Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Climate Bill Is Here—and Republicans Just Handed You the Check

Opinion

The Climate Bill Is Here—and Republicans Just Handed You the Check

Climate change isn’t a distant threat. It’s an everyday expense. And for millions of Americans, the costs are already piling up.

Getty Images, Andriy Onufriyenko

Introduction

Donald Trump ran on fighting inflation. Instead, he’s helped push prices higher—and made life more expensive for everyday Americans. As climate disasters disrupt farms, raise food prices, and strain household budgets, GOP leaders are attacking the science and policies that could help us adapt. From wildfires in California to droughts in Arizona and floods in Texas, extreme weather is turning climate denial into a hidden tax on working families.


By gutting climate programs, pressuring central banks, and shielding polluters, Republicans have shifted the costs of a warming world onto the very people they claim to defend. While former and current officials point fingers elsewhere, these policies—driven by ideology and donor interests—are making the squeeze worse.

Climate change is no longer abstract. It’s the reason your grocery bill is higher, your electricity costs more, and your insurance keeps going up. It’s time to talk about who’s responsible—and who’s paying.

The Real Cost of Denial

Climate change is already raising prices. You can see it at the supermarket and in your monthly bills. Research shows that extreme weather between 2022 and 2024 pushed food costs higher across the globe.

Droughts, floods, and fires aren’t rare anymore. When crops fail in one region, prices rise everywhere. And the hits keep coming—from grocery stores to gas stations.

In 2022, a major drought in California and Arizona nearly doubled produce prices in some areas. Insurance premiums are spiking in regions at higher risk of fires or floods. Utilities are charging more as they upgrade aging systems to handle extreme weather.

At the same time, programs that could ease these burdens have been scaled back or dismantled. The Trump administration cut climate data tools, canceled resilience plans, and weakened the federal role in helping communities prepare. These weren’t oversights. They were choices.

Muting the Messengers

It’s not just about policy—it’s about hiding the problem. Under political pressure, government agencies and financial institutions have pulled back from even mentioning climate risk. That’s not cutting red tape. That’s blocking the warning signs.

The USDA quietly removed key climate data, prompting a lawsuit from farmers and environmental groups. That data helps farmers plan and avoid losses. Without it, they’re left in the dark.

At the Federal Reserve, Chair Jerome Powell responded to Republican pressure by saying climate change isn’t part of the Fed’s role—despite mounting evidence that it affects prices and credit risk.

Meanwhile, major banks like JPMorgan and Citibank have pulled back from earlier climate commitments. Fossil fuel-aligned pressure groups have targeted these institutions, making it riskier to speak out or plan.

When warnings are silenced, people can’t prepare. They don’t see what’s coming. And they’re more likely to blame the wrong things when prices rise.

From Climate Denial to Kitchen Table Crisis

Climate change doesn’t always make headlines. Sometimes, it’s just your paycheck not stretching far enough. It’s rent going up, a grocery bill that shocks you, or an energy bill that spikes during a heat wave.

Because the GOP has worked to blur the lines between cause and effect, many people don’t connect these economic pressures to climate inaction. They blame companies, utilities, or bad luck. But behind those everyday costs are policy choices that made the situation worse.

Instead of addressing climate threats, Republican leaders offer scapegoats—immigrants, urban voters, federal agencies—while protecting the industries driving the crisis. Their approach: cut clean energy funding, weaken climate standards, and end oversight.

Over time, the result is slow-motion economic strain. One disaster might not wreck your budget. But years of higher costs and poor planning will.

Who Really Pays

There’s a clear pattern behind these choices. Follow the money. For every rollback of climate protections, there’s often a donor who benefits.

Big oil, coal, and agribusiness companies spend millions lobbying to delay reform. In return, they get more freedom to pollute—and fewer questions asked.

Blocking clean energy protections helps fossil fuel profits. Ignoring climate risk helps developers. Slashing transparency keeps the public unaware. But those savings for corporations come at a cost: higher bills, riskier lives, and fewer tools for the public to push back.

