growing tree, like a cypress, can grow six feet in that time.

But how much wisdom have policymakers and individuals retained in that time?

COVID caused the greatest economic recession in the U.S. since World War II because of necessary layoffs and cutbacks, according to the Center on Budget & Policy Priorities. Yet the thousands of new layoffs of federal workers recently by the Department of Government Efficiency has no plan to counter the harms done to the economy, let alone the families of those laid off.

During the half-decade of COVID, most Americans trusted facts from the Centers for Disease Control, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and the WHO and complied with vaccines. More than ”270,000 people or 81% of the U.S. population have received at least one dose of the COVID vaccine. Overall, 230,637,348 people or 70% of the population are considered fully vaccinated,” according to a national database.

Today, trust in government is deeply evaporating. A 2024 study shows that 63% of Americans do not trust the government. In 2025, The Edelman Trust Index shows 47% of Americans trust in their government, compared to China, which has a high % trust rate of 77%.

Each of us has a COVID story that has informed how we behave. In March 2020, I was on a business trip in Dallas, Texas, where Mayor Eric Johnson declared the city in a state of local disaster because of five reported cases of COVID. I didn’t touch the doorknobs in my hotel room, and the 20 participants in the conference room wore face masks and sat several feet apart.

As it was for millions in the U.S., my work became totally remote; all travel was canceled. I had groceries delivered. I did not meet with friends. I attended the memorial service for two close friends on Zoom.

Fear governed almost every movement, interaction, and thought. Loss infected personal and professional lives, with news of family members, colleagues, bosses, and mentors succumbing to the bewildering disease.

In the five calendar years since COVID’s start, millions have reinvented a new “normal,” perhaps not returning full-time back to the office or staying in relationships that cracked and crumbled under the weight of confinement. The National Law Review reported that by April 2020, ‘the interest in divorce had already increased by 34% in the U.S.”

After five years, the COVID-sparked recession resolved, with a current 4% unemployment rate. Millions have pivoted to new work, entrepreneurship, and flexible schedules. Some companies demand limited work-from-home schedules and more in-office presence.

According to a recent survey from the Pew Research Center, 46% of workers report “that if their employer no longer allowed them to work from home, they would be unlikely to stay at their current job. This includes 26% who say they’d be very unlikely to stay.”

Consumer confidence is rated at 71.7% in January 2025, down from 74% a month earlier, according to Surveys of Consumers, University of Michigan, University of Michigan: Consumer Sentiment© retrieved from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

I am up to date on all my COVID-19 vaccines, and I contracted COVID once in August of 2022 and not since. I am lucky.

With the latest policy directives on healthcare and the economy departing from knowledge earned and lessons learned due to COVID, many may not be so lucky again. These past five post-COVID years have made everyone older. Tragically, not everyone is wiser.

Michele Weldon is an award-winning author, journalist, emerita faculty at Northwestern University and senior leader with The OpEd Project. Her latest book is The Time We Have: Essays on Pandemic Living.

Read More

Understanding the National Environmental Policy Act Reform Debate
Three blocks labeled "environmental", "social", and "governance" in front of a globe.
Getty Images, Khanchit Khirisutchalual

Understanding the National Environmental Policy Act Reform Debate

History of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

Signed into U.S. law in 1970, NEPA is considered the “Magna Carta” of environmental law. It requires federal agencies to assess the environmental impact of major construction projects such as airports, highways, federal buildings, or projects constructed on federally owned land before construction. To fulfill the NEPA requirements, federal agencies are required to complete a detailed Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for any actions with environmental impact. The completed EIS is an extensive written report from federal agencies that includes a summary of the environmental effects of the proposed project, a purpose statement, potential alternatives, and an overview of the affected environment.

Before a final EIS can be published, agencies must publish a draft EIS for a public review and comment period of 45 days. The final EIS must fully address substantive comments from the review period to be considered complete. Major projects with a low likelihood of pronounced environmental impact can bypass the NEPA process if granted a Categorical Exclusion (CATEX). If the project’s impact on the environment is uncertain, agencies are required to prepare a shorter Environmental Assessment (EA) to determine the need for an EIS.

Keep ReadingShow less
Crowd waving flags
Crowd waving flags
(Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

The Parallel Twin Lives of Democracy

It is a striking paradox of contemporary American life: The country appears to be bitterly divided, yet at the same time it is in deep internal agreement.

Survey after survey show broad consensus on issues that once split the nation: Same-sex marriage, interracial marriage, public smoking bans, marijuana legalization, background checks for gun ownership, even paid parental leave. Many of these were once thought irreconcilable, but today they register supermajority support. Yet at the same time, partisanship has become the most toxic line of fracture in American identity. As political philosopher Robert Talisse has observed, parents who would welcome a child marrying across lines of faith or ethnicity recoil at the prospect of marriage across ideological lines. The left and right increasingly define one another not as fellow citizens who happen to disagree, but as existential threats.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Democratic Party's American Dream Problem — And Opportunity

New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani holds a campaign event with the healthcare worker's union on September 24, 2025 outside of St. Barnabas Hospital in the Bronx borough of New York City.

(Photo by Stephanie Keith/Getty Images)

The Democratic Party's American Dream Problem — And Opportunity

Why have so many rank-and-file Democrats found Zohran Mamdani’s candidacy for New York mayor so captivating – despite all the naysaying from the party’s establishment? Because his message may be the first from a Democrat to counter decades of Republican dominance over a narrative central to our nation: the American Dream.

What the American Dream tells us is that anything is possible in America, that if you work hard, nothing can stop you, and you will succeed. It’s a rags-to-riches story, reminiscent of Horatio Alger and Rocky Balboa, and the classic tale of immigrants arriving with nothing and sacrificing everything to create a better life for themselves and their families.

Keep ReadingShow less
The New Face of US Interventionism: Economic Warfare in Brazil

USA Brazil tariffs

AI generated

The New Face of US Interventionism: Economic Warfare in Brazil

President Donald J. Trump has threatened to impose a new round of tariffs and sanctions against Brazil after Brazil’s Supreme Court sentenced the former far-right president Jair Bolsonaro to 27 years in prison for attempting a coup — an act of political retaliation that should raise alarm bells across the globe.

President Trump’s threat follows the earlier imposition of a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods and Magnitsky sanctions on Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who presided over Bolsonaro’s trial. These measures are designed to punish Brazil’s judiciary for daring to prosecute Bolsonaro, who plotted to overturn the 2022 elections and assassinate then-president-elect Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.

Keep ReadingShow less