Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Climate Bill Is Here—and Republicans Just Handed You the Check

Opinion

The Climate Bill Is Here—and Republicans Just Handed You the Check

Climate change isn’t a distant threat. It’s an everyday expense. And for millions of Americans, the costs are already piling up.

Getty Images, Andriy Onufriyenko

Introduction

Donald Trump ran on fighting inflation. Instead, he’s helped push prices higher—and made life more expensive for everyday Americans. As climate disasters disrupt farms, raise food prices, and strain household budgets, GOP leaders are attacking the science and policies that could help us adapt. From wildfires in California to droughts in Arizona and floods in Texas, extreme weather is turning climate denial into a hidden tax on working families.


By gutting climate programs, pressuring central banks, and shielding polluters, Republicans have shifted the costs of a warming world onto the very people they claim to defend. While former and current officials point fingers elsewhere, these policies—driven by ideology and donor interests—are making the squeeze worse.

Climate change is no longer abstract. It’s the reason your grocery bill is higher, your electricity costs more, and your insurance keeps going up. It’s time to talk about who’s responsible—and who’s paying.

The Real Cost of Denial

Climate change is already raising prices. You can see it at the supermarket and in your monthly bills. Research shows that extreme weather between 2022 and 2024 pushed food costs higher across the globe.

Droughts, floods, and fires aren’t rare anymore. When crops fail in one region, prices rise everywhere. And the hits keep coming—from grocery stores to gas stations.

In 2022, a major drought in California and Arizona nearly doubled produce prices in some areas. Insurance premiums are spiking in regions at higher risk of fires or floods. Utilities are charging more as they upgrade aging systems to handle extreme weather.

At the same time, programs that could ease these burdens have been scaled back or dismantled. The Trump administration cut climate data tools, canceled resilience plans, and weakened the federal role in helping communities prepare. These weren’t oversights. They were choices.

Muting the Messengers

It’s not just about policy—it’s about hiding the problem. Under political pressure, government agencies and financial institutions have pulled back from even mentioning climate risk. That’s not cutting red tape. That’s blocking the warning signs.

The USDA quietly removed key climate data, prompting a lawsuit from farmers and environmental groups. That data helps farmers plan and avoid losses. Without it, they’re left in the dark.

At the Federal Reserve, Chair Jerome Powell responded to Republican pressure by saying climate change isn’t part of the Fed’s role—despite mounting evidence that it affects prices and credit risk.

Meanwhile, major banks like JPMorgan and Citibank have pulled back from earlier climate commitments. Fossil fuel-aligned pressure groups have targeted these institutions, making it riskier to speak out or plan.

When warnings are silenced, people can’t prepare. They don’t see what’s coming. And they’re more likely to blame the wrong things when prices rise.

From Climate Denial to Kitchen Table Crisis

Climate change doesn’t always make headlines. Sometimes, it’s just your paycheck not stretching far enough. It’s rent going up, a grocery bill that shocks you, or an energy bill that spikes during a heat wave.

Because the GOP has worked to blur the lines between cause and effect, many people don’t connect these economic pressures to climate inaction. They blame companies, utilities, or bad luck. But behind those everyday costs are policy choices that made the situation worse.

Instead of addressing climate threats, Republican leaders offer scapegoats—immigrants, urban voters, federal agencies—while protecting the industries driving the crisis. Their approach: cut clean energy funding, weaken climate standards, and end oversight.

Over time, the result is slow-motion economic strain. One disaster might not wreck your budget. But years of higher costs and poor planning will.

Who Really Pays

There’s a clear pattern behind these choices. Follow the money. For every rollback of climate protections, there’s often a donor who benefits.

Big oil, coal, and agribusiness companies spend millions lobbying to delay reform. In return, they get more freedom to pollute—and fewer questions asked.

Blocking clean energy protections helps fossil fuel profits. Ignoring climate risk helps developers. Slashing transparency keeps the public unaware. But those savings for corporations come at a cost: higher bills, riskier lives, and fewer tools for the public to push back.

This isn’t just about denial. It’s about business. And working families are left to pay for it.

Conclusion: The Heat Is Already Here

Climate change isn’t a distant threat. It’s an everyday expense. And for millions of Americans, the costs are already piling up.

This isn’t just about rising temperatures—it’s about rising bills. The GOP says it’s fighting inflation, but many of its policies are quietly fueling the very cost increases people feel in their groceries, utilities, and insurance.

Unless voters begin to connect these rising expenses to the political decisions that drive them, the cycle will repeat. Prices will keep climbing. And once again, the check will land in your lap.

