Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Angelica Salas’s Journey From Undocumented Immigrant to Community Leader at CHIRLA

News

Angelica Salas has long been a leading advocate for immigrant rights in Los Angeles. Since becoming Executive Director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles (CHIRLA) in 1999, she has transformed the organization into one of the most powerful immigrant-led advocacy groups in the country. Her leadership has redefined what grassroots organizing can look like, mobilizing communities around issues ranging from Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) to voter outreach and legal services.

Salas’s journey into activism is deeply personal. Born in Durango, Mexico, she arrived in the United States at the age of five, undocumented, to reunite with her parents who had migrated for work. Growing up in Pasadena, California, her family lived in the shadows of deportation until they were able to legalize their status. In 2008, Salas became a U.S. citizen, adding a powerful chapter to a story she shares with many of the people CHIRLA serves. Her own experience navigating the U.S. immigration system informs her commitment to building dignity, not dependency, in the immigrant rights movement. After graduating from Occidental College with a degree in history and sociology, Salas joined CHIRLA in 1995 and became its executive director just four years later.


“She started as a receptionist at the office,” said Jorge Mario Cabrera, CHIRLA’s longtime communications director. “She’s been at CHIRLA for more than 28 years and has been our executive director for more than 20 years.” Her rise through the organization mirrors the values she champions—equity, persistence, and resilience.

Since then, her work has led to major policy victories in California. Under her leadership, CHIRLA played a pivotal role in securing in-state tuition and access to financial aid for undocumented students, as well as expanding driver’s licenses to undocumented Californians. But her vision went beyond legislative reform. She helped launch the organization’s day laborer job centers, which became models adopted nationwide.

She transformed the organization’s model into a powerhouse that combines direct services with civic engagement, legal advocacy, and policy organizing.

“You can say that part of our success has been that we are very responsive to community needs,” Cabrera said. “That’s why we have grown so much.” Today, CHIRLA provides a range of services, including legal aid, know-your-rights education, voter registration drives, and legal support for community members detained by ICE. “Just last month alone, from the Los Angeles area, we received over 10,000 calls from community members asking for help with a loved one who was detained, arrested, or disappeared,” Cabrera said, describing the scale of community reliance on CHIRLA’s hotline.

Salas’s influence extends well beyond Los Angeles. She was a founding member of national coalitions like the Fair Immigration Reform Movement and the National Partnership for New Americans, where she helped elevate immigrant-led voices in the national push for comprehensive immigration reform. A seasoned spokesperson, she has appeared in outlets ranging from NPR to the Los Angeles Times, providing insight on a wide range of topics, including sanctuary city policies, ICE raids, and community protection efforts during California wildfires. She has served on numerous boards, including the California Wellness Foundation, UNITE-LA, and America’s Voice, further cementing her reputation as a national strategist in the immigrant justice field.

According to Cabrera, her credibility comes not just from her story but on the scale of her advocacy. “She advocated for our rights as immigrants at the White House, speaking with presidents, vice presidents, secretaries, and ambassadors,” he added.

What sets Salas apart is her grounding in community experience. Her leadership is rooted in the belief that immigrant communities are not passive recipients of help but active agents of change. “Solo el pueblo salva al pueblo”—"only the people can save the people—” is what she told The Guardian in response to the Eaton Fires that displaced many working-class Latinos and members of the historic black community of Altadena. This motto is evident in CHIRLA’s approach, which transitions from charity to empowerment, focusing on cultivating leadership within immigrant communities rather than speaking on their behalf.

“She’s very thoughtful, very inclusive of people’s opinions and experiences, and she’s passionate about the rights of immigrants,” Cabrera said. “She believes we deserve dignity and respect.”

That legacy continues to grow. In July, CHIRLA and a coalition of civil rights organizations secured a federal court victory that prohibits immigration agents from racially profiling and denying legal counsel during raids in Southern California. The judge issued a temporary restraining order following reports of constitutional violations by federal authorities. “No one is above the law, and today’s decision reaffirms that President Trump and all its immigration enforcement apparatus must follow the Constitution,” Salas said in a statement. For CHIRLA and its allies, the decision is more than a legal win—it’s a reminder that resistance, when rooted in community and principle, can still deliver justice.

