Skip to content
Project 2025
Donate to support
diverse voices
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories
As Pressures Mount, Trump Faces the Most Precarious Moment of His Presidency

As Pressures Mount, Trump Faces the Most Precarious Moment of His Presidency

People voting at voting booths.

The Quiet Campaign That Could Rewrite the 2028 Election

The Minneapolis Shooting Is Not an Aberration — It’s a Warning of What Comes Next

The Minneapolis Shooting Is Not an Aberration — It’s a Warning of What Comes Next

Vance’s Claims on ICE Shooting Don’t Match the Evidence

Vance’s Claims on ICE Shooting Don’t Match the Evidence

Can Things Get Even Worse for Mike Johnson?

Can Things Get Even Worse for Mike Johnson?

Fact Check: Trump Police Takeover

News

Fact Check: Trump Police Takeover

People participate in a rally against the Trump Administration's federal takeover of the District of Columbia, outside of the AFL-CIO on August 11, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
Rafael Olavarría
By Rafael OlavarríaAug 16, 2025
Rafael Olavarría
See More Writings by author

Key Points:

  • President Donald Trump declared a “crime emergency” in Washington, D.C. and announced that the federal government would take control of the city’s police, claiming “an increase in violent crime.”
  • Official figures show that violent crime has decreased in D.C. since 2023.
  • In 2024, the number of violent crimes was half of what was reported in 2019, during Trump’s first term.
  • However, Washington, D.C. has ranked among the top 10 U.S. cities with the highest homicide rates per 100,000 residents since at least 2017.

President Donald Trump declared a “crime emergency” in Washington, D.C. and announced that the federal government would take control of the city’s police. According to Trump’s executive order issued on August 11, 2025, this emergency measure is necessary because “there is an increase in violent crime” in the city.

That claim is false.

Official data shows that violent crime has been decreasing in D.C.

Between 2023 and 2024, violent crime dropped by 35%, according to data from the Metropolitan Police Department.

  • In 2023: 5,325 violent crimes
  • In 2024: 3,469 violent crimes

This marks the lowest figure recorded in the city in over 30 years, according to the Department of Justice (under the Biden administration, January 3, 2025).

The category “violent crime” includes homicide, sexual assault, assault with a dangerous weapon, and robbery.

By August 11, 2025 (the date of Trump’s executive order), violent crime had decreased even further—by 26% compared to the same date in 2024.

From January to August 2025, fewer violent crimes were recorded than in the same period in 2024.

Looking at the total number of violent crimes in D.C. since 2017, the 2024 figure is just over half of what was recorded during 2017, 2018, and 2019 (Trump’s first three years in office).

Despite the decline in violent crime, Washington, D.C. still has one of the highest homicide rates in the country.

  • In 2023: 40 homicides per 100,000 residents
  • In 2024: 27.5 homicides per 100,000 residents (according to Trump’s emergency declaration)

This 2024 rate is lower than those recorded in 2020, 2021, and 2022.

Although the Metropolitan Police Department had not yet published its 2024 homicide report at the time of writing, a study by the University of Rochester’s Center for Public Safety Initiatives (February 2025) estimated the 2024 rate at 27.3 per 100,000—similar to the White House figure.

Despite the decrease, the Rochester study ranked D.C. fourth among U.S. cities with the highest homicide rates in 2024, behind:

  1. St. Louis, Missouri – 54.4
  2. New Orleans, Louisiana – 34.7
  3. Detroit, Michigan – 32.1

Washington, D.C., has appeared in Rochester’s reports among the top 10 cities with the highest homicide rates since at least 2017.

The White House has questioned the accuracy of D.C.’s crime statistics, citing a press report about a police commander suspended since May 2025 and under investigation for allegedly altering data.

The commander denies the accusations (made by the D.C. police union), and the outcome of the investigation remains unknown.

Editor's Notes: This article is a translation of "No, el crimen violento no aumentó en Washington D.C, contrariamente a lo que dijo Trump al declarar en emergencia a la ciudad," first published by our partners, Factchequeado.

Rafael Olavarría is a Fact-checker of politics and immigration for FactCheckeado.


Latest news

A car with a bullet hole in the windshield.
Rule of Law

States Sue D.C. at Record Levels — MN Case May Be the Turning Point

We Can’t Let Hegseth Win His War on Women
Diversity, Equity & Inclusion

We Can’t Let Hegseth Win His War on Women

New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country
Governance & Legislation

New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Read More

Two groups of glass figures. One red, one blue.