This isn’t just about denial. It’s about business. And working families are left to pay for it.

Conclusion: The Heat Is Already Here

Climate change isn’t a distant threat. It’s an everyday expense. And for millions of Americans, the costs are already piling up.

This isn’t just about rising temperatures—it’s about rising bills. The GOP says it’s fighting inflation, but many of its policies are quietly fueling the very cost increases people feel in their groceries, utilities, and insurance.

Unless voters begin to connect these rising expenses to the political decisions that drive them, the cycle will repeat. Prices will keep climbing. And once again, the check will land in your lap.

The good news? These outcomes are political—and that means they can change. But only if voters look past the noise, see through the blame game, and hold leaders accountable for the real drivers of economic pain.


Robert Cropf is a professor of political science at Saint Louis University.


Read More

A New Norm of DHS Shutdown & Long Airport Lines

Travelers wait in a TSA Pre security line at Miami International Airport on March 17, 2026, in Miami, Florida. Travelers across the country are enduring long airport security lines as a partial federal government shutdown affects the Transportation Security Administration officers working the security lines.

(Joe Raedle/Getty Images/TCA)

A New Norm of DHS Shutdown & Long Airport Lines

If you’ve ever traveled to France, chances are you’ve come up against this all-too-common phenomenon. You get to the train station and, without warning, your train is out of service. Or a restaurant is oddly closed during regular business hours.

“C’est la grève,” you may hear from a local, accompanied by a shrug. It’s the strike.

Keep ReadingShow less
Constitutional Barriers to Nationalizing Elections
US Capitol
US Capitol

Constitutional Barriers to Nationalizing Elections

In the run-up to the midterms, President Trump continues to call for nationalizing congressional elections. He has sought to initiate the process through executive orders, such as one proposing to set “a ballot receipt deadline of Election Day for all methods of voting.” The words and spirit of the United States Constitution—the bedrock textualism and originalism of conservative constitutional interpretation—say he can’t nationalize elections.

Unlike some consequential constitutional questions, it’s not a close call.

Keep ReadingShow less
Unpacking War Powers in the U.S.-Iran Conflict: Who Decides When America Goes to War?

Smoke billows after overnight airstrikes on oil depots on March 8, 2026 in Tehran, Iran.

(Photo by Majid Saeedi/Getty Images)

Unpacking War Powers in the U.S.-Iran Conflict: Who Decides When America Goes to War?

What Is The War Powers Resolution of 1973?

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 is a law enacted by Congress that limits the U.S. president’s ability to wage or escalate military operations overseas. Passed on November 7, 1973 amid the Vietnam War, the War Powers Resolution reasserts Congress’ constitutional power “to declare war” and “to raise and support Armies.” A key provision of the War Powers Resolution requires the president to submit a report to Congress within 48 hours of military deployment in the absence of an official declaration of war by Congress detailing:

  • The circumstances requiring U.S. forces;
  • The constitutional or legislative justification for the president’s actions;
  • The estimated duration of U.S. involvement in the hostilities.

If Congress does not formally declare war or enact special authorization for continuation of the U.S’ involvement in a conflict within 60 days of the report’s submission, the president must withdraw U.S. troops from the hostilities. If Congress does declare war, the president is instructed under the War Powers Resolution to report to Congress periodically on the status of the hostilities no less than once every 6 months.

Keep ReadingShow less
Protestors holding signs, including one that says "let the people vote."

Attendees hold signs advocating for voting rights and against the SAVE America Act at a rally to outside the U.S. Capitol on March 18, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Heather Diehl

SAVE America Act Debate Begins; Mullin for DHS Hearing

Both chambers of Congress are in session this week and next. The House will probably function about like it has been - lots of votes (often by voice) on uncontroversial bills; many fewer votes on Republican priority bills. Lots of hearings this week and a few legislator updates.

Committee Meetings

Both chambers have a busy week with 64 total committee meetings scheduled.

Keep ReadingShow less