Angelica Salas has become not only a voice for justice but a builder of it.

Lluvia Chavez, a Mexican-American bilingual journalist dedicated to amplifying the stories of underrepresented communities, and a cohort member with the Fulcrum Fellowship

Please help the Fulcrum in its mission of nurturing the next generation of journalists by donating HERE!

Read More

Communication concept with multi colored abstract people icons.

Research shows that emotional, cognitive, and social mechanisms drive both direct and indirect contact, offering scalable ways to reduce political polarization.

Getty Images, Eoneren

“Direct” and “Indirect” Contact Methods Likely Work in Similar Ways, so They Should Both Be Effective

In a previous article, we argued that efforts to improve the political environment should reach Americans as media consumers, in addition to seeking public participation. Reaching Americans as media consumers uses media like film, TV, and social media to change what Americans see and hear about fellow Americans across the political spectrum. Participant-based efforts include dialogues and community-based activities that require active involvement.

In this article, we show that the mechanisms underlying each type of approach are quite similar. The categories of mechanisms we cover are emotional, cognitive, relational, and repetitive. We use the terms from the academic literature, “direct” and “indirect” contact, which are fairly similar to participant and media consumer approaches, respectively.

Keep ReadingShow less
The American Experiment Requires Robust Debate, Not Government Crackdowns

As political violence threatens democracy, defending free speech, limiting government overreach, and embracing pluralism matters is critical right now.

Getty Images, Javier Zayas Photography

The American Experiment Requires Robust Debate, Not Government Crackdowns

The assassinations of conservative leader Charlie Kirk and Democratic lawmakers in Minnesota have triggered endorsements of violence and even calls for literal war on both the far right and far left. Fortunately, an overwhelming majority of Americans reject political violence, but all of us are in a fight to keep our diverse and boisterous brand of democracy alive. Doing so requires a renewed commitment to pluralism and a clear-headed recognition of the limits of government, especially when proposals entail using the criminal justice system to punish speech.

Pluralism has been called the lifeblood of a democracy like ours, in which being an American is not defined by race or religion. It requires learning about and accepting our differences, and embracing the principle that, regardless of them, every person is entitled to be protected by our Constitution and have a voice in how we’re governed. In contrast, many perpetrators of political violence rationalize their acts by denying the basic humanity of those with whom they disagree. They are willing to face the death penalty or life in prison in an attempt to force everyone to conform to their views.

Keep ReadingShow less
A woman sitting down and speaking with a group of people.

The SVL (Stories, Values, Listen) framework—which aims to bridge political divides with simple, memorable steps for productive cross-partisan conversations—is an easy-to-use tool for making an impact at scale.

Getty Images, Luis Alvarez

Make Talking Politics Easier and More Scalable: Be SVL (Stories, Values, Listen)

How can one have a productive conversation across the political spectrum?

We offer simple, memorable guidance: Be SVL (pronounced like “civil”). SVL stands for sharing Stories, relating to a conversation partner’s Values, and closely Listening.

Keep ReadingShow less
St. Patrick’s Cathedral’s Mural: Art, Immigration, and the American Spirit

People attend a mass and ceremony for a new mural dedicated to New York City’s immigrant communities and honoring the city’s first responders at St. Patrick’s Cathedral on September 21, 2025 in New York City.

(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

St. Patrick’s Cathedral’s Mural: Art, Immigration, and the American Spirit

In a bold fusion of sacred tradition and contemporary relevance, artist Adam Cvijanovic has unveiled a sweeping new mural at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York City—one that reimagines the historic narthex as a vibrant ode to peace, migration, and spiritual continuity.

In an age of polarization and performative politics, it’s rare to find a work of art that speaks with both spiritual clarity and civic urgency. Yet that’s exactly what “What’s So Funny About Peace, Love and Understanding” accomplishes. The piece is more than a visual upgrade to a “dreary” entranceway—it’s a theological and cultural intervention, one that invites every visitor to confront the moral stakes of our immigration discourse.

Keep ReadingShow less