Congressional paralysis is no longer accidental. Polarization has reshaped incentives, hollowed out Congress, and shifted power to the executive.

Getty Images, Andrii Yalanskyi

How Congress Lost Its Capacity to Act and How to Get It Back

In late 2025, Congress fumbled the Affordable Care Act, failing to move a modest stabilization bill through its own procedures and leaving insurers and families facing renewed uncertainty. As the Congressional Budget Office has warned in multiple analyses over the past decade, policy uncertainty increases premiums and reduces insurer participation (see, for example: https://www.cbo.gov/publication/61734). I examined this episode in an earlier Fulcrum article, “Governing by Breakdown: The Cost of Congressional Paralysis,” as a case study in congressional paralysis and leadership failure. The deeper problem, however, runs beyond any single deadline or decision and into the incentives and procedures that now structure congressional authority. Polarization has become so embedded in America’s governing institutions themselves that it shapes how power is exercised and why even routine governance now breaks down.

From Episode to System

The ACA episode wasn’t an anomaly but a symptom. Recent scholarship suggests it reflects a broader structural shift in how Congress operates. In a 2025 academic article available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN), political scientist Dmitrii Lebedev reaches a stark conclusion about the current Congress, noting that the 118th Congress enacted fewer major laws than any in the modern era despite facing multiple time-sensitive policy deadlines (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5346916). Drawing on legislative data, he finds that dysfunction is no longer best understood as partisan gridlock alone. Instead, Congress increasingly exhibits a breakdown of institutional capacity within the governing majority itself. Leadership avoidance, procedural delay, and the erosion of governing norms have become routine features of legislative life rather than temporary responses to crisis.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump’s ‘America First’ is now just imperialism

Donald Trump Jr.' s plane landed in Nuuk, Greenland, where he made a short private visit, weeks after his father, U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, suggested Washington annex the autonomous Danish territory.

(Ritzau Scanpix/AFP via Getty Images)

Trump’s ‘America First’ is now just imperialism

In early 2025, before Donald Trump was even sworn into office, he sent a plane with his name in giant letters on it to Nuuk, Greenland, where his son, Don Jr., and other MAGA allies preened for cameras and stomped around the mineral-rich Danish territory that Trump had been casually threatening to invade or somehow acquire like stereotypical American tourists — like they owned it already.

“Don Jr. and my Reps landing in Greenland,” Trump wrote. “The reception has been great. They and the Free World need safety, security, strength, and PEACE! This is a deal that must happen. MAGA. MAKE GREENLAND GREAT AGAIN!”

Keep ReadingShow less
The Common Cause North Carolina, Not Trump, Triggered the Mid-Decade Redistricting Battle

Political Midterm Election Redistricting

Getty images

The Common Cause North Carolina, Not Trump, Triggered the Mid-Decade Redistricting Battle

“Gerrymander” was one of seven runners-up for Merriam-Webster’s 2025 word of the year, which was “slop,” although “gerrymandering” is often used. Both words are closely related and frequently used interchangeably, with the main difference being their function as nouns versus verbs or processes. Throughout 2025, as Republicans and Democrats used redistricting to boost their electoral advantages, “gerrymander” and “gerrymandering” surged in popularity as search terms, highlighting their ongoing relevance in current politics and public awareness. However, as an old Capitol Hill dog, I realized that 2025 made me less inclined to explain the definitions of these words to anyone who asked for more detail.

“Did the Democrats or Republicans Start the Gerrymandering Fight?” is the obvious question many people are asking: Who started it?

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. and Puerto Rico flags
Puerto Rico: America's oldest democratic crisis
TexPhoto/Getty Image

Puerto Rico’s New Transparency Law Attacks a Right Forged in Struggle

At a time when public debate in the United States is consumed by questions of secrecy, accountability and the selective release of government records, Puerto Rico has quietly taken a dangerous step in the opposite direction.

In December 2025, Gov. Jenniffer González signed Senate Bill 63 into law, introducing sweeping amendments to Puerto Rico’s transparency statute, known as the Transparency and Expedited Procedure for Access to Public Information Act. Framed as administrative reform, the new law (Act 156 of 2025) instead restricts access to public information and weakens one of the archipelago’s most important accountability and democratic tools.

Keep ReadingShow less
© Copyright 2026