Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Fulcrum Roundtable: NextGen Takes the Mic

Opinion

Fulcrum Roundtable: NextGen Takes the Mic
man in blue and black crew neck t-shirt holding microphone
Photo by Medy Siregar on Unsplash

Welcome to the Fulcrum Roundtable, where we share insights and discussions with Fulcrum's collaborators on some of the most talked-about topics.

Consistent with the Fulcrum's mission, this program aims to share diverse perspectives to broaden our readers' viewpoints.


The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists. As part of our NextGen initiative, we proudly launched the first-ever Fulcrum Fellowship in June. The 10-week immersive program trains students from across the country in solutions journalism and complicating the narrative techniques to produce stories that counter the one-dimensional narratives too common in mainstream media.

We also teach young journalists to leverage their own voice in first-person narratives, not only to cultivate authenticity and authority, but to challenge the status quo with their lived experience and fresh perspective.

In their first assignment, we asked the cohorts to share their thoughts on what democracy means to them and their perspective on its current health.

I spoke with these students:

Angeles Ponpa, a graduate student at Northwestern Medill in the Politics, Policy, and Foreign Affairs specialization, and a Fulcrum summer intern.

Layla Halilbasic, an incoming junior at Webster University in St. Louis and a cohort member with the Fulcrum Fellowship.

And Nathaly Suquinagua, a bilingual multimedia journalist with a B.A. in Journalism and a minor in Dance from Temple University, and is a cohort member with the Fulcrum Fellowship.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

Last month, Angeles authored Faith, Democracy, and the Catholic Duty To Stay Involved. She wrote about why, in a moment of polarization and despair, opting out may feel easier. However, democracy depends on those willing to participate. "The Catholic Church does give us a really great guide on how we should be civically engaged, but also how we should vote, what should matter the most to us when we're going to the ballot. At the end of the day there is a home for us (Catholics) in politics, and if not then it is time to become that home," Angeles said.

In the column, Disillusionment Isn’t the End, but the Beginning of Change, Layla asked herself, “Why am I not excited about the idea of American democracy?” She shared how she feels indebted to American democracy because her parents immigrated from Bosnia, one of the six republics that made up the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY). The SFRY dissolved in the early 1990s, leading to the independence of several new countries, including Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Despite saying, "I wouldn't be here without it (American democracy)," she does find that connection challenged by what she sees happening in the US today regarding the mistreatment of marginalized groups, including immigrants and refugees.

Nathaly wrote that "democracy means equality, representation, and the chance to build a better world together," in her column: The Responsibility of the First Vote. "My parents are immigrants. I am a first-generation American," she said. "For me, deciding on what to vote on, and democracy for me, doesn't just mean what I believe in, but also what my family would benefit (from) because they can't vote."

In the roundtable discussion, the students were asked to share their thoughts on how news platforms like the Fulcrum can improve in making their community (young people) be seen and heard with authenticity.

Angeles responded by saying there needs to be more complexity. "Issues are so complex. And sometimes, I feel like the News, this is my own personal opinion, I think the news dumbs it down to either this is great or this is bad. Sometimes it's ok to have an article that's just a pure conversation about a topic."

"I think humanizing people," said Layla. "We are not just telling stories about policy, It's about people. It's about us."

Nathaly closed the conversation by saying, "Having more accessibility. Having translations done." She mentioned that making news coverage in different languages is key for newcomers.

The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists. To learn about the many NextGen initiatives we are leading, click HERE.

