Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Similarity Hub Shows >700 Instances of Cross-Partisan Common Ground

Opinion

Similarity Hub Shows >700 Instances of Cross-Partisan Common Ground

Two coloured pencils one red and one blue drawing a reef knot on a white paper background.

Getty Images, David Malan

It is a common refrain to say that Americans need to find common ground across the political spectrum.

Over the past year, AllSides and More Like US found >700 instances of common ground on political topics, revealed in Similarity Hub. It highlights public opinion data from Gallup, Pew Research, YouGov, and many other reputable polling firms.


Similarity Hub reveals perspective overlaps between Democrats and Republicans and points of agreement on political issues among supermajorities of Americans. It is organized into more than 20 issue areas, including hot-button topics such as abortion, immigration, elections, and media bias. Over the past year, there have been over 13,000 views of Similarity Hub.

Similarity Hub is a collaboration between AllSides, a provider of balanced news and 2,400 media bias ratings, and More Like US, a nonprofit that increases trust across the U.S. political spectrum. The tool shows Americans are actually more similar to each other across the political spectrum than is often believed, revealing opportunities for political progress.

Everyday Americans and those in many professions find value in Similarity Hub, including journalists, educators, those in the arts, and leaders in civics, politics, and religious communities.

“Politicians and news media on both sides mislead us into thinking that there is no common ground and that the other side is radically different from us,” said John Gable, co-founder and CEO of AllSides Technologies, Inc. “That is just wrong. By showcasing how much we agree, AllSides and More Like US combat misinformation and false belief, and give us all the ability to better understand reality and come together to solve problems.”

Gable and others hope that Similarity Hub will help close the “Perception Gap” among Americans.

The term “Perception Gap” was coined from a More in Common study that found both Democrats and Republicans, to roughly similar degrees, think those in the other party are more politically extreme than they really are. The Perception Gap is dangerous because it can feed into an idea that “our side” must “win at all costs,” even leading to actions that put the country’s system of government and/or safety at risk.

Correcting the Perception Gap has been found to be effective — it accounted for the majority of the best-performing interventions that reduced anti-democratic attitudes, partisan animosity, and support for political violence in the Strengthening Democracy Challenge, led by Stanford University.

Common ground is everywhere, across all hot-button topics. In terms of foreign policy, a YouGov poll from this February found majorities of Democrats and Republicans agreed with the arguably more liberal position that “the U.S. government should provide aid to foreign countries for disaster response." Yet a Pew Research poll from last year also found that majorities in each party agreed with the potentially more conservative position that "taking measures to protect the U.S. from terrorist attacks should be a top priority in U.S. long-range foreign policy."

Researchers and experts focused on reducing political divides have issued praise for Similarity Hub, including:

  • James Druckman, co-principal investigator of the Strengthening Democracy Challenge and professor of political science at the University of Rochester, who calls Similarity Hub “a vital resource.”
  • Cheryl Graeve, national organizer and program director at the National Institute for Civil Discourse, who says, “I'm hopeful it will help us narrow these Perception Gaps.”
  • Dannagal G. Young, professor of communication and political science and international relations and director of the Center for Political Communication at the University of Delaware, who states, “My hope is this resource might facilitate the kind of journalism that diffuses, rather than reinforces, partisan identity and partisan divides."

Academics and various organizations plan to test the impact of using Similarity Hub data for various use cases. Professor Myiah Hutchens at the University of Florida is testing the impacts of integrating Similarity Hub data into sample newspaper articles. Partners such as Trusting News are planning to make journalists aware of Similarity Hub and how easy it is to use. This effort aims to give Americans more accurate views of each other that include overlaps when consuming news, rather than a distorted sense of endless division.

Republicans and Democrats have a surprising amount of common ground, and Similarity Hub is allowing the American public to see exactly how much.

Andrew Weinzierl is Research Manager & Data Journalist for AllSides.

James Coan is the co-founder and executive director of More Like US. Coan can be contacted at James@morelikeus.org

Correction: A previous version of this story stated that AllSides and More Like US found 550 instances of common ground on political topics when both organizations have now found >700 instances.

Read More

Where is the Holiday Spirit When It Comes to Solving Our Nation’s Problems?

Amid division and distrust, collaborative problem-solving shows how Americans can work across differences to rebuild trust and solve shared problems.

Getty Images, andreswd

Where is the Holiday Spirit When It Comes to Solving Our Nation’s Problems?

Along with schmaltzy movies and unbounded commercialism, the holiday season brings something deeply meaningful: the holiday spirit. Central to this spirit is being charitable and kinder toward others. It is putting the Golden Rule—treating others as we ourselves wish to be treated—into practice.

Unfortunately, mounting evidence shows that while people believe the Golden Rule may apply in our private lives, they are pessimistic that it can have a positive impact in the “real” world filled with serious and divisive issues, political or otherwise. The vast majority of Americans believe that our political system cannot overcome current divisions to solve national problems. They seem to believe that we are doomed to fight rather than find ways to work together. Among young people, the pessimism is even more dire.

Keep ReadingShow less
Varying speech bubbles.​ Dialogue. Conversations.
Varying speech bubbles.
Getty Images, DrAfter123

Political Division Is Fixable. Psychology Shows a Better Way Forward.

A friend recently told me she dreads going home for the holidays. It’s not the turkey or the travel, but rather the simmering political anger that has turned once-easy conversations with her father into potential landmines. He talks about people with her political views with such disdain that she worries he now sees her through the same lens. The person she once talked to for hours now feels emotionally out of reach.

This quiet heartbreak is becoming an American tradition no one asked for.

Keep ReadingShow less
People waving US flags
A deep look at what “American values” truly mean, contrasting liberal, conservative, and MAGA interpretations through the lens of the Declaration and Constitution.
LeoPatrizi/Getty Images

The Season to Remember We’re Still One Nation

Every year around this time, the noise starts to drop. The pace eases a bit. Families gather, neighbors reconnect, and people who disagree on just about everything still manage to pass plates across the same table. Something about late November into December nudges us toward reflection. Whatever you call it — holiday spirit, cultural memory, or just a pause in the chaos — it’s real. And in a country this divided, it might be the reminder we need most.

Because the truth is simple: America has never thrived by choosing one ideology over another. It has thrived because our competing visions push, restrain, and refine each other. We forget that at our own risk.

Keep ReadingShow less
Governors Cox and Shapiro Urge Nation to “Lower the Temperature” Amid Rising Political Violence

Utah Republican Spencer Cox and Pennsylvania Democrat Josh Shapiro appear on CNN

Governors Cox and Shapiro Urge Nation to “Lower the Temperature” Amid Rising Political Violence

In the days following the murder of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, I wrote Governor Cox’s Prayer Wasn’t Just Misguided—It Was Dangerous, an article sharply criticizing Utah Gov. Spencer Cox for his initial public response. Rather than centering his remarks on the victim, the community’s grief, or the broader national crisis of political violence, Cox told reporters that he had prayed the shooter would be from “another state” or “another country.” That comment, I argued at the time, was more than a moment of emotional imprecision—it reflected a deeper and more troubling instinct in American politics to externalize blame. By suggesting that the perpetrator might ideally be an outsider, Cox reinforced long‑standing xenophobic narratives that cast immigrants and non‑locals as the primary sources of danger, despite extensive evidence that political violence in the United States is overwhelmingly homegrown.

Recently, Cox joined Pennsylvania Governor, Democrat Josh Shapiro, issuing a rare bipartisan warning about the escalating threat of political violence in the United States, calling on national leaders and citizens alike to “tone it down” during a joint interview at the Washington National Cathedral.

Keep ReadingShow less