The good news? These outcomes are political—and that means they can change. But only if voters look past the noise, see through the blame game, and hold leaders accountable for the real drivers of economic pain.


Robert Cropf is a professor of political science at Saint Louis University.


Read More

Two groups of glass figures. One red, one blue.

Congressional paralysis is no longer accidental. Polarization has reshaped incentives, hollowed out Congress, and shifted power to the executive.

Getty Images, Andrii Yalanskyi

How Congress Lost Its Capacity to Act and How to Get It Back

In late 2025, Congress fumbled the Affordable Care Act, failing to move a modest stabilization bill through its own procedures and leaving insurers and families facing renewed uncertainty. As the Congressional Budget Office has warned in multiple analyses over the past decade, policy uncertainty increases premiums and reduces insurer participation (see, for example: https://www.cbo.gov/publication/61734). I examined this episode in an earlier Fulcrum article, “Governing by Breakdown: The Cost of Congressional Paralysis,” as a case study in congressional paralysis and leadership failure. The deeper problem, however, runs beyond any single deadline or decision and into the incentives and procedures that now structure congressional authority. Polarization has become so embedded in America’s governing institutions themselves that it shapes how power is exercised and why even routine governance now breaks down.

From Episode to System

The ACA episode wasn’t an anomaly but a symptom. Recent scholarship suggests it reflects a broader structural shift in how Congress operates. In a 2025 academic article available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN), political scientist Dmitrii Lebedev reaches a stark conclusion about the current Congress, noting that the 118th Congress enacted fewer major laws than any in the modern era despite facing multiple time-sensitive policy deadlines (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5346916). Drawing on legislative data, he finds that dysfunction is no longer best understood as partisan gridlock alone. Instead, Congress increasingly exhibits a breakdown of institutional capacity within the governing majority itself. Leadership avoidance, procedural delay, and the erosion of governing norms have become routine features of legislative life rather than temporary responses to crisis.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump’s ‘America First’ is now just imperialism

Donald Trump Jr.' s plane landed in Nuuk, Greenland, where he made a short private visit, weeks after his father, U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, suggested Washington annex the autonomous Danish territory.

(Ritzau Scanpix/AFP via Getty Images)

Trump’s ‘America First’ is now just imperialism

In early 2025, before Donald Trump was even sworn into office, he sent a plane with his name in giant letters on it to Nuuk, Greenland, where his son, Don Jr., and other MAGA allies preened for cameras and stomped around the mineral-rich Danish territory that Trump had been casually threatening to invade or somehow acquire like stereotypical American tourists — like they owned it already.

“Don Jr. and my Reps landing in Greenland,” Trump wrote. “The reception has been great. They and the Free World need safety, security, strength, and PEACE! This is a deal that must happen. MAGA. MAKE GREENLAND GREAT AGAIN!”

Keep ReadingShow less
The Common Cause North Carolina, Not Trump, Triggered the Mid-Decade Redistricting Battle

Political Midterm Election Redistricting

Getty images

The Common Cause North Carolina, Not Trump, Triggered the Mid-Decade Redistricting Battle

“Gerrymander” was one of seven runners-up for Merriam-Webster’s 2025 word of the year, which was “slop,” although “gerrymandering” is often used. Both words are closely related and frequently used interchangeably, with the main difference being their function as nouns versus verbs or processes. Throughout 2025, as Republicans and Democrats used redistricting to boost their electoral advantages, “gerrymander” and “gerrymandering” surged in popularity as search terms, highlighting their ongoing relevance in current politics and public awareness. However, as an old Capitol Hill dog, I realized that 2025 made me less inclined to explain the definitions of these words to anyone who asked for more detail.

“Did the Democrats or Republicans Start the Gerrymandering Fight?” is the obvious question many people are asking: Who started it?

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. and Puerto Rico flags
Puerto Rico: America's oldest democratic crisis
TexPhoto/Getty Image

Puerto Rico’s New Transparency Law Attacks a Right Forged in Struggle

At a time when public debate in the United States is consumed by questions of secrecy, accountability and the selective release of government records, Puerto Rico has quietly taken a dangerous step in the opposite direction.

In December 2025, Gov. Jenniffer González signed Senate Bill 63 into law, introducing sweeping amendments to Puerto Rico’s transparency statute, known as the Transparency and Expedited Procedure for Access to Public Information Act. Framed as administrative reform, the new law (Act 156 of 2025) instead restricts access to public information and weakens one of the archipelago’s most important accountability and democratic tools.

Keep ReadingShow less