Please help the Fulcrum in its mission of nurturing the next generation of journalists by donating HERE!Check out the June roundtable discussion:

- YouTube youtu.be

Read More

Governors Cox and Shapiro Urge Nation to “Lower the Temperature” Amid Rising Political Violence

Utah Republican Spencer Cox and Pennsylvania Democrat Josh Shapiro appear on CNN

Governors Cox and Shapiro Urge Nation to “Lower the Temperature” Amid Rising Political Violence

In the days following the murder of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, I wrote Governor Cox’s Prayer Wasn’t Just Misguided—It Was Dangerous, an article sharply criticizing Utah Gov. Spencer Cox for his initial public response. Rather than centering his remarks on the victim, the community’s grief, or the broader national crisis of political violence, Cox told reporters that he had prayed the shooter would be from “another state” or “another country.” That comment, I argued at the time, was more than a moment of emotional imprecision—it reflected a deeper and more troubling instinct in American politics to externalize blame. By suggesting that the perpetrator might ideally be an outsider, Cox reinforced long‑standing xenophobic narratives that cast immigrants and non‑locals as the primary sources of danger, despite extensive evidence that political violence in the United States is overwhelmingly homegrown.

Recently, Cox joined Pennsylvania Governor, Democrat Josh Shapiro, issuing a rare bipartisan warning about the escalating threat of political violence in the United States, calling on national leaders and citizens alike to “tone it down” during a joint interview at the Washington National Cathedral.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Great Political Finger Trap

Protesters gather near the White House on November 24, 2025 in Washington, DC. The group Refuse Fascism held a rally and afterwards held hands in a long line holding yellow "Crime Scene Do Not Cross" tape along Lafayette Square near the White House.

(Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

The Great Political Finger Trap

In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination earlier this year, a YouGov poll was released exploring sentiments around political violence. The responses raised some alarm, with 25% of those who self-identified as “very liberal,” and nearly 20% of those polled between the ages of 18 and 29, saying that violence was sometimes justified “in order to achieve political goals.” Numerous commentators, including many within the bridging space, lamented the loss of civility and the straying from democratic ideals. Others pointed to ends justifying means, to cases of injustice and incivility so egregious, as they saw it, that it simply demanded an extreme response.

But amidst this heated debate over what is justified in seeking political ends, another question is often overlooked: do the extreme measures work? Or, do acts of escalation lead to a cycle of greater escalation, deepening divisions, and making our crises harder to resolve, and ultimately undermining the political ends they seek?

Keep ReadingShow less

High School Civic Innovators Bridging America’s Divide

At just 17 years of age, Sophie Kim was motivated to start her organization, Bipartisan Bridges, to bring together people from both ends of the political spectrum. What started as just an idea during her freshman year of high school took off after Sophie placed in the Civics Unplugged pitch contest, hosted for alumni in Spring 2024. Since then, Sophie has continued to expand Bipartisan Bridges' impact, creating spaces that foster civil dialogue and facilitate meaningful connections across party lines.

Sophie, a graduate of the Spring 2024 Civic Innovators Fellowship and the Summer 2025 Civic Innovation Academy at UCLA, serves as the founder and executive director of Bipartisan Bridges. In this role, Sophie has forged a partnership with the organization Braver Angels to host depolarization workshops and has led the coordination and capture of conversations on climate change, abortion, gun control, foreign aid, and the 100 Men vs. a Gorilla debate. In addition, this year, Sophie planned and oversaw Bipartisan Bridges’ flagship Politics and Polarization Fellowship, an eight-week, in-person program involving youth from Tustin, Irvine, Costa Mesa, and Huntington Beach, California. A recent Bipartisan Bridges session featuring youth from both Los Angeles and Orange County will be featured in Bridging the Gap, an upcoming documentary.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two speech bubbles overlapping each other.

Democrats can reclaim America’s founding principles, rebuild the rural economy, and restore democracy by redefining the political battle Trump began.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

Defining the Democrat v. Republican Battle

Winning elections is, in large part, a question of which Party is able to define the battle and define the actors. Trump has so far defined the battle and effectively defined Democrats for his supporters as the enemy of making America great again.

For Democrats to win the 2026 midterm and 2028 presidential elections, they must take the offensive and show just the opposite–that it is they who are true to core American principles and they who will make America great again, while Trump is the Founders' nightmare come alive.

Keep ReadingShow less