Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Texas Deadly Floods: Who Is To Blame for the Devastation?

News

Texas Deadly Floods: Who Is To Blame for the Devastation?

Flood waters left debris including vehicles and equipment scattered in Louise Hays Park on July 5, 2025 in Kerrville, Texas. Heavy rainfall caused flooding along the Guadalupe River in central Texas with multiple fatalities reported.

(Photo by Eric Vryn/Getty Images)

As search teams in Texas work through Sunday to locate flood victims after the Guadalupe River overflowed days earlier, government officials have begun to point fingers over who is to blame for the deadly disaster.

At a press conference, Texas Division of Emergency Management Chief Nim Kidd said, "Listen, everybody got the forecast from the National Weather Service. It did not predict the amount of rain that we saw."


In the same briefing, Dalton Rice, the city manager for Kerrville, Texas, said that the catastrophic flash flooding happened because the skies “dumped more rain than what was forecasted."

The National Weather Service (NWS) issued a flash flood warning at 1:14 a.m. Friday for a portion of Kerr County, where the majority of flood-related deaths have been reported. However, it would be at least four hours before any county or city government entity posted evacuation directions on social media, reported KXAN.

The NWS was among the government agencies targeted by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in its effort to streamline the federal bureaucracy, resulting in the loss of approximately 600 staffers.

In May, all five living former directors of the NWS—a branch of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), sent a letter expressing concerns that proposed budget cuts under the Donald Trump administration "leave the nation’s official weather forecasting entity at a significant deficit… just as we head into the busiest time for severe storm predictions like tornadoes and hurricanes.” The letter stated that under-resourced forecast offices could lead to preventable loss of life.

This policy aligns with Project 2025, a proposal initiated by the Heritage Foundation that advocates for significant reforms to the federal government, including the "dismantling" of NOAA. Additionally, Trump has proposed eliminating the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), suggesting that states should primarily manage their own preparations and responses to extreme weather. Disbanding FEMA would necessitate legislative action from Congress.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem criticized the current system used to alert the public about potential weather threats, “When President Trump took office… he said he wanted to fix [that], and is currently upgrading the technology. And the National Weather Service has indicated that with that and NOAA, that we needed to renew this ancient system that has been left in place with the federal government for many, many years, and that is the reforms that are ongoing,” Noem explained.

During the joint press conference with Texas Governor Greg Abbott, Noem confirmed that President Trump has already committed to honoring the governor's federal disaster declaration request, ensuring rapid deployment of federal resources. Approval of a federal disaster declaration speeds up the allocation of emergency resources and funding. Long-term recovery efforts will focus on rebuilding infrastructure and assessing flood preparedness measures for the region, which has a history of flooding.

In a message on Truth Social, Trump said, "Melania and I are praying for all of the families impacted by this horrible tragedy. Our Brave First Responders are on site doing what they do best. GOD BLESS THE FAMILIES, AND GOD BLESS TEXAS!"

Scientists and experts attribute climate change as a significant factor in increasing the intensity and frequency of extreme rainfall events, such as the one experienced in Texas. A warmer atmosphere can hold more moisture, leading to heavier downpours. Some studies suggest this event is "precisely" the type of rainfall scientists expect to become more common due to a warming climate.

On Friday, Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a $4 trillion tax and spending package proposed by congressional Republicans. This legislation effectively eliminates the key climate and clean energy provisions included in the Inflation Reduction Act, which was signed into law by then-President Joe Biden in 2022.

Over the past several hours, rescue teams have successfully saved more than 850 individuals using helicopters, boats, and drones to locate victims and assist those stranded in trees and isolated camps. Local officials report that at least 51 people, including 15 children, have lost their lives due to the flooding in Texas.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network.

SUGGESTION: Just the Facts: Trump Signs ‘Big Beautiful Bill’

U.S. President Donald Trump, joined by first lady Melania Trump, delivers remarks during an Independence Day military family picnic on the South Lawn of the White House on July 04, 2025 in Washington, DC. At the picnic President Trump signed the One, Big Beautiful Bill Act into law. Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images

Read More

Safeguarding Democracy: Addressing Polarization and Institutional Failures

American flag

Nattawat Kaewjirasit/EyeEm/Getty Images

Safeguarding Democracy: Addressing Polarization and Institutional Failures

The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists. To learn about the many NextGen initiatives we are leading, click HERE.

We asked Luke Harris, a Fall Intern with the Fulcrum Fellowship, to share his thoughts on what democracy means to him and his perspective on its current health.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Power of the Purse Belongs to Congress, Not the President
white concrete dome museum

The Power of the Purse Belongs to Congress, Not the President

Money is power. In our system of government, that power was intended to rest squarely with Congress. Yet in recent years, we’ve seen presidents of both parties find ways to sidestep Congress’s “power of the purse” authority, steadily chipping away at their Article I powers and turning appropriations into suggestions rather than binding law.

As someone who served in the House of Representatives — and in its leadership — I saw firsthand how seriously members of both parties took this duty. Regardless of ideology, we understood that Congress’s control of the purse is not just a budgetary function but a core constitutional responsibility.

Keep ReadingShow less
Understanding the National Environmental Policy Act Reform Debate
Three blocks labeled "environmental", "social", and "governance" in front of a globe.
Getty Images, Khanchit Khirisutchalual

Understanding the National Environmental Policy Act Reform Debate

History of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

Signed into U.S. law in 1970, NEPA is considered the “Magna Carta” of environmental law. It requires federal agencies to assess the environmental impact of major construction projects such as airports, highways, federal buildings, or projects constructed on federally owned land before construction. To fulfill the NEPA requirements, federal agencies are required to complete a detailed Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for any actions with environmental impact. The completed EIS is an extensive written report from federal agencies that includes a summary of the environmental effects of the proposed project, a purpose statement, potential alternatives, and an overview of the affected environment.

Before a final EIS can be published, agencies must publish a draft EIS for a public review and comment period of 45 days. The final EIS must fully address substantive comments from the review period to be considered complete. Major projects with a low likelihood of pronounced environmental impact can bypass the NEPA process if granted a Categorical Exclusion (CATEX). If the project’s impact on the environment is uncertain, agencies are required to prepare a shorter Environmental Assessment (EA) to determine the need for an EIS.

Keep ReadingShow less
Crowd waving flags
Crowd waving flags
(Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

The Parallel Twin Lives of Democracy

It is a striking paradox of contemporary American life: The country appears to be bitterly divided, yet at the same time it is in deep internal agreement.

Survey after survey show broad consensus on issues that once split the nation: Same-sex marriage, interracial marriage, public smoking bans, marijuana legalization, background checks for gun ownership, even paid parental leave. Many of these were once thought irreconcilable, but today they register supermajority support. Yet at the same time, partisanship has become the most toxic line of fracture in American identity. As political philosopher Robert Talisse has observed, parents who would welcome a child marrying across lines of faith or ethnicity recoil at the prospect of marriage across ideological lines. The left and right increasingly define one another not as fellow citizens who happen to disagree, but as existential threats.

Keep ReadingShow less